3.1 Effect of metal salts catalyst on the polymerization of ε-CL
The efficiency of various metal sources catalyst was evaluated for the ring-opening polymerization of ε-CL with benzyl alcohol as initiator (Table 1). Obviously, no polymerization was observed in the absence of catalyst at 60 oC for 4 h (entry 1 in Table 1). Unsatisfactory activity could be observed when the polymerization of ε-CL catalyzed by some commonly used metal chlorides like RuCl3, TiCl3 or ZnCl2 at [M]/[C]/[I] ratio of 800/1/1 (entries 3 ~ 5 in Table 1). Although AlCl3 exhibited a relatively high activity under the same conditions, the wide distribution of polymers with PDI 1.57 was obtained (entry 2 in Table 1).
To our delight, FeCl3 exhibited a much higher activity than other metal chlorides catalysts even the polymerization was conducted at room temperature (entries 6 ~ 7 in Table 1). As one kind of industrial catalyst in the polymerization of ε-CL, Sn(Oct)2 presented its high efficiency only at high temperature (140 oC) (entries 8 ~ 9 in Table 1). It indicated that FeCl3 catalyst is superior to industrial catalyst in terms of catalytic efficiency and polymer product distributions. An attempt was made to replace FeCl3 with FeCl2, but no polymerization products could be determined (entry 10 in Table 1). It demonstrated that iron(III) may be more easily coordinated with the substrate or initiator to form active intermediates, which then accelerated the polymerization. In addition, the catalytic performance of FeBr3 was lower than that of FeCl3, which indicated that the generation of the active intermediates also be affected by the anions of catalyst (entry 11 in Table 1).
Table 1
Ring-opening polymerization of ε-CL catalyzed by various metal salts a
Entry
|
Catalyst
|
Conv./%
|
T/oC
|
PCL
|
Mw
|
Mn
|
PDI
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
60
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
AlCl3
|
76.4
|
60
|
15200
|
9700
|
1.57
|
3
|
RuCl3
|
20.5
|
60
|
4700
|
3800
|
1.24
|
4
|
TiCl3
|
51.2
|
60
|
5100
|
4500
|
1.13
|
5
|
ZnCl2
|
20.3
|
60
|
4500
|
4000
|
1.12
|
6
|
FeCl3
|
98.8
|
60
|
21100
|
16500
|
1.28
|
7
|
FeCl3
|
98.3
|
25
|
9300
|
8000
|
1.16
|
8
|
Sn(Oct)2
|
10.2
|
60
|
5300
|
4400
|
1.20
|
9
|
Sn(Oct)2
|
91.2
|
140
|
17800
|
9600
|
1.85
|
10
|
FeCl2
|
0
|
60
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
FeBr3
|
71.4
|
60
|
12300
|
9300
|
1.33
|
a [M]:[C]:[I] (mol) = 800:1:1, [M]: ε-CL, [C]: catalyst, [I]: BnOH; 4 h.
3.2 Effect of initiator on the polymerization of ε-CL
The effect of initiator on the polymerization of ε-CL was also investigated at [M]/[C]/[I] ratio of 800/1/1. Table 2 presented the results for obtained PCL initiated by various alcohols using FeCl3 as catalyst. A high molecular weight (Mw>20000 g/mol) could be obtained by using benzyl alcohol, phenylethanol, 1-butanol and ethanediol as initiator, respectively (entries 1–4 in Table 2). Although the high molecular weights (Mw=26400 g/mol) was obtained using ethanediol as initiator, the other chain polymerizations were also significant with a high PDI value (1.50). However, low molecular weight of PCL (Mw=14100 g/mol) could be obtained using isopropanol (entry 5 in Table 2). Therefore, it could be known that the polymerization was closed related with the steric hindrance of the active site of initiator [30].
Table 2
The effect of different initiators on polymerization of ε-CLa
Entry
|
Initiator
|
Conv.
(%)
|
Mn,theob
|
PCL
|
Mw
|
Mn
|
PDI
|
1
|
Benzyl alcohol
|
98.8
|
90300
|
21100
|
16500
|
1.28
|
2
|
2-Phenylethanol
|
96.7
|
88400
|
21200
|
15500
|
1.37
|
3
|
1-Butanol
|
98.3
|
89800
|
22800
|
17100
|
1.33
|
4
|
Ethanediol
|
98.0
|
89500
|
26400
|
17600
|
1.50
|
5
|
Isopropanol
|
99.6
|
91000
|
14100
|
10700
|
1.32
|
a [M]:[C]:[I] = 800:1:1, 4h, 60 oC, [M]: ε-CL, [C]: catalyst, FeCl3, [I]: initiator.
3.3 Effect of molar ratio of monomer to initiator on the polymerization
Effect of the amount of initiator on the ring-opening polymerization of ε-CL was tested as shown in Fig. 1. As the molar ratio of [M]/[I] increased from 200 to 800, Mw of PCL increased from 14400 g/mol to 21100 g/mol. In addition, the declined PDI value was also obtained with the decreased amount of initiator. However, the PDI value and Mw of PCL increased significantly when the molar ratio of [M]/[I] was higher than 800. Due to a significant excess of ε-CL, the polymerization time was also extended. The wide molecular weight distribution of products could be ascribed to the long reaction time, which leaded to the occurrence of other chain polymerizations such as intermolecular and intramolecular transesterification.
3.4 Effect of temperature on the polymerization of ε-CL
The influence of temperature on the ROP of ε-CL catalyzed by FeCl3 in the presence of benzyl alcohol as an initiator was further investigated (Fig. 2). As the reaction temperature increased from 30 oC and 60 oC, the molecular weights of PCL increased sharply. When the temperature was further increased, the increase trend of molecular weights was not significant, and even showed a downward trend when reaction temperature was higher than 100 oC. On the other hand, the PDI value increased continuously with the gradual increased temperature. It could be suggested that the high temperature promoted the other chain polymerizations or intramolecular transesterification [31].
3.5 Kinetic and mechanism of polymerization
The profiles of the ring-opening polymerization of ε-CL catalyzed by FeCl3 was shown in Fig. 3. In the first hour, ε-CL conversion slowly increased. Followed, the reaction rate accelerated rapidly. There is an obvious induction period in the catalytic polymerization system. After 1.5 hours of reaction, the conversion of ε-CL reached up to 83.3%, and Mw was 10400 g/mol.
Kinetic measurements of ε-CL polymerization catalyzed by FeCl3 were carried out. The kinetic plots for FeCl3-catalyzed ROP of ε-CL is shown in Fig. 4. A distinct first-order relationship between ln([CL]0/[CL]) versus time was observed, obtaining a constant reaction rate related to the monomer consumption (the apparent rate constant, kp = 1.16 h− 1). It also could be known that the polymerization has a short induction period. It indicated that FeCl3 presented excellent catalytic performance for the ROP of ε-CL.
To get understanding the polymerization mechanism of ε-CL catalyzed by FeCl3, some controlling experiments were carried out (Table 3). No polymerization of ε-CL occurred when the reaction was conducted in the absence of FeCl3 catalyst (entry 1 in Table 3). FeCl3 could promote the solvent-free ring-opening polymerization of ε-CL in the absence of BnOH initiator, but the conversion of ε-CL was only 18.6% (entry 2 in Table 3). When BnOH was used as initiator, the conversion of ε-CL reached up to 98.8%, and the molecular weights of PCL was 21100 g/mol.
Table 3
Effects of initiator on polymerization of CL catalysted by FeCl3a
Entry
|
[M]:[C]:[I]
|
Initiator
|
Conv.
/%
|
Mn,theob
|
PCL
|
Mw
|
Mn
|
PDI
|
1
|
800:0:1
|
BnOH
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
800:1:0
|
-
|
18.6
|
17100
|
1900
|
1700
|
1.12
|
3
|
800:1:1
|
BnOH
|
98.8
|
90300
|
21100
|
16500
|
1.28
|
a [M]: CL, [C]: FeCl3, [I]: BnOH, 60 oC, 4 h.
b Calculated from ([M]/[I]) × Conv. × Mw(CL) + Mw (Initiator)
Based on the above results, it could be speculated that there are two reaction pathways for FeCl3-catalyzed ROP of ε-CL. Firstly, in the absence of initiator, FeCl3 may directly coordinate with ε-CL. The ε-CL monomer molecule was activated and to occur the ring opening polymerization reaction. The speculation could be confirmed through UV-Vis spectroscopy characterization. As shown in Fig. 5, the carbonyl group absorption peak of ε-CL at 240 nm shifted to 247 nm in the presence of FeCl3. It indicated the occurrence of the coordination between FeCl3 catalyst and ε-CL [32].
The interaction between FeCl3 and BnOH results caused another reaction pathway when the polymerization of ε-CL was conducted in the presence of initiator. As shown in 1H-NMR spectra (Fig. 5), the chemical shift of the hydrogen peak of BnOH at 4.56 ppm shifted to 4.62 ppm. It indicates that FeCl3 may interact with BnOH to form metal alkoxy compounds.
Furthermore, the intermediate molecule during the ROP of ε-CL was captured by ESI-MS (electro spray ionization mass spectrum) (Fig. 6). The peak with m/z of 269.0 could be ascribed to the metal alkoxy compound generated from the reaction between FeCl3 and BnOH. The peaks with m/z of 383.1, 497.1 and 611.1 belong to the small molecule PCL with monomers number of 1, 2 and 3. These results support a coordination-insertion mechanism as proposed in Fig. 7. The process begins with the monomer activation by the active ferrous alkoxy compound which is generated from the reaction of FeCl3 catalyst and BnOH [33–35].