3.1. XRD analysis
X-ray diffraction was employed to analyze how the presence of Al2O3/CdO nanoparticle nanohybrids influenced the structural characteristics of CMC. Figure 1 shows X-ray diffraction of pristine CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 filled with different quantities of CdO nanoparticles. The X-ray diffraction of the CMC sample displays a broad-peak appears about 2θ = 23.23◦. This explains the semi-crystalline nature of pure polymer (CMC). The CMC samples were studied, and equivalent results were observed [19]. They showed that the addition of metals nanoparticles reduced the intensity of the peak at 2θ = 23.23◦ for virgin CMC. Such modifications may be caused by the interactions between the pure polymer and metals oxides, which enhanced the amorphous phase of the prepared samples [20]. As the virgin CMC incorporated a sufficient quantity of dopant, free volume space and the potential for ion migration were formed. In this work, the incorporation of Al2O3/CdO was important in the increase in Al ion and Cd ion protonation, which causes the modifications of the amorphous phase. More nanofiller material was added, and this resulted in the hump's width expanding. This observation may be used to suggest the easy interaction between pure polymer CMC and Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles [21]. In Fig. 1, it is evident that the peaks attributed to Al2O3/CdO start to emerge at specific angles: 2θ = 30.87°, 36.85°, 44.38°, 58.56°, and 67.74°. These peaks are attributed to the Miller‒Bravais indices of (220), (311), (400), (422), and (440), respectively. The detected 2θ values agreed with the value established by the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) (file no 79-1558)[22]. The strong ion interactions and arrangement of big ion clusters that produced a significant quantity of ion clusters may have caused the Al2O3/CdO peaks to rise again. This might mean that the Al2O3/CdO concentration accelerates the routes of ion percolation
In addition, as we will notice in the FT-IR spectra, the cofactor is observed to interact primarily with the polymeric matrix through a carbonyl group (C = O) and a carboxylate anion (COO) group. The enhancement in the crystalline phase of pristine CMC, following the introduction of Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles, is attributed to the local structural arrangement induced by complex formation within the polymeric structure, especially at the final concentration [23].
3.2. FTIR spectra
Figure 2 displays the FT-IR spectrum of pristine CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs doped with different quantities of CdO nanoparticles. The main vibrational frequencies of CMC were displayed in the FTIR spectrum of the virgin CMC. The spectrum included large peaks at 3303 cm− 1, which are caused by O-H stretching vibrations in CMC, and minor peaks at 2919 cm− 1, which are related to aliphatic C-H vibration modes [24]. The characteristic CMC transmittance peaks were located at 1586, 1417, 1313, and 1027 cm− 1 which related to asymmetric -COO- vibrations, CH2 scissoring, OH bending, and C-O-C bending, respectively. The CMC-Al2O3/CdO nanocomposite films showed stronger FTIR peak intensities than the virgin CMC polymer. This behavior indicated that Al2O3/CdO and the pure CMC exhibited some substantial intermolecular interactions. Moreover, the Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles was well dispersed in the CMC, which changed the order of the polymeric matrix and ultimately increased peak intensity. It is evident that the intensity of the ‒OH peak at 3303 cm− 1 for high concentrations of cadmium oxide nanoparticles decreased after the addition of cadmium oxide in various concentrations, as well as that of the C‒O and COO transmittance peaks, which expanded and decreased. This was due to the strong interactions between pure CMC, Al2O3 NPs, and CdO NPs' functional groups [25]. With rising CdO -NPs concentrations, the characteristics of the major functional groups, such as the (C‒O‒C,-OH, and C‒O) groups, progressively altered and intensity decreased. As no new peaks were seen in the FT-IR spectra of the prepared samples, it was assumed that the interaction between the Al2O3/CdO NPs and pure CMC were physical (e.g., van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds). Furthermore, as shown by the XRD patterns, the larger amorphous region within the doped samples is the consequence of an incorporated method that produces chain cross‒linking‒scission between CMC- Al2O3/CdO NPs composite.
3.3. Optical analysis
UV/Vis analysis is employed to measure the decrease in intensity of a light beam after it traverses through a thin film or reflects off its surface. Figure 3 displays the UV/Vis spectra for pure CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs filled with various quantities of CdO nanoparticles. The appearance of a shoulder peak at 197 nm in the CMC curve can be attributed to the n→ π* transition. Around 238 nm, there's another peak that belongs to π → π* [26]. The intensity of the 238 nm peak increases as cadmium oxide nanoparticle concentrations increase. The peaks' irregular changes in intensity, as shown by XRD analysis, may be caused by variations in crystallinity, which indicates complexation or homogeneity, and by variations in the optical bend gap between the CMC chain and the Al2O3/CdO NPs [27–30]. A new peak at 417 nm can be seen in the filled samples and may be caused by the surface plasmon resonance of Al2O3/CdO NPs (SPR). The intensity of surface plasmon resonance peak increases, and there is a redshift towards higher wavelengths (from 417nm to 433nm). The following Equation (Eq. 1) was used to compute the energy gap (Eg) for all obtained samples [31, 32]:
$$\left(\alpha hv\right)={C(hv-{E}_{g})}^{r}$$
1
where h\(v\) is the energy of the incedent photons and C is fixed value. The values of r differs depending on whether the transitions are direct or indirect. In the k space, it has values of 2 for a direct transition and 1/2 for an indirect transition. The absorption coefficient (\(\alpha\) ) can be calculated using the Beer- Lambert's formula [26].
$$\alpha \left(v\right)=2.303\left( \frac{absorbance}{thickness} \right)$$
2
Figure 4 displays the dependence of \(\alpha \left(v\right)\) on the photon energy (h\(v)\) for pure CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs filled with different concentrations of CdO nanoparticles. Table 1 displays the modified absorption edge values, which have been reduced from 4.67 eV to 2.42 eV. Since the conduction and valence bands of the electron hole changes as filler concentrations increase, the absorption edge values decrease. The plots of \((\alpha\)hυ)2 and \((\alpha\)hυ)1/2 vs for all prepared samples are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, and Table 2 gives a summary of the Eg values that were calculated. Table 1 demonstrates that when filler concentrations increase, the energy gap values Eg decrease. For the direct transition, the energy gap values decrease from 5.35 eV to 2.98 eV, and for the indirect transition, they decrease from 4.82 eV to 1.04 eV. According to the FTIR analysis, this reduction could be brought on by coordination or interactions between pure CMC chains and Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles, which might result in localized states inside the band gap.
Table 1
Optical band gap (Egi and Egd) and the absorption edge values for all samples under investigation.
Samples | Concentration | Abs. edge. (eV) | Eg (eV) |
Direct | Indirect |
Pure CMC | 0.0 | 4.67 | 5.35 | 4.82 |
CAl | CMC/Al2O3 | 2.55 | 3.51 | 1.34 |
CAlCd1 | CMC/ Al2O3/2%CdO | 2.47 | 3.14 | 1.19 |
CAlCd2 | CMC/ Al2O3/4%CdO | 2.45 | 3.06 | 1.11 |
CAlCd3 | CMC/ Al2O3/6%CdO | 2.42 | 2.98 | 1.04 |
3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was utilized to explore the thermal degradation of polymers. This technique is often applied to assess essential kinetic parameters such as degradation temperature, activation energy, and decomposition points. These parameters can clarify the thermal stability of pure CMC following the incorporation of metal nanoparticles. Figure 7 shows TGA behavior depicting weight loss as a function of temperature for CMC, CMC/Al2O3, and CMC/Al2O3 NPs loaded with various concentrations of CdO nanoparticles at a heating rate of 5 oC/min over the temperature range of 30 oC to 800 oC. In the first temperature range (28 oC to 247 oC), the produced films are relatively thermally stable. In the second zone, between 247 and 479 oC, all films had a fast weight loss attributed to the chemical interaction between aluminum/cadmium and pure matrix CMC. By adding nanoparticles of metals like aluminum and cadmium, the remaining/residual weight increases significantly. This suggests that adding nanometals to CMC boosts the thermal stability of the produced samples. Table 2 lists the weight loss of films at various temperatures as determined by TGA thermograms. These values indicate that the thermal stability of the produced pure polymer has been increased by the addition of Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles.
Table 2
The weight loss% at various decomposition temperatures of CMC and their metal nanocomposites was obtained using the TGA analysis.
materials | T (oC) |
D50 | D60 | D70 | D80 | |
Pure CMC | 307 | 300 | 284 | 211 | |
CAl | 376 | 322 | 295 | 154 | |
CAlCdO1 NPs | 415 | 347 | 301 | 268 | |
CAlCdO2 NPs | 419 | 370 | 313 | 264 | |
CAlCdO3 NPs | 446 | 404 | 232 | 283 | |
3.5. Electrical behavior
Figure 8 depicts the pristine CMC incorporated with Al2O3 NPs and various concentrations of CdO nanoparticles, as well as the relationship between log (f) and log (σ). The conductivity of the prepared samples improved as the nanoparticles of metal oxide increased. Low frequency dispersion was induced by interiorizations or spatial charge [33]. The electrical conductivity was improved in nanocomposites with more dopants because the molecules began to bridge the gap between the two localized states and simplify charge carrier mobility [34]. The increase of amorphous regions inside the CMC-doped polymeric material, as indicated by the XRD results, improved the electrical conductivity of the prepared samples. The Jonscher equation was used to calculate conductivity values.
$$\sigma \left(\omega \right)= {\sigma }_{dc}+ {A\omega }^{s}$$
3
Where s is the exponent factor, \(\sigma\) is electrical conductivity, and \(\omega\)is the angular frequency equal to 2пf. Table 3 presents the computed values of σdc and s for all nanocomposites sample. The values of s, which were notably less than 1, demonstrated that these composites utilized a hopping mechanism for charge conduction [35]. The final samples (CAlCdO3 NPs) had \({\sigma }_{dc}\)of 2.08 10− 7 Scm− 1 as shown in Table 3..
Table 3
The σdc, and s results for CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs filled with different concentrations of CdO nanoparticles.
Samples | \({\varvec{\sigma }}_{\varvec{d}\varvec{c}}\) (Scm-1) | S |
Pure CMC | \(3.23 \times {10}^{-9}\) | 0.82 |
CAl | \(1.62 \times {10}^{-8}\) | 0.76 |
CAlCdO1 NPs | \(7.37 \times {10}^{-7}\) | 0.65 |
CAlCdO2 NPs | \(4.11 \times {10}^{-7}\) | 0.51 |
CAlCdO3 NPs | \(2.08 \times {10}^{-7}\) | 0.48 |
3.6. Dielectric analysis
Through a dielectric investigation, the relationship between improved charge mobility and heightened ionic conductivity is established. Evaluating the charge storage capacity of polymer composites is achieved through analysis of dielectric permittivity. The dielectric permittivity of a polymer electrolyte is determined using the following equation:
ε ∗ = ε′− jε′′ (3)
Here, ε′ represents the dielectric constant and ε′′ represents the dielectric loss. Figrs 9 and 10 show the dependence of ε′ and ε′′ on log(f) for CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs filled with different concentrations of CdO nanoparticles. These graphs demonstrate that the non‒Debye kind of behavior, also known as the refining density of the charge carriers in the region of space charge accumulation, is what leads the value of ε′ to increment at lower frequencies [4]. The decrease in ε′ and ε′′ values in higher frequency regions is attributed to the pronounced periodic reversal of the field at the interface and the diminishing contribution of charge carriers to ε′ with increasing frequency. Additionally, it's observed that elevating the concentrations of Al2O3/CdO nanoparticles results in a concurrent rise in both dielectric constant and dielectric loss.
3. 7. Argand plot
The analysis of the Argand plot reveals that the primary factor behind the relaxation process of the polymer matrix is the ion conductivity. Figure 11 displays the Argand plot, which consists of the actual M′ and the fictitious M′′, for CMC, CMC/Al2O3 and CMC/Al2O3 NPs filled with different concentrations of CdO nanoparticles. Polymeric matrix relaxation time distribution frequently deviates from a semicircular shape. It is obvious that every polymer chain has a depressed semi-circular arc. The center of this arc, which is situated along the M′ axis, shows the electric relaxation of nanocomposite samples. In this work, the length of the depressed semicircular arc was used to evaluate the conductivity of the prepared films [36]. Arc length in CMC/Al2O3 reduces as cadmium oxide content rises, indicating enhanced conductivity [37]. The Argand curves shift to the origin when cadmium oxide content increases in nanocomposite samples. The presence of diverse polarization forms, relaxation mechanisms, and intricate ion-dipole interaction collectively give rise to the non‒Debye behavior of ions.