An antibiotic combination is better than single-drug therapy in case of postoperative infection by atypical Mycobacteria. [9]
Recent studies have demonstrated that clarithromycin, cefoxitin, and imipenem were also effective against these microorganisms [10,11,12]. Based on reported NTM [MOTT] sensitivities, amikacin with ciprofloxacin or amikacin with cefoxitin [10] should be administered to the patient while waiting for microbial sensitivity results, if there is a strong suspicion of atypical mycobacterial infection [10,13]. According to results of a study from Brown-Elliott and Wallace, the M. fortuitum group is less drug resistant than M. abscessus and M. chelonae.[13] Thus, treatment of infections caused by the M. fortuitum group has been much easier and generally more effective than treatment of M. abscessus and M. chelonae infections.Postoperative wound infections caused by MOTT generally appear few weeks to some months following the procedure. [14] In some case series the incubation period ranged from 20 to 66 days. On the contrary infections due to other pyogenic bacteria have a shorter incubation period as compared to MOTT which have a longer incubation period ranging from several days to several months. [3]The absence of clinical response after the administration of antimicrobial agents against commonly invading bacteria (e.g., Staphylococci, Streptococci) and the sterility of routine cultures of samples taken from the infected sites were clues for MOTT infection.
Time between the onset of symptoms and the microbiological diagnosis also took long time. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is imperative to make the diagnosis. A study by Joon Young Song et al. stated that since the symptoms are relatively mild and indolent, the clinical diagnosis of atypical mycobacterium is often delayed and took more than two months from initial manifestation. [15] Also, in the revised literature, most publications conclude that clinical diagnosis of mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infections is not easy to perform and that the diagnosis is often delayed. Delays of more than one year have been reported. A high degree of clinical suspicion and appropriate microbiological techniques are necessary to avoid delays in diagnosis. [10]
Clinically the infections caused by MOTT in post-operative wound infections are almost similar to pyogenic abscesses with induration, micro-abscesses, and discharge from sinuses and erythema. Systemic manifestations like fever and chills are rare. [2] The clinical features in our study were also similar with erythematous nodules, indurations, micro-abscesses and discharging sinuses. [9] All our patients presented with only local manifestations that started with painful nodules which gradually increased in size, which then would fistulize and open on the skin draining pus while none of them had any systemic manifestations.
The source of infection in our case series is not clear. As per latest article by Maurer et al.,, a number of sources could have been the possible source of infections which included contaminated gentian violet, rinsing solutions, antiseptic solutions, injectable medications, unsterile surgical instruments or poor wound care. [11]However in case of hernioplasty patients in our study as the organisms were also isolated from mesh, the source could be either the mesh or the transient presence of the mycobacteria in the surgical environment. [12]
In other patients who had undergone caesarean section it is theoretically possible as per other study that nontuberculous mycobacteria might have gained access to the surgical wound from the public water system at the time of showering or it is equally possible that these organisms are present on the skin and are not eliminated by skin preparation preoperatively, thus gaining access through the skin incision. [16]
Mechanical cleaning of blood and charred tissue that accumulates in the joints of the instruments may be not done properly after surgery. Thus, these contaminated instruments used during the surgical procedures might have left microorganisms implanted on the subcutaneous tissue which germinates and after an incubation period of 3–4 weeks giving rise to clinical symptoms. [17]
Successful treatment of MOTT requires both surgical treatment and combination of antibiotics. [18]This Combination of antibiotics as determined by susceptibility should be prescribed for an adequately long time so that the wound heals and also to ensure that no recurrence occurs. It has been reported that conventional anti-tubercular drugs are ineffective in treating these cases. Antibiotics should be given based on their susceptibility report and also combination of antibiotics is preferable over single regimen. [19] M.fortuitum responds to antibiotics like amikacin, quinolones, doxycycline and sulphamethaxole. Latest studies reveal that clarithromycin, cefoxitin and imipenem were useful for treating MOTT. [20,21,22] Almost all the patients in our study were cured with a combined approach of drainage and clarithromycin based combination therapy. In hernioplasty patients mesh was removed. In one female patient who developed incisional hernia as a complication of this infection, underwent hernia repair and excision of abscess cavity.
It has been recommended that in order to prevent recurrence, antibiotic treatment should be given for a minimum of at least three months, or to be continued for at least 3 to 6 weeks after the wound get healed. Recent research work has also recommended that antibiotic treatment should be given for 6 to 12 months though the optimal length of treatment has not been yet established. [16, 17]
So, it is important to re-emphasize upon the surgeons about the importance of following strict sterilization protocols including cleaning laparoscope instruments as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Proper sterilization of medical equipments, proper skin cleansing preoperatively are essential prerequisite to prevent these infections. Clinicians should be aware to include MOTT in the differential diagnosis of surgical site infections in order to make early diagnosis and prompt treatment.
The limitations of this study were as follows: the exact source of infection could not be made out for further prevention of infection involving future surgical procedures and also molecular characterization was not done. Since PCR is costly for most patients, identification is still done commonly by conventional methods in most of the laboratories in countries like India.
To conclude, delayed onset chronic wound infection by Atypical mycobacteria is preventable.These organisms are not responsive to conventional antitubercular drugs but to specific drug regimens.