Scoping review
This protocol is registered with the open science framework database. Open science framework was also searched to determine if there is no registered similar protocol. No similar study to the one we propose is currently registered. In thisproposed scoping review, we will use resources that enhance methodological transparency and allow the reproducibility of the results and synthesis. To achieve this, thestudyprotocol will be produced according to the framework on scoping reviews by Arksey and O’Malley(9). The following stages for scoping reviews are listed in this framework;
- Identifying the research question.
- Identifying relevant studies
- Study selection
- Charting the data
- Collating, summary and reporting the results.
To further improve the study, there will be quality appraisal of all the individual studies selected into the scoping review as recommended by Levac et al(10).
Identifying the research question.
What is the impact of targeted treatment on the prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis infection in primary school children (5 -15 years) in Africa?
Eligibility of the research question.
The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome framework (PICO) will be employed to determine the eligibility of the research question as illustrated in table 1.(11)
Identification of relevant studies
This study will utilize evidence published by primary research studies and grey literature. Both qualitative and quantitative studies will be reviewed. Articles will be retrieved from the following databases, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, EBSCO host and websites such as WHO and governmental websites. In order to get a clear reflection of the impact of the targeted treatment of schistosomiasis.Literature search from the past 20 years will be conducted from 2000 to 2020. All study designs will be included. Furthermore citations in retrieved articles will be screened and relevant articles found through the citations will be included in the study. The search will be restricted to articles published in English. Two researchers (Nathan Chanhanga - NC and PisiraiNdarukwa - PN) will conduct the searchindependently. The bibliography software Zotero will be used to store, organize and manage all references and ensure a systematic and comprehensive search. Initially, the search key words will include, schistosomiasis, prevalence, intensity, targeted treatment, mass drug administration, primary school children, Africa. Boolean terms “AND” and “OR” will be used in advanced search to restrict search to the area of interest. In addition Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free texts will be used to guide and indexing article records. We have already done a pretest of the search strategy in PubMed, for articles from January 2000 to February 2020, to determine if the search strategy is appropriate and presented the results in Table 2.
Table 2
Pilot data base keyword search.
Keyword search
|
Date of search
|
Search engine used
|
Number of articles retrieved
|
“Schistosomiasis OR Bilharzia” AND “Targeted treatment OR Mass Drug Administration” AND Prevalence OR Burden OR Intensity AND “Primary schools AND Africa”
|
10/05/20
|
PubMed
|
1800
|
Study selection
The eligibility criteria was designed to limit the study to focus on articles that address the research question; What is the impact of targeted treatment on the prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis infection in primary school children in Africa. The articles do not necessarily have to address a national project – it can be at project level. The PICO strategy guided this process.
Table 3
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
PICOS Strategy
|
Inclusion criteria
|
Exclusion criteria
|
P-
Population
|
Primary school children aged 5 to 15 years in Africa in from 2000 to 2020
|
Children below 5 years or adults and out of Africa
|
I-Intervention
|
Mass drug administration , Health education on schistosomiasis infection
|
No intervention employed to fight schistosomiasis infection
|
C-
Comparison
|
With baseline prevalence and intensity for schistosomiasis infection
|
Studies without baseline results for prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis
|
O-
Output
|
Impact on the prevalence and Intensity of schistosomiasis
|
No results on the impact on prevalence or intensity
|
Other factors
|
In English language
|
Not in English language
|
Eligible articles from the title search will be exported to Zotero Version 7 library specifically created for this study. Further to that, a comprehensive screening of article titles from the data bases listed above will be conducted by two researchers. In addition all studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be checked for duplication and all duplicates will be removed. This is done before abstract screening is conducted. Thereafter full article will be screened. Moreover, the screening of abstracts and the full articles will be done by two independent reviewers guided by the eligibility criteria. Database searching and article retrieval will be done with assistance of the University of KwaZulu-Natal Librarian. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram (Figure 1)will be utilized to illustrate the screening of the search.(12)
Charting Data
Aa Data Charting table will be used to guide the extraction of relevant information from each article included in the study. The data charting form will be continuously updated with the latest information. This tool with have the following four main domains;
- Identification of study.
- Title, Author and date, Journal full reference,
- Research questions or aims, study population, study design, sample size, geographic settings, intervention and duration.
- Impact on prevalence or intensity of schistosomiasis infection, treatment/intervention coverage.
Two independent researchers will summarize data from selected articles using the Microsoft Excel spread sheets. The two spread sheets will be merged into one report and if there are disagreement a third independent researcher will be involved for resolve.
Collating, summarizing and reporting results.
Content analysis and coding of extracted data will be done by two researchers. The nature, extent and distribution of the selected studies will be reviewed. Furthermore, to understand the context and the impact of targeted treatment or mass drug administration on the prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis infection, a template with tables and charts will be developed. Furthermore, a template with a table summarizing basic characteristics of all the selected studies will be designed and reviewers (NC and NP) will make comments and notes on the following headlines, population, intervention, sample size, impact on prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis, intervention coverage. This meticulous and consistent approach will allow us to make comparisons across all the interventions, identify contradictory evidence regarding specific interventions and identify research gaps. It will also allow us to quantify the effect of targeted treatment or MDA on the prevalence or intensity of schistosomiasis.
Quality appraisal
For quality assessment of chosen articles, a Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be adopted and piloted by two independent researchers (NC and NP). We propose to use the MMAT because it clarifies the important aspects of this study(13) It will be used on all the selected articles since they are all primary research studies. We will appraise descriptive statistics, randomized control studies and cross-sectional studies.
MMAT will also be used to scrutinize the relevance of the aim of selected articles, adequacy and methodology, study design, data collection, data analysis, presentation of findings, discussion and conclusions. In addition, grey literature will be appraised with the guide of the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significates (AACODS) check list form.(14)
The risk of bias for each outcome across individual studies will be summarized as a descriptive statement supported by a risk bias table. A review-level narrative summery of risk of bias will be provided.For each study retained, the overall quality of score will be calculated using the above tools. Since there are a few criteria in each domain the score can be represented as percentages. For qualitative and qualitative studies, the score will be the number of criteria met divided by 4 and multiplied by 100% hence (scores vary from 25% =1 criteria met to 100% = all criteria met). For mixed methods the proposition is that the overall score of the combination cannot be higher than the score of the weakest component, hence the weakest component score is the overall score.(13)
Participants and the public.
This is will be a systematic scoping review and hence its design does not include direct contact or recruitment of study participants.