3. 1. SEM analysis
Figure 1 show the SEM images the surface morphology of chitosan, β-CD, ZnO NPs, and the generated chitosan polymers ( Fig. 1 a-g). These images show apparent differences between them, and the surface appearances were changed upon reaction as compared to fibrous nature of chitosan’s surface. The Chs-Sal polymer was appeared as rough amorphous slides (Fig. 1-b). Additionally, the surface morphology of β-CD and pseudopolyrotaxane polymer showed higher difference between them due to the insertion of Chs- Sal polymer into the β-CD (Fig. 1-d). Pseudopolyrotaxane polymer showed a scaly and slightly rough structure with bigger random particle crystal size. SEM images of Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs composite showed smooth slides without pores surface. The pores of Chs-Sal polymer considered as a particle sink to get ZnO NPs inside it for form the soft surface of composite (Fig. 1-f). The surface morphology of pseudopolyrotaxane polymer was changed in Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs composite (Fig. 1-g). It has become uneven and aggregated in Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs composite.
3. 2. XRD analysis
Analyze the phase structure and its crystallite size of chitosan, Chs- Sal polymer, β-CD, pseudopolyrotaxane polymer, ZnO NPs, Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs, Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs composite, XRD analysis has been accomplished (Fig. 2 and 3). XRD spectra were recorded at 25 ºC in the range 5º−80º. The characteristic diffraction peaks of chitosan were observed at 2θ = 8.6º and 20ºconfirming its semi-crystalline nature [37, 38]. XRD analysis showed the formation of Schiff base (Chs- Sal polymer) via the changing of amino group nature. Moreover, the difference in the crystal size and crystallinity of chitosan as indicated by disappearance peaks in 16.4º, 33.6º and appearance of a slight peak in 13.8 º. Additionally, the crystallinity values of Chitosan and the formed Chs-Sal polymer showed 57.7 and 50.6 %, respectively. The crystallinity value of Chs-Sal decreased due to the formation of Schiff base and cleavage of hydrogen bonds [39]. The XRD pattern of pseudopolyrotaxane polymer showed sharp diffraction angle at 14.2 º and the crystallinity value was 48.3% and the crystal size increased compared to Chs-Sal polymer (crystal size values of Chs-Sal and pseudopolyrotaxane polymer were 2.4 and 3.2 nm, respectively. After addition of ZnO NPs to the Chs-Sal polymer gave a different pattern in XRD analysis. A broad peak in the blind polymer became a broader peak with less intensity and some sharp peaks appeared at 15 º, 17 º, and 29.9 º. Moreover, the crystal size of Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs (3.8 nm) increased on the cost of crystallinity value (46.1%), this difference indicates the interaction between the ZnO NPs and Chs-Sal polymer. Finally, Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs composite XRD result showed broad peaks at 13.3 º, 13.7 º, 14.2 º, 14.6 º, 17.6 º, 18.2º, higher crystal size 5.78 nm and lower crystallinity value 45%.
3. 3. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)
FT-IR spectra were used to confirm the formation of our components. Fig 4 showed the difference between the Chs and Chs-Sal polymer as a Schiff base. The -OH group characteristic peak in chitosan appeared at 3334 cm-1, which appears superimposed to the N-H stretching band and the hydrocarbon bond C-H appeared at 2978 cm-1. In addition to the peaks of -C=O amide and –NH2 were observed at 1657 cm-1 and 1598 cm-1. The spectrum of Schiff base polymer showed C=N band at 1631 cm-1, such results confirmed the Chs-Sal polymer formation. Moreover, the stretching and bending vibration peaks of C-C bonds on the aromatic ring of the aldehyde and the stretching vibration peak of -C-O of Sal appeared at 1490, 820 and 1250 cm-1, respectively [40-42]. For clearance the characteristic band of salicaldehyde in the region 1660-1730 cm-1 has not appeared in Schiff base spectrum indicating that there is no traceable residue of free Sal. The differences between absorbance bands of chitosan and Chs-Sal polymer are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. FT-IR changes of pure Chs and Chs-Sal polymer
Functional
Groups
|
Wave number, cm 1
|
|
Chs
|
Chs-Sal
|
∆ν
|
ν[OH, NH] symmetric
|
3343
|
3373
|
-30
|
ν [ CH aliphatic]
|
2978
|
2960
|
+18
|
ν [ C-O]
|
1657
|
1649
|
+8
|
ν [ C-N]
|
-
|
1631
|
-
|
ν [ CH2-OH]
|
1378
|
1370
|
+7
|
ν [ C-O-C]
|
1068
|
1072
|
-4
|
ν= ν (Chs-Sal polymer) – ν(Chs).
We noticed that the absorption band of the hydroxyl group is slightly higher and less intensity than the β-CD sample (Fig. 4). Also, the ν[OH] symmetric stretching was shifted to higher frequency and ν[CH-aliphatic] was shifted to lower frequency compared to those in β-CD. Furthermore, the ν[C–O–C] and ν[CH2-O] bending vibrations were shifted to lower frequencies at 1027 and 1158 cm-1, respectively. These results confirmed the formation of pseudopolyrotaxane polymer through the reaction of Chs-Sal polymer with β-CD. This result can be explained as follow, the insertion of the Chs-Sal chain through the electron rich cavity of the cyclodextrin rings lead to increasing the frequencies [43]. On the other hand, the decrease in frequencies is due to the formation of Vander Waals forces and hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of β-CDs and carbonyl groups of chitosan and salicylaldehyde molecules as well as the hydrogen bond between the adjacent β-CDs, Fig 4. The differences between absorbance bands of pure β-CD, Chs-Sal polymer and pseudopolyrotaxane polymer are showed in Table 2.
Table 2. FT-IR changes of β-CD, Chs-Sal polymer, and pseudopolyrotaxane polymer.
Functional
groups
|
|
|
Wave number, cm 1
|
|
∆ν1
|
Chs-Sal polymer
|
pseudopolyrotaxane
|
β-CD
|
∆ν2
|
ν[OH, NH] symmetric
|
+23
|
3373
|
3396
|
3389
|
+7
|
ν [ CH aliphatic]
|
-60
|
2960
|
2900
|
2925
|
-25
|
ν [ C-O]
|
+19
|
1649
|
1668
|
-
|
-
|
ν [ CH2-OH]
|
-22
|
1370
|
1158
|
1159
|
-1
|
ν [ C-O-C]
|
-45
|
1072
|
1027
|
1028
|
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∆ν1 = ν(pseudopolyrotaxane) –ν(Chs-Sal polymer), ∆ν2= ν(pseudopolyrotaxane) –ν( β-CD).
The FT-IR spectrum of the Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs polymer in Fig 5, showed a broad absorption band at 3408 cm-1 corresponds to the stretching vibrations of hydroxyl (OH) groups. The absorption band at 2945 cm-1 is attributed to symmetric stretching of aliphatic C–H groups of Chs in polymer blend [44],which is markedly shifted and decreased in intensity (2930 cm−1) upon doping of ZnO NPs. The absorption band at 1660 cm-1 assigned to free C=O stretching vibration [45]. The absorption bands at 1560 and 1413 cm-1 corresponds to the polymer (C=N) group [46] bending and the stretching vibration of (CH2-OH) group, respectively, were shifted towards higher wave numbers and decreased in their intensities, because of the interaction between the polymer blend chains and the ZnO NPs [47]. The band at 1073 cm-1 is attributed to C–O–C stretching became less intense and shifted to lower wavenumber. The differences between absorption bands of Chs-Sal polymer and Chs-Sal polymer doped with ZnO NPs are summarized in Table 3. These changes (shift and decrease in the intensity) indicated the strong interaction between these functional groups in the polymer blend and ZnO NPs. The absorption band at 675 cm-1 is appeared due to the stretching mode of the amide groups attached to zinc oxide NPs, Fig. 5 [48, 49].
Table 3. FT-IR changes of Chs-Sal polymer, Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs composite and ZnO NPs .
Functional
groups
|
|
|
Wave number, cm 1
|
|
∆ν1
|
Chs-Sal polymer
|
Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs
|
ZnO NPs
|
∆ν2
|
ν[OH, NH] symmetric
|
+107
|
3373
|
3480
|
3333
|
+147
|
ν [ CH aliphatic]
|
-30
|
2960
|
2930
|
-
|
-
|
ν [ C-O]
ν [NH-bending]
|
-11
+50
|
1649
1570
|
1660
1620
|
-
1553
|
-
+67
|
ν [ CH2-OH]
|
+43
|
1370
|
1413
|
1393
|
+20
|
ν [ C-O-C]
|
+1
|
1072
|
1073
|
1090
|
-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∆ν1 = ν(Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs) –ν(Chs-Sal polymer), ∆ν2 = ν(Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs)- ν(ZnO NPs).
Fig 6 showed the difference between Chs-Sal polymer, Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs composite, Chs-Sal/ β-CD and Chs-Sal/ β-CD /ZnO NPs composite. The FT-IR spectrum of the Chs-Sal/ β-CD /ZnO NPs composite showed a broad absorption band of –OH group at 3375cm-1 with increasing of intensity compared to the last polymers. The absorption band of aliphatic C–H groups at 2927 cm-1, which is markedly shifted and increased in intensity. The absorption band at 1663 cm-1 assigned to free C=O stretching vibration, and C-N group appeared at 1663 cm-1 with high intensity. The absorption bands at 1158 and 1028 cm-1 correspond to the stretching vibration of (CH2–OH) group and C–O–C stretching became more intense and shifted to lower wavenumber. These changes (shift and increase in the intensity) indicate the strong interaction between these functional groups in the polymer blend of pseudopolyrotaxane and ZnO NPs. The absorption band at 756 cm-1 appeared due to the stretching mode of the amide groups attached to zinc oxide NPs. The differences between absorption bands of Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs polymer, Chs-Sal/ β-CD polymer and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs polymer are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. FT-IR changes of Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs polymer, Chs-Sal/ β-CD polymer and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs polymer.
Functional groups
|
Wave number, cm 1
|
|
∆ν1
|
Pseudopolyrotaxane
|
Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs
|
Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs
|
∆ν2
|
ν[OH, NH] symmetric
|
-21
|
3396
|
3375
|
3480
|
-105
|
ν [ CH aliphatic]
|
+27
|
2900
|
2927
|
2930
|
-3
|
ν [ C-O]
|
-5
|
1668
|
1663
|
1660
|
+3
|
ν [ CH2-OH]
|
-2
|
1158
|
1156
|
1413
|
-257
|
ν [ C-O-C]
|
+1
|
1027
|
1028
|
1073
|
-45
|
∆ν1 = ν(Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs) –ν(pseudopolyrotaxane), ∆ν2 = ν(Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ ZnO NPs) –ν(Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs).
3. 4. Optical properties
UV-visible spectroscopy of Chs-Sal polymer, Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs composite, Chs-Sal/ β-CD and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite were recorded in the range of 200–800 nm at 25 °C (Fig. 7). The UV-visible spectrum of Chs-Sal polymer showed a broad peak at the region 327–360 nm due to the presence of π bond(–N=CH–). Interestingly, modification of Chs-Sal polymer with β-CD and ZnO NPs exhibited slight blue shifts in the characteristic peak, from 360 to 340 and 356 nm, respectively. Also, in the case of addition of β-CD and ZnO NPs into Chs-Sal as a one pot reaction gave sharp peak in 439 nm. These data approved the formation of Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs composite, Chs-Sal/ β-CD and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite. Additionally, the energy gap energy of the prepared polymers was calculated depending on the UV-visible absorption spectra according to Tauc's formula. The values of Eg for Chs-Sal polymer,Chs-Sal/ β-CD,Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs composite and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite were 4.4, 3.55, 2.65 and 3.11 eV, respectively.
3.5. Thermal analysis
Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out to study the thermal stability of the prepared polymers and their resistance to heat. Fig. 8 shows the TGA curves of Chs-Sal,Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs composite, Chs-Sal/ β-CD and Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite. Generally, it is clear from this Fig that the thermal stability decreased in case of Chs-Sal/ β-CD composite compared with Chs-Sal polymer whereas the weight loss at 350°C is 67 % and 52%, respectively. In addition, the incorporation of ZnO NPs was slightly increased the heat resistance of the produced Chs-Sal/ZnOcomposite (the weight loss at 350°C is 47 %). On the other hand, the thermal stability of Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite increased 55 % at the same temperature compared with Chs-Sal/ β-CD, due to the addition of ZnO NPs increased the stability of polymer. Depending on the results in Fig. 8, the order of thermal stability of the four samples is Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs ˃ Chs-Sal/ ZnO NPs Chs-Sal ˃ Chs-Sal/ β-CD ˃ Chs-Sal.
3.6. Gas sensing properties
Fig. 9 (a, b) shows the response of the polymer composite as sensor towards NH3 various concentrations at room temperature. The Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite sensor exhibited high sensing characteristics toward NH3 down to 10 ppm concentration. It was observed that the sensor response was increased by increasing NH3 concentration, and recovered after purging the chamber with air, indicating reversible response characteristics of the composite. Due to the presence of ZnO NPs on the exterior surface of β-CD in the Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite, β-CD enhances the dispersibility and surface area of ZnO NPs which results in the presence of more reactive sites onto the ZnO NPs surface which increases the amount of the adsorbed gas and the response as well [50,51]. In addition, the hydrophilic nature of the exterior surface of β-CD due to the distribution of hydroxyl groups may also participates in the adsorption of NH3 molecules [52,53]. Moreover, many vapor channels in the cavities of β-CD in addition to the inclusion of Ch-Sal-ZnO into these cavities may enhance the sensor response of Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite [54]. Furthermore, the inner cavity of β-CD may occupied by traces of water vapor from the atmospheric air which may also interact with NH3 vapor [55,56]. The sensor response and recovery times were 650 s and 350 s, respectively, indicating that Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite is suitable for gas sensing applications. Besides, the selectivity of the Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite sensor has also been studied at room temperature upon exposure to various 100 ppm gases/vapors (NH3, chloroform, ethanol, and methanol) as depicted in Fig. 9c. the results indicating that the Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite sensor exhibits the highest response when exposure to 100 ppm NH3 suggesting that the Chs-Sal/ β-CD/ZnO NPs composite is has excellent selectivity in NH3-monitoring application. Fig. 9(d) shows the response comparison of Chs-Sal , Chs-Sal/β-CD, Chs-Sal/ZnO NPs, and Chs-Sal/β-CD/ZnO NPs composite as sensors to 100 ppm of NH3 at RT. The obtained observations indicated that Chs-Sal/β-CD/ZnO NPs composite exhibited improved NH3 sensing response compared to other polymers.