The increase in global population and changing lifestyles have increased the demand for wood-based panels (WBP), with global production of WBP more than doubling from about 178 million m3 in 2000 to about 396 million m3 in 2021 (FAO, 2023). On the other hand, competition for raw wood supply has intensified, leading to an increase in wood prices, mainly due to increased demand for raw wood from both WBP producers and the bioenergy sector (Guan and Zhang, 2023). In countries like Iran, the wood supply is much worse due to the tripling of production volume in the last decade (more than 3 million m3) and ongoing forest conservation plans (Heidarlou et al., 2023). The use of agricultural waste as a renewable and abundant material in the world and also in Iran is considered one of the most reliable solutions to overcome this challenge. Most agricultural residues are quite similar to wood in terms of the chemical and morphological composition of the fibers (Dukarska et al., 2019). Researchers have showed the potential of various agricultural residues such as bagasse stalks (Legesse et al., 2022), rice straw (Li et al., 2010), bamboo (Bazzetto et al., 2019), almond shells (Guerue et al., 2006), corn husks (Zakaria et al., 2021), palm biomass (Eghtedarnezhad et al., 2020) and rapeseed stalks Hýsek et al. (2018) for particleboard production.
Wheat straw has significant potential to replace wood for the production of WBP as it is much more widespread and abundant than other lignocellulosic sources in the world. Global wheat production is estimated at about 750 million tons (Mancini et al., 2018). It is stated that for every ton of wheat, about 1.3 to 1.6 tons of straw remain in the field (Montane et al. 1998; Neitzel et al. 2022). Thus, It is estimated that at least 975 million tons of wheat straw is available as residue in the fields each year, most of which is burned, negatively impacting global warming potential. Previous research has shown that although wheat straw can be used as a raw material for the production of WBP, the composition and hydrophobic structure of the straw surface leads to incompatibility between the straw and the conventional resins (e.g., urea formaldehyde) used for WBP production (Yao et al. 2003; Boquillon et al. 2004). This leads to a very weak bond and a reduction in the physical and mechanical properties of the resulting straw particleboard (Han et al. 1998; Oh and Lee 2012). To overcome this challenge, some techniques have been proposed. The wheat straw was pretreated with various materials before being used for board production. Pretreatments of wheat straw with enzymes (Zhang et al. 2003), steam, hot water, sulfuric acid (Harlvarsson et al. 2009, 2010), acetic anhydride and soap solution (Bekhta et al. 2013), silane coupling agents (Hafezi et al. 2016), and plasma (Hysek et al. 2018) have been carried out to improve the adhesion of wheat straw with urea formaldehyde adhesives. Others suggested using alternative adhesive systems such as isocyanate (p-MDI) (Boquillon et al. 2004; Cao et al. 2017), epoxidised linseed oil (Luo and Yang et al. 2010), acrylated epoxidised soybean oil (Tasooji et al. 2010) and tannin adhesive (Tabarsa et al. 2011) to make panels from wheat straw. Most of these adhesives consist of harmful or toxic chemical substances derived from fossil raw materials, so their further use is severely restricted. However, there is a lot of emphasis on green or environmentally friendly adhesives in WBP production these days (Sutiawan et al., 2021).
Citric acid (CA) is an organic polycarboxylic acid with three carboxyl groups that is commercially produced from the fermentation of glucose or materials containing glucose and sucrose (Widyorini et al. 2016). CA can also be extracted naturally from various fruits and vegetables, especially citrus fruits such as oranges, tangerines, lemons, limes, etc. (Tsao et al., 1999). Citric acid has been used for decades as a modifier to improve the dimensional stability of wood and WBP (Umemura et al., 2012). Recently, Menezzi et al. (2018) and Ando and Umemura (2021) studied the chemical bonding between the functional groups of wood carbohydrates and lignin with citric acid using sophisticated analytical techniques. They found that an ester bond forms between the carboxyl groups of citric acid and the hydroxyl groups (aromatic and aliphatic) in lignin and wood carbohydrates. They also suggested the use of citric acid as an environmentally friendly adhesive for the manufacture of wood products. So far, researchers have investigated the potential of citric acid as a bio-based adhesive to produce different types of WBP, especially from agricultural residues. In this context, the use of particles from bamboo (Widyorini et al., 2016), bagasse (Kusumah et al., 2016), maize husks (Prasetiyo et al., 2018), Imperata cylindrica (Syamani et al., 2018) and Nipa frond (Santoso et al., 2019) for the production of particleboard has been reported. The effective processing conditions for CA-bonded particleboard were summarized by Lee et al. (2020) as follows: Pressing temperature of more than 180°C, board density of 800 kg/m3, CA content of 20 wt.% or more and pre-drying of 12 hours at 80°C. The pre-drying of resinated particles with CA was suggested to eliminate moisture from particles before hot pressing (Kusumah et al. 2016; Syamani et al. 2018).
There are no studies on the production of wheat straw boards with citric acid as an adhesive, which was the aim of the current study. It seems that citric acid, due to its acidic nature, can scratch or even dissolve the oily extracts on the straw surface and form chemical bonds with the hydroxyl groups of the straw. In this case, the above-mentioned complex pre-treatment of the wheat straw prior to the production of particleboard is not necessary. The influence of adhesive content and mat moisture on the properties of wheat straw particleboard before hot pressing was investigated. To control the moisture content of the resinated particles, different pre-drying protocols (various drying times and temperatures) were applied.