The morphology and growth mechanism of SiC nanowires were controlled by using different catalysts. The corresponding surface and cross-section morphology SEM images of all six samples are illustrated in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
As shown in Fig. 1(a), when the thickness of the Al2O3 catalyst is 2 nm, a large number of pearl-like beads are formed on the surface of the substrate, which are in an intimate contact with the surface (Fig. 1(d)). As the thickness of the catalyst film increases, SiC nanowires begin to form, but they are straight and co-exist with the pearl-chain-like nanowires (Fig. 1(b), (c)). Also, the thickness of the nanowire on the substrate surface becomes larger which obviously increased from 11 to 85 µm for the samples prepared with the Al2O3 film thickness of 4 and 6 nm, respectively (Fig. 1(e), (f)). The diameter of the straight nanowire is about 50 nm. The minimum diameter of the pearl-chain-like nanowire is about 100 nm, and the maximum diameter of the pearls is about 850 nm. The SEM images of the samples prepared with Ni catalyst are illustrated in Fig. 2. As observed, the diameter of the SiC nanowires catalyzed by Ni film is about 50 nm while their surface is smooth and clean (Fig. 2(a)-(c)). The cross-section image (Fig. 2(d)) shows a mats-like arrangement of the nanowires on the substrate. As the thickness of the Ni catalyst increases to 4 and 6 nm, the thickness of nanowires increases from 63 to 92 µm, respectively, while the layer of nanowires is denser (Fig. 2(e), (f)). These results indicate that different growth mechanisms of the nanowires in the presence of the two catalysts. For A1, A2, and A3 samples, the nanowires are grown following the OAG mechanism. In this case, the growth of SiC nanowires is assisted by semi-liquid Al2O3 when an Si-O-Al amorphous layer is formed on the surface of the nanowires, preventing the lateral growth of the nanowires. By contrary, the growth mechanism of the nanowires in N1, N2, and N3 samples is the VLS mechanism. In this case, the catalyst droplets form at lower temperatures. The catalyst droplet can be used as a template to control the morphology of the SiC nanowire at the top of the nanowire. Secondly, the solid-liquid interface is formed at the top of the nanowires, so that the reactants continue to crystallize at the interface to form nanowires.
Fig. 3 displays the XRD patterns of SiC nanowires grown in the presence of the two different catalysts.
As illustrated in Fig. 3 (a), all three samples showed typical diffraction peaks for 3C-SiC. When the thickness of Al2O3 is 2 nm, the characteristic peak strength of SiC is extremely weak. As the thickness of the Al2O3 catalyst film increases, the characteristic peaks of SiC gradually become sharp and clearly visible. This indicates that the crystallinity of the nanowires is gradually increasing. In Fig. 3(b), the typical diffraction peaks of SiC are displayed even at the lower thickness of the Ni film. Yet, the peaks become sharper as the thickness of the Ni film increases. To note, for the N3 sample, traces of C can be observed in the XRD pattern. The comparison of the crystallinity of samples reveals that a crystallization degree of 22.3% is obtained for the N3 sample, which is made of grains of 14.3 nm, whereas a crystallinity degree of 35.6% is determined for the A3 sample, consisting of grains of 21.1 nm (Table 1). This result is consistent with the SEM result. The sample with Al2O3 as catalyst has a larger diameter, so the overall crystallinity is higher. This is because the semi-liquid catalyst in the OAG growth mechanism is only attached to the surface of SiC nanowires, and the limiting force on the diameter of nanowires is weaker than that on the tip nanowires droplets in the VLS mechanism.
Table 1
Crystallinity and grain size of SiC nanowires grown on the substrate surface in the presence of Ni or Al2O3 as catalysts.
Sample | Crystallinity /% | Grain size /nm |
A3 | 35.6 | 21.1 |
N3 | 22.3 | 14.3 |
The microstructure and composition of the A3 sample are analyzed by (HR)TEM, SAED, and elemental mapping. The results are displayed in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4 show representative high-resolution(HR) TEM images of A3 sample. It can be observed that two different morphologies co-exist in the sample, a bead-like morphology as well as a smooth and straight shaped morphology (Fig. 4(a)). The pearl-like beads of ~ 150 nm in diameter, which are placed alongside the nanowire, are amorphous. The core of the beads is crossed by a straight nanowire with a diameter of 50 nm. The d-spacing between two neighboring lattice fringes is 0.25 nm, according to the Fig. 4(b). It can be observed from the selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) in the Fig. 4(b) inset, that the crystal diffraction lattice co-exists with a halo, attributed to the amorphous phase. Hence, it can be stated that the core of the pearl-like beads is made of a SiC single crystal while the pearl-like structure is amorphous. From Fig. 4(c), it can be observed that the straight SiC nanowires, having a diameter of 50 nm, are grown in the (111) direction. In addition, twin defects can be observed inside the nanowires. The EDS pattern of pearl-chain-like nanowire clearly shows that the amorphous layer mainly contains Si, O, and Al (Fig. 4(d)). As listed in Table 2, in the Area 1, the amorphous Si-O ratio is close to 1: 2 while a small amount of Al is also detected. The Si-C ratio of Area 2 is close to 1, and the atomic content of oxygen is 2.65%, indicating that the core of the nanowire is composed of 3C-SiC single crystals. The microstructure and composition of the smooth and straight nanowires in A3 are the same as the core of the beads discussed above (Fig. 4(e)).
Table 2
Elemental analysis results of different regions in A3 displayed in Fig. 4(d).
Element Atomic fraction (%) | Si | C | O | Al |
Area 1 | 29.53 | 2.06 | 63.39 | 5.01 |
Area 2 | 52.81 | 44.54 | 2.65 | – |
Since no other metal elements participate to the reactions during the synthesis, but only Al2O3, it is evident that the nucleation and growth of the A1, A2, and A3 samples are governed by the OAG mechanism. Figure 5 schematically illustrates the growth of SiC nanowires in the presence of Al2O3 catalyst via the OAG mechanism.
In the initial stage of the reaction, the Al2O3 film deposited on the Si substrate is strongly bonded to substrate, which limits the agglomeration of catalyst on the substrate surface. The pyrolysis temperature of 1350 °C is very close to the melting point of the silicon wafer, which weakens the bonding force between the Al2O3 thin layer and the silicon wafer. The released reactive atoms react with the pyrolysis byproduct gas (CO and SiOX) of the PCS, the available bonds are directed toward the surface, and the diffused Al atoms form a Si-O-Al amorphous layer. This amorphous layer plays the role of adsorbent of reactive gases and promotes the formation of SiC nanowires with a certain crystal orientation. During the growth of SiC nanowires, the oxygen and aluminum atoms in Si-O-Al may be expelled by silicon atoms, which diffuse to the edges of the crystal and form a amorphous protective shell, which also guides the growth direction of the nanowires. Therefore, the atomic content of oxygen in the pearl-shaped amorphous layer is as high as 63.39%. Overall, the highly reactive Si-O-Al layer on the top of the SiC nanowire acts as a collector of gaseous Si-C, whereas the amorphous layer on the side of the nanowire prevents the increase of the nanowire diameter. It is assumed that the twin defects of SiC nanowires are one of the driving forces of the growth along one direction. The existing twin dislocations in the growth direction and the formation of facets with low surface energy can also improve growth rate of nanowires along the (111) crystal plane. Twin steps are more likely to adsorb atoms. When the rate of amorphous adsorption in the reaction system is greater than the crystallization rate of SiC, the pearl-like amorphous clusters appear on the nanowires, forming the pearl-chain nanowires.
Representative HRTEM images of N3 sample are depicted in Fig. 6.
It can be observed from Fig. 6(a) that the Ni catalyst is placed on the top of the SiC nanowires, indicating that N1, N2, and N3 have grown according to the VLS mechanism. The Ni catalyst controlls the growth of SiC nanowires in the (111) direction. As shown, the average diameter of nanowires is 50 nm (Fig. 6(b)). Many twin defects can be observed inside the nanowires, and a periodic sawtooth-shaped crystal structure of the SiC nanowires is noticed on the surface. As can be seen from the elemental analysis in Table 3, the catalyst droplet mainly contains 77.76% Ni and a small amount of Si, C and O. The elemental composition of single crystal nanowires is mainly Si and C with atomic ratios close to 1:1, and O with 2.38%. The amorphous layer coated on the surface of nanowires is mainly C. The SAED pattern illustrated in the inset of Fig. 6(b) shows a single crystal lattice while the lines in the middle of the lattice are attributed to the twin defects in the nanowires. The high-resolution image in Fig. 6(c) shows that the diameter of the Ni catalyst droplet is about 200 nm. The surface of the droplet is covered by an amorphous layer of Si-O-C with a thickness of 5 nm. The EDS spectrum of N3 shows that the catalyst droplets on the top of the nanowires are composed of Si, C, O, and Ni, whereas the Si-O-C mainly exists on the surface of the catalyst droplet (Fig. 6(d)).
Fig. 7 briefly illustrates the growth of SiC nanowires supported with Ni catalyst via the VLS mechanism.
As the increase of substrate temperature, Ni first forms small droplets on the substrate surface, followed by the formation of a liquid-solid interface. Subsequently, the by-product gas formed during PCS pyrolysis is continuously adsorbed on the liquid-solid interface and promotes the crystallization of Si-O-C amorphous phase. The extra unreacted C is coated on the surface of nanowires, resulting in the formation of SiC single crystal nanowires. In addition, the lowest surface-energy (111) growth is allowed. Under these conditions, the increase in nanowires diameter is limited and the single-crystal SiC nanowires are produced.
Table 3
Elemental analysis of different regions in N3 corresponding to Fig. 6(a)-(b)
Element Atomic fraction (%) | Si | C | O | Ni |
Area 1 | 12.91 | 7.79 | 1.54 | 77.76 |
Area 2 | 49.05 | 48.57 | 2.38 | – |
Area 3 | 11.68 | 79.43 | 8.89 | – |
(3) Photoluminescence properties
Fig. 8 illustrates the photoluminescence spectra of A3 and N3 samples.
As shown in Fig. 8, the photoluminescent spectra at 350 nm of A3 and N3 display two obvious emission peaks at ~ 395 and 465 nm, corresponding to 3.13 and 2.67 eV, respectively. This indicates that the prepared 3C-SiC nanowires emit within a wide range of wavelengths. Yet, the intensity of the emission peaks varies according to the catalyst type. It is obvious that the morphology and structural defects influences the photoluminescence characteristics of nano-SiC crystals[12]. Herein, the shape of the emission peaks is largely similar, and the center position of the emission peak changes minimally. However, compared to the conventional SiC crystal with a relatively larger grain size for which the emission occurs at 556 nm, a significant blue shift is noticed for both samples. This can be explained by a quantum size effect, which causes the shift of the emission peak, as previously observed [13]. Among them, the presence of amorphous phase in A3 also can cause the blue shift in the center position of the emission peak.
(4) Thermal stability
The TG and DSC curves of A3 and N3 are displayed in Fig. 9.
The TG curves show no change before 1100 °C. However, above 1100 °C, a weight gain is observed for both samples, indicating that the SiC nanowire sample is further oxidized. The oxidation is more evident for the A3 sample, of which the residual mass is 105.54% (Fig. 9(a)). In this case, the sample contains Al with a lower melting point (660 °C), while the content of amorphous Si-O-Al is high and easily oxidized, which is reflected by the weight gain. N3 samples showed a relatively low rate of mass change. This is because the excess carbon in the PCS precursor is consumed by the trace of oxygen, forming a thin amorphous layer of carbon on the surface of the nanowire[14]. It can be observed from the TEM image that there is an amorphous carbon layer on the surface of SiC nanowires, and the oxidation of the amorphous carbon layer will consume and result in weight loss. Meanwhile, the weight gain and mass cancellation of the amorphous grains and Si-O-C occur during the oxidation process. N3 shows absorption peaks at 566.69 °C, while the adsorption peak of A3 appears at 654.40 °C (Fig. 9(b)). In addition, a peak appears at 1170.36 °C,