Study selection and characteristics
The flowchart of study selection is shown in Fig. 1. A total of 3983 studies were retrieved in this study. There were 1984 duplicated studies removed and 1917 studies inconsistent with the purpose of the study were excluded by reading the title and abstract. The remaining 55 studies were screened by reading the full text. Finally, 27 studies were included for this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Of the 27 studies, which included 4 case-control studies [27–30] and 23 cross-sectional studies [31–53]. One study [53] was conducted in America, one [30] in Egypt, one in Canada [50], and three [35, 51, 52] in France, the others in China. In terms of language, there are 11 English [27–31, 33, 35, 50–53] and 16 Chinese articles [32, 34, 36–49]. The 27 studies included a total of 2380 participants. Of the 1451 patients with BD, 953 were in depressive episodes and 498 were in manic episodes. The remaining 929 were HC. The sample size for the original studies ranged from 16 [51] to 264 [31]. After excluding 2 studies [29, 52] that did not indicate the sex ratio of enrolled patients, the proportion of females of all remaining patients was 53%, the proportion of females was 56% during depressive episodes, and 47% during manic episodes. The mean age of patients ranged from 15.9 [40] to 53.3 [52]. The diagnostic criteria for BD included the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) [27, 29, 30, 33, 35, 38, 41, 43, 44, 50–52], the International Classification of Diseases diagnostic Criteria, Edition10(ICD 10) [28, 31, 34, 36, 39, 40, 42, 48], the Chinese Criteria for Classification and Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, Edition3(CCCD-3) [32, 37, 45–47, 49], and the Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Psychoses (3rd) [53]. In most studies, euthyroid patients or no history of thyroid disease were required to be included, while two studies [27, 30] had no any description of thyroid function. Except for 2 studies [36, 47] that didn't mention it, and one study [35] just said it was immunoassay, methods for measuring serum TH included Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) [28, 31, 34, 39–42, 44], Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) [27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 37, 38, 45], Radioimmunoassay (RIA) [46, 50–53], Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [43, 48–50], Immunofluorescence (IF) [50], and most studies show that they were measured in the morning. In terms of drug expression, some studies directly specified medication-free [30, 31, 33, 34, 42, 45], the duration of drug discontinuation in other studies were separately 6 months [27, 29, 36], 3 months [32, 39], 2 months [43], 1 month [37, 40, 46, 50], and at least 2 weeks [28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47–49, 51–53]; But the specific medications were not specified, some said they had stopped antipsychotics、antidepressants、or mood stabilizers, some claimed they had stopped any drugs that have an effect on endocrine function, and some were even first-episode and had no history of taking antipsychotics, it is worth noting that all studies were categorized by the shortest duration of discontinuation. HC was the healthy participant without psychiatric and thyroid disorders, most studies selected physical examination subjects in hospitals [28, 32, 34, 37, 38, 40, 41, 44–47], and a few studies were recruited through the community [39] or advertising [27, 29, 50], but also volunteers [33, 35] and medical staffs [30, 43, 48, 49, 53], while three [42, 51, 52] were unknown.
Quality assessment and risk of bias
As shown in Table 1, all of the 27 studies included were of medium to high quality, with a minimum score of 6, and among them 8 were of high quality (NOS of 7–8 and AHRQ of 8).
Table 1
Characteristics of the included population
Study | Location | Design type | TH measurement method | Diagnostic criteria for BD | State | Number (Male/Female) | Average age(years) | Education(years) | Thyroid function in BD | Withdrawal time | Rating scale (Mean ± SD) | Reference range of TH | Scale of quality score |
NOS | AHRQ |
Chen et al. 2022 [27] | China | Case-control | Direct chemiluminescence method | DSM-V | BD-D | 59(23/26) | 23.81 ± 5.87 | 14.04 ± 2.44 | No description on thyroid function. | ≥ 6 months | 24-item HDRS ( 27.05 ± 5.87) | TSH:0.49–4.91mIU/L TT4:69.97–152.52nmol/L TT3:1.01–2.48nmol/L FT4:7.64–16.03pmol/L FT3:3.09–7.42pmol/L | 7 | |
| | | HC | 52(27/25) | 24.62 ± 5.55 | 15.58 ± 2.53 | 24-item HDRS (1.80 ± 2.34) | | |
Zhao et al. 2021 [31] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemiluminescence (TSH: electrochemiluminescence double antibody sandwich method;TT3、FT3、TT4、FT4:Quantitative analysis by electrochemical luminescence) | ICD-10 | BD-M | 136(71/65) | 27.81 ± 8.62 | N/A | No history of thyroid disease. | drug-naïve | YMRS (28.57 ± 12.00) | TSH:0.27–4.20mIU/L TT462.00–164.00nmol/L TT3:1.30–3.10nmol/L FT4:12.00–22.00pmol/L FT3:3.60–7.50 pmol/L | | 8 |
| | | BD-D | 128(53/75) | 26.91 ± 7.04 | | MADRS (25.74 ± 11.79) | | |
Lai et al. 2021 [33] | China | Cross-sectional | Direct chemiluminescence method | DSM-IV | BD-D | 69(32/37) | 26.23 ± 8.98 | 13.62 ± 2.65 | All subjects were euthyroid. | drug-naïve | 24-item HDRS ( 26.72 ± 5.76) | TSH:0.49-4.91mIU/L TT4:69.97-152.52µg/dl TT3:1.01–2.48 ng/ml FT4:7.64–16.03 ng/dl FT3:3.09–7.42 pg/ml | | 7 |
| | | HC | 53(29/24) | 36.23 ± 13.95 | 14.49 ± 3.12 | 24-item HDRS (2.49 ± 2.05) | | |
Han et al. 2021 [28] | China | Case-control | Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Cobas e601 automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system) | ICD-10 | BD-M | 70(35/35) | 24.3 ± 5.1 | N/A | No history of thyroid disease. | > 2 weeks | YMRS ( 28.2 ± 3.4) | TSH:0.27–4.20mIU/L TT4:66–181nmol/L TT3:1.3–3.1nmol/L FT4:12–22pmol/L FT3:2.8–7.1pmol/L | 6 | |
| | | HC | 70(35/35) | 24.7 ± 4.3 | | | | |
Shi et al. 2021 [32] | China | Cross-sectional | Automatic chemiluminescence immunoanalyzer (Xiamen Haifei Biotechnology Co., LTD., Model: SMART 3000) | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 40(20/20) | 33.68 ± 1.70 | 6.96 ± 2.60 | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 3 months | N/A | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 40(18/22) | 33.69 ± 1.71 | | | | |
Fei et al. 2021 [34] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemiluminescence [Automatic biochemical analyzer (Model: AU583, USA Beckman Coulter Co.)] | ICD-10 | BD-D | 45(16/29) | 21.53 ± 8.38 | N/A | No history of thyroid disease. | drug-naïve | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 94(32/62) | 22.72 ± 3.76 | | | | |
Duval et al. 2020 [35] | France | Cross-sectional | Assay by immunoassay technique with enhanced luminescence | DSM-IV | BD-D | 13 | 34.3 ± 10.8 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 13 | 33.2 ± 9.2 | | | | |
Zhong et al. 2019 [29] | China | Case-control | Direct chemiluminescence method | DSM-V | BD-D | 57 | 26.74 ± 8.73 | 14.03 ± 2.83 | No history of thyroid disease; All subjects were euthyroid. | ≥ 6 months | 24-item HDRS ( 27.10 ± 5.69) | TSH:0.38-4.31mIU/L TT4:4.9–11.0µg/dl TT3:0.79-1.58ng/ml FT4:0.82-1.63ng/dl FT3:2.10-3.80pg/ml | 8 | |
| | | HC | 20 | 28.32 ± 9.01 | 14.72 ± 2.76 | | | |
Xing et al. 2019 [36] | China | Cross-sectional | N/A | ICD-10 | BD-M | 62(33/29) | 39.06 ± 11.96 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 6 months | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | BD-D | 30(15/15) | 34.50 ± 13.87 | | | | |
Wang et al. 2019 [37] | China | Cross-sectional | Automatic chemiluminescence immunoanalyzer (ARCHITECT i2000SR, Abbott Laboratories) | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 82(23/59) | 36.0 ± 10.4 | 9.7 ± 5.3 | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 1months | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 53 | | | | | |
Khaled et al. 2018 [30] | Egypt | Case-control | The Immulite 1000 chemiluminescent immunoassay system | DSM-IV | BD-M | 30(21/9) | 23.6 ± 6.2 | N/A | No description on thyroid function. | drug-naïve | N/A | N/A | 6 | |
| | | HC | 15 | 24.4 ± 6.5 | | | | |
Chen et al. 2018 [38] | China | Cross-sectional | Chemiluminescence method | DSM-V | BD-D | 48(25/23) | 39.3 ± 5.6 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 15(8/7) | 41.5 ± 4.9 | | | | |
Zhu et al. 2017 [39] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) | ICD-10 | BD-M | 40(20/20) | 43 ± 13.35 | N/A | No history of thyroid disease; All subjects were euthyroid. | > 3 months | N/A | N/A | | 8 |
| | | HC | 40(20/20) | 41.2 ± 8.5 | | | | |
Shi et al. 2017 [41] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemical luminescence immunoanalyzer | DSM-IV | BD-D | 50(17/33) | 37.23 ± 15.61 | 11.03 ± 1.51 | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | HAMD (30.50 ± 3.84) | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 50(20/30) | 36.58 ± 16.94 | | | | |
Jiang et al. 2017 [42] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay [Roche Cobase601 fully automatic Electrochemical luminescence immunoassay system (ECLIA)] | ICD-10 | BD-M | 65(35/30) | 24.3 ± 5.2 | N/A | No history of thyroid disease; All subjects were euthyroid. | drug-naïve | N/A | TSH:0.27-4.2uIU/ml T4:66-181nmol/l T3:1.3-3.1nmol/l FT4:12-22pmol/l FT3:2.8-7.1pmol/l | | 8 |
| | | HC | 62(35/27) | 23.9 ± 4.4 | | | |
Chen et al. 2017 [43] | China | Cross-sectional | Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay [STEKOL1300 spectrophotometer, Thermo Multiskan MK3 enzyme label instrument (ELISA)] | DSM-Ⅳ | BD-M | 26(15/11) | 32 ± 12 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 months | N/A | TSH:0.34-5.6mIU/L TT4:60.9-122.3µg/L TT3:0.87–1.78 µg/L FT4:6.1-11.2ng/L FT3:2.5ཞ3.9 ng/L | | 8 |
| | | BD-D | 33(16/17) | 34 ± 12 | | | |
| | | HC | 41(17/24) | 31 ± 5 | | | |
Zhang et al. 2017 [40] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemiluminescence (Roche-Cobase601) | ICD-10 | BD-M | 49(26/23) | 15.90 ± 1.83 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | ≥ 1 months | N/A | TSH:0.27-4.2uIU/ml T4:68-181nmol/l T3:1.3-3.1nmol/l FT4:12-22pmol/l FT3:3.1-6.8pmol/l | | 8 |
| | | BD-D | 80(39/41) | 16.60 ± 1.09 | | | | |
| | | HC | 50(23/27) | 15.72 ± 1.47 | | | | |
Wang et al. 2015 [44] | China | Cross-sectional | Electrochemical luminescence immunoassay (Roche automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoanalyzer made in Germany) | DSM-Ⅳ | BD-D | 42(16/26) | 38.45 ± 14.34 | 9.38 ± 3.30 | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 69(24/45) | 37.67 ± 14.41 | 9.74 ± 2.46 | | | |
Zhang et al. 2007 [46] | China | Cross-sectional | Radioimmunoassay | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 30(15/15) | 22ཞ68 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 1months | N/A | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 30(15/15) | 22ཞ65 | | | |
Zhan et al. 2007 [45] | China | Cross-sectional | Chemiluminescence (Bayer ACS: 180 SE automatic chemiluminescence analyzer) | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 42(20/22) | 36 ± 8 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | drug-naïve | N/A | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 30(15/15) | 34 ± 6 | | | |
Du et al. 2005 [47] | China | Cross-sectional | N/A | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 32(16/16) | 37 ± 8 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | N/A | FT3:1.4-4.2pg/ml FT4:0.8-2.2ul/L TSH:0.4-6.0uIU/ml | | 6 |
| | | HC | 30(15/15) | 34 ± 10 | | | |
Jia et al. 2004 [48] | China | Cross-sectional | Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) | ICD-10 | BD-D | 23(11/12) | 32.2 ± 12.4 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | > 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 30(13/17) | 34.2 ± 10.0 | | | |
Li et al. 2003 [49] | China | Cross-sectional | Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay | CCMD-3 | BD-D | 25(11/14) | 33 ± 9 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid. | ≥ 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 8 |
| | | HC | 30(13/17) | 34 ± 10 | | | |
Sokolov et al.1994 [50] | Canada | Cross-sectional | TSH-Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; T4, T3- Immunofluorescence; FT4- Radioimmunoassay | DSM-III | BD-M | 13(6/7) | 17.3 ± 1.2 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid | ≥ 1 months | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 13(5/8) | 17.3 ± 1.6 | | | |
Souetre et al. 1988 [51] | France | Cross-sectional | Radioimmunoassay | DSM-III | BD-D | 8(2/6) | 52.8 ± 7.4 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid | ≥ 2 weeks | HDRS (24.4 ± 3.8); | N/A | | 7 |
| | | HC | 8 | N/A | (6.1 ± 3.5) | | |
Souetre et al. 1986 [52] | France | Cross-sectional | Radioimmunoassay | DSM-III | BD-D | 8 | 53.3 ± 4.49 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid | ≥ 2 weeks | HDRS (22.89 ± 4.7); | N/A | | 6 |
| | | HC | 13(8/5) | 48.85 ± 6.91 | (5.7 ± 2.3) | | |
Linnoila et al. 1982 [53] | America | Cross-sectional | Radioimmunoassay | Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Psychoses (3rd) | BD-M | 7 | 38.3 ± 17.6 | N/A | All subjects were euthyroid | ≥ 2 weeks | N/A | N/A | | 7 |
| | | BD-D | 9 | | | | |
| | | HC | 8 | 37.0 + 10.4 | | | |
DSM-V: the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 Edition); DSM-Ⅳ: the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4 Edition); DSM-III: the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3 Edition); ICD-10: the International Classification of Diseases diagnostic Criteria(10 Edition); CCMD-3: Chinese Criteria for Classification and Diagnosis of Mental Disorders(3 Edition); BD: bipolar disorder; BD-D: BD-depression; BD-M: BD-mania; HC: healthy control; 24-item HDRS: 24-item Hamilton depression rating scale; YMRS: Young Mania Rating Scale; MADRS: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; HAMD-24: Hamilton Depression Scale-24; TH: thyroid hormone; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; T4: thyroxine; T3: triiodothyronine; FT4: free T4; FT3: free T3; NOS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; N/A: not available |
Comparison of BD-depression and HC
A total of 19 studies [27, 29, 32–35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 43–49, 51–53] reported comparison of BD-depression and HC. Eighteen studies reported serum TSH level found no significant differences between groups (SMD: -0.15, 95%CI: -0.32 to 0.01, I2 = 53.75%, P = 0.06). Eleven studies reported serum T3, T4 levels, no significant difference was observed in T4 level (SMD: -1.71, 95%CI: -4.87 to 1.45, I2 = 99.82%, P = 0.29), however, serum T3 level decreased significantly in BD-depression compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: -0.52, 95%CI: -0.86 to -0.18, I2 = 85.53%, P = 0.00, Fig. 2). Fifteen studies showed serum FT3, FT4 levels, no significant difference was observed in FT4 level (SMD: 0.29, 95%CI: −0.09 to 0.67, I2 = 91.07%, P = 0.14), nevertheless, serum FT3 level decreased significantly in BD-depression compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: −0.55, 95%CI: −1.06 to -0.04, I2 = 95.04%, P = 0.04, Fig. 3) (Table 2).
Comparison of BD-mania and HC
A total of 8 studies [28, 30, 39, 40, 42, 43, 50, 53] reported comparison of BD-mania and HC. Seven studies showed serum TSH level increased significantly in BD-mania compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.36, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.02, Fig. 4). Eight studies reported serum T3, T4 levels, no significant difference was observed in T4 level (SMD: −1.62, 95%CI: −4.39 to 1.14, I2 = 99.50%, P = 0.25), whereas, serum T3 level decreased significantly in BD-mania compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: −0.73, 95%CI: −1.37 to -0.08; I2 = 92.24%, P = 0.03, Fig. 5). Six studies reported serum FT4 level increased significantly in BD-mania compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.66, I2 = 44.49%, P = 0.00, Fig. 6). Five studies showed serum FT3 level was no significant difference (SMD: 0.16, 95%CI: −0.14 to 0.46, I2 = 64.50%, P = 0.29) (Table 2).
In males, no significant differences in TSH (SMD: -0.16, 95%CI: -0.43 to 0.11, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.23), T4 (SMD: -0.06, 95%CI: -0.83 to 0.71, I2 = 86.39%, P = 0.88), T3 (SMD: -0.19, 95%CI: -0.56 to 0.19, I2 = 44.42%, P = 0.32) and FT3 levels (SMD: 0.01, 95%CI: -0.26 to 0.28, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.96) between groups, whereas, the level of FT4 (SMD: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.56 to 1.13, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.00) increased significantly in BD-mania compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (Table 3).
In females, FT4 (SMD: 0.08, 95%CI: -0.20 to 0.36, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.57) and FT3 levels (SMD: -0.01, 95%CI: -0.29 to 0.28, I2 = 3.72%, P = 0.96) were no statistical significance between groups, while, TSH level (SMD: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.21 to 0.78, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.00) increased significantly, meanwhile, T4 (SMD: -0.68, 95%CI: -1.34 to -0.01, I2 = 79.64%, P = 0.05) and T3 levels (SMD: -0.57, 95%CI: -0.86 to -0.29, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.00) decreased significantly in BD-mania compared with HC, the difference between groups was statistically significant (Table 3).
Comparison of BD-mania and BD-depression
A total of 5 studies [31, 36, 40, 43, 53] reported comparison of BD-mania and BD-depression. Four studies in TSH level found no significant differences between groups (SMD: 0.04, 95%CI: -0.14 to 0.21, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.69). As far as 5 studies in T3 and T4 levels were concerned, no significant difference was observed in T4 level (SMD: 1.37, 95%CI: -0.78 to 3.52, I2 = 98.96%, P = 0.21), however, serum T3 level increased significantly in manic episodes than in depressive episodes, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.46, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.00, Fig. 7). Four studies showed serum FT3 and FT4 levels, no significant difference was observed in FT4 level (SMD: 0.31, 95%CI: -0.10 to 0.72, I2 = 79.03%, P = 0.14), while serum FT3 level increased significantly in manic episodes than in depressive episodes, the difference between groups was statistically significant (SMD: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.28 to 0.81, I2 = 47.63%, P = 0.00, Fig. 8) (Table 2).
Subgroup analysis
Subgroup analysis was based on diagnostic criteria for BD、mean age of patients、and methods for measuring serum TH revealed that these factors were the source of heterogeneity between studies. There were significant differences of TSH in subgroups of gender and mean age. T4 had significant intergroup differences in subgroups of mean age and measurement methods. There were significant subgroup differences in the diagnostic criteria, mean age and measurement methods of T3. There were significant differences of FT4 in subgroups of gender, mean age and measuring methods. FT3 had significant intergroup differences in subgroups of mean age. All of the above differences between subgroups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Table S3 in supplementary material).
Sensitivity analysis and public bias
The results of sensitivity analysis showed that most of the results were stable, and the statistical significance of a few unstable results was consistent with the original results after excluding the outlier study, indicating that the results were stable (Table S2 in supplementary material). Egger's test showed that all publication bias concentrated in T4 results (comparing BD-depression or BD-mania with HC). We continued to draw a funnel plot for comparing BD-depression with HC that included more than 10 studies, where publication bias disappeared (P = 0.87) and heterogeneity decreased (I2 = 0.00%) after excluding studies that caused the apparent asymmetry, and the results were consistent with ours, suggesting that the existence of publication bias may not affect our results (Figure S1 in supplementary material).
Table 2
Presentation of the results for the primary outcome indicators
| Outcome indicators | N | SMD | 95%CI | I2 (%) | P-value |
BD-D and HC | TSH | 18 | -0.15 | (-0.32 to 0.01) | 53.75 | 0.06 |
T4 | 11 | -1.71 | (-4.87 to 1.45) | 99.82 | 0.29 |
T3 | 11 | -0.52 | (-0.86 to -0.18) | 85.53 | 0.00 |
FT4 | 15 | 0.29 | (-0.09 to 0.67) | 91.07 | 0.14 |
FT3 | 15 | -0.55 | (-1.06 to -0.04) | 95.04 | 0.04 |
BD-M and HC | TSH | 7 | 0.20 | (0.04 to 0.36) | 0.00 | 0.02 |
T4 | 8 | −1.62 | (− 4.39 to 1.14) | 99.50 | 0.25 |
T3 | 8 | −0.73 | (− 1.37 to -0.08) | 92.24 | 0.03 |
FT4 | 6 | 0.42 | (0.17 to 0.66) | 44.49 | 0.00 |
FT3 | 5 | 0.16 | (-0.14 to 0.46) | 64.50 | 0.29 |
BD-M and BD-D | TSH | 4 | 0.04 | (-0.14 to 0.21) | 0.00 | 0.69 |
T4 | 5 | 1.37 | (-0.78 to 3.52) | 98.96 | 0.21 |
T3 | 5 | 0.29 | (0.12 to 0.46) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
FT4 | 4 | 0.31 | (-0.10 to 0.72) | 79.03 | 0.14 |
FT3 | 4 | 0.55 | (0.28 to 0.81) | 47.63 | 0.00 |
BD: bipolar disorder; BD-D: BD-depression; BD-M: BD-mania; HC: healthy control; N: sample size; SMD: standard mean difference; CI: confidence interval; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; T4: thyroxine; T3: triiodothyronine; FT4: free T4; FT3: free T3 |
Table 3
Presentation of the results for the comparison of gender in BD-mania and HC
| Outcome indicators | | N | SMD | 95%CI | I2 (%) |
Males | TSH | 4 | -0.16 | (-0.43 to 0.11) | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| T4 | 4 | -0.06 | (-0.83 to 0.71) | 86.39 | 0.88 |
| T3 | 4 | -0.19 | (-0.56 to 0.19) | 44.42 | 0.32 |
| FT4 | 4 | 0.85 | (0.56 to 1.13) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FT3 | 4 | 0.01 | (-0.26 to 0.28) | 0.00 | 0.96 |
Females | TSH | 4 | 0.49 | (0.21 to 0.78) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| T4 | 4 | -0.68 | (-1.34 to -0.01) | 79.64 | 0.05 |
| T3 | 4 | -0.57 | (-0.86 to -0.29) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FT4 | 4 | 0.08 | (-0.20 to 0.36) | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| FT3 | 4 | -0.01 | (-0.29 to 0.28) | 3.72 | 0.96 |
N: sample size; SMD: standard mean difference; CI: confidence interval; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; T4: thyroxine; T3: triiodothyronine; FT4: free T4; FT3: free T3 |