The effect of different pretreatments on oil absorption and quality characteristics of fried potato is presented in Tables 1 and 2. The results showed that pretreatments significantly affected values of oil, TF, CA, TP, bioaccessibility of TP, AC, texture and color (p < 0.05).
Oil content
As seen in Table 1, the oil content of fried potatoes ranged from 26.06 to 32.01%. Similar findings have been reported by Al-Khusaibi and Niranjan (2012) and Rimac-Brnčić et al. (2004) as 29.03–41.23% and 22.89–39.77%, respectively. On the other hand, Cruz et al. (2018) found higher levels of oil (39.54 to 57.81%) in fried potato chips than that detected in this study. Oil absorption is a complex process which includes numerous physical, chemical and structural transformations during frying (Lumanlan et al. 2020). Therefore, this can be due to differences in potato variety and conditions of frying and pretreatments. Although there was no significant difference between oil contents of HWB and US treated potatoes (p > 0.05), OH treated one had lowest oil content. This might be related to some structural changes which cause reduction in oil absorption. It is known that OH provides fast and uniform heating and results in less thermal damage in product (Kaur et al. 2016). For this reason, this might stabilize the tissue structure more against the violence of the frying process compared to other pretreatments, increasing cell wall/tissue integrity and consequently preventing the oil migration in the potato tissue during the frying process. Additionally, OH treated potatoes might have smooth surface resulting in lower oil uptake due to the fact that Moreno et al. (2010) found that products with rougher surfaces retained more oil after deep-fat frying. As agreement with our result, Ignat et al. (2015) found that oil content of PEF treated potatoes was lower than that of blanched ones. They stated that more water was probably located outside the cells creating a barrier and leading to a reduced oil uptake during frying due to PEF-induced electroporation.
TF
Thermal processing such as roasting, baking, steaming, frying and grilling reduce the flavonoids in foods due to their lower stability (Gao et al. 2022). The highest value of TF was recorded for fresh potato as 100.09 mg RE/100 g (on dry matter basis) (Table 2). The results revealed that deep fat frying greatly reduced TF content of potato when compared with that of fresh form (Table 1 and Table 2) regardless of pretreatments applied. The percentage decreases of TF content in fried potatoes pretreated by OH, HWB and US were 67.14%, 80.91% and 74.24% respectively when compared with fresh potato. This reduction in flavonoids could be due to their leaching out and/or their thermal degradation. Similar to our findings, Gunathilake et al. (2018) reported lower TF contents in some fried green leaves as compared to their fresh forms. Some previous studies also notified a decrease in flavonoids in eggplant (Arkoub-Djermoune et al. 2016) and cauliflower (Ahmed and Ali 2013) after frying process. On the contrary, Salamatullah et al. (2021) and Abong’ et al. (2021) stated that TF content increased in fried eggplant fruit and sweet potato, respectively, as compared to their fresh ones. The results indicated that TF content of fried potatoes was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by pretreatments applied as illustrated in Table 1. OH treatment resulted in the least loss of TF content in fried potato, followed by US and HWB, respectively. This result is in agreement with the study of Zulekha et al. (2018) who reported that conventional heating resulted in higher loss for phenolic compounds of coconut water when compared to OH.
TP
In parallel with TF, TP content in all fried potatoes was lower compared with fresh content (Table 2 and Table 3). Deep frying of potatoes pretreated by OH, HWB and US decreased TP content by 36.22%, 58.79% and 54.15% respectively compared to the content in fresh potato. This indicates degradation of polyphenols in potatoes during frying. The reduction of TP with frying process was also reported for leafy vegetables (Gunathilake et al. 2018), cauliflower (Ahmed and Ali 2013) and potato (Romano et al. 2022). Such decrease has been attributed to disruption of cell walls and breakdown of phenolic compounds. The results indicated that TP content of fried potatoes was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by pretreatments applied as illustrated in Table 3. As in the same tendency of TF content, OH pretreatment was better in retention of TP than other pretreatments, which might be due to rapid heating process preventing the oxidation or decomposition of phenolic compounds. Similar finding has been reported by Zulekha et al. (2018). There was no significant difference between TP values of fried potatoes pretreated by HWB and US (p > 0.05).
After in vitro digestion, TP of fried samples pretreated OH and US significantly decreased compared to their initial values (p < 0.05) (Table 3). This reduction has also been reported for walnut (Figueroa et al. 2016), edible green leaves (Gunathilake et al. 2018), Epilobium angustifolium (Dacrema et al. 2020) and sorghum (Ziółkiewicz et al. 2023). Polyphenols are known to be unstable under gastrointestinal digestion due to pH variations and interactions with dietary constituents such as proteins, fibre, iron or digestive enzymes (Pinto et al. 2017). On the other hand, TP content of the potato pretreated by HWB was not significantly changed (p > 0.05), which is consistent with the study of Helal et al. (2014) for cinnamon beverages. This might be associated with differences in type of the phenolic substances releasing from the components in potato such as proteins and carbohydrates depending on the cell structure during pretreatments applied and consequently, their stability. As seen in Table 3, bioaccessibility of TP of fried potatoes at the end of pancreatic digestion was almost high ranging from 75.37–84.06% depending on the pretreatments applied. Although the highest value was observed for the samples pretreated by HWB, the difference was not significant statistically (Table 3).
CA
CA was the major phenolic acid determined in raw (3.53 mg/100g DM) and fried potato samples (0.36–1.72 mg/100g DM). As agreement with our result, Kasnak and Palamutoglu (2022) reported that most of the phenolic acids in eight potato cultivars was chlorogenic acid ranging from 0.066 mg/100g to 1.52 mg/100g. Similarly, Romano et al. (2022), Burgos et al. (2013) and Ruiz et al. (2018) also found CA as the predominant phenolic acid in potato. The results showed that frying process decreased CA content of potato samples ranging from 51.27–89.80%. This reduction was also reported by Romano et al. (2022) for purple potato. Fried potato pretreated by OH had significantly the highest retention of CA content (Table 1).
AC
AC value of the potatoes changed significantly (p < 0.05) ranging from 54.21 to 124.13 mmol AAE/100g DM after frying (Table 3). This might be the result of the fact that the contents of TF, TP and CA of fried potatoes changed with the pretreatments applied. Interestingly, while the only AC value of fried potato pretreated by OH was higher than that of the fresh potato sample (83.91 mmol AAE/100g DM), other two pretreatments caused decrease in AC. This implies that OH pretreatment showed a positive effect on AC, which can be due to differences in the conditions of pretreatments applied to potato. Increase or remaining unchanged in AC of food product after OH treatment has been reported by other researchers (İncedayi 2020; Hardinasinta et al. 2022; Karacabey et al. 2023).
As seen in Table 3, after in vitro digestion, AC of all fried potatoes pretreated decreased significantly (p < 0.05). However, the higher losses were observed in gastric stage. The increase of AC during the intestinal stage compared to gastric one could have been due to the ability of intestinal digestive enzymes and bile salts to extract or solubilize phenolics from food (Udomwasinakun et al. 2023). Additionally, another reason for this result might be possibility of transformation of bioactive compounds into other substances with different structures which have more AC under intestinal digestion conditions.
Table 1
Analysis results of fried potatoes
Analysis | Pretreatment |
---|
OH | HWB | US |
---|
Oil content (%, on DM basis) | 26.06 ± 0.27a | 32.01 ± 1.92b | 30.71 ± 0.84b |
TF (mg RE/100g DM) | 32.89 ± 1.55c | 19.11 ± 1.18a | 25.78 ± 1.17b |
CA (mg/100g DM) | 1.72 ± 0.18c | 0.36 ± 0.02 a | 1.02 ± 0.06b |
Texture (N) | 357.96 ± 12.14b | 394.75 ± 7.17c | 324.26 ± 1.14a |
L* | 62.57 ± 0.17c | 61.20 ± 0.16b | 58.92 ± 0.28a |
a* | 2.66 ± 0.03a | 2.82 ± 0.11a | 8.68 ± 0.09b |
b* | 32.75 ± 0.12c | 27.51 ± 0.35a | 31.58 ± 0.03b |
Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) between values |
Table 2
Analysis results of fresh potato
TP (mg GAE/100g DM) | 64.71 ± 1.78 |
---|
AC (mmol AAE/100g DM) | 83.91 ± 3.99 |
TF (mg RE/100g DM) | 100.09 ± 5.46 |
CA (mg/100g DM) | 3.53 ± 0.26 |
Table 3
AC (mmol AAE/100g DM), TP (mg GAE/100g DM) and TP bioaccessibility (%) of fried potatoes
Parameter | Stage | OH | HWB | US |
---|
AC | Initial | 124.13 ± 1.73cC | 54.21 ± 0.53cA | 77.12 ± 1.06cB |
Gastric | 50.92 ± 1.87aC | 22.00 ± 0.30aA | 40.64 ± 0.97aB |
Intestinal | 94.72 ± 1.87bC | 51.02 ± 0.95bA | 56.63 ± 1.25bB |
TP | Initial | 41.27 ± 0.90bB | 26.67 ± 2.19aA | 29.67 ± 1.86bA |
Gastric | 34.33 ± 2.33aB | 25.33 ± 1.45aA | 24.67 ± 2.33abA |
Intestinal | 32.41 ± 1.59aB | 22.00 ± 1.15aA | 22.33 ± 1.20aA |
TP bioaccessibility | Initial | 100 ± 0.00bA | 100 ± 0.00aA | 100 ± 0.00aA |
Gastric | 83.13 ± 4.80aA | 96.16 ± 9.05aA | 84.48 ± 12.01aA |
Intestinal | 78.73 ± 5.19aA | 84.06 ± 9.85aA | 75.37 ± 0.81aA |
For each variable, values with lowercase letters in the same column and uppercase letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Color
Color is one of the important parameters for giving information about the quality of foods. The results showed that pretreatments prior to frying significantly (p < 0.05) affected L*, a* and b* color parameters of fried potato (Table 1). Color of fried potato is the result of the Maillard reaction that depends on the content of reducing sugars and amino acids or proteins at the surface (Pedreschi et al. 2005; Qiu et al. 2018; Abduh et al. 2021). OH pretreatment contributed to the decrease of brown pigment (dark-colored melanin) during frying process, which resulted in the highest L* value (62.57). The increase in the value of L* is an indication that the darkness of the sample has decreased. Fried potato samples treated with HWB and OH pretreatments showed lower a* values. Similarly, Abduh et al. (2021) found that a* values of fried potato slices treated blanching with and without PEF (pulsed electric field) was in the range of 1.52–5.37. However, the potato pretreated with US exhibited the highest a* value (8.68), which may be due to increasing non-enzymatic browning reactions. The higher a* value means the darker (more red) potato slice (Pedreschi et al. 2005). With respect to b* (yellowness) values, the highest b* value (32.75) was observed in fried potato treated with OH pretreatment followed by those treated with US and HWB, respectively. Decrease in b* value was considered to be contributing to the loss of the sensorial quality of the fried potato (Alvarez et al. 2000). As agreement with our result, Cruz et al. (2018) found that b* values of fried potato chips ranged from 27.9 to 32.7 depending on frying time.
Texture
Texture is one of the most important properties for fried potato. Hardness which is defined as the peak force at the maximum compression (Qiu et al. 2018; Canedo et al. 2022) was used to describe the texture of the fried potato strips. As seen in Table 1, pretreatments before frying significantly (p < 0.05) affected hardness of fried potato. HWB treated potato strips presented the highest hardness (maximum peak force) followed by OH and US treated samples, respectively. This result can be attributed to modification of pectin substances by activation of PME enzyme during blanching (Alvarez et al. 2000) because moderate HWB condition (10 min. at 65 C) was applied in this study. On the other hand, the lower hardness of OH treated samples can be due to electroporation which may cause partial loss in turgor pressure, impairing plant tissue firmness (Ignat et al. 2015).
Sensory evaluation
The average scores of sensory properties of fried potatoes are shown in Fig. 1. The potato most liked by the panelists was that pretreated with US followed by OH. However, with respect to oiliness, the potato pretreated by OH had the highest score. This is an important advantage of OH pretreatment because high oil content can lead to some health problems such as obesity and coronary diseases (Cruz et al. 2018). On the other hand, in terms of all sensorial parameters except appearance, the sample pretreated with HWB had the lowest score. The results of color and oiliness for potato pretreated by HWB were, also, consistent with its lowest b* value and highest oil content, respectively.