The FTIR spectra of the raw and NADES pretreated rice straw provide insights into the modification in the functional groups associated with macromolecules, viz. cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin (Fig. 2). Cellulose fraction can be assigned to absorbance bands 893 cm− 1 (linked to glycosidic C-H deformation), 1158 cm− 1 (C-O-C stretching), 2910 cm− 1 (stretching vibrations of C-H group), and 3443 cm− 1 (attributed to O-H vibrations)[52, 53]. Deviation in the hemicellulose absorbance band at 1730 cm− 1 is attributed to the C = O stretching of acetyl acid [53]. Altercation in lignin content from the straw cell wall can be observed from the absorbance band at 1465 cm− 1 assigned to bending vibrations in C-H3 functionality. However, the C = C stretching of the aromatic ring of lignin is assigned at 1510 cm− 1, 1598 cm− 1, and 1635 cm− 1 [33, 53]. The FTIR spectra indicate that the fraction of lignin and hemicellulose decreases after pretreatment, which could be caused due to the weakening/breakage of the straw cell wall, leading to the formation of crakes and cavities.
Lignin is present in the complex composition of high and low molecular weight constituents in the straw cell wall [54]. It is observed that lignin removed from the straw cell wall after pretreatment remains in soluble (low molecular weight fraction) and insoluble (high molecular weight fraction) form in the pretreated residue [53]. Noticeably, the removal of lignin and hemicellulose ultimately results in enhancing the accessibility of cellulosic fraction in the pretreated pulp. Furthermore, the frequency band around 1080 cm− 1 can be designated to the Si-O-Si functionality of silica [55]. Silica is present in rice straw ranging from 5 to 14 wt % [56]. However, continuous stirring of pretreatment media can be attributed to the movement of some of the silica to inner layers from straw cell wall, causing variation in the silica absorbance band in pretreated rice straw samples. EDX data also confirms the presence of silica in the inner layers of pretreated samples (S-3). The presence of silica in the pretreated pulp improves the flame-retardant property, which may be useful in end-use acoustical applications [57, 58].
XRD analysis is performed to investigate the variation in the degree of crystallinity in raw and pretreated rice straw samples. Due to its amorphous structure, rice straw does not show sharp peaks; however, two broad peaks around 22.6 degrees (200 plane) and 16–18 degrees (110 plane) are observed in raw and pretreated rice straw samples [33] (Fig. 3). The peak around 22.6 degrees could be attributed to crystalline cellulose Iα and Iβ, whereas the peak around 16–18 degrees is linked with amorphous cellulose [33]. On pretreatment, an increase in the peak area around the (200) and (110) planes suggests enhancement in the crystalline fraction with an increase in pretreatment duration and time. The degree of crystallinity is generally measured by crystallinity index through peak area and peak height methods [59]. It is observed that, after a certain point, the ratio of (I200 -IAmp)/I200 in the peak height method remains almost constant (S-4), leading to similar crystallinity index values in pretreated rice straw samples [1hr (RS 140°C), 3hr (120°C), and 3hr (140°C)]. The results through the peak area method indicate that the crystallinity index of raw rice straw (45.72%) is increased to 56.70 %, 59.43%, 2.48–67.85% after pretreating for 1hr (120°C), 1hr (140°C), 3hr (120°C) and 3hr (140°C), respectively. An increase in crystallinity index suggests enhancement in the cellulosic fraction after NADES pretreatment and reduction in the amorphous lignin and hemicellulose content which is also exhibited in FTIR spectroscopy. A similar increase in the crystallinity index of the rice straw on pretreatment with different methods is observed in many other reports [33, 56, 60–62].
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) provides insight into the thermal stability of raw and pretreated rice straw samples. The TGA curve in Fig. 4 can be divided into three stages 25°C- 250°C (stage 1), 250°C-400°C (stage 2), and 400–750°C (stage 3). Weight loss in stages 1, 2, and 3 are measured around 10%, 55%, and 13%, respectively, indicating the largest weight loss in stage 2. Weight loss due to the removal of moisture and hemicellulose is predominant in stage 1; however, the decomposition of hemicellulose and low molecular weight organic compounds led to weight loss in the second stage[57]. An increment in the T10 limit (the temperature at which 10% weight loss takes place) in the pretreated samples (288–304°C) is observed compared to raw rice straw (238°C), indicating an improvement in thermal stability after pretreatment. The increase in the T10 limit can be attributed to a decrease in amorphous hemicellulose and lignin fraction in the pretreated rice straw, which ultimately reduces the rate of thermal degradation. An increase in the thermal stability of rice straw after pretreatment is also reported by other researchers [52, 63].
Stage 2 of the TGA curve indicates a higher weight loss range (~ 55%) in pretreated rice straw samples than in raw rice straw (~ 45%). Weight loss at this stage could be assigned to the release of volatile organic compounds from raw and pretreated rice straw samples. In the case of pretreated samples, the higher decomposition range can be attributed to a significant reduction in lignin and the removal of minerals (Si, Mg, Ca) linked to ash content during the pretreatment step. Similar observations are reported by X. Chen et al. in their work on the thermal stability of cellulose fibers from rice straw[52]. Ash and inorganic minerals are left in samples after stage 3. The TGA curve also indicates the highest residue in the raw rice straw (32%) at 750°C compared to pretreated rice straw samples (22–25%) after stage 3. This can be attributed to the remaining high ash content and other minerals in the raw rice straw, whereas a significant portion of these minerals is removed from the straw cell wall during pretreatment.
BET analysis indicates an increasing trend in surface area and mean pore volume of the pretreated samples with an increase in pretreatment duration and temperature (S-5). BET surface area increased from 2.18 m2/grams (raw rice straw) to 3.52 (1hr, 120°C), 6.59 (1hr, 140°C), 7.71 (3hr, 120°C) and 12.55 m2/grams (3hr, 140°C) of the pretreated rice straw samples, respectively. The increase in BET surface area indicates the formation of crakes and cavities with increasing pretreatment temperature and duration. Moreover, an increase in total pore volume is also observed in pretreated rice straw samples with an increase in pretreatment severity (S-5). The increase in total pore volume may be attributed to the formation of pores during the removal of lignin from the straw cell wall. This is also validated in the aforementioned XRD, FTIR, and TGA analysis.
Furthermore, FESEM analysis provides insights into changes in the topography and the morphology of raw and pretreated samples (Fig. 5). The FESEM image of raw rice straw Fig. 5 (a) shows a few minor cracks on the surface, which could be formed during preprocessing (milling operation). However, no other significant changes can be observed in the straw cell wall of raw rice straw. FESEM micrographs of pretreated rice straw samples (Fig. 5 (b, c, d, e)) suggest that more numbers of pores (micro and nano) start forming on increasing the pretreatment duration and temperature, which can be linked to the formation of crakes and cavities on the straw cell wall. The structural morphology of the raw and pretreated rice straw samples suggests a noticeable effect of NADES pretreatment on the straw cell wall and the separation of cellulosic microfibrils from the inner structures. This also validates results obtained by XRD analysis. Moreover, the FESEM micrographs of the straw cell wall of pretreated rice straw samples indicate that removal/weakening of the lignin is in line with the FTIR analysis and BET results, indicating an increase in surface area and total pore volume. It is evident from the FESEM micrograph that the diameter of pretreated fibrils decreases significantly, which ultimately indicates more number of fibers in unit thickness. An increase in the number of fibers assists in creating a higher obstruction in the path of sound flow, thus ultimately leading to the higher dissipation of sound energy in the biomaterial.
The internal arrangement of fibers in the raw and pretreated rice straw samples can be analyzed by density, porosity, and tortuosity values, providing insights into their ability to dissipate sound energy. The density of raw rice straw is measured as 0.38 g/cm3, whereas with increasing pretreatment temperature and duration, a decrease in density 0.244 g/cm3 (1hr, 120°C), 0.234 g/cm3 (1hr, 140°C), 0.221 g/cm3 (3hr, 120°C), 0.202 g/cm3 (3hr, 140°C) being observed. The decrease in density is attributed to morphological changes in straw cell walls due to the formation of crakes and cavities, which ultimately led to a more porous structure in pretreated rice straw samples.
Table I Density, porosity, and tortuosity of raw and pretreated rice straw samples
Material | Density (\(\varvec{\rho })\) (gm/cm3) | Porosity (\(\varvec{\varnothing })\) (%) | Tortuosity (a∞) |
Raw rice straw | 0.382 | 65 | 1.260 |
1 hr, 120°C | 0.244 | 77.90 | 1.142 |
1 hr, 140°C | 0.234 | 81.42 | 1.114 |
3 hr, 120°C | 0.221 | 82.23 | 1.108 |
3 hr, 140°C | 0.202 | 82.37 | 1.107 |
The porosity calculated from density values suggests an increasing trend in pretreated rice straw samples [77.90% (1hr, 120°C), 81.42% (1hr, 140°C), 82.23% (3hr, 120°C), and 82.37% (3hr, 140°C)] compared to 65% in raw rice straw. The increasing porosity indicates the presence of void spaces in the pretreated rice straw samples, which will assist in the transformation of sound energy into thermal energy, leading to higher sound dissipation in the developed biomaterial. Furthermore, the inner structure of pores and orientation of fibers inside the biomaterials can be estimated by tortuosity. Tortuosity is an indication of a tortuous path of sound flow calculated from the empirical formula of porosity mentioned in Table I.
SAC indicates the frequency specific dissipation of sound energy in the developed biomaterial. Figure 6 shows a significant improvement in the SAC of the pretreated rice straw samples compared to raw rice straw. The frequency values are mentioned in the log scale (log10) for a better representation of SAC at lower frequencies (< 1000 Hz). Moreover, the noise reduction coefficient (NRC) is calculated to examine the effectiveness of the pretreatment on sound absorption performance. NRC is calculated as one-third octave average normal incidence SAC at 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, and 2000 Hz frequencies[46]. The NRC values of the raw and pretreated rice straw [(1hr, 120°C), (1hr, 140°C), (3hr, 120°C), and (3hr, 140°C)] are calculated as 0.41, 0.47, 0.50, 0.52, and 0.55, respectively.
The improved SAC in pretreated samples could be attributed to the presence of a large number of crakes and cavities in the pretreated rice straw compared to raw straw. The formation of crakes, cavities, and separation of cellulosic microfibrils from the main structure increases the porosity and ultimately assists in higher sound dissipation within the pretreated rice straw samples. The sound energy mainly dissipated through frictional and viscous losses. However, scattering and structural vibrations also contribute to sound dissipation within raw and pretreated rice straw samples. A comparative NRC of the developed biomaterials and commercially available alternatives such as glass wool, melamine foam, and acoustic foam is mentioned in supplementary (S-6). The sound absorption performance of the developed biomaterials is observed to be comparable with the commercial alternatives, indicating the scope of their applicability in commercial and industrial settings.
The effect of thickness on sound absorption performance is also examined for the raw and pretreated rice straw samples. The changes in SAC by an increase in the thickness of the samples from 25 mm to 50 mm are shown in Fig. 7. In general, an increase in thickness leads to higher resistance in the sound energy propagation and results in enhancement in sound dissipation within the material. However, after a certain thickness, the sound dissipation does not exhibit significant improvement, which is also suggested by some reports [64, 65]. This may be caused due to the reflection of sound waves from the surface of the material, leading to destructive interference with incoming waves and ultimately leading to minimal improvement in SAC. Noticeably, for the pretreated sample (1hr, 120°C), negligible improvement in NRC is observed with an increase in thickness from 25 to 50 mm. As exhibited in Fig. 7, the SAC of the 50 mm sample (1hr, 120°C) increases up to 200 Hz, dipped subsequently, and remains lower than the SAC of 25 mm samples until 1400 Hz, ultimately leading to similar NRC values. A similar dip in SAC at lower frequencies (less than 400 Hz) is also observed in other 50 mm samples, which may be attributed to either structural (orientation of pretreated fibers in 50 mm samples leading to minimal improvement in SAC due to higher reflection in a specific frequency band) or operational (dip due to superposition of incident and reflected waves for thicker samples in impedance tube) factors [66]. Interestingly, the fluctuations in sound dissipation are more prominent at lower frequencies (< 1500 Hz), whereas at medium to higher frequencies, the results indicate a gradual increase in SAC with thickness.
It has been observed that with an increase in the air gap to 10 mm, a significant increment in NRC takes place in raw (0.41 to 0.43) and pretreated rice straw samples [1hr, 120°C (0.47 to 0.50); 1hr, 140°C (0.50 to 0.54); 3hr, 120°C (0.52 to 0.56) and 3hr, 140°C (0.55 to 0.60)], respectively. With the introduction of an air gap behind the material, an increase in SAC at low frequencies can be attributed to the absorption of sound energy of larger wavelengths (Fig. 8). Noticeably, in the case of raw rice straw, a slight reduction in NRC is observed when the air gap increases from 20 mm to 30 mm. The reduction in NRC of raw rice straw from 0.43 to 0.42 could be attributed to the shifting of peaks towards the low-frequency range, which ultimately reduces the NRC. A similar drop in SAC after a certain air gap is observed by M.B. Mvubu et al. in studying the effect of air gap on the SAC of natural fibers[67]. Moreover, a shift in peaks toward lower frequency ranges can also be observed for the pretreated rice straw samples, leading to an almost similar NRC value (0.63) with a 30 mm air gap compared to a 20 mm air gap (0.62). The results also indicate that the increase in SAC may not be significant after a certain air gap.