In the light of the high prevalence of asthma worldwide, particularly given the substantial absolute numbers of patients with severe or “difficult-to-treat” asthma, there is considerable value in identifying new targets that can be utilized as biomarkers, or as targets for novel therapy, thereby facilitating precision medicine. In this study, we determined whether systemic levels of the Type 17 cytokines IL-26 and IL-17A are altered in allergen-sensitized children, with and without asthma, compared with non-sensitized children. Indeed, we observed that systemic protein concentrations of both IL-26 and IL-17A are altered in a similar manner; the serum concentrations of both these cytokines are enhanced in children sensitized to dog allergen as compared to non-sensitized children. Based on prior studies demonstrating that systemic concentrations of IL-26 are enhanced in adults with asthma as compared to adults without asthma 5, 22, 23, we were not surprised to discover that both systemic IL-26 and IL-17A concentrations were likewise enhanced in children sensitized to dog-allergen who also had asthma. However, we were surprised to discover that systemic IL-26 and IL-17A concentrations did not markedly differ between sensitized children with and without asthma. Moreover, systemic IL-26 and IL-17A concentrations amongst allergen-sensitized children were not clearly different with respect to other allergic manifestations, namely eczema, allergic rhinitis, or a history of one or more food allergies. In this respect, the presence of elevated IL-26 and/or IL-17A concentrations in our cohort was not distinctly associated with asthma or specific allergic disease, but rather emerge as general biomarkers of an inflammation that has traditionally been regarded as mediated by Type 2 cytokines. Along with this, we observed a statistically significant positive correlation between systemic IL-26 and IL-17A concentrations, regardless of whether the analysis included all allergen-sensitized subjects or if it was restricted to only those with asthma. Of note, in the control group of non-sensitized children, there was a small number of subjects with self-reported eczema that did not appear to be associated with elevated levels of either IL-26 or IL-17A, but it is difficult to make clinically meaningful conclusions from this due to the small sample size.
Although we found that enhanced IL-26 concentrations are not restricted to children with asthma in our study material, we sought to determine whether IL-26 concentrations may correlate with disease severity amongst allergen-sensitized children with asthma. Previous studies have reported that increasing local IL-26 concentrations correlate with worsening disease severity in adults with asthma 5, 24. However, Salhi and colleagues did not observe a specific correlation between systemic IL-26 concentration and markers of disease severity in adults with asthma 22. In our study material, we observed that, amongst children with asthma, increasing systemic IL-26 levels correlate with increasing ACT scores. That is to say: We found that increased systemic IL-26 values were associated with improved control of symptoms. However, we detected no statistically significant correlation between systemic IL-26 concentrations and AQLQ scores, nor was there any statistically significant correlation between systemic IL-26 and lung function according to spirometry (FEV1, FEV1/FVC%) in the current study material. It should be noted however, that the range of spirometry values in the allergen-sensitized study group, while clearly different than the non-sensitized control group, was quite modest and reflects primarily mild-to-moderate asthma. This limited range of disease severity, combined with limited statistical power due to the moderate size of the current material, may explain why we did not detect correlations between systemic IL-26 concentrations and certain clinical assessments.
As these observations were somewhat mixed and were discordant with the previous studies comparing local IL-26 and markers of asthma severity, we wondered whether systemic IL-26 concentrations may correlate with other surrogate markers of asthma severity in a manner similar to that of ACT scores. To this end, we compared systemic IL-26 to daily inhaled corticosteroid doses in the patients with asthma. We observed that increasing systemic IL-26 values correlated with decreasing inhaled corticosteroid doses, which supports the notion that systemic IL-26 concentrations correlate with improved overall symptom control. Moreover, patients that received one or more course of oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations in the year preceding study enrolment had significantly lower systemic IL-26 levels compared to the patients with asthma who had not received oral corticosteroids. As patients could not have evidence of an active asthma exacerbation at the time of enrolment, this difference was not due to direct inhibition of systemic IL-26 production by systemic glucocorticoids, a phenomenon which has been described in vitro 18. If replicable, these findings would suggest that elevated systemic IL-26 concentrations predict milder disease severity in allergen-sensitized children, in contrast with observations of local IL-26 production in the airways. Furthermore, they raise the question of whether these observations indicate that the cellular sources of IL-26 have been recruited into the airways in severe asthma, or whether elevated systemic IL-26 levels per se may confer a protective effect against the development of severe asthma in allergen-sensitized children.
There are some limitations of this retrospective analysis of previously collected study materials. First, the primary focus for patient recruitment was to establish a cohort of allergen-sensitized children, with or without other clinical allergic manifestations. While a majority of these children also had clinically documented asthma, the cohort was not originally designed with this in mind, which could suggest that there are certain differences between our study population and those in similar studies. Second, while the majority of allergen-sensitized children in our study had asthma, most participants had only mild to moderate disease as reflected in spirometry values, ACT and AQLQ scores. This limited range of severity was also reflected by the fact that there were few asthma exacerbations in the 12 months leading up to study enrolment, whereas other studies have focused more on subjects with clinically severe asthma. Nevertheless, it is interesting that so many of the asthmatic subjects in our study had significantly elevated levels of IL-26 and/or IL-17A, cytokines which are typically associated with more severe and often steroid-resistant asthma. This raises the question of whether the cytokine elevations we observed are merely due to general allergic inflammation in our allergen-sensitized group, or if those children with elevated systemic IL-26 and/or IL-17A concentrations may be predisposed to developing the more severe Type 1/Type 17 asthma endotype over time. A third limitation of this study is a lack of concurrent airway sampling for analysis, either via sputum or BAL, that would have allowed a concurrent assessment of local and systemic cytokine concentrations, and finally, a lack of concurrent microbiological data. Given that both IL-26 and IL-17A expression can be affected by microbial pathogens 19, 30, 31, it would be ideal to have a thorough microbiological analysis performed in future studies, to rule out dysbiosis per se as a confounding factor.