A systematic review of vertical transmission and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among infants born to mothers with COVID-19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34019/v1

Abstract

Amidst the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, evidence on vertical transmission and natural passive immunity among the newborns exposed to COVID-19 is scanty and varies. This pose a challenge on preventive interventions for the newborns. We conducted a systematic review to first, determine the likelihood of vertical transmission among COVID-19 exposed infants and second, determine whether antibodies against Severe Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/ COVID-19 virus exist among COVID-19 vertically exposed but negative infants. This review registered in PROSPERO searched evidence from PubMed/ MEDLINE and Google Scholar, among others. About 517 studies were retrieved, where only 33 articles (5.8%) qualified for final analysis. A total of 205 infants born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers were pooled from 33 eligible studies. Overall, 6.3% (13/205; 95%CI: 3.0%-9.7%) of the infants tested positive for COVID-19 virus at birth. Of 33 eligible studies, 6 studies (18.8%) reported about IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM were detected in 90% (10/11; 95%CI: 73.9%-107.9%) of infants who had no COVID-19 but vertically exposed. In conclusion, the current evidence revealed a low possibility of vertical transmission of COVID-19 while antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in most of the infants who had no COVID-19. Further studies on perinatal outcomes and the magnitude of natural passive immunity in infants born to mothers with COVID-19 are warranted.


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/ COVID-19 virus was first reported from Wuhan, China in late December 20191. Since then, there has been a rapid increase in the number of new cases and deaths from the disease, and overall changing in the disease landscape2. In its 121 situation report on May 20, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed a total of 4,789,205, COVID-19 virus positive cases, 1,980,118 recoveries, and 318 789 deaths3

Like other infectious diseases, pregnant women continue to be vulnerable to COVID-194. Literature has reported the possible potential implications of COVID-19 in pregnancy but the debate on a possible vertical transmission is still ongoing4,5. Few studies have associated the potential influence of COVID-19 infection from an infected pregnant woman to her fetus or newborn, these include the possibility of miscarriages, preterm delivery and neonatal infections6,7. The previous epidemic from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV) reported no prenatal transmission of SARS. This was confirmed through testing of amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood obtained during cesarean section together with throat swab of the newborn8,9. Evidence have started to show the likelihood of mother to child transmission of COVID-19 infection among the confirmed neonatal infections10–12.

On the other hand, the detection of immunoglobulin (IgM/IgG) against SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM among infants born COVID-19 confirmed mothers but themselves tested COVID-19 negative have been reported13–18. This serological evidence raises more concern about the possible mother to child transmission of antibodies against SARS-CoV-28,9. Evidence seems to be scant and varying with regards to both vertical transmission and antibodies against COVID-19 virus among the exposed newborns. To address this scientific gap of clinical and policy implication, we conducted this systematic review to first, pull evidence to examine the likelihood of vertical transmission and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among newborns exposed to COVID-19.

Methods

Design: This systematic review was conducted to address the following question, “Is there a vertical transmission and antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in infants born to mothers with COVID-19?”. A systematic review protocol was developed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines19 and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/: PROSPERO database registration number: CRD42020185362)

Search strategy: Articles were retrieved using online search engines and library sources, including PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Additionally, websites of key healthcare organizations such as WHO and centre for disease prevention and control (CDC) were also searched. Similarly, a grey literature search was done with the help of Google.  Data from December 1, 2019 to May 18, 2020 conducted in human beings, and published in English language were included. The strategy was developed for PubMed/MEDLINE (Additional file 1) using keywords and MeSH (MEDLINE) then adapted to other databases. To be as inclusive as possible, the search strategy included the terms covering the concept of immunity and infection among infants born to mothers with COVID-19. Keywords such as vertical transmission, antibody, immunoglobulin, pregnant mother, pregnancy, child, infant, new-born, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were used.

Eligibility criteria and study selection: To exclude irrelevant studies, two reviewers (GMB and BJN) independently screened the titles and abstracts, and a full-text articles were assessed for further consideration for inclusion. Disagreements on study eligibility were resolved by consensus, and/or a third reviewer was consulted if necessary. If the information on eligibility was unavailable and/ or unclear, study authors were contacted to clarify. The selected studies were included based on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection using quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) or dual fluorescence PCR and immunoassay such as enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry for antibodies detection, patient pregnant on admission, infant’s COVID-19 status soon after birth and infection control and prevention (IPC) measures during and after delivery, i.e., mother wore N-95 during delivery, personnel protective equipment wore by health care workers, infants immediately separated with her mother to a negative pressure room and infants did not breastfeed before samples were taken. This review included, letter to the editor, correspondence, editorial, research article (case report, case series, cross-sectional, clinical trial, cohort, case control study) etc., however, articles that reported on the secondary data such as review were excluded. 

Data management: All article citations retrieved from database searches were exported into EndNote software version X7 (Thomson Reuters, 2015) where duplicates were identified and removed. Identified publication(s) were analyzed using criteria based on vertical transmission and/ or IgG/ IgM against SARS-CoV-2 and maximum correspondence with inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). 

Data extraction and quality assessment: The reviewers independently extracted the variables of interest from the selected studies using data extraction. Data extraction form was developed in Excel spreadsheet 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA), pre-tested on 3 eligible articles and adjusted accordingly (Table 1). The primary endpoints were birth outcomes, such as COVID-19 infection, IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2. PRISMA-P guideline19 recommends a quality assessment of the included literature, but given the time from the first report of COVID-19 (December 31, 2019), most of the extracted studies were case reports with a very small number of participants (mostly one participant) per study. In this case, authors decided not to perform the risk assessment as described elsewhere20, heterogeneity and meta-analysis 

Summary measures and synthesis of results: A summary estimate of proportions for COVID-19 virus positive and IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2 among infants born to mothers with COVID-19 were determined using Open Meta Analyst software21.The statistical measures included along with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for continuous variables. The narrative was written by the lead reviewer (GMB) and then checked independently by two reviewers (BJN and DLM). The variables that were missing from included articles were recorded as not reported. No statistical test was applied in handling missing data. However, available information was used in recalculating some variables using the Open Meta Analyst calculator.

Results

Characteristics of the studies included

A total of 517 studies were pooled from a systematic search, where only 33 articles (5.8%) were eligible for final analysis. Of 33 included studies, 21 were case reports (65.6%), 10 retrospective studies (28.1%) and 2 (6.3%) prospective studies. From 33 articles, a total of 205 infants were born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers. All articles reported on COVID-19 transmission, but only 6 studies (18.8%) reported about IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2 among infants born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers. Most of the studies, 19 (59.4%) were conducted in China. Twenty-three studies (71.9%), reported that mothers delivered through cesarean route with preterm delivery in the majority of the studies, 20 (62.5%). Infection prevention and control (IPC) during and after delivery was reported to be in place by the majority of the included studies, 21 (63.6%) (Table 1). 

The proportions of possible vertical transmission of COVID-19

Thirty studies were analyzed to determine the possible vertical transmission of among infants born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers. A total of 205 infants were born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers, where only 6.3% (13/205; 95%CI: 3.0%-9.7%) of the infants tested positive for COVID-19 virus at birth. Of 33 included studies, 21 were case reports (65.6%), 10 retrospective studies (28.1%) and 2 (6.3%) prospective studies. The proportions of the infants who contracted COVID-19 vertically from their mother were 22.2% (6/27; 95%CI: 6.5%-37.9%), 2.1% (3/141; 95%CI: -0.3%-4.5%), 7.5% (3/40; 95%CI: -0.7%-15.7%) for case reports, retrospective and prospective study, respectively.

A total of 19 studies (59.4%) were reported to be conducted in China and the remained from the rest part of the world. China reported 4.2% of infants vertically contracted COVID-19 from their mothers (7/167; 95%CI: 1.2%-7.2%) where those who were reported outside China was 10.5 % (6/57; 2.6%-18.5%). Twenty-three studies (71.9%) reported about mothers who delivered through cesarean while 6 (18.7%) studies were vaginal delivery route. The remained studies did not report about the mode of delivery. Cesarean mode of delivery found 10% positive infants (7/70: 95%CI: 3.0%-17.0%) while for vaginal delivery route was 10.3% (3/29; -0.7%-21.4%).

Twenty-one studies (63.6%) reported IPC were in place, other studies IPC  were difficult to assess since they were retrospective study with no clear mention of IPC in place, hence assigned not applicable (NA) except two studies where IPC was not reported (NR). In the rest of the studies IPC were not clearly reported. For those with IPC measures in place, 12.3% (9/73; 95%CI: 4.8%-19.9%) of the infants were vertically infected. A total of 20 studies (62.5%) reported preterm delivery while 12 (37.5%) were full term delivery. Two studies gestation period was not reported. In the group of full term, 3.2% (4/124; 95%CI: 0.1%-6.3%) infants tested COVID-19 virus positive while for preterm, 18.4% (7/38; 95%CI: 6.1%-30.7%) of infants born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers were positive. 

IgG/ IgM against SARS-CoV-2 among infants born to COVID-19 mothers

Of 33 included studies, only 6 studies (18.8%) reported about IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2 among infants born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers. Antibodies were quantified in 11 infants, where 10 out of 11 infants (90.9%; 95%CI: 73.9%-107.9%) had IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2. Among 10 infants with detected antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, only one infant (10%; -8.6%-28.6%) tested COVID-19 virus positive. Furthermore, one infant whose antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were not detected tested positive for COVID-19.

Discussion

This review summarizes the findings from 205 born to mothers with COVID-19. The review aimed to determine the possible vertical transmission of COVID-19 and characterize the immunological feature of infants born to COVID-19 mothers. It was found that, 6.3% of infants born to COVID-19 mothers were infected. The transmission was reported both in preterm13,22–25 and full-term born infants23,26 and even where the infection prevention and control measures were in place13,22,25. Furthermore, the vertical transmission was reported regardless of the mode of delivery, vaginal22,27 or cesarean route13,23–26.

Based on negative samples from amniotic fluid, cord blood, vaginal discharge, neonatal throat swabs or breastmilk, WHO reported no evidence on mother-to-child transmission when infection manifests in the third trimester 28. However, the recent case report conducted in France, reported the case of transplacental transmission of a male neonate who was delivered through cesarean section with a gestational age of 35+5 weeks.  A baby was delivered under a well infection prevention and control settings, amniotic fluid, blood and non-bronchoscopic, nasopharyngeal, rectal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were collected for RT-PCR and all were positive for the E and S genes of SARS-CoV-225.

Findings from the current review were contrary to those reported by Gatta and colleagues7, from their review which involved 51 pregnant women, where 3 pregnancies were ongoing, among 48 remained pregnancies, 46 gave birth by cesarean delivery and 2 gave birth vaginally, there was no evidence of vertical transmission recorded in all reported births. In this study, all studies were retrospective and conducted in the same country, China. In the current study about 40% of the reported cases were reported outside China.  However, the study reported a high number of preterm birth and cesarean delivery route similar to the findings of the current review where 71.9% were delivered by cesarean route and 62.5% by preterm birth. Another rapid review conducted in 32 pregnant women affected with COVID-19 found no evidence of vertical transmission, the study reported 27 cesarean section, 2 vaginal delivery and 47% delivered preterm6. A small sample size (n = 32) used in this rapid review may have contributed to the differences in detecting the number of infected infants compared to the current review (n = 205).

On the other hand, this review has revealed evidence for antibodies (IgG/IgM) against SARS-CoV-2 among infants tested negative for COVID-19 but born to COVID-19 mothers. Antibodies were quantified in 11 infants13–18, where 10 out of 11 infants (90.9%) had IgG/IgM against SARS-CoV-2. One infants whose antibodies were not detected tested positive for COVID-1913. In this study13, negative serology was found both in mother and neonate on the day of birth, and later seroconversion of the mother occurred. The delayed serological conversion curve can be explained in the studies conducted elsewhere in which IgM seroconverts after day 5 from symptom onset29. In the study by Zeng et al.,16, three infants were reported to have elevated IgG levels but normal IgM levels. However, virus-specific IgG/IgM was detected in all six neonatal blood sera samples. The IgG concentrations were elevated in 5 infants. IgG elevation is explained by the fact that, IgG is passively transferred across the placenta from mother to fetus at the beginning of 20th gestational week and become more elevated at the time of birth30. But, IgM, which was detected in 2 infants16, is unlikely to be transferred from mother to fetus due to large molecular structure31. The presence of this specific antibody IgG/IgM for the infants who tested negative, and were born to mothers with COVID-19 indicated the possibility of transplacental immunity (natural passive immunity) while the one who had COVID-19 developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 following an exposure to virus (natural active immunity).

This study is limited by the small number of participants obtained from the extracted studies, type of the study (low quality study designs, i.e., retrospective studies) included and limited samples from amniotic fluid and cord blood. Nevertheless, this is the first review with more than 200 infants born to mothers with COVID-19. Findings from this review are important for understanding the transmission likelihood and immunological characteristics of infants whose mothers are infected with SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, currently, there is evidence of a low vertical transmission among infants born to COVID-19 virus positive mothers. Additionally, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in most of the infants who tested COVID-19 negative. Further studies on perinatal outcomes in newborns who vertically acquired COVID-19 and the magnitude of natural passive immunity are recommended.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate. Not applicable 

Data availability. A datasets used and/or analyzed in this review are provided in the main manuscript and its supplementary material (Additional file 1).

Acknowledgments. Authors (GMB & BJN) acknowledge the training support received from Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences through Systematic Review and Meta-analysis workshop funded by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sweden. 

Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 

Authors' contributions. GMB designed the study protocol, conducted data extraction and synthesis and drafted the narrative synthesis. BJN designed the study protocol, conducted data extraction and synthesis. DS: designed the protocol and performed data search. DLM revised the narrative synthesis. BFS participated in protocol development and revised the narrative synthesis. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76(February):71-76. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034
  2. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109(February):102433. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Situation Report 121.; 2020.
  4. Editor D, Placenta À, Placenta À, Placenta À, Placenta À. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Potential implications of SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(3):464-465. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.03.025
  5. Nunzia A, Gatta D, Rizzo R, Pilu G, Simonazzi G. Systematic Review Coronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy : a systematic review of reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.013
  6. Mullins E, Evans D, Viner RM, O’Brien P, Morris E. Coronavirus in pregnancy and delivery: rapid review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;(March):586-592. doi:10.1002/uog.22014
  7. Della Gatta AN, Rizzo R, Pilu G, Simonazzi G. COVID19 during pregnancy: a systematic review of reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.013
  8. Hospital PM, Kong H, Wai F, Cheng T, Peiris JSM, Lee KH. Infants Born to Mothers With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. 2003;(November). doi:10.1542/peds.112.4.e254
  9. Wong SF, Chow KM, Leung TN, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. 2004:292-297. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.019
  10. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, et al. Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):559-564. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30176-6
  11. Liu C. Antibodies in Infants Born to Mothers With COVID-19 Pneumonia Tests for IgG and IgM antibodies for severe acute respiratory Training and Fit Testing of Health Care Personnel for Reusable Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators Compared With Disposable N95 Respi. 2020;323(18):1848-1849. doi:10.1038/2101070a0
  12. Author T, Society ID. No Title. 2020.
  13. Alzamora MC, Paredes T, Caceres D, Webb CM, Valdez LM, La Rosa M. Severe COVID-19 during Pregnancy and Possible Vertical Transmission. Am J Perinatol. 2020;1(212). doi:10.1055/s-0040-1710050
  14. Buonsenso D, Costa S, Sanguinetti M, et al. Neonatal Late Onset Infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Am J Perinatol. 2020;1(212). doi:10.1055/s-0040-1710541
  15. De Socio GV, Malincarne L, Arena S, et al. Delivery in Asymptomatic Italian Woman with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2020;12(1):e2020033. doi:10.4084/MJHID.2020.033
  16. Hui Zeng, Chen Xu, Junli Fan, Yueting Tang, PhD Qiaoling Deng, MD Wei Zhang XL. Antibodies in Infants Born to Mothers With COVID-19 Pneumonia Tests. JAMA. 2000. doi:10.1038/2101070a0
  17. Xiong X, Wei H, Zhang Z, et al. Vaginal Delivery Report of a Healthy Neonate Born to a Convalescent Mother with COVID­19. J Med Virol. 2020;(April):3-5. doi:10.1002/jmv.25857
  18. Lee DH, Lee J, Kim E, Woo K, Park HY, An J. Emergency cesarean section on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) confirmed patient. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020. doi:10.4097/kja.20116
  19. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349(January):1-25. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647
  20. Zaigham M, Andersson O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID-19 : A systematic review of 108 pregnancies. 2020;(April):1-7. doi:10.1111/aogs.13867
  21. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Meta-Analyst: Software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-80
  22. Baud D, Greub G, Frave G, et al. Second-Trimester Miscarriage in a Pregnant Woman With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020:1-3. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.7233
  23. Chen Y, Peng H, Wang L, et al. Infants Born to Mothers With a New Coronavirus (COVID-19). Front Pediatr. 2020;8(March):1-5. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00104
  24. Zamaniyan M, Ebadi A, Aghajanpoor Mir S, Rahmani Z, Haghshenas M, Azizi S. Preterm delivery in pregnant woman with critical COVID ‐19 pneumonia and vertical transmission . Prenat Diagn. 2020. doi:10.1002/pd.5713
  25. Vivanti A, Vauloup-Fellous C, Prevot S, et al. Transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pre-print.:1-11. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-28884/v1
  26. Sun M, Xu G, Yang Y, et al. Evidence of mother-newborn infection with COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020;(xxx):2-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.066
  27. Ferrazzi E, Frigerio L, Savasi V, et al. Vaginal delivery in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women in Northern Italy: a retrospective analysis. Bjog. 2020:0-1. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16278
  28. World Health Organization. WHO Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Who. 2020;2019(March):12. https://www.who.int/internal-publications-detail/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected%0Ahttp://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/178529/1/WHO_MERS_Clinical_15.1_eng.pdf.
  29. Melville JM, Moss TJM. The immune consequences of preterm birth. Front Neurosci. 2013;7(7 MAY):1-9. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00079
  30. Kohler PF FR. Elevation of cord over maternal IgG immunoglobulin: evidence for an active placental IgG transport. Nature. 1966;210(5040):1070-1071. doi:10.1038/2101070a0.
  31. Ng WF, Wong SF, Lam A, et al. The placentas of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: A pathophysiological evaluation. Pathology. 2006;38(3):210-218. doi:10.1080/00313020600696280
  32. Al-kuraishy H, Al-Maiahy T, Al-Gareeb A, Musa R, Ali Z. COVID-19 pneumonia in an Iraqi pregnant woman with preterm delivery. Asian Pacific J Reprod. 2020;0(0):0. doi:10.4103/2305-0500.282984
  33. Clara Alonso Díaz MLM. First case of neonatal infection due to COVID 19 in Spain夽. 2020;(January):19-20. doi:10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.03.002
  34. Cuifang Fan, Di Lei, Congcong Fang, Chunyan Li, Ming Wang, Yuling Liu YB. Perinatal Transmission of COVID-19 Associated SARS-CoV-2: Should We Worry? Cuifang. Foreign Aff. 2012;91(5):287. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  35. Li Y, Zhao R, Zheng S, et al. Lack of Vertical Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(6):200287. doi:10.3201/eid2606.200287
  36. Liu W, Wang J, Li W, Zhou Z, Liu S, Rong Z. Clinical characteristics of 19 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19. Front Med. 2020;14(2):193-198. doi:10.1007/s11684-020-0772-y
  37. Lowe B, Bopp B. COVID-19 vaginal delivery - a case report. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. doi:10.1111/ajo.13173
  38. Lu D, Sang L, Du S, Li T, Chang Y, Yang X. Asymptomatic COVID‐19 infection in late pregnancy indicated no vertical transmission. J Med Virol. 2020;(March):1-5. doi:10.1002/jmv.25927
  39. Lyra J, Valente R, Rosario M, Guimaraes M. Cesarean Section in a Pregnant Woman with COVID-19: First Case in Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2020;33:1-3. doi:10.20344/amp.13883
  40. Zhu H, Wang L, Fang C, et al. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(1):51-60. doi:10.21037/tp.2020.02.06
  41. Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W, et al. Neonatal Early-Onset Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 33 Neonates Born to Mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;23(77):2-4. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0878
  42. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, Zeng W, Feng L, Wu J. No SARS-CoV-2 detected in amniotic fluid in mid-pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;3099(20):19-20. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30320-0
  43. Yin M, Zhang L, Deng G, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection During Pregnancy In China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. medRxiv. 2020;2:2020.04.07.20053744. doi:10.1101/2020.04.07.20053744
  44. Yang P, Wang X, Liu P, et al. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information . 2020;(January).
  45. Yan J, Guo J, Fan C, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnant women: A report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;2019. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.014
  46. Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhu F, Tang Y, Shen X. A case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in a pregnant woman with preterm delivery. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;(Xx Xxxx):2019-2021. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa200
  47. Wang S, Guo L, Chen L, et al. A case report of neonatal COVID-19 infection in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;(Xx Xxxx):3-7. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa225
  48. yang H, Sun G, Tang F, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women suspected of coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect. 2020;(xxxx). doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.003
  49. Qiancheng X, Jian S, Lingling P, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;95:376-383. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.065
  50. Peng Z, Wang J, Mo Y, et al. Unlikely SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission from mother to child: A case report. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(5):818-820. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.004
  51. Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809-815. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3
  52. Lan Dong, Jinhua Tian, Songming He, Chuchao Zhu, MD Jian Wang, MD Chen Liu MJ. Possible Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 From and Infectd Mother to Her Newborn. Public Health Ethics. 2020;323(18). doi:10.1093/phe/phw039

Table 1

Table 1: Characteristics of the included studies

Author

Country

Design

Mode of delivery 

IPC during delivery 

Gestation period 

Covid19 (positive cases/ total)

IgM/IgG for SARS-CoV-2 (detected/total)

Al-kuraishy et al.,202032

Iraq

CR

Vaginal

In place

Preterm

0/1.0

NR

Alzamora et al.,202013

Peru

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

1.0/1.0

0/1.0

Baud et al.,202022

Switzerland

CR

Vaginal

In place

Preterm

1.0/1.0

NR

Buonsenso et al.,202014

Italy

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/1.0

1.0/1.0


Italy

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

0/1.0

NR

Chen et al.,202023

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/3.0

NR

De Socio et al.,202015

Italy

CR

Vaginal

In place

Full term

0/1.0

1.0/1.0

Díaz et al.,202033

Spain

CR

Cesarean

NR

Full term

0/1.0

NR

Fan et al.,202034

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/1.0

NR


China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

0/1.0

NR

Lee et al.,202018

Korea

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/1.0

NR

Li al.,202035

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

0/1/0

NR

Liu et al.,202036

China

RT

NA

In place

Full term

0/10

NR

Ferrazzi et al.,202027

Italy

RT

Vaginal

NA

NA

2.0/24

NR


Italy

RT

Cesarean

NA

NA

0/18

NR

Lowe et al.,202037

Australia

CR

Vaginal

In place

Full term

0/1.0

NR

Lu al.,202038

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/1.0

NR

Lyra et al.,202039

Portugal

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/1/0

NR

Zhu et al.,202040

China

RT

NA

NA

Full term, 

0/4

NR


China

RT

NA

NA

Preterm

0/6

NR

Zeng et al.,202041

China

PR

NA

In place

Full term

2.0/29 

NR


China

PR

NA

In place

Preterm

1/4.0

NR

Zeng et al.,202016

China

RT

Cesarean

In place

Full term

0/6

6.0/6.0

Zamaniyan et al.,202024

Iran

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

1/1.0

NR

Yu et al.,202042

China

RT

Cesarean

NA

Full term

1/3.0

NR

Yin et al.,202043

China

RT

NA

NA

Full term

0/12

NR


China

RT

NA

NA

Preterm

0/5

NR

Yang et al.,202044

China

PR

Cesarean

NA

Full term

0/3

NR


China

PR

Cesarean

NA

Preterm

0/4

NR

Yan et al.,202045

China

RT

Cesarean

NA

Full term

0/4

NR


China

RT

Cesarean

NA

Preterm

0/1

NR

Xiong et al.,202017

China

CR

Vaginal

NR

Full term

0/1

0/1

Wang et al.,202046

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

0/1

NR

Wang et al.,202047

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

1/1.0

NR

Sun et al.,202026

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Full term

1/1.0

NR


china

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

1/2.0

NR

Sun et al.,202048

China

RT

NR

NA

Full term

0/13

NR

Qiancheng et al.,202049

China

RT

NR

NA

Full term

0/22

NR


China

RT

NR

NA

Preterm

0/1.0

NR

Peng et al.,202050

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

preterm

0/1

NR

Chen et al.,202051

China

RT

Cesarean

NA

Full term

0/5

NR


China

RT

Cesarean

NA

Preterm

0/4

NR

Dong et al.,202052

China

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

0/1

1/1

Vivant et al.,202025

France

CR

Cesarean

In place

Preterm

1/1

NR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: CR: Case report, PR: Prospective, RT: Retrospective, NR: Not reported, NA: Not applicable, Babies born before 37 weeks were termed as “preterm”

 


Additional File

Additional file 1: PubMed/MEDLINE search results