This study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Free State (Ethics number UFS-AED2020/0020/63). The trial was carried out on fifty (50), second parity, South African Dohne Merino ewes ranging in age 2 to 4 years (4-6 tooth) weighing 46-55kg with mean body condition score (BCS) 3.5±0.4. The ewes were housed in a sheltered environment but had access to outside paddocks. The animals were quarantined for a period of 21 days and inspected for possible diseases and infections before the start of the trial.
Housing
All 50 ewes grazed together on a paddock of 5 hectares. The paddock consisted of a mixture of natural pasture and the ewes had unrestricted access to water in troughs that were connected to a permanent water supply (tanks) that were cleaned regularly. Each evening, the ewes were kept in an overnight sheltered kraal for protection from unfavorable weather conditions and predation.
Feeding of ewes
The ewes grazed daily from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm on the pastures and in addition, each ewe received 2kg of pellets per day. The pellets consisted of a ration of crushed yellow maize, Lucerne, and molasses. Ewes experiencing diarrhea were fed 1 kg bucket of pellets and 1 kg bucket full of crushed lucerne and water was provided ad libitum.
Health management
During the selection of ewes, inspections were conducted for any signs caused by diseases and infection. The experimental animals were dosed for internal parasites using propose orange, dipped with Prodip, and vaccinated against Ovine pasteurellosis at the beginning of the trial. Sick animals were separated from healthy animals after routine inspections that were done daily. Sick animals were kept in bays where they were fed enough hay and had access to water and treatment.
Experimental design
The 50 ewes were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 each. The control group (n=10) received no oil, the SO group (n=10) received 30 ml sunflower oil per day, the OO group (n=10) received 30 ml olive oil per day, the FO group (n=10) received 30 ml fish oil per day and the PO group (n=10) received 30 ml palm oil per day. The animals were tagged on the right-hand side and the ear tag clearly indicated the animal number and its group.
Data analysis for this trial was subjected to analysis of variance (IBM SPSS statistics 27 programs) using General Linear Model (GLM) procedure for repeated measures and used Tukey’s model at an interval of 95% confidence interval
Drenching of ewes with dietary oils
The ewe’s head was slightly lifted in an upward position, holding it towards one’s hip to gain full control of the animal’s head. On the other hand, the drench gun was slowly inserted into Ewe’s mouth. Oils were gently drenched in the animal’s mouth and allowed to swallow before releasing. After drenching, the animals were taken to pasture camps for grazing and returned to the kraal at 16:30 where they were sheltered for overnight resting. The ewes received 30 ml oil for 120 days; 2 weeks prior to insemination, a rest period of 45 days after insemination to ensure embryo attachment, throughout gestation and parturition and ended when lambs were weaned from the ewes.
Synchronization of oestrus using CIDR®
Oestrus was synchronized in all ewes using controlled internal drug-releasing device (CIDR) with 0.6 g progesterone to assist in the administering of exogenous progesterone (Plate 3.17). The CIDRs were in place for a period of 15 days. All ewes were checked daily to ensure that the CIDRs remained in place for the duration of the treatment period. At CIDR removal ewes were administered 20 IU/kg of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG). The ewes were then allowed to rest for 48 hours and monitored for signs of oestrus behaviour every 2 hours before laparoscopic AI could take place.
Laparoscopic artificial insemination (LAI)
Laparoscopy is an intrauterine technique of insemination, especially used in small species to go around their unique tortuous cervix (Sathe, 2018). The laparoscopic technique for AI is regarded as less dangerous than the traditional surgical approach (Evans et al. 2004; Anel et al. 2006). This technique is widely regarded by scientists as the one with improved results in conception rates and a highly effective method of semen administration at the point of reception compared to other surgical techniques (Stefani et al. 1990; Fantinati et al. 2005; Shipley et al. 2011).
Follow up rams until pregnancy
After laparoscopic artificial insemination, animals were not handled for a fortnight before follow-up rams were introduced to ewes. Rams were kept with ewes for a period of 15 days. The purpose of these rams was to cover or impregnate those that could not conceive during laparoscopy. There was no handling of ewes for a period of 45 days, this was to ensure a proper embryo attachment and also to avoid stress to the ewes. Drenching of animals resumed after 45 days of resting and continued for 196 days.
Pregnancy diagnosis
The importance of pregnancy diagnosis is to detect ewes that are pregnant and also that are not pregnant on time. The procedure of pregnancy diagnosis was done using a sonar scanner.
Measurements
The following data was generated: Conception rate and pregnancy rate of the Dohne Merino ewes, lambs born alive, singletons vs. multiple birth rate, lamb birth weight, lamb mortality rate, lamb average weight gain (weekly), average daily gain of lambs, time taken until weaning, which is determined by date, weight of the lambs at weaning.
Data collected and statistical analysis
Lambs were separated from the flock and placed in smaller holding pens. Lambs were then weighed using a hanging scale (A 50 kg mechanical hanging scale was used).
Parameters and statistical analysis
Lambing percentage = (number of females lambing/ total number of mated females) x 100 (Smith, 2011).
Fecundity rate = (number of lambs born/ number of females lambed) x 100
Mortality rate = (number of lambs dying before 10 days/ Total number of lambs born alive) x100 (Smith, 2011).
Weaning percentage = (Number of lambs weaned/number of lambs born) x 100 (Smith, 2011).
Data analysis for this trial was subjected to analysis of variance (IBM SPSS statistics 27 programs) using General Linear Model (GLM) procedure for repeated measures and used Tukey’s model at an interval of 95% confidence interval.