See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research article
Kimberly Walker
University of South Florida
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
Despite a growing understanding of the importance of provider HPV recommendation on parental acceptance, US HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal. Given the prevalence and use of the media for health decisions, this study examined the relationship between the media and provider HPV recommendation on parental HPV vaccine hesitancy.
Methods
Thirty individual interviews with vaccine accepting mothers in the Midwest were conducted to examine their experiences with initial hesitancy to accept HPV vaccination at point of provider recommendation and their suggestions for improving the HPV vaccine patient/provider recommendation experience.
Results
Results found that the media served as an antecedent to hesitancy for three main vaccination concerns: protection, efficacy and sexual stigma. A model for understanding the influence of the media as it relates to the three topical HPV vaccination concerns and its process on parental HPV vaccine decision making emerged.
Conclusions
Findings suggest that mothers experience hesitancies from passive and active HPV vaccination media information that prompt confusion and fear with accepting provider HPV vaccination recommendation. Providers’ approach to HPV vaccination recommendation must consider concerns reported in the media with delivery techniques modified to adjust to parental fears absorbed from adverse media information.
Keywords
Patient/provider relationship, human papillomavirus, media, provider recommendation, qualitative, communication
Figure 1
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 10 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 04 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 04 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 04 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 30 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 29 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Oct, 2020
Version 1
Posted 14 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 11 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 10 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 10 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 23 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 22 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 22 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 08 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 07 Jul, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Kimberly Walker
University of South Florida
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 10 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 04 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 04 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 04 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 30 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 29 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Oct, 2020
Version 1
Posted 14 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 11 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 10 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 10 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 23 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 22 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 22 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 08 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 07 Jul, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Background
Despite a growing understanding of the importance of provider HPV recommendation on parental acceptance, US HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal. Given the prevalence and use of the media for health decisions, this study examined the relationship between the media and provider HPV recommendation on parental HPV vaccine hesitancy.
Methods
Thirty individual interviews with vaccine accepting mothers in the Midwest were conducted to examine their experiences with initial hesitancy to accept HPV vaccination at point of provider recommendation and their suggestions for improving the HPV vaccine patient/provider recommendation experience.
Results
Results found that the media served as an antecedent to hesitancy for three main vaccination concerns: protection, efficacy and sexual stigma. A model for understanding the influence of the media as it relates to the three topical HPV vaccination concerns and its process on parental HPV vaccine decision making emerged.
Conclusions
Findings suggest that mothers experience hesitancies from passive and active HPV vaccination media information that prompt confusion and fear with accepting provider HPV vaccination recommendation. Providers’ approach to HPV vaccination recommendation must consider concerns reported in the media with delivery techniques modified to adjust to parental fears absorbed from adverse media information.
Figure 1
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...