The present study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of short-term exercise interventions of badminton and of rope skipping on fatigue and sleep problems among Chinese university students with poor sleep quality (PSQI score > 7) and without any exercise habits. Seventy-six participants were divided into three groups: a badminton group, a rope skipping group, and a control group. A 15-day exercise intervention was assigned to the badminton and rope skipping groups. Our first hypothesis was partially supported—both exercises were effective only in improving perceived fatigue and sleep onset latency—while the second hypothesis was rejected, as there was no significant difference between the effects of both kinds of exercise.
The effect of exercise as a treatment for insomnia is guaranteed. In the present study, as consistent with the objective EEG results reported by Kalak et al. [27], participants who performed badminton or rope skipping during the study reported spending less time falling asleep, while those in the control group did not. In addition, although we failed to identify changes in the PSQI scores, the causal relationship between reduced global PSQI scores and exercise was corroborated in multiple studies [34]. Aside from altered feelings, exercise also generates physiological changes, such as elevating body temperature, which can assist in falling asleep [4, 34].
Researchers have not reached an agreement on the effect of exercise on fatigue. In the present study, those participants in the badminton group and the rope skipping group reported feeling less fatigued after the intervention, while those who did not engage in any exercise felt as fatigued as before the experiment. Loy and colleagues [35] suggested that the effect of exercise on fatigue could be explained by sufficient energy recovery after the exercise, as energy is expended during the exercise and subsequently subjective sleep quality may improve [34]. Moreover, we discovered that participants in the exercise groups overall felt significantly better and more alert following the experiment, while such changes were not detected in the control group.
These findings were consistent with some of the previous findings [28, 43] but not the others [44, 45]. Likewise, the elevated overall feelings and levels of alertness identified in the present study could not be attributed to badminton and rope skipping. It needs to be noted that the operationalization of assessing fatigue, alertness, and mood state may be the main cause of the mixed study results. For instance, we measured them via a questionnaire that contains one question for each variable, while others measured fatigue using other questionnaires or measured alertness objectively via psychomotor vigilance testing [44]. Additionally, the intensity and the content of exercises also varied. Hence, inconsistent results should be expected when methods and materials were not standardized.
The effects of badminton and rope skipping on subjectively perceived fatigue and sleep issues did not differ significantly from each other, contrary to our hypothesis. This suggests that additional fatigue was not generated by cooperating with an opponent during badminton, as we had assumed. However, it should be noted that participants were grouped based on their inclination, which means that cooperating with an unfamiliar opponent during badminton might not be as stressful as it would be for participants in other groups. Possible differences may be identified if randomization is utilized in future studies. Therefore, while it may imply that doubles sports and even team sports are as relaxing as individual sports, further research is necessary to assess the comparability of different exercises and sports.
We extended the existing findings on short-term exercise interventions and corroborated that a 15-day intervention with exercising on alternate days can improve perceived fatigue and SOL in university students who do not include exercise in their daily routines. Compared to strictly standardized laboratory studies, our findings are more representative of real-life scenarios. We recommend that university students, or individuals who have limited spare time, perform rope skipping or badminton on alternate days for 15 days if they experience fatigue or struggle to fall asleep. Moreover, it is worth noting that some participants reported a willingness to continue exercising even after the experiment ended. This suggests that short-term exercise interventions are likely to enhance individuals’ interest in exercise. For future studies, follow-up surveys are encouraged to investigate whether participants developed regular exercise habits. Furthermore, in light of these findings, clinical practitioners can incorporate badminton and rope skipping exercises as quick-acting interventions for individuals suffering from psychiatric disorders because these short-term exercises may alleviate symptoms by mitigating sleep issues and fatigue. If exercise is included as a part of the intervention plan but clients refuse to comply, these two exercises can also serve as strategies to encourage and establish daily exercise routines. However, further evidence is required to substantiate the potential benefits of badminton and rope skipping in clinical practises.
4.1 Limitations
The present study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. As mentioned earlier, some groups, such as the badminton group and the control group during the analysis of fatigue, had small sample sizes, which could reduce the statistical power and effect size of the results and could contribute to the insignificant results of the PSQI scores, overall feelings, and levels of alertness. In addition, the attrition rates in the present study were relatively high, with half of the data for SOL and all the data for sleep efficiency being discarded. Both questionnaires and actigraphy require participants to comply with the instructions. To address this issue in future studies, researchers should consider arranging rehearsals or practice sessions before the start of the experiment.
Another limitation of this study is that we failed to exclude a potential confounder: the dormitory environment. Some participants reported concerns about this factor, which has been shown to affect sleep quality among university students [42]. In Chinese university dormitories, students usually share the same bedroom with one to five other roommates. Participants in the present study reported that maintaining ideal sleep quality was challenging when their sleep was easily disturbed by roommates, and that their sleep quality often improved when roommates were away on weekends. On one hand, the dormitory environment is likely to be a significant confounding factor that affects the results relevant to sleep; therefore, researchers should take it into consideration for future sleep studies conducted in Chinese universities. On the other hand, in future research on fatigue or sleep issues, the effects of interventions could be evaluated for university students whose sleep quality is severely disturbed by external factors.