Rubella virus (RuV) is a single-stranded RNA virus capable of inducing persistent infections that can lead to various associated pathologies [1]. Notably, in 2014, RuV was detected in disseminated cutaneous granulomas afflicting three patients diagnosed with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID), marking the first documented instances of such an occurrence[2]. Interestingly, the RuV sequences found in these patients exhibited variation from currently circulating strains but shared striking similarity with the Wistar 27/3 vaccine strain. Subsequent evidence for RuV genomic RNA within the nasopharyngeal cavities of patients diagnosed with PIDs strongly indicated the ongoing replication and evolution of the rubella vaccine in those individuals [2–8].
RuV positive granulomas have been reported to develop 2-152 weeks (average 48 weeks) after MMR vaccination typically affecting the skin of the limbs (especially around the site of vaccine administration) [3.8]. The severity of RuV-associated granulomatous inflammation exhibits a wide spectrum, ranging from a limited number of superficial cutaneous plaques or nonulcerated nodules to more severe presentations featuring deep ulcerated lesions accompanied by necrosis [9]. In patients presenting with RuV-associated granulomas, serological testing revealed a distinctive profile. Specifically, serum samples from these patients tested negative for RuV-IgM. Conversely, RuV-IgG titers were significantly elevated, with values falling within a range of 580–1623 IU/mL. These elevated IgG titers far exceeded those typically observed in immunologically intact individuals following Rubella vaccination, which typically average around 40 IU/mL[6.10]. In our case, this patient displayed characteristic lower extremity cutaneous manifestations and marked elevation in RuV IgG levels, aligning with patterns observed in previous reports.
RuV-associated granulomas are predominantly sarcoidal epithelioid type consisting of M2 type (CD68+/CD206 + and CD68+/CD163+) macrophages harboring RuV antigen at the granuloma center surrounded by lymphocytes. Based on the identity of cells harboring RuV capsid protein (RVC) antigen and their distribution in the lesions, four distinct granuloma patterns can be classified: M-type RuV-associated granuloma, M(n)-type RuV-associated granuloma, N-type RuV-associated granuloma and DNI-type RuV-associated granuloma [3]. It is interesting that the characteristic feature of all granuloma patterns was a substantial presence of T cells even though most individuals had low T-cell counts or defective T-cell cytotoxicity [3]. The histopathological examination of our case reveals a distinctive amalgamation of necrotizing and non-necrotizing granulomas within a single biopsy specimen. Notably, this histological pattern is marked by the presence of CD68+/CD168 + M2 macrophages, encircling acellular necrotic centers. These necrotic centers exhibit dense infiltration by CD3 + T cells and, in some instances, the presence of neutrophils is noted, positioned in the interstitial space between the ring of macrophages and the necrotic centers. This histological configuration closely aligns with the characteristic features associated with M(n)-type Rubella virus (RuV)-associated granulomas.
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I deficiency syndrome, also recognized as Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome (BLS) type II, is attributed to deficiencies in TAP1, TAP2, or Tapasin [11]. Among individuals with TAP1 deficiency, a significant proportion manifests severe, chronic bacterial infections affecting the respiratory tract and/or experiences the development of severe, chronic cutaneous granulomatous lesions mimicking Wegener’s granulomatosis during adolescence or early adulthood [12]. Interestingly, viral infections are not prominent in TAP1 deficient patients. It is presumed that TAP-independent immune responses provide adequate protection against viral infection[13], or alternatively, immune tolerance may develop over time in response to these pathogens. Nonetheless, the patient we have presented in this report was diagnosed with TAP1 deficiency and concurrently experienced the complicating factor of RuV-induced cutaneous granuloma, thus highlighting a unique clinical scenario. Sukriti et al.[14] reported that diminished expression of TAP1 can result in impaired viral antigen presentation, thereby compromising the effective clearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV). This observation may offer insights into the mechanisms underlying chronic RuV infections in individuals with TAP1 deficiency. Nevertheless, this presumption warrants further validation through additional cases and comprehensive research.
This case provides valuable diagnostic insights. In general, when patients with chronic cutaneous granulomatous lesions fail to respond to immunosuppressive or antibiotic therapies, there should be a consideration for specific pathogenic infections. Molecular diagnostic techniques such as PCR or mNGS applied to skin biopsy tissues can aid in confirming the presence of these infections. It is worth noting that using secretions for PCR or mNGS is not recommended due to their lower diagnostic yield compared to tissue samples. Upon the diagnosis of RuV-associated granulomas, it is imperative to consider the possibility of underlying immune deficiencies. Live rubella vaccines are contraindicated for individuals who have, or are potentially at risk of developing, severe antibody deficiencies, T-cell deficiencies, or innate immune defects[15].