See the published version of this preprint at Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research Article
Ritesh D Lokhande
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-8679
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The subsidence caused on the surface due to the construction of subsurface tunnels for various purposes in urban areas is a major concern for both the tunnel and the overlaid buildings. Seeing the importance of study, different models has been created keeping reference of commercial and residential buildings. The amount of surface deformation and the stresses so generated are calculated, which plays a paramount role before construction. These models are analyzed on circular and semicircular tunnels with various loading conditions and varying litho. In this paper, two software’s namely STAAD Pro and Rocscience were used for structural design and analysis respectively. The study gives the basic idea of behavior of these two shapes of tunnels with varying loading condition and strata which shows a path for predicting unforeseeable displacements in real life situations.
Keywords
Tunneling, Subsidence, Surface Displacements, Stresses
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50
Figure 51
Figure 52
Figure 54
Figure 55
Figure 56
Figure 57
Figure 58
Figure 59
Figure 60
Figure 61
Figure 62
Figure 63
Figure 64
Figure 65
Figure 66
Figure 67
Figure 68
Figure 69
Figure 70
Figure 71
Figure 72
Figure 73
Figure 74
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.
Version 1
Posted 14 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Minor revisions
On 25 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 14 May, 2021
Reviews received
Received 11 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 18 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Ritesh D Lokhande
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-8679
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.
Version 1
Posted 14 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Minor revisions
On 25 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 14 May, 2021
Reviews received
Received 11 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 18 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.
The subsidence caused on the surface due to the construction of subsurface tunnels for various purposes in urban areas is a major concern for both the tunnel and the overlaid buildings. Seeing the importance of study, different models has been created keeping reference of commercial and residential buildings. The amount of surface deformation and the stresses so generated are calculated, which plays a paramount role before construction. These models are analyzed on circular and semicircular tunnels with various loading conditions and varying litho. In this paper, two software’s namely STAAD Pro and Rocscience were used for structural design and analysis respectively. The study gives the basic idea of behavior of these two shapes of tunnels with varying loading condition and strata which shows a path for predicting unforeseeable displacements in real life situations.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50
Figure 51
Figure 52
Figure 54
Figure 55
Figure 56
Figure 57
Figure 58
Figure 59
Figure 60
Figure 61
Figure 62
Figure 63
Figure 64
Figure 65
Figure 66
Figure 67
Figure 68
Figure 69
Figure 70
Figure 71
Figure 72
Figure 73
Figure 74
Loading...