The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of childhood trauma and its contributing factors in children and adolescents. In this study, girls (23.8%) experienced more childhood trauma than boys (14%). The results of this study showed that childhood trauma becomes more prevalent with age. Childhood trauma prevalence among children aged 5–8 years (16.6%), 9–11 years (17.7%), and 12–14 years (21%). According to this study, big family size, parental education, and emotional issues were effective cause of childhood trauma.
In the current study, the total magnitude of childhood trauma was 17.5%, which is consistent with a similar study conducted in US, 18.6% (14), London 16% (24) and North Carolina 14.8% (25). However, the finding of this study was higher than studies conducted in Australia (9%) (26), in Romania 4.6% (19), In Switzerland 11.5% (3). The difference between the present study and the finding from Australia could be that the study conducted in Australia involved inpatient department service and utilized 135 samples of children and adolescents aged 7 to 16 years old. In addition to this, children and adolescents were excluded if they were in foster care or if they had experienced child abuse. But the current study was carried out among 417 samples of children and adolescents from the pediatric outpatient department who were aged 5 to 14 years old. A possible variation between this study and Romania might be that the current study investigated any kind of childhood trauma among children and adolescents, while Romanian studies investigated only physical abuse in childhood. Furthermore, the discrepancy between Switzerland and our findings may be that studies carried out in Switzerland investigated whether the diagnosis of cancer and type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood resulted in childhood trauma among 209 samples of children and adolescents aged between 6.5 and 14.5 years, but our study focused on whether any kind of trauma exposure during childhood resulted in childhood trauma among 417 samples of children and adolescents aged 5 to 14 years old attending pediatric outpatient department service.
The finding of this study lower than study conducted in Pakistan 32.5% (27) and California 35% (28). This observed difference between the present study and Pakistan might be that the Pakistan study was conducted in a primary care clinic and data was collected by female-trained medical students, whereas the present study was conducted in a comprehensive specialized hospital and data was collected by trained bachelor's degree holders in psychiatry who were under the supervision of mental health specialists collected the data. Since there might be a skill gap between medical students and licensed mental health specialists and a bachelor’s science degree in psychiatry, this can result in an observed discrepancy in the magnitude of childhood trauma between our study and Pakistan. Childhood trauma in California studies is higher than the current study. This difference could be a study done in California to evaluate whether children and adolescents develop childhood trauma after being admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and their families. This study investigated whether any kind of trauma exposure in childhood can result in childhood trauma among children and adolescents seeking treatment from pediatric outpatient department service.
In this study, large family size was approximately two times more likely to be associated with childhood trauma than small family size. This finding is similar to the study conducted in Island (29). A possible explanation for this association might be that in large family, family conflict were common, which can have an impact on physical and psychological trauma in pediatric populations (29). A typical issue in large families was criticism, a lack of cohesiveness, and a lack of communication, which was also, associated with worse pediatric health outcomes. A further finding showed that trauma symptoms in kids and teens were directly correlated with criticism from the large family (30, 31).
This study found that parental educational levels below high school were just over four times more likely to be associated with childhood trauma compared to high school and above. This finding is in line with similar study cared out in Columbia (32). Lower parental education levels have been found to be a risk factor for childhood trauma, (33), Because parents with lower educational levels have fewer cognitive resources, they are more ineffective parents and expose kids and teenagers to trauma (34). Studies have revealed that lower parental education levels are more prevalent in lower socioeconomic status (SES), which is connected to higher levels of perceived parental stress, a higher risk of tension buildup, and a higher probability that parents will abandon their parenting responsibilities, all of which are linked to various types of childhood trauma (35, 36). Additionally, it has been noted that mothers with poorer educational backgrounds tend to overstress their children by failing to appropriately meet their requirements, which puts them at risk for trauma (37).
Finally, this study observed a significant association between the emotional problems of children and adolescents and childhood trauma. In this study, children and adolescents who have emotional problems were nearly two times more likely to have had childhood trauma than those who had no emotional problems. This finding is in line with a study conducted in Brazil (18). A possible explanation for this association might be that childhood trauma has been linked to increased vulnerability to the detrimental effects of pediatrics on mental health and has been established as a key risk factor for developing emotional difficulties later in life (38).
A child's and adolescents, emotional and physical health are significantly impacted by childhood trauma, which increases the risk of dangerous behaviors and sickness. Childhood trauma can prevent someone from processing painful situations, which can have a long-lasting negative emotional effect (39, 40). Traumatic experiences that cause maladaptive responses to stress diminish a person's ability to understand and deal with stressful situations, which causes emotional difficulties in children and teenagers (41, 42). Anguish and suffering brought on by a traumatic event might result in a person having ongoing emotional problems (43–45). Beyond an individual's viewpoint, the occurrence and severity of childhood trauma can be determined by factors other than that person's perception, such as the environment they have been exposed to since they were children. Depending on the length of exposure and the severity of the traumatic experiences, this can lead to emotional problems (46, 47). After experiencing extreme trauma as a child, intolerable agony is unavoidable due to the effects on feelings and emotions. Additionally, the child will experience pain and suffering as a result of the trauma, which will lead to emotional problems (10, 46, 48).
Limitation of the study
This study utilized a small number of participants, which could undermine the generalizability of the findings in other study settings. In addition to this lack of scale validation in the study setting area and, finally, social desirability bias may have been introduced.