Chemical structure of NOC
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of NOC demonstrate the existence of good carbon spheres and layered porous carbon structures, with regular spherical parts being carbon spheres and sheet-like substances being carbon sheets. Both carbon sheets and spheres have rich porous structures. As shown in Figs. 2a and 2b, from a microscale perspective, even after 10 minutes of ultrasonic treatment, the carbon layer adheres tightly to the carbon sphere, indicating that the material has good structural stability and thus constructs an excellent conductive path.
Raman spectroscopy and XRD spectroscopy can be used to study NOC samples better. More intuitively, the XRD spectrum exhibits two typical diffraction peaks concentrated at 2 θ = 30 ° and 43 ° represent graphite carbon in terms of (002) and (100) in Fig. 3(a), respectively. In addition, Raman spectroscopy can monitor the degree of material graphitization, as shown in Fig. 3(b). The two peaks at wavelengths 1349 cm− 1 and 1589 cm− 1 of all NOC samples correspond to D and G bands, respectively. The intensity ratio (ID/IG) of the D and G bands is an indicator of the degree of graphitization. The D peak represents the crystal defect of the C atom, and the G peak represents the hybridization of SP2. The smaller the ID/IG ratio, the higher the degree of graphitization. In this case, the ID/IG ratio of NOC is 0.92. With the increase of carbonization temperature, the conductivity of the material significantly increases, and 1000 ° C reaches the optimal equilibrium point between the degree of graphitization and nitrogen doping content.The conductivity of NOC powder measured by an automatic powder resistivity tester is 0.9 × 10− 4 Ω m, and the conductivity is 1.1 ×104 S m− 1, which proves that the conductivity between powders is good and can be used to improve the conductivity of the matrix material. The excellent conductivity of NOC powder was demonstrated, which is consistent with the SEM, XRD, and Raman results of NOC mentioned earlier.
Chemical structure of ETFE-F and C-ETFE-F
Figures 4(a) and (b) show the DSC test results of ETFE-F with a melt index of 15.6 and ETFE-F with a melt index of 11.2, respectively, to better explore the Tm, Tc, and crystallinity of the ETFE membrane. These results are consistent with the theoretical values of the ETFE membrane. From Table 1, it can be seen that the crystallinity of ETFE-F with a melt index of 15.6 is 34.11%, which is lower than the crystallinity of ETFE-F with a melt index of 11.2 by 37.69%, indicating that the higher the resin melt index, the smaller the crystallinity of the membrane. The reason is that the higher the melt index of the polymer, the better the fluidity of the molecular chain, and the easier it is to move freely, which is not conducive to orderly arrangement, leading to a decrease in crystallinity and lower crystallinity. Overall, high crystallinity, high membrane strength, and decreased flexibility are important indicators for ETFE membranes as substrates. Based on the usage situation, we choose the ETFE membrane with 11.2 melt fingers as the substrate.
Table 1
Sample name
|
Tm (℃)
|
Tc (℃)
|
ΔHc (J g− 1)
|
Xc (%)
|
15.6-ETFE-F
|
258.29
|
238.61
|
32.37
|
34.11
|
11.2-ETFE-F
|
255.78
|
239.57
|
34.01
|
37.69
|
Tm (℃) is melting temperature;Tc (℃) is crystallization temperature༛ΔHc (J g-1) is enthalpy of crystallization༛Xc (%) is crystallinity.
From Fig. 5(a) and 5(b), it can be seen that the contact angle of ETFE-F is about 98.5 °, and the contact angle of C-ETFE-F is about 132.2 °, which can be attributed to the exposed hydroxyl groups on the surface. Prove that corona treatment of surface photophores alters the surface tension of ETFE-F, leading to enhanced wettability, and NOC can adhere to the surface of ETFE-F, demonstrating the feasibility of this scheme for preparing electronic labels.[37]
As shown in Fig. 6(a), the FTIR spectral strong absorption band of ETFE-F is analyzed as follows:2974cm− 1 is the anti stretching vibration peak of - CH2 -,2880cm− 1 is the symmetric stretching vibration peak of -CH3,1453cm− 1 is the deformation vibration peak of CH2, the absorption band 1248cm− 1 is the deformation vibration peak of CH3, and 1165cm− 1.The stretching vibration peak representing - CF2 -, the strong absorption at 1117cm− 1 and 1043cm− 1 can be attributed to the vibration on the - C- C carbon chain, and 744cm− 1 is the in-plane rocking vibration peak of CH2. The FTIR spectra of ETFE-F and C-ETFE-F are basically consistent, indicating that the influence of structural changes in ETFE materials on the membrane properties can be ignored during the experimental process.
In Fig. 6(b), the XRD spectrum of ETFE-F shows the presence of (120) crystal planes at 19.5 °, forming a tetragonal crystal system. The XRD spectrum of C-ETFE-F exhibits a (120) crystal plane at 19.5 °, forming a tetragonal crystal system. The sharp peak at 27° exhibits a (002) crystal plane, which is due to the introduction of carbon materials. Generally speaking, the higher the graphitization degree, the sharper the peak, and the narrower the half peak width. On the contrary, it is a low "Bulging peak".
Mechanical properties of the ETFE-F and C-ETFE-F
According to the testing requirements of ASTM D882, the specimen is stretched to failure to obtain mechanical properties. Plastic membrane sample is loaded into a fixture for testing, it is usually in a relaxed rather than tensioned state. The tensile strength test and elongation at break test molds are shown in Figure S3 (a), and the direction of force application is described in Fig. 7(d). The tear strength testing mold is shown in Figure S3 (b), and the direction of force application is described in Fig. 7(d). Samples 1 and 2 are ETFE-F, Samples 3 and 4 are C-ETFE-F in Figs. 7(a), 7(b) and 7(c).
Tear strength refers to the force required when a polymer membrane material is torn. It refers to the maximum tensile force per square millimeter applied to the transverse area of the membrane material when it is horizontally pulled apart.
Tear strength calculation formula:
TS = F/A
Among them, F is the force applied at the time of fracture, in kilograms; A is the cross-sectional area of the fracture, in square millimeters.
Measurement of tensile strength and elongation at break
The following equation is used to calculate elongation and tensile strength:
Elongation calculation formula EB=(L1-L0/L0) × 100
Formula for calculating tensile strength σ = F/(b × d)
In the formula, EB: elongation, σ: Tensile strength (MPa)
F: Force value (N); b: Width (mm); d: Thickness (mm), L1: Distance between scale lines, L0: Distance between scales
Note that the thickness of the sample is 50 µm, and the width is 5 mm. The cross-sectional area of sample A is 1.25 mm2. Test speed: 500 ± 30 mm/min
The tensile strength of various samples in Fig. 7 (a) at 20 ℃ is 33.4 MPa, 33.9 MPa, 32.9 MPa, and 33.1 MPa,The elongation at break of various samples in Fig. 7 (b) are 450.1%, 442.8%, 466.2%, and 486.2%, respectively. The tear strengths in Fig. 7 (c) are 69.5, 68.1, 66.8, and 66.1 Nmm− 1, respectively. Therefore, the sample exhibits excellent mechanical properties, good tensile strength, elongation at break and tear strength, ensuring the stability of the substrate.