Photochemistry: Sample Preparation
SDA was synthesised through a sustainable green chemistry method previously reported by Rioux et al.14 Solutions of SDA were prepared in 10 mM concentrations using 0.4 M aqueous sodium phosphate buffer to maintain a physiological pH value of 5.6.34 Samples of diethyl sinapate, methyl sinapate and sinapoyl malate were made in the previously reported fashion.16,35
Wax-coated calcium fluoride (CaF2) circular windows of 25 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness (UQG optics) were prepared by adapting the protocol previously reported by Pambou et al.36 Specifically, Carnauba wax, No. 1 (CAS: 8015-86-9, Sigma Aldrich) was dissolved in chloroform to a concentration of 0.05% by weight. 1 mL of this solution was then pipetted onto a clean UV grade CaF2 window and spin-coated using a spin coater (Laurell Technologies, WS‑650MZ-23NPP/LITE) programmed to run at 3000 rpm for 20 seconds. These parameters have been shown in reference 36 to give a film thickness between 50 and 100 Å; hence we assume this to be the approximate thickness of the wax coatings on the samples studied in the present work.
Thin films of the chosen sample were then added on top of the wax coatings mentioned above; to achieve this, 1 mL of a 100 mM solution dissolved in ethanol was pipetted on top of a wax-coated CaF2 window prepared as described above and spun again for 20 seconds at 3000 rpm. The presence of the sample on the surface of the windows was confirmed through UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy, which revealed a peak in the absorption spectrum centred at 330 nm (Figure 1), approximately 15 nm red-shifted from the absorbance of SDA in aqueous solution at pH 5.6. The thickness of the spin-coated films was calculated through the experimentally determined molar absorption coefficient of SDA (15,000 ± 2,000 M-1 cm‑1, Figure S15), giving a thickness of 3 µm.
All steady-state UV/Vis absorption spectra were collected on a Cary 60 Spectrometer (Agilent Technologies) using a cuvette of 10 mm path length for solution samples. Along with these studies, solar irradiation to assess the photostability of the samples was provided by Oriel instruments, 91191-1000 solar simulator and was tuned using a neutral density filter to give an irradiation power equivalent to 1 sun (1000 W m-2).
Transient Absorption Spectroscopy
The TAS set-up used to collect the presented ultrafast spectroscopy data has been described previously;37,38 hence only specific details about the reported experiments are given here. Photoexcitation (or pump) wavelengths were chosen to correspond to the peak absorption wavelength of the samples of interest (305 and 330 nm), with the white light continuum detection (or probe) beam (330–740 nm) generated by focussing fundamental (800 nm) laser radiation into a vertically translated 2 mm CaF2 window. Liquid samples flowed through the sample interaction region using a diaphragm pump (SIMDOS 02) and a demountable liquid flow cell (Harrick Scientific Products Inc.); PTFE spacers of 100 µm and 6 µm thickness were used to define the thickness of the liquid samples. Thin film samples in liquid form and spin-coated onto the wax surface were translated in the focal plane of the probe beam. Sample degradation in all three environments was monitored by comparing the ΔOD between each scan cycle; if drops in the signal were observed after a scan cycle, the samples could be replenished before continuing.
To gain quantitative insight into the ultrafast dynamics of SDA (and SDA2-, vide supra), a global sequential fitting method across all probe wavelengths (330–740 nm) was employed using the TIMP package in R interfaced through Glotaran.39,40 Each set of TA spectra collected at a series of pump-probe time-delays (Δt) were sequentially fit with a 3-step kinetic model (i.e., , giving rise to 3 Evolutionary Associated Difference Spectra (EADS), modelling the spectral components. Each EADS exponentially decays with an associated lifetime, τn. This decay incorporates a convolution with a Gaussian to model the instrument response function (IRF, ≈ 80 fs full-width half maximum (FWHM)) and a third-order polynomial correction for the chirp of the experimental data. The fit returned lifetimes for each dynamical process, along with associated standard errors reported as twice their value. The fit quality was evaluated through the associated residuals (difference between the fit and the data), displayed in the SI Figure S16.
Computational Methods
To account for the different environments, DFT and TD-DFT were used to compute sinapic diacid in water (using implicit and explicit solvent models), in the gas phase, and on a mimic of a wax surface (here referred to as model surface). The deprotonated form (SDA2‑) was used in aqueous environments, while the neutral (SDA) form was used in the gas phase and model surface calculations, all of which were performed using Gaussian 16 rev a03.41
Optimizations and energy calculations of SDA2- and SDA were performed at the ωB97XD/6-31+G(d,p) level. In the calculations including the model surface, the optimizations were done using ωB97XD/6-31G(d) and subsequent energy calculations using 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. The minimum energy S1/S0 state intersections were optimised using the penalty function method proposed by Martínez and co-workers,42,43 implemented in the CIOpt program with an in-house adaptation to work with Gaussian software. The topographies of the potential energy curves were characterised by linear interpolations in internal coordinates connecting the vertically excited S1 state (at the ground state equilibrium geometry) to the S1 minimum and the S1/S0 intersection. Charge transfer analysis of the ground and low-lying singlet excited states of neutral and dianionic SDA were computed using the TheoDore program44 (see Table S4 and Supplementary Information for more details).
To mimic the water environment, we use SMD (Solvation Model Based on Density)20 as an implicit solvation model (here referred to as SDA2-.(H2O)0) and systematically added up to 15 water molecules (SDA2-.(H2O)n , where n indicates the number of water molecules). The ground (S0) and the first three singlet excited electronic states (S1, S2, S3) for SDA2- were optimised with implicit solvation, while the S0 and S1 states were optimised with micro-solvation. These SMD/water results can be viewed in Figure S4 and the reaction coordinates are shown in Figure S6.
To simulate SDA in a wax environment, the fully protonated form was considered since this species is expected to be deposited on the surface. First, optimisations of the S0 and S1 states of the isolated neutral SDA molecule in the gas phase were undertaken. Thus, the two most stable conformers of SDA in its ground state (see Figure S7 and Table S2) were selected for the simulations with the wax surface model The topography of the S1 state for these isolated conformers is shown in Figure S10. In the S0 optimizations of SDAA and SDAB in different orientations on the top of the model surface, only the SDA atoms were allowed to move (Figure S8).
Plant Heating
Experiments to measure the local heating of plant leaves were performed in the following manner: 25 μl spots of sinapic diacid, 50 mM dissolved in 10% ethanol, adjusted to pH 4.5-5.6 using 1M KOH, were pipetted onto 39-day old Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. 10% ethanol was used as a control. After evaporation, the plants were moved to a climate cabinet (18°C, 70% RH) or a greenhouse. Images were taken after 4 hr UV-A+B and white light treatment (5 µmol m-2 s-1 total UV and 190 µmol m-2 s-1 Photosynthetic Active Radiation, PAR, for the climate cabinet, 18 µmol m-2 s-1 total UV and 850 µmol m-2 s-1 PAR for the greenhouse studies, irradiation spectrum is shown in Figure S12).
In Silico investigation
i. Bioaccumulation
Bioaccumulation was evaluated using the bioconcentration factor (BCF), defined as the ratio of the concentration of the test chemical in aquatic organisms to its concentration in the ambient environment. Two different platforms were employed to predict BCF. The VEGA platform provides 4 models (CAESAR, Meylan, KNN/Read-across, and Arnot-Gobas) for which a log value is given, as well as information about the reliability of the prediction (low, moderate, or high). The online tool ISIDA/Predictor is a consensus regression model based on 17 individual models. The outcome is given as a log value with a prediction confidence estimate (outside applicability domain (AD), average, good, and optimal, based on the model predictions). According to the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, a substance with a BCF higher than 2000 (or log BCF > 3.3) is considered bioaccumulative, while a substance with a BCF higher than 5000 (or log BCF > 3.7) is considered very bioaccumulative.
ii. Biodegradability
Biodegradability was evaluated using the VEGA platform (IRFMN model) as well as the online tool ISIDA/Predictor (consensus regression model based on 15 individual models). For both tools, the outcome is given as qualitative prediction (readily biodegradable/not readily biodegradable), plus information about the reliability of the prediction (low, moderate, or high reliability for VEGA or outside AD, average, good, and optimal for ISIDA/Predictor).
iii. Persistence
Persistence in sediment, soil, and water were evaluated using the VEGA platform. The qualitative IRFMN model gives a statement (not persistent or nP, close to persistence threshold or nP/P, close to very persistent threshold or P/vP, very persistent or vP) while the quantitative IRFMN model gives an estimate on the number of days of persistence in the so-called matrix. Both models also provide information on the reliability of the prediction (low, moderate, or high reliability). In addition, we used the online tool ISIDA/Predictor that provides a consensus model based on 19, 15, and 20 individual models, respectively. The outcome is given as a statement (persistent P or not persistent nP) with a prediction confidence estimate (outside AD, average, good, and optimal).
iv. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity
The potential mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of SDA was assessed using the different software tools VEGA, TEST, and LAZAR. Previous work has shown the relevance of applying multiple models to increase the predictive power of such in silico investigations.45,46 Detailed information on the use of these models can be found in previous publications.18,47 In short, the different predictions generated by the individual models were converted to numeric values ranging between 0 and 1, in which presumed non-mutagenicity/non-carcinogenicity spans the range 0-0.50, while mutagenicity/carcinogenicity ranges from 0.51 to 1 (see Table S7).
The arithmetic mean of the different prediction scores was calculated and plotted in a diagram, divided into three zones: a score > 0.66 means a positive prediction (mutagenic/carcinogenic) with good reliability, while a score <0.33 is a negative prediction (non-mutagenic/non-carcinogenic) with good reliability. A score between 0.33 and 0.66 is considered equivocal: scores between 0.33 and 0.5 are regarded as negative predictions (non-mutagenic/non-carcinogenic) with insufficient reliability, while scores between 0.5 and 0.66 are regarded as positive predictions (mutagenic/carcinogenic), again with insufficient reliability.
v. Endocrine Toxicity
Endocrine toxicity was investigated using the VEGA platform. The term “endocrine toxicity” here encompasses 5 models which give predictions on receptor-mediated effects (4 models: Estrogen Receptor-mediated effect IRFMN/CERAPP, Androgen Receptor-mediated effect IRFMN/COMPARA, Thyroid Receptor Alpha effect NRMEA, and Thyroid Receptor Beta effect NRMEA), as well as on receptor binding affinity (Estrogen Receptor Relative Binding Affinity model IRFMN). A qualitative prediction (yes/no), plus information about the reliability of the prediction (low, moderate, or high reliability), is provided for each model.
vi. Acute and short-term toxicity
Acute and short-term toxicity was investigated using in silico models for oral LD50 and the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) from 90-day toxicity studies. The oral LD50 in rats was estimated using T.E.S.T., based on a dataset comprising values from 7413 substances. The NOAEL was estimated using the module NOAEL - IRFMN/CORAL provided within the VEGA platform, based on a dataset comprising 140 different NOAELs from repeated-dose 90-day oral toxicity studies in rodents.
vii. Read-across approach
The read-across approach relies on the structural similarity of SDA and closely-related compounds to predict, by extrapolation, unknown aspects of SDA’s toxicity. Using the OECD QSAR Toolbox (https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/oecd-qsar-toolbox.htm), we sought to identify a list of structurally similar compounds for which available experimental data for the endpoints of mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and acute toxicity were extracted. Predictions for the test compound (SDA) were then generated with the help of the module « Read-across ». Compounds used in the read-across approach were isoferulic and ferulic acids (CAS 537-73-5 and 1135-24-6, respectively). Sinapic acid is probably the most structurally similar analogue, but it was not considered for the read-across due to a lack of available data in the OCED and QSAR toolbox.
In vitro investigation
i. Chemicals
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany). Doxorubicin was purchased from Cayman (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and dissolved in DMSO. All other chemicals were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) or Sigma, at the highest purity available, if not stated otherwise below.
ii. Cell culture
Human intestinal Caco-2 cells were cultured as previously described in Voss et al.48 Briefly, cells (passages 26–36) were seeded at 10,000 cell/well in 96-well plates in culture medium (DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose, L-Glutamine, sodium pyruvate, 3.7 g/L NaHCO3, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin,100 µg/mL streptomycin). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. For differentiation into an intestinal epithelial-like monolayer, cells were cultured for 3 weeks with renewal of medium every 2-3 days.49 All the assays were performed on differentiated Caco-2 cells.
Human liver HepaRG cells were cultured as previously described in Alarcan et al.50 In short, cells (passages 15–20) were seeded at 9,000 cell/well in 96-well plates in culture medium (Williams’ E Medium with stable Glutamine, 2.24 g/L NaHCO3 and Phenol Red, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin,100 µg/mL streptomycin, 5 µg/mL insulin, and 50 µM hydrocortisone hemisuccinate). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Following 2 weeks maintenance, the cells were cultured in the same medium supplemented with 1.7% DMSO (differentiation medium) for an additional 2 weeks with medium renewal every 2 to 3 days.
iii. Cell viability assay
Neutral Red uptake (NRU) assay was performed to assess the cytotoxicity of SDA in Caco-2 and HepaRG cells. Following 24 h incubation, cell medium was removed, then cells were incubated for 2 h with 100 µL solution of neutral red (4 µg/mL). After washing with PBS, cells were lysed and put under shaking for 10 min before fluorescence measurement at 645 nm (excitation at 530 nm).
iv. γH2AX assay
The γH2AX assay was performed according to Sprenger et al.51 Cells were treated for 24 h with different concentrations of SDA. Doxorubicin (1 μM) was used as positive control. Following treatment, the cells were washed once with cold PBS and fixed with 50 μl ice-cold methanol for 30 min. Cells were then washed with PBS-T (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) and blocked with 50 μl of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS-T for 1 h at room temperature. After removal of blocking solution, cells were stained with 40 μl (1:500 dilution in blocking solution) of the primary antibody anti-phospho histone H2A.X (S139) (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). After 1 h, the antibody was removed and cells were washed three times with PBS-T before staining with 40 μl (1:400 dilution in blocking solution) of the secondary antibody AlexaFluor 647 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h. The cells were again washed three times with PBS-T, then stained for 30 min with 50 μl DAPI (3 μM; TCI Deutschland, Eschborn, Germany). The fluorescence intensity was measured with the Celldiscoverer 7 microscope using the software ZEN 3.1 for image acquisition and analysis.