There are several parameters which affect the absorption performance of coating such as thickness of matrix material, form, dimensions, and location of air cavity. Firstly, in optimization section each parameter is examined separately. After determined the optimum value of each parameter, all parameters are examined together. So, the effect of each parameter on each other could be seen. Recently, absorber structure design met two concepts: soft coating and gradient medium [4]. The reflection coefficient of absorber tends to decrease with these two conditions. Soft coating is fulfilled by using PU and gradient mediums are used in the matrix material. After the material selection of matrix material is done, geometric conditions of cavity are examined. Air cavity could be in the cylindrical form; thus, absorption performance of pure PU could be enhanced. However, gradient condition is not satisfied with this form, and the absorption performance is limited. To obtain high absorption, cylindrical form is transformed into conical cavity form. The effect of the dimensions of conical air cavity (top and bottom radius and thickness) and location of it, are analyzed. Firstly, the model which consist of pure PU with 30 mm thickness as matrix material and backing steel is analyzed. Figure 2(a) shows the model and acoustic performance of this model.
Moreover, a conical air cavity with 14 mm long with 1- and 15-mm top and bottom radius, respectively are added to matrix material. The length and bottom radius of the cone kept constant, and the top radius of cone is set as 1, 4, 7, and 10 mm. The location of the top of cone is below 1 mm the water domain. The air domains are shown as blue. The acoustic performance of these parameters is shown in Fig. 2(b). Also, the bottom radius of conical air cavity is considered as a significant parameter in terms of acoustic performance. Therefore, a parametric study are done which based on the bottom radius. The lengt, location and top radius of the cone are kept constant, and bottom radius is set as 5, 10, 15, and 18 mm. The results of parametric study is shown in Fig. 2(c). After, the the top and bottom radius of conical air cavity kept constant, and length of cavity is set as 6,10, 14, and 18 mm. The results of parametric study are shown in Fig. 2(d).
The location of air cavity is significant in terms of impedance matcing between the coating and water domain. Therefore, a parametric study based on the location of air cavity are done. The top and bottom radius of conical cavity is 1 and 15 mm, respectively in this analysis. The length of the cavity is 14 mm. The distance between surface of coating and the top of conical cavity is set as 1, 5, 9, and 13 mm. The result are shown in Fig. 3(a). After, each parameter is examined separately, top, and bottom radius of conical air cavity are examined together. The results are shown in Fig. 3(b). Optimization studies are also carried out by reducing the dimensions of conical air cavity. Firstly, all the dimensions of the cavity reduced by 20%. So, top, and bottom radius are set as 0.2 and 3 mm, respectively. The length of the cavity is set as 2.8 mm, and the location of the cavity is kept constanst, 1mm below from the upper surface of coating. The results are shown as Fig. 3(c). Also, the optimization of reduced conical cavity are done with parametric study. The reduced model are set as 20%, 50%, 80% and 100% of top and bottom radius 1 and 15 mm, respectively. The length of cavity is set as 2.8 mm. The results are shown in Fig. 3(d) The location of cavity is kept constanst, 1 mm below the upper surface of the coating.
Also, an array designed is arranged as array with 1mm gap horizontally and vertically. To obtain conical array, the model arranged conically in both interior and exterior geometry. The result is shown in Fig. 4(a). A novel approach, which proposed in this study is adding a tradational gong geometry as air cavity to matrix material. The model dimensions is taken from the literature [30]. It is expected that the incident sound wave energy transform into vibration, and heat energy thanks to gong air cavity. The technical drawing of the gong is shown in Fig. 1. In this study, width of the coating is 40mm, hence, the tradational gong model not directly applicable to matrix material. Therefore, all of the dimensions of gong are offset according to width of the model which proposed in this study (40 mm).
Consequently, the literature model with 112.5 mm width reduced to 15 mm with dimension of reduction ratio of 0.133, at the same time, all other dimensions are reduced according to the certain ratio. Also, a parametric study which examine the location of the gong air cavity is done. In this analysis the distance between upper surface of gong and upper surface of coating is set as a parameter. Figure 4(b) shows the model and parametric study results of gong air cavity. Moreover, the length of the gong must be reduced because of the model width is 40 mm. However, the thickness of gong could be increased. So, the thickness of gong is set as 2 mm, and distance between the upper surface of gong and upper surface of coating is set as a parameter (h3). Figure 4(c) shows the model and results of parametric study. Effect of conical air cavity on acoustic performance is observed. Therefore, it is aimed to enhance its performance by designing novel gradient cavity. Sandglass model is firstly introduced. The model is arranged as arrays no gap in vertically, and 1mm gap horizontally. Moreover, a parametric study is done to determine effect of number of sandglasses. Firstly, 25 sandglasses which designed as shown in Fig. 10.13(b). After, 25, 22, 18, 13 sandglasses models are analyzed. The acoustic performance of the models is shown in Fig. 4(d).
The parametric studies which based on conical air cavity dimensions and location is examined with/without gong shape air cavity. To observe effect of gong, conical air cavity with r1 = 1 mm, and r2 = 15 mm, are examined with/without gong shape air cavity (h3 = 22 mm) and shown in Fig. 6(a). For bottom radius, r2 = 5 mm is selected, and results are shown in Fig. 6(b) For cavity length, h1 = 6 mm is selected, and results are shown in Fig. 6(c). For combined parametric study based on top-bottom radius the critical values are selected as r1 = 7 mm, and r2 = 15 mm, and results are shown in Fig. 6(d).