1. UNESCO. Digital higher education. https://en.unesco.org/themes/higher-education/digital Accessed 1 November 2020.
2. Biggs J, Tang, C. Teaching For Quality Learning At University Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Edition: 4th ed: Society for Research into Higher Education; 2011.
3. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004;93(3), 223-231
4. Lillejord S., Børte K., Nesje K. & Ruud E. (2018). Learning and teaching with technology in higher education – a systematic review. Oslo: Knowledge Centre for Education, www.kunnskapssenter.no Available from https://www.forskningsradet.no/om-forskningsradet/publikasjoner/2018/learning-and-teaching-with-technology-in-higher-education/
5. Simonson M, Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. Teaching and learning at a distance. Distance: Foundations of Distance Education 5th Edition ed2006.
6. Evans L, Vanden Bosch ML, Harrington S, Schoofs N, Coviak C. Flipping the Classroom in Health Care Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Nurse Educ. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):74-78. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000554. PMID: 30015680.
7. H. HEW, K.F., LO, C.K. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 18, 38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
8. Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216-21.
9. Tomesko J, Touger-Decker, R., Dreker, M., Zelig, R., & Parrott, J. S. . The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction to Teach Physical Examination to Students and Trainees in the Health Sciences Professions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 4:1-11, 2382120517720428. 2017.
10. The World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) World phsyiotheraphy 2020 https://www.wcpt.org/node Accessed 5 October 2020
11. Physical therapy WCPT. WCPT guideline for physical therapist professional entry level education 2011 https://world.physio/guideline/entry-level-education Accessed 5 October 2020
12. Unge J, Lundh, P., Gummesson, C. & Amnér, G. Learning spaces for health sciences – what is the role of e-learning in physiotherapy and occupational therapy education? A literature review. Phys Ther Rev. 2018;23:1, 50-60.
13. Mącznik AK, Ribeiro DC, Baxter GD. Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users' perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Sep 28;15:160. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0429-8. PMID: 26415677; PMCID: PMC4587774.
14. Veneri D. The role and effectiveness of computer-assisted learning in physical therapy education: A systematic review. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2011;27(4):287-98.
15. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation BMJ 2015; 349:g7647
16. Shephard K. Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2008;9(1):87-98.
17. Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5, 210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
18. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 2011; 343:d5928
19. Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7(2):95-105.
20. Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development. 2014;34(1):1-14.
21. Moore MG, & Kearsley G. Distance education: A systems view. Publisher: Wadsworth. 1996:Extent:290 p.
22. Sharples M, Taylor J, Vavoula G. A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In: Andrews R, Haythornthwaite C, editors. The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research: Sage publications; 2006. p. 221-47.
23. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Bus Horiz. 2016;59(4):441-50.
24. McAuley A, Stewart B, Siemens G, Cormier D, editors. The MOOC model for digital practice2010.
25. Blackstock FC, Watson KM, Morris NR, Jones A, Wright A, McMeeken JM, et al. Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: two randomized trials. Simul. 2013;8(1):32-42.
26. Green RA, Whitburn LY. Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Oct;9(5):422-30. doi: 10.1002/ase.1602. Epub 2016 Mar 1. PMID: 26929149.
27. Maloney S, Storr M, Paynter S, Morgan P, Ilic D. Investigating the Efficacy of Practical Skill Teaching: A Pilot-Study Comparing Three Educational Methods. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2013;18(1):71-80.
28. Maloney S, Storr M, Morgan P, Ilic D. The effect of student self-video of performance on clinical skill competency: a randomised controlled trial. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Mar;18(1):81-9. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9356-1. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PMID: 22354337.
29. Nicklen P, Keating JL, Paynter S, Storr M, Maloney S. Remote-online case-based learning: A comparison of remote-online and face-to-face, case-based learning - a randomized controlled trial. Education for Health. 2016;29(3):195-202.
30. Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernandez-Lao C, Guirao-Pineyro M, Castro-Martin E, Diaz-Rodriguez L. A blended learning approach to palpation and ultrasound imaging skills through supplementation of traditional classroom teaching with an e-learning package. Manual Therapy. 2012;17(5):474-8.
31. Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernandez-Lao C, Galiano-Castillo N, Castro-Martin E, Diaz-Rodriguez L, Arroyo-Morales M. Evaluation of e-learning as an adjunctive method for the acquisition of skills in bony landmark palpation and muscular ultrasound examination in the lumbopelvic region: a controlled study. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics. 2012;35(9):727-34.
32. Fernández-Lao C, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Galiano-Castillo N, Caro-Morán E, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Arroyo-Morales M. The effectiveness of a mobile application for the development of palpation and ultrasound imaging skills to supplement the traditional learning of physiotherapy students. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):274. Published 2016 Oct 19. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0775-1
33. Noguera JMjgcue, Jiménez JJ, Osuna-Pérez MC. Development and evaluation of a 3D mobile application for learning manual therapy in the physiotherapy laboratory. Computers & Education. 2013;69:96-108.
34. Lozano-Lozano M, Galiano-Castillo N, Fernández-Lao C, Postigo-Martin P, Álvarez-Salvago F, Arroyo-Morales M, et al. The Ecofisio Mobile App for Assessment and Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Imaging for Undergraduate Health Science Students: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(3):N.PAG-N.PAG.
35. da Costa Vieira RA, Lopes AH, Sarri AJ, Benedetti ZC, de Oliveira CZ. Oncology E-Learning for Undergraduate. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Cancer Education. 2017;32(2):344-51.
36. Rocha ACB, Pereira JLB, Soares CFT, Barbosa P, da Silva AC, de Moraes AM, et al. THE EFFECTS OF A VIDEO GAME ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN THE KNOWLEDGE TEST IN THE DISCIPLINE "PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE AND ETHICS IN PHYSIOTHERAPY" FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA. Etd Educacao Tematica Digital. 2017;19(2):570-81.
37. Silva CC, Toledo SL, Silveira PS, Carvalho CR. Evaluation of a multimedia online tool for teaching bronchial hygiene to physical therapy students. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. 2012;16(1):68-73.
38. Ulrich F, Helms NH, Frandsen UP, Rafn AV. Learning effectiveness of 360° video: experiences from a controlled experiment in healthcare education. Interactive Learning Environments. 2019.
39. Bartlett AS, Smith N. The Effect of a Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Mobile Application on Student Learning of Assessment Skills: A Pilot Study. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2020;31(2):66-73.
40. Huhn K, McGinnis PQ, Wainwright S, Deutsch JE. A Comparison of 2 Case Delivery Methods: Virtual and Live. Journal of Physical Therapy Education (American Physical Therapy Association, Education Section). 2013;27(3):41-8.
41. Hyland MR, Pinto-Zipp G, Olson V, Lichtman SW. A Comparative Analysis of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Traditional Lecture Instruction for Administration and Management Topics in Physical Therapy Education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. 2010;7(7):1-14.
42. Moore WA & Smith AR (2012) Effects of video podcasting on psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study behaviour of student physical therapists, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49:4, 401-414, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2012.728876
43. Covill L, Cook J. Comparison of Academic Performance in Traditional and Flipped Classrooms and Students' Attitudes of the Flipped Experience. Journal of Allied Health. 2019;48(1):e1-e7.
44. Day LJ. A gross anatomy flipped classroom effects performance, retention, and higher-level thinking in lower performing students. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018;11(6):565-74.
45. Deprey SM. Outcomes of Flipped Classroom Instruction in an Entry-Level Physical Therapy Course. Journal of Physical Therapy Education (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins). 2018;32(3):289-94.
46. Murray L, McCallum C, Petrosino C. Flipping the Classroom Experience: A Comparison of Online Learning to Traditional Lecture. Journal of Physical Therapy Education (American Physical Therapy Association, Education Section). 2014;28(3):35-41.
47. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Lei, M., Liu, P., Theobald, J., Meng, L., Liu, T., Zhang, C., & Jin, C. (2018). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on the development of self-directed learning in nursing education: a meta-analysis, Frontiers of Nursing, 5(4), 317-329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0032
48. Låg T, Sæle RG. Does the Flipped Classroom Improve Student Learning and Satisfaction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AERA Open. July 2019. doi:10.1177/2332858419870489
49. Merrill, M.D. First principles of instruction. ETR&D 50, 43–59 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
50. Dunleavy G, Nikolaou CK, Nifakos S, Atun R, Law GCY, Tudor Car L. Mobile Digital Education for Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e12937. doi: 10.2196/12937. PMID: 30747711; PMCID: PMC6390189.
51. Merayo N, Ruíz I, Debrán J, Aguado JC, de Miguel I, Durán RJ, et al. AIM-Mobile Learning Platform to enhance the teaching-learning process using smartphones. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2018;26(5):1753-68.
52. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education. 1996;32(3):347-64.
53. Jeno LM, Dettweiler U, Grytnes J-A. The effects of a goal-framing and need-supportive app on undergraduates' intentions, effort, and achievement in mobile science learning. Computers & Education. 2020;159:104022.
54. Fossland TR, Kirsti RyeI. Kvalitetskjeden i høyere utdanning – en guide for digital kompetanse og undervisningskvalitet. SBN 978-82-91308-57-9 Norgesuniversitetets skriftserie (1/2016) [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://diku.no/rapporter/kvalitetskjeden-i-hoeyere-utdanning.</p