Soybean Oligosaccharides Supplementation Attenuates the Fecal Odor Compounds by Modulate the Cecal Microbiota of Broilers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-35493/v1

Abstract

Background: Abatement of odor emissions in poultry production is very important for the quality and safety in poultry industries and benefit to the environment.

Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the dietary supplementation of different levels soybean oligosaccharides (SBO) in comparison with chlortetracycline (CHL) on major odor-causing compound in excreta and cecal microbiota of broiler chickens. One-day-old broiler chickens were assigned to 6 treatments with 6 replicate pens (10 birds/pen) for the 42-day experiment, including, the negative control (NC) fed a basal diet, the positive control (PC) fed a basal diet with CHL, and the basal diet with SBO at 0.5, 2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 g/kg, respectively. Fresh excreta was sampled for analysis odor compounds by high performance liquid chromatography. Cecum content was collected to analyze the cecal microbiota by 16S rRNA sequencing.

Results: The excreta indole concentration of broilers fed 2.0, 3.5 and 5.0 g/kg SBO and CHL diets were significantly decreased (P < 0.01) compared to NC. Excreta skatole concentration (P < 0.001) and pH (P < 0.05) were decreased by SBO and CHL. Formate concentration of birds fed 3.5 and 5.0 g/kg SBO diets were higher than that of birds fed other diets (P < 0.001). The acetate concentration (P = 0.003) were increased in birds fed 3.5 g/kg SBO diet. Deep sequencing 16S rRNA revealed that the composition of the cecal microbial digesta slightly or significantly changed by the supplementation of SBO or CHL. SBO decreased the abundance of Bacteroides, Bilophila, and Escherichia, which were related to indole and skatole concentration of excreta. While CHL had strong tendency to enrich Ruminococcus and reduce Rikenella.

Conclusion: These results indicated that supplementation of dietary SBO was beneficial in attenuating the concentration of odor causing compounds and impact the composition cecal microbiota of broilers.

Background

Broiler chickens are an indispensable source of animal protein for human beings, more than 65 billion chickens are produced annually in the word [1]. Meanwhile, broilers production also brings a huge amount of odor substances. Abatement of odor emissions in poultry production is very important for the quality and safety in poultry industries and benefit to the environment [2, 3]. The odor compounds, mainly including skatole (3-methylindole), indoles and volatile organic compounds, are produced by the microbial degradation of the nutrient substrates in the large intestine[4, 5]. These substances could cause the decline in performance, meat quality and welfare of broilers. Billions of microbes inhabit in the large intestine and act as mediators of these reactions of broilers. The component of diet is thought to be the key factor in influencing the composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microbiota, and further effects in the production of odor compounds [68]. Therefore, altering the ingredient of the diet may be possible to reduce odor emission from the source of odor [9, 10].

Soybean oligosaccharides (SBO) are one group of non-digestible carbohydrates, which are extracted from soybean seeds, primarily consist of stachyose, raffinose, and sucrose [11, 12]. While the exact mode of action remains elusive, it is usually considered that dietary SBO could be selectively fermented by some types of intestinal bacteria in the large intestine, resulting in decrease the contents of the major odor-causing compounds and better growth performance of animals [3, 13]. Several studies have shown a link between the cecal microbiota and odor-causing compounds of animals by dietary SBO. For example, diets with SBO significantly changed the population of Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus and E. coli, and decreased the content fecal NH3 in broilers [14]. SBO supplementation modifies the intestinal ecosystem in weaned piglets and has potentially beneficial effects on the gut [15]. Similar study in mice revealed that administration of SBO improved the numbers of benefical intestinal microbes [16]. In vitro studies have revealed that SBO can improve the gut microbiota balance in colon and modulate its metabolism in pigs [7], changed in the intestinal microbiota and reduced the production of odor compounds in broilers [17, 18]. Antibiotics work primarily by reshaping the intestinal microbiota [19], which is known as a unique ecosystem to play a crucial role in host health and metabolism [2022]. However, the change and relationship between the compounds of major odor compounds and the intestinal microbiota are not elucidated by adding dietary SBO. It also remains unknown whether SBO and antibiotic modulate the intestinal microbiota in distinct manners.

We hypothesized that the mode of action of different levels of dietary SOB or antibiotic effect on odor-causing compounds content in excreta and occurs through the composition of cecum microbiota of broilers. Therefore, it is necessary to better understand how cecal bacterial communities react to these feed additives and suitable level of addition. In these study, we used high-throughput sequencing of the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to assess the alter of structure cecal bacterial community and the change of major odor compounds of excreta in broiler chickens after fed either a commercial diet free of antibiotics (NC), the same basal diet supplemented with a sub-therapeutic level of chlortetracycline (PC), or the basal diet supplemented with 0.5 g/kg to 5.0 g/kg of SBO (0.5SBO, 2.0SBO, 3.5SBO, or 5.0SBO). The new light on their produce mechanism and may allow SBO as targeted manipulation of the intestinal microbiota to reduce odor compounds and improve animal health and productivity in the future.

Methods

Experimental design, birds and diets

A total of 360 day-of-hatch commercial mixed sex Archer Abor+-hybird broiler chicks were obtained from a Commercial Hatchery (Shenyang, China) and randomly assigned to one of six dietary treatments with 6 replicates (n = 10) per treatment in a completely randomized block design. All birds were fed a non-medicated common commercial-type broiler starter (d 0–21) and grower (d 22 to 42) corn-soybean meal basal diets and offered water ad libitum. Detailed information about the basal diets is summarized in Additional file 1. The six treatment groups were as follows: negative control (NC), basal diet was no additives; positive control (PC), the same basal diet supplemented with 40 mg/kg chlortetracycline (CHL), and SBO at 0.5 g/kg (0.5SBO), 2.0 g/kg (2.0SBO), 3.5 g/kg, (3.5SBO), and 5.0 g/kg (5.0SBO), respectively. The basal diets were commercially manufactured feed which formulated to meet NRC (1994) requirements without antibiotics. The SBO was extracted from soybean meal, and the main ingredient was stachyose, with purity of 80.92% [23].

The chickens were raised in cages pens in an environmentally controlled broiler house. The ambient temperature on 1 d was 35 ± 2 ℃, and was decreased 3 ℃ per week until it reached 26 ℃, thereafter, the temperature was kept constant until 42 d. The light was provided 24 h constant for the entire period of the experiment.

Sampling procedures, determination of odor compounds and VFAs

On d 40, 41 and 42, fresh excreta were sampled from each replicate group using plastic trays below each cages within 2 min after excretion. The dropped fresh excreta were collected from the tray and transferred into plastic tubes. The total amount of collected excreta samples from the same replicate were pooled stored in a freezer at − 20℃ for skatole and indole analyses. The pH of excreta was measured using the pH meter (PB-10, Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany). Concentrations of indole, skatole, VFAs (formic, acetate, propionate, and butyrate) and lactate in the excreta were measured using HPLC equipment (model Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) as described Yang et al. [3, 8].

On d 42, one bird per replicate of each treatment was randomly selected, euthanized by cervical dislocation. The contents of ceca were collected under sterile conditions by dissection and pooled two contents by treatment. Samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and were stored at -80 ℃ for further microbiota analysis through 16S rRNA sequencing.

DNA isolation

The microbial DNA was isolated from cecal content using a QIAamp Fecal DNA Isolation Kits (Qiagen Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) and Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nyxor Biotech, Paris, France) analysis.

PCR amplification and sequencing

The following primers were applied for the amplification of the variable V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene: 515F 5ˊ-barcode-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3ˊand 806R: 5ˊ-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3ˊ, where the barcode is an 8-base sequence unique to each sample. PCRs were carried out in triplicate 50 µl reactions containing 0.5 µmol L− 1 forward and reverse primers, 5 µl tenfold reaction buffer, 250 nmol L− 1 dNTP, 0.2 µl FastPfu Polymerase and 20 ng template DNA. Thermal cycling consisted of 3 min initial denaturation at 95 ℃, followed by 30 cycles at 95 ℃ for 30 s, 50 ℃ for 30 s, and 72 ℃ for 60 s, and a final extension at 72 ℃ for 7 min. About 400–450 bp fragment of PCR products was obtained and purified with GenJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific Co., USA).

Sequencing libraries were generated using NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs Co., US) following manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added. The library quality was assessed on the [email protected] Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific Co., US) and Agilen Bioanalyzer 2100 system. At last, samples were sequenced on an IIlumina MiSeq 2500 instrument using a 250 bp paired-end reads protocol at the Mymbio Tech Company of Beijing. Paired-end sequencing with dual index reads was performed with automated cluster generation.

Bioinformatic analysis

Paired-end reads from the original fragments were merged using FLASH version 1.2.7 [24]. 16S rRNA reads were decoded based on sample specific barcodes and processed to remove low quality reads data. The quality average score of reads was above 20, joining together the sequences and removed the sequences shorter less than 100 bp reads using Mothur software to filer data. Chimeras and error sequences of optimized data were removed using QIME (version 1.8.0) [25] software package by clustering data into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for species classification under 0.97 similarity [26, 27]. Rarefaction analysis and good’s coverage were determined to quantify the coverage and sampling effort, and statistic the abundance information of each OUT in samples. Collector’s curves for richness observations (ACE and Chao1) and Shannon diversity index were calculated. Beta diversity analysis was performed using UniFrac to compare the results of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the community ecology package R-forge and generate PCoA figures. Besides, using the Number Cruncher Statistical System software (NCSS 20017; Kaysville, UT, USA), by the unweighted pair-group (UPGMA) method and Manhattan distance with no scaling, double hierarchical analysis was conducted [28].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance protocol using SPSS 19.0 (Statistical Package for Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago). Replicates were considered the experimental units for data of odor compounds and VFAs. Differences between the means were compared using LSD multiple range tests, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 level. For microbial data, means separation was via four nonorthogonal contrasts of (i) negative control treatment vs. others, (ii) negative control treatment vs. SBO treatments, (iii) positive control treatment vs. others, (iv) positive control treatment vs. SBO treatments. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to evaluate the relationship between odor compounds and genera.

Results

Effect of in-feed SBO on odor compounds and VFAs in excreta

Table 1

Effect of soybean oligosaccharides on indole (ng/g), skatole (ng/g) concentration, and pH in excreta of broilers during excreta collection.

Item

Dietary Treatmentsd

 

Statistics

NC

PC

0.5SBO

2.0SBO

3.5SBO

5.0SBO

 

SEMe

P-value

Indole

111.07a

60.58bc

87.85ab

40.49c

21.71c

37.92c

 

8.040

0.003

Skatole

34.23a

23.90 cd

28.18b

22.42d

18.68e

26.23bc

 

0.964

< 0.001

pH

6.53a

6.49ab

6.29abc

6.21abc

6.12c

6.30abc

 

0.043

0.023

a, b, cMeans in a column within treatment grouping without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).

dNC, negative control; PC, positive control, NC with 40 mg/kg chlortetracycline; 0.5SBO, 2.0SBO, 3.5SBO, and 5.0SOB: NC with 0.5, 2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 g/kg soybean oligosaccharides respectively.

eSEM, standard error of the mean.

The effect of dietary supplementation of different levels SBO on the concentration of skatole and indole, and pH in excreta of broilers on final days are presented in Table 1. The treatments supplementation of SBO decreased indole and skatole of excreta in broiler chickens compared to the NC treatment (P < 0.05). The indole (P = 0.003) concentration was significant decreased when supplementation of SBO at 2.0, 3.5 and 5.0 g/kg compared to NC, with the average 70% lower than the NC; while there is no significant differences with PC. The skatole concentrations (P < 0.001) were significantly lower when supplementation of SBO or CHL than NC, and it was lowest when SBO supplementation at 3.5 g/kg, with less 45.4% and 12.8% than NC and PC, respectively.

VFAs and lactate data are shown for excreta in broiler chickens fed dietary supplements on the final days in Table 2. The birds fed 3.5 and 5.0 g/kg SBO has higher formate than that of the other groups (P < 0.001). While feeding birds with diets containing 3.5 g/kg SBO increased acetate level in excreta compared to other treatments (P = 0.003). The propionate, butyrate and lactate level of excreta were not affected by the dietary treatments (P > 0.05).

Table 2

Effect of soybean oligosaccharides on VFAs and lactate concentrations in excreta of broilers (mg/g)

Item

Dietary Treatmentsc

 

Statistics

NC

PC

0.5SBO

2.0SBO

3.5SBO

5.0SBO

 

SEMd

P-value

Formate

0.187b

0.176b

0.277b

0.300b

0.561a

0.542a

 

0.033

< 0.001

Acetate

0.237b

0.223b

0.244b

0.258b

0.293a

0.256b

 

0.006

0.003

Propionate

0.256

0.224

0.227

0.244

0.237

0.259

 

0.022

0.999

Butyrate

0.229

0.140

0.136

0.258

0.212

0.186

 

0.017

0.327

Lactate

4.108

4.016

4.565

4.378

4.249

4.058

 

0.188

0.964

a, bMeans in a column within treatment grouping without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).

cNC, negative control; PC, positive control, NC with 40 mg/kg chlortetracycline; 0.5SBO, 2.0SBO, 3.5SBO, and 5.0SBO: NC with 0.5, 2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 g/kg soybean oligosaccharides respectively.

dSEM, standard error of the mean.

Effect of in-feed SBO on the cecal microtiota diversity

Broiler chicks were fed a non-antibiotics corn-soybean basal diet supplemented without or with different levels of SBO and antibiotic for six weeks before collection of cecal content samples for each treatment. Following bacterial DNA isolation and sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 4 479 533 raw sequences reads were obtained, and 3 420 000 high-quality sequences were used for further analysis, with an average of 190 000 sequences per sample. There was detected 9 821 difference phylotypes among all samples for OUTs at distance (species level). At OUT level, rarefaction curves was performed and indicated that there were sufficient sequences for sampling to detect the diversity of majority bacteria. The estimators of community richness (ACE and Chao), diversity (Simpson and Shannon index) and good’s coverage are shown in Table 3. There was no significant differences in the OUT, ACE, Chao1, Simpson, Shannon, and good’s coverage indices in the dietary treatments, but there was a trend significant for OUT, ACE, and the Chao1 (P < 0.10). OUT, ACE, and the Chao1 were more for NC compared with others (P = 0.090, 0.064, and 0.099), and ACE, and the Chao1were more for NC compared with SBO treatments (P = 0.070 and 0.100).

Table 3

The bacterial diversity analysis of samples in different treatment of broilers cecum contents

Item

Dietary Treatmentsa

 

Statistics

NC

PC

0.5SBO

2.0SBO

3.5SBO

5.0SBO

 

SEMb

Contrastc (P-value)

OTU

2266

1761

1841

1862

1989

1742

 

84.2

1(0.090)

ACE

2856

2287

2271

2282

2485

2169

 

102

1(0.064), 2(0.070)

Chao1

2749

2276

2281

2262

2456

2183

 

95.8

1(0.099), 2(0.100)

Simpson

0.975

0.945

0.913

0.919

0.907

0.958

 

0.012

 

Shannon

6.87

6.17

6.29

6.28

6.32

6.71

 

0.180

 

good’s coverage

0.997

0.997

0.997

0.998

0.997

0.998

 

0.0001

 

aNC, negative control; PC, positive control, NC with 40 mg/kg chlortetracycline; 0.5SBO, 2.0SBO, 3.5SBO, and 5.0SBO: NC with 0.5, 2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 g/kg soybean oligosaccharides respectively.

bSEM, standard error of the mean.

c1 = NC vs. others; 2 = NC vs. SBO treatments (0.05 < P < 0.1).

Using the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard indices determined β-diversity to reveal the differences in cacal microbiota composition among individual treatments. While there was no obvious segregation of the microbiota that birds fed different diets based on the Bray-Curtis index (Fig. 1A), NC and PC groups were relatively separated from all other groups using the Jaccard index (Fig. 1B).

Effect of in-feed SBO on the bacterial phylum of cecal microbiota

On the classification basis of sequences from the cecal samples, 7 different phyla were identified at the phylum level, which distributed across all the treatment groups (Fig. 2). The others, the remaining phyla with sequence frequencies of < 1%, were considered low abundance. The pyrosequencing results showed that Bacterodetes (43.16–54.74%) and Firmicutes (39.62–51.70%) were the dominant phyla for cecal content, accounting for more than 90% (90.57–94.86%) of the total bacterial abundance in broiler chickens fed dietary supplements on d 42 (Additional file 2). The percentage of Proteobacteria showed higher for NC than for PC and supplementation SBO diets (P = 0.049) (Additional file 2). The abundance of Tenericutes was slightly less for the mean of NC or PC compared with SBO diets (P = 0.101 and P = 0.100, respectively). Feeding birds with diet PC decreased Actinobacteria compared to containing SBO diets and NC (P = 0.023) or only SBO diets (P = 0.026). There were no significant differences between the experimental treatments in the abundance of Bacteroidetes (P = 0.916), Firmicutes (P = 0.908), Unknown (P = 0.629), Cyanobacteria (P = 0.208) or others (P = 0.676).

Effect of in-feed SBO on the bacterial genus of cecal microbiota

At the genus level, the sequences from samples corresponded to 177 genera. The double hierachal cluster analysis on the top 50 most abundant taxa (Fig. 3) indicated that the proportion of unknown flora was the highest (56.73–75.98%) in groups, and other dominant genus included those of the taxa Bacteroides (1.47–12.33%), Ruminococcus (2.74–4.61%), Phascolacrctobacterium (0.18–5.99%), Rikenella (0.65–6.96%), Oscillospira (1.96–3.89%), Faecalibacterium (1.36–5.05%), AF12 (0.52–2.40%), Helicobacter (0.34–2.49%), while the relative abundance of other taxa was below 2%.

The unknown bacteria was less for the mean of NC diet compared with others (P = 0.047) (Fig. 4; Additional file 3). Compared with NC, supplementation of PC and SBO (P = 0.006) or supplementation of SBO (P = 0.009) showed lower percentage of Bcteroides (Additional file 3), and lowest was observed at 3.5 mg/kg SBO (Fig. 4). The abundance of Ruminococcus was greater for PC than for the birds fed SBO and NC or SBO (P = 0.028 and P = 0.024, respectively), the mean of fed PC was significant greater than the birds fed SBO at 0.5, 3.5, and 5.0 mg/kg. The percentage of Rikenella was less for PC than for other treatments (P = 0.048). The Escherichia was greater for NC vs. others (P = 0.026) or SBO treatments (P = 0.030). Bilophila was greater for NC vs. others (P = 0.063) or SBO treatments (P = 0.071), which were close to significant level. There were higher abundance of Faecalibacterium for supplementation of SBO levels of 2.0, 3.5 and 5.0 mg/kg, and higher Lactobacillus for 0.5, 2.0 mg/kg SBO levels compared to fed NC or PC, although no significant difference among the experimental treatments.

The correlation coefficient between the skatole levels of excreta and bacteria at genus in cecum of broilers

As shown by Table 4, the relationships among odor compounds and cecal digesta microbiota were observed in SBO and control diets of broilers. Indole was highly correlated with Bilophila (P < 0.1), while skatole was highly related to Bacteroides (P < 0.1), Bilophila (P < 0.05), and Escherichia (P < 0.1). There were high r (positive) for acetate versus Faecalibacterium (P < 0.05). Propionate was significantly correlated with Unknown (negative), Bacteroides, and Rikenella (P < 0.05), and lactate was highly correlated with Lactobacillus (P < 0.05).

Table 4

The correlation coefficient between the odor compound levels of excreta and bacteria at genus in cecum of broilers

Itema

Unk

Bac

Rum

Rik

Fae

Bil

Lac

Esc

Indole

-0.059

0.493

0.007

-0.104

-0.641

0.751*

-0.017

0.628

Skatole

-0.376

0.744*

-0.049

0.295

-0.536

0.861**

-0.270

0.800*

Formate

-0.384

-0.192

-0.530

0.564

0.699

-0.382

-0.220

-0.281

Acetate

-0.257

-0.234

-0.595

0.224

0.908**

-0.336

0.097

-0.288

Propionate

-0.908**

0.858**

-0.182

0.880**

0.397

0.590

-0.550

0.709

Butyrate

-0.498

0.541

-0.062

0.253

0.743

0.301

0.004

0.382

Lactate

0.507

-0.319

-0.646

-0.358

0.020

-0.303

0.902**

-0.433

pH

-0.131

0.470

0.582

-0.035

-0.707

0.654

-0.453

0.628

aUnk = Unknown; Bac = Bacteroides; Rum = Ruminococcus; Rik = Rikenella; Fae = Faecalibacterium; Bil = Bilophila; Lac = Lactobacillus; Esc = Escherichia.

*P < 0.1; **P < 0.05.

Discussion

Odor emission from chicken excreta is produced mainly by the microbial degradation the substrates in the cecum of broilers, which is a serious environmental problem in broilers industry. Strategies to mitigate emissions are needed. Among the strategies to reduce odor and gas emissions in the broiler industry, dietary supplementation of feed additives including SBO are becoming an accepted strategy because of their beneficial effects against intestinal pathogenic microbes and reduces the production of odor compounds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different levels of dietary SBO and CHL on odor-causing compounds in excreta and the composition of cecum microbiota of broilers.

At the end of the experiment, birds fed SBO has indole reduced by 21–80% and impairment of skatole by 33–64% compared with negative treatment. The value of skatole was decreased 22% between 3.5SBO treatment and antibiotic treatment. Also, 3.5 g/kg SBO supplementation decreased the pH, increased acetate in excreta compared with both control treatments, while 3.5 g/kg and 5.0 g/kg SBO had higher formate than that both control treatments. The produced short chain fat acids from fermented indigestible residues by the abundant microorganisms present in the ceca. Oligosaccharides are able to enter into the ceca in generous amounts and being fermented there by microflora [24]. Our former study has shown similar results [3], when supplementing 1.25 g/kg SBO in broiler decreased indole, skatole and the pH in broiler excreta. Additionally, it has been observed that SBO could decreased the concentration of indole and skatole, and pH value by intestinal microbiota of broilers in vitro [18].

Overall, in this study, the results demonstrated that the dietary supplementation with SBO might be a useful strategy to attenuate the production of odor in broilers. SBO supplementation decreased the concentration of indole, skatole and pH, and enhance the concentration of part of organic acid of excreta in broilers. The results of correlation analysis further indicated that the odor compounds were associated with intestinal microbial community. Broilers fed SBO and CHL had some alterations in the alpha and beta diversity, though non-significant, which indices of the cecal microbiota and these modifications promoted relevant changes of the microbial community structure.

In the early animal trials and in vitro studies, we used the molecular technique of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis revealed a shift in the microbiota composition [3, 8, 18]. However, this technique lack the depth and precision to reveal specific changes in bacterial composition. Subsequently, the method next-generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene could offer more information on specific changes in certain bacterial populations. However, there is scarce reports about using high-throughput sequencing study the changes on microbial communities of cecum by supplementation SBO in broilers. The approach of high-throughput sequencing provided a much accurate and in-depth estimation of cecal microbial diversity in broilers. Therefore, the results of present study provided the information of the ecology of cecal bacterial communities. In line with the previously reports on cecal microbiota of broilers [1, 30], it was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes at the phylum level, regardless of diet. The metabolism favours the fermentation of cellulose and stach etc in the cecum, results in higher microbial diversity and dominance of the saccarolytic and anaerobic order of Bacteroides and Clostridiales [1]. The most abundant genera detected in this study were unclassified, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Phascolacrctobacterium, Rikenella, Oscillospira, Faecalibacterium, and the unclassifed bacteria was the most. The results were quite similar with those obtained by Wen et al. and Zhu [1, 30]. Bjerrum et al. [30] reported that bacterial strains closely related to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were dominant in the ceca.

Based on the phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities and number of OTUs, SBO and CHL did not change the chicken cecal bacterial community membership, but the treatments significantly altered relative abundance of certain taxa in the cecum. This observation is in accordance with the study of Zhu et al. [30] who reported that SBO addition (0.6%) altered the chicken cecal microbiota. When added frucotooligosaccharide in broiler diets, the total number of anaerobes and Lactobacilli in the ceca increased while the number of E. Coli decreased [32]. Similar results were observed by Baurhoo et al by mannanoligosaccharide [33]. In present study, Bacteroides, Bilophila and Escherichia were significantly decreased in the cecum by SBO (Fig. 4). While Ruminococcus (Fig. 4), Lachnospiraceae and Coriobacteriaceae (Additional file 4) were enriched, Rikenella (Fig. 4) appeared to be diminished by chlortetracycline. These results are consistent with earlier observations that in-feed antibiotic preferentially enriched butyrate-producing bacteria [19], SBO inhibited the growth of pathogenic microbes, and reduced the production of odor compounds [3, 14, 30]. Previous studies have found that supplementation of broiler diets with a mixture of chlortetracycline and other antibiotic increased both Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae [34]. It is known that both Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae produce butyrate [19, 35, 36].

The most dramatic effect of SBO supplementation is differential reduction of the members of four most dominant bacterial families (Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae,and Enterobacteriaceae) in the chicken cecum (Additional file 4). SBO increased the population of a group of lactic acid bacteria in vitro, genera Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Weissella, and Leuconostoc in the cecal contents of young broiler chickens [17]. In broilers, supplementation of 1.25 g/kg SBO showed a higher cecal bacterial diversity, along with lower excreta indole and skatole production, it also increased the excreta total VFA concentration and decreased the pH value, when compared with that of the broilers fed the control diet [3]. Dietary supplementation with SBO increased the diversity of intestinal microflora and elevated the numbers of some presumably beneficial intestinal bacteria, (eg, Bifidobacterium sp, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and Roseburia), also increased the concentration of short-chain fatty acid in the intestinal lumen, and reduced the numbers of bacteria with pathogenic potential (eg, Escherichia coli, Clostridium, and Streptococcus) and the concentration of several protein-derived catabolites (eg, isobutyrate, isovalerate, and ammonia) in piglets[15]. In contrast, Ma et al. [16] described that intragastric administration of 4.0 g/kg body weight SBO significantly enhanced the proliferation of Bifidobacteria and lactic bacteria, and increased numbers of Enterococci and decreased numbers of Clostridium perfringens in the fecal contents of mouse.

Two lactic acid bacterial genera including Lactobacillus and Enterococcus were differentially regulated by SBO among the abundant OTUs in the cecum, however, no statistical differences were observed on the relative abundance of these bacterial genera between treatments, which may be related with the adding levels of SBO (Additional file 3). Lactic acid bacteria provide a myriad of beneficial effects to the host, and are widely used as probiotics in animal production [37, 38]. It is interesting to note that Lactobacillus was upregulated by 0.5, 2.0, and 3.5 g/kg SBO, while the Enterococcus was obviously reduced in response to 0.5, 2.0, and 3.5 g/kg SBO. An upregulation in the Lactobacillus abundance is consistent with earlier observations that SBO administration was associated with population of the Lactobacillus species [17, 39]. The lactate concentration in excreta was significantly positive correlation with Lactobacillus in the cecum (Table 4). Both Lactobacillus spp. and acetate production in the cecum of chickens by xylo-oligosaccharides treated diets have been shown to be increased, may promote intestinal health [40].The abundance of Enterococcus was reduced by lower levels of SBO (Additional file 3). Enterobacter aerogenes has been showed to be responsible for the degradation of L-tryptophan to skatole in cecum of broilers [18]. A lone Proteobacteria (Escherichia) was also reduced by all levels of SBO and CHL, and significantly positive correlation with the levels of skatole in excreta, which is in agreement of earlier reports of a downregulation of Escherichia in response to in-feed SBO[16, 18]. Escherichia is a typical harmful bacterium in the intestinal tract that is involved in the degradation of tryptophan to indole [41]. These results collectively suggest that SBO has a strong tendency improve the intestinal microbial balance [3] by favouring a quick proliferation of beneficial strains and inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microbes [7] and then contributes to reduce the production of odor compounds [18, 42].

Our results show that a higher positive correlation for acetate versus Faecalibacterium, which is a bacterial stain known to ferment mono-oligosaccharides and oligosaccharides into butyrate and lactate [31]. The intestinal metabolite skatole is generated by decarboxylation of indoleacetic acid by Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp. [43]. Indole formation is converted from tryptophan via the action of the enzyme tryptophanase, which is expressed in many Gram-positive bacterial species including Escherichia coli, Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp. [4446]. Our results show that a positive correlation for indole versus Bilophila, skatole versus Bacteroides, Bilophila and Escherichia, which is in agreement of earlier report of Uncultured Lachnospiraceae bacterium and Bacteroides sp. are associated with the production of major odor-causing compounds in the excreta of broilers [3].

Indole and skatole are mainly produced by the microbial degradation of several substrates of cecum of broilers. The present study demonstrated that supplementation of broilers dietary SBO significantly reduced the production of odor compounds in excreta, and this effect was associated with cecal microbiota composition, in comparison to its un-supplemented control counterpart, and these partly similar to those of CHL individuals.

Conclusions

In summary, our data indicates that dietary SBO supplementation modulated the relative abundance of some specific bacteria without changing the whole microbial structure. Decreased the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Rikenella, and Escherichia bacteria in cecum and elevated fecal acetate concentration in chickens fed SBO might be an intestinal skatole mitigating attribute and may contribute to ameliorate the producing of odor-causing compound during chicken production.

Abbreviations

SBO: Soybean oligosaccharides; CHL: Chlortetracycline; NC: Negative control; PC: Positive control; NRC: National research council; VFA: Volatile fatty acid; HPLC: High performance liquid chromatography; OTUs: Operational taxonomic units; PCoA: Principal coordinate analysis; SEM: Standard error of the mean

Declarations

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Department of Animal Science and Technology of the Shenyang Agricultural University for their valuable assistance in conducting the experiments.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31772618 and 31372328) supported this study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author by request. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in the article.

Authors’ Contributions

Guiqin Yang conceived and designed the experiments; Haiying Liu, Xin Li and Weiguo Dong performed the experiments. Haiying Liu, Xin Li, Xin Zhu analyzed and interpreted the data. Haiying Liu and Li Xin, and Guiqin Yang drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to data interpretation and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal trials were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shenyang Agricultural University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors approved the submission of this manuscript and declare no conflicts of interest. The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The agencies that funded this research had no role in the study design, analysis, or writing of this article.

Author details

College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.

Conflicts of Interest 

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wen C, Yan W, Sun C, Ji C, Zhou Q, Zhang D, Zheng J, Yang N. The gut microbiota is largely independent of host genetics in regulating fat deposition in chickens. The ISME J. 2019; 13:1422–36.
  2. Sharma NK, Choct M, Wu SB, Smillie R, Swick RA. Dietary composition affects odour emissions from meat chickens. Anim Nutr. 2015; 1:24–9.
  3. Yang G, Yin Y, Liu H, Liu G. Effects of dietary oligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, concentrations of the major odor-causing compounds in excreta, and the cecal microbiota of broilers. Poult Sci. 2016; 95:2342–51.
  4. Jensen MT, Hansen LL. Feeding with chicory roots reduces the amount of odorous compounds in colon and rectal contents of pigs. Anim Sci. 2006; 82:369–76.
  5. Le PD, Aarnink AJA, Jongbloed AW, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Ogink NWM, Verstegen MWA. Inter active effects of dietary crude protein and fermentable carbohydrate levels on odour from pig manure. Livestock Sci. 2008; 114:48–61.
  6. Hooper LV, Midwedt T, Gordon JI. How host microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002; 22:283–307.
  7. Zhou X, Kong X, Yang X, Yin Y. Soybean oligosaccharides alter colon short-chain fatty acid production and microbial population in vitro. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90:37–9.
  8. Yang G, Zhang P, Liu H, Zhu X, Dong W. Spatial variations in intestinal skatole production and microbial composition in broilers. Anim Sci J. 2019; 90:412–22.
  9. Rehman H, Vahjen W, Awad WA, Zentek, J. Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Arch Anim Nutr. 2007; 61:319–35.
  10. Sharma NK, Choct M, Wu S, Swick RA. Nutritional effects on odour emissions in broiler production. World Poult Sci J. 2017; 73:257–80.
  11. Kim S, Kim W, Hwang IK. Optimization of the extraction and purification of oligosaccharides from defatted soybean meal. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2003; 38:337–42.
  12. Patel S, Goyal A. Functional oligosaccharides: production, properties and applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 27:1119–28.
  13. Flickinger EA, Fahey JGC. Pet food and feed applications of inulin, oligofructose and other oligosaccharides. Br J Nutr. 2002; 87: S297–300.
  14. Zhang Z, Huang R, Ma K, Guo Y, Chen H, Pan D. Effect of soybean-oligosaccharides on microorganism of cecum and content of NH3 in excreta of broilers. J Agri. Uni. Hebei. 2006; 29:104–7.
  15. Zhou X, Kong X, Lian G, Blachier F, Geng M, Yin Y. Dietary supplementation with soybean oligosaccharides increases short-chain fatty acids but decreases protein-derived catabolites in the intestinal luminal content of weaned Huanjiang mini-piglets. Nutr Res. 2014; 34:780–8.
  16. Ma Y, Wu X, Giovanni V, Meng X. Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on intestinal microbial communities and immune modulation in mice. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017; 24:114–21.
  17. Lan Y, Williams BA, Verstegen WA, Patterson R, Tamminga S. Soy oligosaccharides in vitro fermentation characteristics and its effect on caecal microorganisms of young broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007; 133:286–97.
  18. Liu H, Hou R, Yang G, Zhao F Dong W. In vitro effects of inulin and soybean oligosaccharide on skatole production and the intestinal microbiota in broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018; 102:706–16.
  19. Robinson K, Becker S, Xiao Y, Lyu W, Yang Q, Zhu H, Yang H, Zhao J, Zhang G. Differential impact of subtherapeutic antibiotics and ionophores on intestinal microbiota of broilers. Microorganisms. 2019; 7:282–94.
  20. Lalles JP. Microbiota-host interplay at the gut epithelial level, health and nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016; 7:66.
  21. Durack J, Lynch SV. The gut microbiome: Relationships with disease and opportunities for therapy. J Exp Med. 2019; 216:20–40.
  22. Wang G, Huang S, Wang Y, Cai S, Yu H, Liu H, Zeng X, Zhang G, Qiao S. Bridging intestinal immunity and gut microbiota by metabolites. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76:3917–37.
  23. Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang L. Isolation of oligosaccharides from soybean molasses by alcohol precipitation. China Oils and Fats. 2009; 34:47–50.
  24. Magoc T, Salzberg S. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:2957–63.
  25. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EKet al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010; 7:335–6.
  26. Wang QG, Garrity M, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73:5261–7.
  27. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 5069–72.
  28. Huson DH, Mitra S. Introduction to the analysis of environmental sequences: metagenomics with MEGAN. In: Anisimova M, editor. Sstatistical and computational methods. Springer, Evolutionary Genomics; 2012. p. 415–29.
  29. Svihus B, Choct M, Classen HL. Function and nutritional roles of the avian caeca: a review. World Poult Sci J. 2013; 69:249–64.
  30. Zhu X, Liu J, Liu H, Yang G. Soybean oligosaccharide, stachyose and raffinose in broilers diets: Effects on odor compound concentration and microbiota in cecal digesta. Poult Sci. 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.034.
  31. Bjerrum L, Engberg RM, Leser TD, Jensen BB, Finster K, Pedersen K. Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poult Sci. 2006; 85:1151–64.
  32. Xu Z, Hu C, Xia M, Zhan X, Wand M. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2003; 82:1030–6.
  33. Baurhoo B, Phillip L, Ruiz-Feria CA. Effects of purified lignin and mannan oligosaccharides on intestinal integrity and microbial populations in the ceca and litter of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2007; 86:1070–8.
  34. Banerjee S, Sar A, Misra A, Pal S, Chakraborty A, Dam B. Increased productivity in poultry birds by sub-lethal dose of antibiotics is arbitrated by selective enrichment of gut microbiota, particularly short-chain fatty acid producers. Microbiology. 2018; 164:142–53.
  35. Meehan CJ, Beiko RG. A phylogenomic view of ecological specialization in the Lachnospiraceae, a family of digestive tract-associated bacteria. Genome Biol Evol. 2014; 6:703–13.
  36. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14:20–32.
  37. Ljungh A, Wadstrom T. Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2006; 7:73–89.
  38. Wan LY, Chen ZJ, Shah NP, El-Nezami H. Modulation of intestinal epithelial defense responses by probiotic bacteria. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016; 56:2628–41.
  39. Yan G, Guo Y, Yuan J, Liu D, Zhang B. Sodium alginate oligosaccharides from brown algae inhibit Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2011; 90:1441–8.
  40. Pourabedin M, Guan L, Zhao X. Xylo-oligosaccharides and virginiamycin differentially modulate gut microbial composition in chickens. Microbiome. 2015; 3:15.
  41. Deslandes B, Gariepy C, Houde A. Review of microbiological and biochemical effects of skatole on animal production. Livest Sci. 2001; 71:193–200.
  42. Abdelqader A, Al-Fataftah AR, Das G. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance, eggshell quality, intestinal morphology and microbiota composition of laying hens in the late phase of production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013; 179:103–11.
  43. Roager HM, Licht TR. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2018; 9:3294.
  44. Lee JH, Lee J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010; 34:426–44.
  45. Elsden SR, Hilton MG, Waller JM. The end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acids by clostridia. Arch Microbiol. 1976: 107, 283–288.
  46. Devlin AS, Marcobal A, Dodd D, Nayfach S, Plummer N, Meyer T, et al. Modulation of a circulating uremic solute via rational genetic manipulation of the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2016; 20:709–715.