Vaginal evisceration is a rare complication after abdominal hysterectomy. Bowel evisceration, outside the introitus of the vagina has been associated with life threatening sequelae such as peritonitis, bowel injury and necrosis and sepsis among others (1). This surgical event occurs most frequently related to vaginal hysterectomies (63%) followed by abdominal (32%) and laparoscopic (5%) (5). A Mayo Clinic study between 2004 and 2008 reported a 4.1% incidence of vaginal dehiscence after robotic closure of vaginal cuff. 9 cases were operated due to malignancies, 10 cases coitus was the triggering cause, most case occur at a medium of 41 postoperative days and 3 had a recurrent dehiscence needing a second repair, on this series the used a vaginal approach andsometimes combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach (6). Hormonal alterations together with atrophies at the level of the female genital apparatus represent a risk factor in the postmenopausal period. Up to 70% of patients with evisceration have some serious associated condition, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, cancer, infectious processes, or alterations in nutritional status (obesity, thinness, and deficiency states, among others) (4). Steroid medication is also often a history in patients with eviscerations. It has been shown that diabetes can act as a consequence of a delay in phagocytic activity, favors bacterial development, decreases collagen synthesis and cancels healing. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomies are associated with higher rates of vaginal cuff dehiscence and evisceration than are open and vaginal hysterectomies. With the rising prevalence of minimally invasive hysterectomy, gynaecologists should know how to manage this rare but potentially serious condition. Urgent laparotomy historically was recommended for management of vaginal cuff evisceration to allow for complete bowel evaluation. More recently, successful outcomes using a less-invasive vaginal or combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach have been reported (2). According to Cronin, there are several determining factors that can influence its appearance, both due to a deficient relaxation anaesthetic technique during closure and also deficient surgical technique (too tight knots, covering too much tissue on the edges with the stitches, continuous sutures too tight, hasty closures and uneven stitches on the suture line, necrosis caused by extensive electro cautery burns, etc.) (6). Likewise, perioperative complications and in the immediate postoperative period such as intestinal loop perforations, prolonged ileus, cough, persistent hiccups, etc. will influence the appearance. Also, the size and location of some laparotomy incisions, together with fecal peritonitis, urgent interventions, will be decisive for a subsequent evisceration to exist. Regarding the type of incision and its relationship with this postoperative condition, some studies have noted that evisceration is less frequent after transverse incisions than in median ones, and that they are less frequent in the vaginal region than in the upper part of the abdomen. There is also a direct relationship between the size of the incision and wall failure in the immediate postoperative period. The proposed treatment is surgical, since a quick and timely intervention greatly reduces intestinal morbidity. The pelvic reinforcement with mesh is very successful because it prevents recurrences.