Effects of WMP on body weight gain
After 12 weeks of administration, the weight of HFD group increased by 51.53%, while that of WMP-treated HFD-fed rats increased by 10.91%, which was lower than that of group HFD significantly (P < 0.01). WMP could significantly inhibit the increase of body weight induced by high-fat diet (Fig. 1), which was no difference of the amount of diet. Compared with group NCD, the Lee's index, epididymal fat index, perirenal fat of HFD group increased significantly (P < 0.01), and WMP could significantly reverse the increases (Tab.1).
Effect of WMP on serum lipid profile
In 12 weeks after administration, the HFD rats appeared hyperlipidemia as evidenced by increases of serum TC, TG and LDL-C (P < 0.01).The WMP rats decreased serum TC by 51.54%, TG by 24.97%, LDL-C by33.82% compared with the HFD rats. The serum ASL and AST levels in group HFD were significantly increased, which was related to liver injury. The WMP group reduced AST by 26.66%, ALT by 59.47%.The HFD rat’s MDA and NO content increased compared with NCD group (P < 0.001), WMP reduced MDA and NO content compared with HFD group significantly (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the HFD decreased expression of several genes involved with regulating lipid metabolism, including adiponectin, PPAR-γ, visfatin, CEBPα and increased expression of Leptin. WMP suppressed the increase of leptin expression and increased in PPAR-γ (P < 0.05), visfatin (P < 0.05), and CEBPα (P < 0.001) expression with the tendency of WMP to return adiponectin to normal (Tab. 2).
Effect of WMP on hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress and lipid metabolism
After 12 weeks of WMP administration, liver weight was decreased (Tab. 1) while concomitantly lowering hepatic TC and TG deposition and ameliorating HFD-induced hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia in these rats. WMP treatment enhanced hepatic lipase LPL, HSL activities in rats (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the leptin expression was elevated, and adiponectin, PPAR-γ, visfatin expression reduced in HFD-fed rats compared with NCD rats. Whereas, WMP supplementation increased adiponectin, PPAR-γ, visfatin expression compared with HFD rats, but no effect on leptin (Tab. 3).
The livers of NCD and WMP groups presented reddish brown and normal in shape, while the HFD group appeared yellow brown color and larger liver (Fig. 2a, upper). The HE staining results showed that the liver cells in NCD rats were arranged orderly and complete with no obvious vacuolated lipid droplets. In HFD rats, the liver tissue was irregular in the cells, the edges were not clear, and there were a large number of vacuolated lipid droplets and severe fat degeneration. Compared with the HFD group, WMP mitigated the fatty degeneration of the liver and improved the cell boundaries. It is obvious that the arrangement of hepatic cell cord tends to be normal (Fig. 2a, below). The amount` of epididymal adipocytes in group HFD was significantly larger than that in group NCD and group WMP (Fig. 2b).
Effect of WMP on high fat diet induced insulin resistance
All experimental rats appeared a significant increase of blood glucose values at 30 and 60 min after oral glucose (P < 0.01)(Fig. 3). After 120 min, the glycemic profile of HFD group was not reestablished to basal levels (0 min) and was higher than other groups significantly (P < 0.01). WMP administration in HFD-induced rats significantly decreased postprandial glucose levels compared with HFD group. The area under the curve for OGTTs was the largest in the HFD group, and the WMP group significantly reduced (P < 0.01). WMP-treated HFD-fed rats displayed improved fasting glycaemia. At the same time, WMP-treatment reduced level of insulin (P < 0.05) and improved insulin sensitivity. This conclusion was also supported by the lower HOMA-IR indexes of the WMP-treated HFD-fed rats when compared with their vehicle-treated HFD controls (P < 0.01).
WMP regulated the gut microbiota
To evaluate changes in the gut bacterial community induced by WMP, 16S rDNA from variable regions V3–V4 of the fecal samples from NCD, HFD and WMP groups were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq/MiSeq platforms; richness and evenness were calculated. At the OTU level, the HFD rats had reduced number of species when compared with the NCD rats. Diversity measured by Shannon’s richness index reduced significantly in the HFD group when compared with the NCD group. The WMP rats had increased Shannon’s indexes when compared with the HFD group, but had not reached the same level as the NCD group. Diversity measured by Simpson’s evenness index also appeared increased values in the HFD group when compared with the NCD group, while that in the WMP group was lower than in the HFD group, but did not reach the levels as in the NCD group (Fig. 4a). The similarity of intestinal microbiota in each fecal sample was evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA). From the PC1 direction, the NCD group is closer to the WMP group than the HFD group (Fig. 4b). Heatmap expressed the first 50 species of the OUT level, and we observed that some species were restored to the NCD group by WMP (Fig. 4c).
At the phylum level, the major bacterial communities were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Fig. 5a, left), and the HFD increased the relative abundance of Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria significantly (P < 0.05) against the NCD group, which could be significantly reversed by WMP (Fig. 5a, right). The WMP treatment for 12 weeks decreased in the relative abundance of Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria significantly (Fig. 5a, right), while there was a significant increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Actinobacteria (Fig. 5b).
At the family level, the main bacterial communities were Lachnospuraceae, Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae, BacteroidalesS24-7 group, Ruminococcaceae, Lactobacillaceae (Fig. 5b, left), and the HFD diet leaded to a sharp increase in Bacteroidaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Fusobacteriaceae and decrease in Lactobacillaceae, while the WMP-treated HFD-fed rats reversed these change (Fig. 5b). Increased Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroidales S24-7 group, Ruminococcaceae and Prevotellaceae were also observed in the WMP group when compared with the HFD group (Fig. 5b, right).
At the genus level, 7 top relative abundance bacteria were as follows: Bacteroides, norank Bacteroidales S24-7 group, Lactobacillus, Romboutsia, unclassified Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella-9, and 5 bacteria were with significant differences (Fig.5c). The HFD diet leaded to a sharp increase in Bacteroides, Romboutsia, Fusobacterium and decrease in norank Bacteroidales S24-7 group and Lactobaciius, while the WMP-treated HFD-fed rats reversed these changes, decreased Fusobacterium by 98.68%, Bacteroides by 69.91% when compared with the HFD group (Fig. 5c, right).
At the species level, that WMP significantly reversed the increase of Fusobacterium varium, Bacteroides vulgates significantly (P < 0.01) and the decrease of Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillus animalis and Akkermansia sp. (Fig. 5d).