A generalization of the results obtained at the studying coarse-clastic soils allows us to conclude that a ratio of the device’s diameter to the maximum fraction’s size should not be less than 5: dd ≥ 5dmax. The maximum particle size for a standard instrument with a diameter of 300 mm should be 60 mm.
When determining the model mixtures’ grain composition, it is recommended to keep in them the percentage of fractions less than 5 mm or 10 mm. Thus, two points are fixed on the model mixtures’ grain composition graph: the fine earth content and the maximum fraction content (Fig. 2). This coarse-grained soil modeling technique was developed by HydroProject JSC.
Using the coarse-clastic soil modeling method, in which the percentage of fractions less than 5 mm in the model and natural soils should be the same, the maximum fraction is determined by the minimum size of the container used. Thus, there are two points on the graph of the grain composition of the model mixture: the contents of fine earth and maximum fraction. In this case, the modeling method is applied that excludes the arbitrariness of the content of the fractions ranging in size from 5 to 60 mm. Intermediate points on the graph are determined by a proportional decrease in the fractions’ content in the natural soil, which are calculated according to the formula:
$$\frac{m}{Pd}=\left(100-p<5\right)+p<5$$
where: m/Pd – the percentage of fractions in the model mixture;
p < 5 – the percentage of fraction less then 5 mm;
p – the percentage of the fraction in the natural soil.
Model mixtures are made for each material type that is tested on a standard compaction unit. Before the compaction, the mixtures are moistened with water in such a way that the moisture content of the fine earth, which is part of the mixture, is at least 5–6%. The mixture is loaded into a container of a vibrator unit (Fig. 3) and leveled, and then the distance between the soil surface and the top of the device is measured at five points with a measuring ruler. The bar of the measuring ruler rotates 90° and measures five more points on the ground surface.
The average value of 10 points determines the position of the sample surface relative to the top of the instrument, and the difference between the position of the bottom and the ground surface determines the sample height.
After the installation is assembled, the vibrator fixed at the bottom is turned on, and the container vibrates for 8 minutes. Then the load and the rubber gasket are removed, and the distance from the upper edge of the container to the surface of the layer is measured at ten points. The obtained data is used to calculate the volume and maximum density of the compacted sample.
Determining the limiting densities allows us to build a graph of the dependence of two parameters: content of fine earth in a mixture with a model grain composition “m” and density “рd”.
The graph has the density extremum at a certain content of fine earth in the composition of the mixtures under study. Testing the mixtures with different content of fine earth makes it possible to determine its optimal content (Fig. 4).
Table 1
The results of compaction of model mixtures, their limiting densities and maximum densities of natural soil
Mixture #
|
Content of fraction < 5 mm, %
|
Content of fraction < 20 mm, %
|
Density of model mixture, t/m3
|
Natural soil
ρdmax, t/m3
|
Required density ρdmp, t/m3
|
ρdmix
|
ρdmax
|
1
|
25
|
35
|
1,74
|
2,06
|
2,25
|
2,18
|
2
|
18
|
64
|
1,68
|
1,98
|
2,13
|
2,02
|
3
|
10
|
33
|
1,63
|
1,88
|
2,00
|
1,84
|
Using the results of Table 1, we obtain the relative densities of the stone used for preparing the grain compositions containing fine earth from 10 to 25%.
Table 2
Fine earth content, %
|
Relative density, t/m3
|
Id= 0,70
|
Id= 0,75
|
Id= 0,80
|
Id= 0,85
|
25
|
1,95
|
1,97
|
1,99
|
2,00
|
18
|
1,88
|
1,90
|
1,91
|
1,93
|
10
|
1,80
|
1,81
|
1,82
|
1,84
|
The results of determining the soil density of the prism on the experimental site, depending on the number of passes of the roller and the thickness of the layer, are shown in the following graphs (Figs. 5–7).
Thus, the prisms were laid out of stone rock mass in layers of 50, 70, and 80 cm, moistened with water from a water carrier and compacted with a 27-ton roller compactor in 6–8 passes. The average density was 2.19, 2.10, 2.04 t/m3, respectively. The data were obtained on the experimental site for the grain mixtures with a maximum fraction of up to 200 mm (Fig. 8).
When developing stone quarries using explosions, it is possible to estimate the grain composition of the resulting stone material using experimental curves. At the same time, one can also judge the effectiveness of the applied blasting method to obtain the stone material with the required grain composition. To obtain complete information on the grain composition of the stone material, experimental blasting should be carried out, which will determine the explosion method to obtain the needed fractions.
According to the data obtained, the most rational and providing a relatively high soil density is the method of laying stone material in layers no more than 1 meter thick with mandatory wetting with water at a flow rate of 150–300 l/m3 and compaction with a long-range vibrating mechanism.
The laying of stone material is recommended to be carried out by high-capacity dump trucks with a more or less uniform distribution over the surface of the layer and subsequent leveling with a bulldozer.
As can be seen from the results of determining the granulometric compositions and densities of the stone material laid in the experimental embankment, the relative shrinkage of the stone material layer in the embankment decreases with an increase in fine fractions (less than 5 mm) in the soil composition. At loads of 4.0 MPa, the shrinkage decreases from 8.6 mm to 6.2 mm; with an increase in the content of the fine fraction in the rock mass, it is quite high and the deformation of the material is significant. The most optimal value of fine earth content in the soil composition is 18–25%; in this case, the shrinkage will not exceed 6 mm.