rmTBI resulted in acute deficits on the beam task, but not Y-maze or EPM.
To assess the relationship between rmTBI and MCC950 treatment on behavioural outcomes in the acute setting, a battery of tasks was performed in the first 48-hours following injury (beam task: 4 hours, Y-maze: 24 hours, EPM: 48 hours). With baseline beam performance included as a covariate, there was a significant effect of rmTBI (F(1,48) = 10.8, p = 0.002), but not treatment (F(1,48) = 0.014, p = 0.905) or rmTBI × treatment interaction (F(1,48) = 0.002, p = 0.966) for number of slips on the beam (Figure 2A). Additionally, for time to cross the beam (Figure 2B) there was a similar, albeit non-significant trend for an effect of rmTBI (F(1,48) = 3.63, p = 0.063), but not treatment (F(1,48) = 0.200, p = 0.659), or rmTBI × treatment interaction (F(1,48) = 1.29, p = 0.262). For the Y-maze (Figure 2C), no effect of rmTBI (F(1,47) = 1.14, p = 0.290), treatment (F(1,47) = 0.801, p = 0.375), or rmTBI × treatment effect (F(1,47) = 0.160, p = 0.691) was found for the discrimination index of time spent exploring the novel arm. Similarly, for the EPM (Figure 2D), no effect of rmTBI (F(1,48) = 0.001, p = 0.978), treatment (F(1,48) = 0.0030, p = 0.863) or rmTBI × treatment effect (F(1,48) = 0.018, p = 0.894) was found for time spent in the open arm.
At 72-hours, mRNA levels of ASC and protein levels of NfL were associated with rmTBI.
To assess the relationship between rmTBI and MCC950 treatment with levels of inflammasome-associated mRNAs (NLRP3; Figure 3A, ASC Figure 3B, caspase-1 Figure 3C, IL-1β Figure 3D, and IL-18 Figure 3E), PCR was performed on brain tissue collected from the ipsilateral hippocampus at 72 hours. A significant effect of rmTBI (F(1,29) = 7.82, p = 0.009) was found for ASC; however no significant effect of treatment (F(1,29) = 0.283, p = 0.947), or rmTBI × treatment interaction was found (F(1,29) = 0.002, p = 0.962). No significant effect of rmTBI, treatment, or rmTBI × treatment interaction was found for NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, or IL-18. In addition, the relationship between rmTBI and MCC950 on protein levels of NfL was investigated at 72-hours (Figure 3F). An effect of rmTBI (F(1, 34) = 133.7, p < 0.0001) was found, however no effect of treatment (F(1,34) = 1.66, p = 0.206), or rmTBI × treatment effect (F(1,34) = 0.500, p = 0.485) was found. Full details of statistical results (F- and p-values) for molecular outcomes are provided in Table 1.
rmTBI increased microglia cell number compared to uninjured shams.
To investigate the relationship between rmTBI and MCC950 treatment on microglia number, a cell count was performed for the number of Iba-1 positive cell bodies in the corpus callosum, motor cortex, sensorimotor cortex, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus (Figure 4). All regions were on the ipsilateral side of injury except for the corpus callosum which was analysed centrally. Significant effects of injury were found for increased microglia cell number in the corpus callosum (F(1,10) = 13.2, p = 0.005), motor cortex (F(1, 10) = 4.99, p = 0.0496), sensorimotor cortex (F(1,10) = 7.16, p = 0.023), and thalamus (F(1,10) = 13.2, p = 0.005). Only the hippocampus was found to have a significant rmTBI × treatment interaction (F(1,10) = 5.03, p = 0.049). Post-hoc analyses revealed that the rmTBI + MCC950 group had significantly greater number of microglial cells in the hippocampus compared to both the sham + vehicle group (95% CI (2.87 to 50.47), p = 0.028) and the sham + MCC950 group (95% CI (7.97 to 52.03), p = 0.009). No region was found to have a significant effect of treatment. Full details of the two-way ANOVA statistical results (F- and p-values) are provided in Table 2 and results from the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for the hippocampus are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Measures of reactive microglia morphology was increased after rmTBI compared to shams, regardless of MCC950 treatment.
To investigate the efficacy of the MCC950 treatment as a possible therapeutic treatment for TBI, we measured the number of branches, the number of branch endpoints, and the length of branches per microglial cell (Figure 5). Microglial cells were measured in the S1BF, hippocampus, and the perirhinal cortex. In the ipsilateral S1BF, rmTBI rats had a significantly fewer number of branches per microglia (F(1,10) = 10.57, p = 0.0087), fewer endpoints per microglia (F(1,10) = 19.33, p = 0.0013), and a shorter branch length per microglia (F(1,10) = 19.26, p = 0.0014). There were no differences in the number of branches (F(1,10) = 2.0, p = 0.1874), number of endpoints (F(1,10) = 2.389, p = 0.1533), or the length of microglial branches (F(1,10) = 1.498, p = 0.2491) between groups in the ipsilateral hippocampus. There were fewer microglial endpoints in the ipsilateral perirhinal cortex of rmTBI rats compared to shams (F(1,10) = 5.348, p = 0.0433), but there was no effect on the number of branches (F(1,10) = 4.241, p = 0.0665), or the branch length per microglial cell (F(1,10) = 4.585, p = 0.0579). See Supplementary Figure 2 for microglia morphology analyses in the contralateral hemisphere.
Serum NfL levels correlated with the number of slips on the beam task.
Additional analyses were performed to assess whether circulating levels of the axonal injury biomarker, NfL in rmTBI rats were associated with sensorimotor function at 4-hours, and the number of microglia in each of the seven brain regions at 72-hours (Figure 6). There was a significant correlation between serum NfL levels and number of slips on the beam task (Spearman’s r = 0.441, p = 0.021), as well as number of microglia in the corpus callosum (Spearman’s r = 0.821, p = 0.034). No correlations were found between serum NfL levels and number of microglia in the motor cortex (Spearman’s r = 0.607, p = 0.167), sensorimotor cortex (Spearman’s r = -0.179, p = 0.713), entorhinal cortex (Spearman’s r = 0.071, p = 0.906), hippocampus (Spearman’s r = -0.321, p = 0.498), thalamus (Spearman’s r = 0.393, p = 0.396), or hypothalamus (Spearman’s r = -0.214, p = 0.662). To further elucidate the relationship between NfL levels and neuroinflammation, a further correlation analysis was performed between serum NfL levels and ASC mRNA levels in the hippocampus; however no significant correlation was found (Pearson’s r = 0.109, p = 0.698, Supplementary Figure 3).