Cells, Virus Stock, Reagents, and Antibodies
Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells (ATCC) were maintained in suspension in Sf900-II SFM medium (Invitrogen, Waltham, CA, USA) at 28°C. Cellfectin™ II transfection reagent was purchased from Gibco (Beijing, China). The BacPAK Baculovirus Rapid Titer Kit was purchased from Takara (Dalian, China). The FPLV-CC-19 strain was isolated and identified by our laboratory. Anti-CPV-2c-VP2 monoclonal antibody was also prepared in our laboratory.
Construction of a Recombinant Bacmid-VP2
The gene encoding FPLV VP2 (GenBank OP491797) was optimized for the baculovirus-insect cell expression system (BES). Sequence optimization and synthesis were completed by Nanjing Zoonbio BioTech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The primer sequences were as follows: FPLV-VP2-F: 5’-GATTATTCATACCGTCCCACCATC
GGGCGCGGATCCGCCACCATGCTGCTGGTGAACCAGAGCCACCAG-3’. FPLV-VP2-R: 5’-GCTGATTATGATCCTCTAGTACTTCTCGACAAGCTTTTAGG
CGTAGTCAGGCACGTCGTAGGGGTAGTA-3’. To enhance VP2 display on the baculovirus, a Kozak sequence, a gp67 secretion signal peptide, and a poly-histidine (6×His) tag were added to the N-terminus, and a haemagglutinin (HA) tag was added to the C-terminus.
The VP2 fragment was subcloned and inserted into the pFastBac plasmid through homologous recombination. PCR and double enzymatic digestion (Bam H I and EcoR I) verified the construction of pFastBac-VP2. DNA sequencing confirmed the accuracy of the VP2 gene in the recombinant plasmid. Then, pFastBac-VP2 was transferred into E.coli DH10Bac competent cells to obtain rBacmid-VP2. The existence of the VP2 gene in bacmid DNA was determined by PCR using PUC/M13 universal primers.
Transfection and Protein Expression
rBacmid-VP2 was transfected into Sf9 insect cells with Cellfectin™ II transfection reagent (Gibco, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. At 5-6 days post-transfection, the supernatant was collected, and the titer of the recombinant baculovirus (defined as P1) was determined by using a Baculovirus Titer Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The expression of the FPLV-VP2 capsid protein in Sf9 insect cells was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, which used an anti-His tag monoclonal antibody as a primary antibody.
Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA)
After four rounds of subculture, Sf9 cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8, 000 ×g for 20 minutes. The cell pellets were lysed with 25 mM NaHCO3 at 4°C for 2 hours, and then the supernatant (rpFastBac-FPLV-VP2 protein) was collected by centrifugation at 8, 000 r/minute (rotator type F-34-6-38, Eppendorf, Germany) for 20 minutes. rpFastBac-FPLV-VP2 protein was verified by an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). First, Sf9 cells were infected with rpFastBac-FPLV-VP2 protein for 48 h, after which the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 minutes at RT. After 3 times washes with PBST, a blocking solution (5% BSA) was added for 60 minutes. After another 3 times washes, the homemade anti-CPV-2c monoclonal antibody (clone 5B18) was diluted (1:200), and added to the wells and incubated at 37℃ for 60 minutes.3 times of washes again, a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled sheep anti-mouse IgG was added at a dilution of 1:2, 000 and incubated at 37℃ for another 45 minutes. After the last 3 time washing, results were measured with an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop-40, Germany).
Antigenicity Analysis of rFPLV-VP2 Protein
The antigenicity of rFPLV-VP2 protein (P4) was determined by the feline panleukopenia virus antigen rapid test immunochromatographic strips produced by SHANGHAI QUICKING Biotech CO., Ltd.
The haemagglutinin activity of rFPLV-VP2 protein was tested using the haemagglutinin assay (HA). The HA test was carried out by using 96 well ‘V’ bottom microtiter plate, 25 μL of 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.4) was dispensed in well A-1 and thereafter across the rows (1-4) and columns (A-G) using 10-100 μL variable volume multichannel micropipette. Then, 25 μL of rFPLV-VP2 were put into first well of microtiter plate, set one biological replicates and control group. Then, they were serially diluted from1:21 to 1:220 across through the first column. Next, 25 μL of PBS was dispensed all working wells and thereafter, 50 μL of 1% porcine RBC suspension was placed. The plate was agitated at 150 rpm for 2 min to ensure proper mixing of reactants. After that, the plate was put at 4℃ for 45 minutes and formation of serrated edged mat and bottom were recorded as negative and positive results (figure 7), respectively. The titer was calculated as reciprocal of the last well with agglutination.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
The morphology of the rFPLV-VP2 protein (P4) was observed using negative staining with phosphotungstic acid. Briefly, 1 mL of rFPLV-VP2 protein and 20 μL of CaHPO4 solution were placed into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, mixed well, and stand at room temperature for 10 minutes. Then, the tube was centrifuged at 15,000 r/minutes for 15 minutes, and the sediment was dissolved with 15 μL of EDTA saturated solution to create a droplet. The droplet was dropped onto a copper grid, allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 minutes, and stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid staining solution (pH 6.8) for 1 minute. The excess staining solution was removed with filter paper, and the virus morphology was observed on a JEOL 2010 transmission electron microscope operated at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV.
Protocols for Animal Immunization and Challenge
Eight 3-4-month-old British shorthairs that were seronegative for FPLV were randomly divided into the following groups. Group I: 3 cats vaccinated with the FPLV VLP vaccine (Seppic adjuvant, 9:1); group II: 3 cats vaccinated with the commercial vaccine; and group III: 2 cats vaccinated with minimum essential medium (MEM). All cats were intramuscularly inoculated with a single dose (1.0 mL) of each sample. Blood samples were taken from all cats at 0-, 7-, 14-, 21-, 24-, 28-, 35-, 42-, and 50-days post-vaccination (dpv). The serum antibody titers against FPLV were determined by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI).
Three weeks after vaccination, all cats were orally challenged with 5 mL of FPLV-CC-19 strain cell culture (HI=29; TCID50=106.5/mL). Continuous observation and record cats’ performances (mental state, food, and water intake, excrement shape, and rectal temperature) for 10 days post-challenge (dpc), to evaluate the immune efficacy of vaccines.