Malnutrition is a multifactorial illness and children can be affected by a wide variety of modifiable and non-modifiable determinants. This study found various associated factors that were consistent with the findings of previous studies and some factors showed higher risk than others. The association of economic status with malnutrition is well documented. [17] This study showed similar findings. Although the community under study is overall a poor community, the malnutrition risk of households with low family income earning below or equal to national minimum wage for unskilled work in Pakistan i.e., PKR 25,000/= was high (OR=3.18).
The educational status of parents is associated with the nutritional status of child. Most previous studies have highlighted mothers’ education to be an important factor.[18-20] In this study Father’s education (primary or below) was found to have higher association compared to low maternal education. A possible explanation could be that Fathers play a leading role in patriarchal tribal communities even if they migrate and reside in urban squatters.
Daily wagers are vulnerable in many ways and it was reflected as an influencer in the current study showing a daily wager father is 1.8 times more likely among cases.
Although most of the participants were born in Karachi, their parents had moved to the city from other parts of Pakistan or from Afghanistan less than fifteen years back (61.8%). The risk of malnutrition was 1.48 times increased in children whose parents migrated less than fifteen years back. However, the result was not significant (p-value 0.055). The reporting bias is very likely as many participants are suspected to have hidden their migration from Afghanistan due to current sociopolitical issues including risk of deportation. And since most Afghans are ethnically Pashtoon, it is impossible for a non-Pashtun to differentiate between a Pakistani Pashtun and an Afghan Pashtun.
Environmental factors are strong predictor of malnutrition in previous literature. [21,22] This study showed significantly strong association of pour/pit/ open sewer with malnutrition which was consistent after adjustment for confounders. Some past studies points to crowding as a predictor of malnutrition. [23] In the current study, the number of two or less rooms in the house were independently associated with undernutrition (OR=2.1).
Six months exclusive breast feeding of infants is recommended for achieving optimal growth and physical and mental development. [24] Breast feeding should be continued for up to two years along with ignition of weaning at six months. In this study only 35% children were exclusively breast fed for 6 months. [22] Pakistan is a country with lowest exclusive breast feeding rates in South Asia. [25] It has been observed that bottle feeding is widespread in poor households and high dilution is used by parents due to affordability issues. Low concentration of formula further deteriorates nutrition along with other bottle associated factors. The present study found that not just formula but buffalo and goat milk as well as tea whitener was being given to total 6% of infants. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. Parents must be educated about the serious impact of such use. In the current study, the inappropriate duration of breastfeeding was associated with 3. 57 times risk of malnutrition. Breast feeding promotion is thus an urgent and efficient to intervention to fight malnutrition in the children under 5 years.
Weaning should be timely, adequate, safe and proper. [26] Majority of the participants (68.5%) showed inappropriate weaning age, mostly delayed. Only 31% participants were weaned at the WHO recommended age of six months. The association with malnutrition was strong and inappropriate weaning age was associated with 3 times malnutrition chance in this study.
Several studies have shown independent association between incidence of common illnesses such as diarrhea, cough and cold with the development of malnutrition. Acute infections can lead to weight loss and underweight can suppress immunity and make child vulnerable to infections. Thus, a vicious cycle goes on. [16,22] But the current study failed to establish association between frequent common illnesses and malnutrition.
The current study did not find any strong association with low birth weight (OR=1.17). It is in contrast to past studies. 16,22,27 But the possible explanation is that most of the participants were born in homes or private clinics run by non- trained staff and there was no documented evidence of birth weight. The recall of weight by mothers could thus not be trusted. However, this study found an association between delivery at home and malnutrition (OR=1.87). An association between birth attendant being a relative or traditional attendant (Dai) and malnutrition was also established in the present study (OR=1.91). But adjusted rates did not verify this association.
This study found environmental factor as an important predictor. Children with access to VIP or flush toilet showed a lower risk of malnutrition. Unhygienic conditions such as open defecation and pour or pit latrine are associated with malnutrition according to many past studies conducted in rural settings. [28] The findings are consistent in the current study showing four times higher risk of malnutrition in children using pour pit toilet.
Children with complete Immunization status did not show lower risk of malnutrition unlike some previous studies on the subject. [29,30] The children showed overall better immunization coverage (n=215) as compared to national coverage probably due to setting of a primary healthcare center providing immunization facility.
A very disturbing experience while conducting the current study was that it was easier and quicker to enroll cases while it became very difficult to find controls who met the inclusion criteria of WFA, WFH, HFA and OFC of z score above -2sd.