The drug Tramadol HCl was obtained from Hetero drugs pvt ltd, Hyderabad. Tamarindus kernel powder was collected from local market. To obtain Tamarindus Gum (TG) and Ispaghula gum (IG) were isolated by suitable procedures. Ingredients such as Sodium Starch Glycolate (SSG), kollidon CL, Cross Carmellose Sodium (CCS), Methocel K15M, Methocel K100, Sodium bicarbonate(SB) and citric acid were also obtained from yarrow chem. Products. Micro crystalline cellulose, talc, magnesium stearate, and lactose were of analytical grade.
Identification of drug and spectral studies by FTIR:
The drug was identified by performing UV-spectroscopy and its absorption maxima are 271nm. Drug excipient interaction studies were performed by FTIR. Spectral studies were established by conducting one- month compatibility of the drug and optimized formulation excipients at 400C and 75% relative humidity. The obtained spectra were shown in Fig. 1
Isolation of Tamarindus gum:
TG was extracted from the tamarind kernel powder available in the market. The 20 g of defatted tamarind seed kernel powder was added to 200 ml of cold distilled water to prepare slurry. The slurry was then poured into 800ml of boiling distilled water containing citric acid (0.2%). The solution was boiled for 20 min with stirring in a water bath. The resulting thin clear solution was kept overnight (24 h) so that most of the proteins and fibers settled out, following which the solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min. Supernatant liquid was separated and poured into the excess of absolute alcohol with continuous stirring (1:1). The precipitate was washed with 200 ml of absolute ethanol, diethyl ether, and petroleum ether and/or acetone and dried at 50–60°C for 10 h. Dried polymer was powdered, sieved, and stored in desiccators (7, 8)
Isolation of Ispaghula gum:
Ispaghula Seeds were collected and soaked in distilled water for 48 h, boiled for 10–30 min until the mucilage was formed. This extracted mucilage was passed through a muslin cloth, so the obtained filtrate, acetone was added to precipitate the mucilage. Separate this precipitated mucilage, and dried in an oven 400C, passed through #80 sieves, and stored in desiccators.
Formulation Development:
Modified release formulation consists of the immediate release formulation followed by the compression coat formulation. At first, the immediate release layer and rapid release core tablets were formulated by using super disintegrants such as SSG, kollidon CL, CCS by direct compression method. These formulations were represented in Table 1. These tablets were compression coated with both natural and synthetic polymers (MethocelK15M, KG and TG). These polymers according to table no 2 as CF1 to CF6 were mixed, 2/3 rd portion of the mixture was introduced in the die cavity, then the core tablet was placed and added the remaining 1/3rd portion, then compressed using 8mm punch. In the next step the buoyant compositions in Table no 5 using Ispaghula gum and Methocel K100M as major polymers for delayed floating were blended and compressed over the prepared compression coated tablet by using 9mm punch to obtain the coated floating tablets as BL1 to BL8 and finally the immediate release layer was compressed (9, 10)
Table 1
23 Factorial Design for buoyant layer
Independent Variables | Actual values|(mg) | Coded values | Dependent Variables |
Low (-) | High (+) | Low (-) | High (+) | Y1 = Buoancacy Lag Time(BLT) |
HPMCK 100 (X1) | 80 | 100 | -1 | + 1 | Y2 = Total floating time (TFT) |
IG (X2) | 25 | 50 | -1 | + 1 | Y3= % Swelling index (%SI) |
SB (X3) | 50 | 75 | -1 | + 1 | Y4 = % Drug Release (%DR) |
Table 2
Composition of prepared tablets
Composition of Immediate Release tablet | IF1 | IF2 | IF3 | IF4 | IF5 | IF6 |
S.NO | Formulation Ingredients |
1 | Tramadol hcl | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
2 | SSG | 4 | 8 | - | - | - | - |
3 | Kollidon CL | - | - | 4 | 8 | - | - |
4 | CCS | - | - | - | - | 4 | 8 |
5 | MCC | 42 | 38 | 42 | 38 | 42 | 38 |
6 | Talc | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
7 | Magnesium stearate | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total weight | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
Composition of compression coat | CF1 | CF2 | CF3 | CF4 | CF5 | CF6 |
1 | Methocel K15 | 200 | - | - | 150 | 150 | 120 |
2 | KG | - | 200 | - | - | - | 40 |
3 | TG | - | - | 200 | 50 | 50 | 40 |
4 | MCC | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Total weight | 210 | 210 | 210 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
Composition of buoyant layer | BL1 | BL2 | BL3 | BL4 | BL5 | BL6 | BL7 | BL8 |
1 | Methocel K100 | 80 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 80 | 100 |
2 | IG | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 |
3 | SB | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
4 | Citric acid | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
5 | Lactose | 15 | - | 15 | - | 15 | - | 15 | - |
6 | Talc | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
7 | Magnesium stearate | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Total weight | 560 | 560 | 560 | 560 | 560 | 560 | 560 | 560 |
Factorial Design of Buoyant Formulation:
23 factorial design was selected by using minitab 21.4.1 software demo version, where 3 factors each at 2 levels were considered. In formulations, independent variables selected are amounts of HPMC K 100(X1), IG (X2), and SB (X3), whereas Buoyant Lag Time (FLT), Total floating time (TFT), %Swelling Index (%SI) and % Drug Release AT 10th hr (%DR) were selected as dependent variables. The main effects (X1, X2, and X3) represent the average result of changing 1 factor at a time from its low to high value. The interaction terms (X1X2, X2X3, and X1X3) show how the response changes.(11)
Preformulation studies : The drug and polymers were selected and identified
Characterization of TG and IG
The separated TG and IG powder was evaluated for solubility, swelling index, density, flow, and derived properties. Phytochemical tests such as Molisch’s test, Ninhydrin test, Ferric chloride test, Wagner’s test, Keller-Killani test, Fehling’s test, Shinoda test, ruthenium red test were performed for both gums. (12)
Table 3
Post compressional characteristics of the prepared formulations
Formulation code | Weight variation | Hardness (kg/cm2) | Friabilty (%) | Thickness (mm) | Content uniformity |
IF1 | 101 ± 0.54 | 6.42 | 0.72 | 2.5 ± 0.04 | 99.88 ± 0.22 |
IF2 | 97 ± 0.22 | 6.32 | 0.68 | 2.6 ± 0.02 | 99.26 ± 0.28 |
IF3 | 98 ± 0.64 | 5.28 | 0.69 | 2.6 ± 0.04 | 101.2 ± 0.42 |
IF4 | 97 ± 0.26 | 5.76 | 0.66 | 2.7 ± 0.02 | 97.88 ± 0.24 |
IF5 | 97 ± 0.82 | 5.67 | 0.68 | 2.6 ± 0.05 | 99.21 ± 0.26 |
IF6 | 99 ± 0.84 | 6.42 | 0.65 | 2.6 ± 0.03 | 98.29 ± 0.22 |
BL1 | 101 ± 0.74 | 4.62 | 0.66 | 5.88 ± 0.05 | 98.64 ± 0.43 |
BL2 | 97 ± 0.56 | 4.46 | 0.78 | 6.0 ± 0.04 | 101.31 ± 0.29 |
BL3 | 98 ± 0.26 | 4.62 | 0.74 | 6.13 ± 0.02 | 99.94 ± 0.46 |
BL4 | 97 ± 0.22 | 5.16 | 0.67 | 6.28 ± 0.05 | 99.83 ± 0.68 |
BL5 | 99 ± 0.36 | 4.48 | 0.64 | 6.22 ± 0.02 | 101.4 ± 0.72 |
BL6 | 97 ± 0.84 | 4.64 | 0.68 | 5.82 ± 0.03 | 101.2 ± 0.43 |
BL7 | 98 ± 0.28 | 4.61 | 0.69 | 6.28 ± 0.06 | 101.27 ± 0.45 |
BL8 | 99 ± 0.22 | 4.68 | 0.68 | 6.22 ± 0.03 | 99.86 ± 0.54 |
All Values ± Std Dev |
Physical Characterization of tablets
The formulated core tablet powder blends were evaluated for pre compression and post compression properties and were represented in Table 3. The compressed coated and coated floating tablets were evaluated for various parameters such as weight variation, hardness, friability, thickness, disintegration time and drug content were represented in Table 9. (13)
In-vitro buyonacy time
In vitro buoyancy studies were performed for all formulations. 100 ml beakers each containing simulated gastric fluid, pH1.2 were taken as the medium and buyonacy results were obtained as per USP. Buyonacy lag time (BLT) and total floating time (TFT).
In-vitro swelling studies
The swelling index of tablets was determined by placing the tablets in the basket of dissolution apparatus using dissolution medium pH 1.2 buffer at 37 ± 0.5º C and tested after 0.5, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and up to twelve hours. Each dissolution basket containing the tablet was taken out and blotted with tissue paper to remove the excess water and weighed on the analytical balance. The experiment was done in triplicate for each time point, the swelling index was calculated. (14, 15)
$$\text{S}\text{w}\text{e}\text{l}\text{l}\text{i}\text{n}\text{g} \text{i}\text{n}\text{d}\text{e}\text{x}=\frac{(\text{W}\text{e}\text{t} \text{w}\text{e}\text{i}\text{g}\text{h}\text{t} \text{o}\text{f} \text{t}\text{a}\text{b}\text{l}\text{e}\text{t} - \text{D}\text{r}\text{y} \text{w}\text{e}\text{i}\text{g}\text{h}\text{t} \text{o}\text{f} \text{t}\text{a}\text{b}\text{l}\text{e}\text{t})}{\text{D}\text{r}\text{y} \text{w}\text{e}\text{i}\text{g}\text{h}\text{t} \text{o}\text{f} \text{t}\text{a}\text{b}\text{l}\text{e}\text{t} ]}\text{*}100$$
In-vitro dissolution study:
The release rate of Tramadol Hydrochoride formulated tablets was determined using United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) Dissolution Testing Apparatus 2 (paddle method). The dissolution test was performed using 900 ml of 0.1N HCl for 12 hrs. A sample (5 ml) of the solution was withdrawn every time from the dissolution apparatus and the samples were replaced with fresh dissolution medium. The samples were filtered through a 0.45µ membrane filter and diluted to a suitable concentration with 0.1N HCl for 12 hrs. samples were analysed using UV-visible spectroscopy.(16)
Drug release kinetics and stability studies:
Coated Floating Pulsatile Tablets of Tramadol Hcl tablets were subjected to various kinetic studies like zero order (Cumulative percentage drug released vs. Time), first order (Log cumulative percentage of drug unreleased vs. Time), Higuchi equation (Cumulative percentage of drug unreleased vs. Square root of time) and Korsemeyer’s (Log cumulative percentage released vs. Log time). Accelerated stability study was carried out for the optimized batch (F8) at 40 ± 2∘C/75 ± 5% RH over 3-month period according to ICH guidelines in the stability chamber (Thermolab India). At the end of the 3 months, the tablets were examined for physical characteristics, drug content, in vitro drug release (lag time), and buoyant lag time. (17)
In- Vivo Buoyancy Studies:
The in vivo X-ray study was conducted on overnight fasted rabbits (2-2.5kg) by oral administration of CFPT formulation to observe the buoyancy ability and gastric retention of formulation. Prior permission was sought from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) for conducting the study, for this part of the tablet content (30mg) were replaced with with barium sulphate (BaSO4) and the procedure has been done under the guidance of a radiologist. Using barium sulphate X-ray visibility was enhanced. At different time intervals (0, 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 h after administration of tablets), the rabbits were anaesthetized using ketamine HCl at a dose of 20 mg/kg and exposed to abdominal X-ray imaging at 40 mA, 45 KV, and 5 mAs.(18) The distance between the source of X- ray and rabbit was kept constant (80 cm) for all images.