We conducted a single center, retrospective, case-series study of individuals who underwent RALCCUD in our department between 2017 and 2022. Ethical approval was granted by our local ethical committee the Institutional Ethical and Clinical Research at Nantes Université (Groupe Nantais d'Ethique dans le Domaine de la Santé) review board (Nantes, 2022) number “AVIS 22-3-170”.
Indications for the surgery were the inability to perform ISC through the urethra because of difficulty reaching or finding the urethra. Inclusion criteria for the study were age at least 15 years old and with a post-surgical follow-up of at least 3 months.
Before surgery, all individuals underwent an assessment by a multidisciplinary team that included at least a urologist, a physical medicine and rehabilitation doctor and, if necessary, an occupational therapist. The ability to hold a catheter and to self-catheterize through an abdominal stoma was assessed during a short hospital stay prior to surgery.
Individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury underwent MRI to rule out the presence of syringomyelia, which may be a contra-indication to the laparoscopic approach 15.
An assessment was performed preoperatively, at 3 months post-operatively and then yearly. The assessment included stomal and urethral continence, satisfaction, renal function and urodynamic function, outcomes and complications.
The primary outcome was continence status at the last follow-up. Continence was defined as no leakage (no pad) from either the urethra or the stoma without the need for secondary incontinence surgery after RALCCUD 16. The secondary outcomes were the rate of clinically significant post-operative complications (≥ grade 3 on the Clavien Dindo classification 17), classed as early (0–30 days post-operative) or late (> 30 days post-operative), and the rate of stomal complications requiring reintervention. The stomal complications requiring reintervention included stenosis, false route and incontinence after excluding other causes such as bladder overactivity.
Statistical analysis:
Continuous variables are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs; 25th and 75th percentiles), and categorical variables as numbers and percentages. MannWhitney test or Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables according to normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk’s test) and chi-square or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. SAS software (version 9.4, NC, USA) was used.
Surgical Technique
All the procedures were performed by two surgeons.
The patient was placed in a modified lithotomy position with 25° of Trendelenburg to shift the bowel away from the pelvis. An 18Fr Foley catheter was placed in the bladder.
The camera port (8 mm) was placed intraperitoneally via an open laparoscopy approach under the umbilicus, and pneumoperitoneum was established with 12 mmHg insufflation pressure. An 8-mm robotic port was placed on each side of the camera port and a fourth robotic port was placed in the right iliac fossa at the same level. The ports were placed at least 8 cm apart. An additional 12-mm port was inserted in the left iliac fossa for the assistant. After trocar placement, the robot (four-arm Da Vinci Xi Surgical System®, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was docked.
Bladder mobilization:
The bladder was freed from the peritoneum and mobilized by sectioning the urachus and the two umbilical arteries. It is critical to ensure that the bladder is adequately mobilized and that it can easily be brought to the anterior abdominal wall near the camera port.
Catheterisable tube preparation
The preferred choice for tube formation was the appendix. It was identified after mobilizing the caecum, from which it was then separated with care taken to preserve the blood supply.
Then, the length of the tube and the anatomical possibility to reach the planned stoma location were verified. A key issue for RALCCUD is an accurate evaluation of the distance between the implantation of the conduit in the bladder and the stomal anastomosis.
The tip of the appendix was sectioned, and a 14 Fr feeding-tube was introduced to verify the patency of the whole appendix.
In case of previous appendicectomy, or an unusable appendix, it is possible to use a retubularized tube, according to the Yang-Monti technique 5. For this, a 3/0 polyglotone suture was placed on the ileum 30 cm from the ileocecal valve. The robot was undocked and performed a 4cm incision below the umbilical incision. A 2cm intestinal segment located 30 cm from the ileocecal valve was isolated extracorporeally to construct a retubularized tube.
Then the tube was reintroduced in the abdomen and the robot was docked to carry on the surgery intraperitoneally. If the distance between the bladder and abdominal wall was long, a tube was prepared according to the Casale Principle 6, after isolation of an ileal segment of 3.5cm in length.
In case of concomitant augmentation cystoplasty (AC), a 30-cm ileal segment was isolated at 30 cm from the ileocecal valve at the same time.
Anti-reflux anastomosis
The tube was always implanted in the posterior bladder wall. If concomitant AC was not performed, the tube was implanted according to the Lich-Gregoir anti-reflux principle. The bladder was filled with 300mL of saline solution. The posterior wall of the bladder was opened sagittally with preservation of the bladder mucosa. Each side of the detrusor muscle was suspended to the anterior abdominal wall using a 3/0 polyglactin suture to provide adequate exposure. The catheterisable channel was sutured to the bladder mucosa with interrupted 5/0 polydioxanone sutures and the detrusor was closed with 3/0 polyglactin to create a submucosal anti-reflux mechanism at least 4 cm long.