In total, 2,326 women participated in this study, 419 (mean age, 47.54 ± 8.48 years) in the regular screening group and 1884 (mean age, 49.26 ± 8.45 years) in the irregular screening group. Out of the participants, 468 (20.12%) tested positive for HPV.A total of 39.67% and 51.98% of women in the regular and irregular screening groups, respectively, were farmers. In the regular and irregular screening groups, 195 (47.33%) and 816 (43.54%) women, respectively, had secondary education (middle/high school). Furthermore, a greater proportion of women in the regular screening group had a university education than those in the irregular screening group. In the regular screening group, 56.12% of the women had an annual household income ranging from RMB 10,000 to 30,000.Notably, 2.94% and 0.86% of the women in the regular and irregular screening groups, respectively, received HPV immunization. A comprehensive summary of the participants’ characteristics is provided in Table 1.
Table 1
Characteristics of participants before and after matching in regular and irregular screening groups. (n = 2326)
Characteristics | Before | t/χ2 | P | After | t/χ2 | P |
| Regular N = 419 | Irregular N = 1884 | | | Regular N = 417 | Irregular N = 417 | | |
Age | 47.54 ± 8.48 | 49.26 ± 8.45 | -3.77 | <0.001 | 47.65 ± 8.35 | 47.65 ± 8.35 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
HPV | | | 0.0355 | 0.850 | | | 90.7092 | <0.001 |
Positive | 86(20.53) | 379(20.12) | | | 84(20.14) | 216(51.80) | | |
Negatives | 333(79.74) | 1505(79.88) | | | 333(79.86) | 201(48.20) | | |
Occupation | | | 33.8342 | <0.001 | | | 6.1747 | 0.045 |
Farmers | 165(39.76) | 970(51.98) | | | 165(39.95) | 191(46.59) | | |
Worker/Individual/Staff | 169(40.72) | 26.63(26.63) | | | 168(40.68) | 133(32.44) | | |
Others | 81(19.52) | 21.38(21.38) | | | 80(19.37) | 86(20.98) | | |
Education | | | 31.5662 | <0.001 | | | 7.0053 | 0.030 |
Primary or Illiterate | 132(32.04) | 832(44.40) | | | 132(32.30) | 166(39.90) | | |
Middle/High school | 195(47.33) | 816(43.54) | | | 195(47.56) | 188(45.19) | | |
Graduate | 85(20.63) | 226(12.06) | | | 83(20.24) | 62(14.90) | | |
Annual income | | | 82.9695 | <0.001 | | | 42.1386 | <0.001 |
≤ 10000 | 30(7.19) | 300(15.98) | | | 30(7.23) | 50(12.80) | | |
10000–30000 | 234(56.12) | 629(33.51) | | | 233(56.14) | 141(34.06) | | |
>30000 | 135(32.37) | 758(40.38) | | | 134(32.29) | 188(45.41) | | |
Unknown | 18(4.32) | 190(10.12) | | | 18(4.34) | 35(8.45) | | |
Family history of cancer | | | 0.8549 | 0.3552 | | | 1.3287 | 0.2490 |
YES | 29(6.97) | 156(8.34) | | | 28(6.76) | 37(8.92) | | |
no | 387(93.03) | 1715(91.66) | | | 386(93.24) | 378(91.08) | | |
Current gynecological symptoms | | | 19.1545 | <0.001 | | | 30.0013 | <0.001 |
YES | 137(32.70) | 836(44.37) | | | 135(32.37) | 213(51.08) | | |
NO | 282(67.30) | 1048(55.63) | | | 282(67.63) | 204(48.92) | | |
Sex | | | 2.0478 | 0.152 | | | 0.0147 | 0.903 |
YES | 256(85.91) | 1461(82.54) | | | 254(85.81) | 354(86.13) | | |
NO | 42(14.09) | 309(17.46) | | | 42(14.19) | 57(13.87) | | |
History of HPV vaccination | | | 11.9414 | 0.0005 | | | 7.4675 | 0.0063 |
YES | 12(2.94) | 16(0.86) | | | 12(2.96) | 2(0.48) | | |
NO | 396(97.06) | 1849(99.14) | | | 394(97.04) | 412(99.52) | | |
Regular gynecological examinations | | | 771.8798 | <0.001 | | | 347.5194 | <0.001 |
YES | 362(86.40) | 331(17.57) | | | 362(86.81) | 94(22.54) | | |
NO | 57(13.60) | 1553(82.43) | | | 55(13.19) | 323(77.46) | | |
Table 2 shows that age was a risk factor for HPV infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.056, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.031–1.082). In contrast, regular screening was a protective factor for HPV infection (OR = 0.174, 95% CI: 0.117–0.259), suggesting that individuals who undergo regular screening have a lower likelihood of infection HPV compared with those who do not.
Table 2
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of HPV infection
Variables | β | SE | Wald χ2 | p | OR | 95% CI |
age | 0.054 | 0.012 | 19.787 | <0.001 | 1.056 | [1.031 1.082] |
Worker/Individual/Staff | -0.841 | 0.264 | 10.135 | 0.001 | 0.431 | [0.257 0.724] |
Other occupations | -0.908 | 0.264 | 11.791 | 0.001 | 0.403 | [0.240 0.677] |
Middle/High school | -0.441 | 0.220 | 4.016 | 0.045 | 0.643 | [0.418 0.990] |
Graduate | -0.674 | 0.363 | 3.435 | 0.064 | 0.510 | [0.250 1.039] |
Regular screening | -1.749 | 0.203 | 74.237 | <0.001 | 0.174 | [0.117 0.259] |
Known HPV | 0.376 | 0.217 | 3.011 | 0.083 | 1.456 | [0.952 2.226] |
Table 3 shows that, among the individuals who had HPV knowledge (675), 314 (46.51%) underwent regular screening, whereas among the 1,642 participants who lacked HPV knowledge, 386 (23.50%) underwent regular screening (X2 = 121.9331, P < 0.001).
Table 3
HPV awareness and regular screening among 2326 participants
| Regular screened | Irregular screened | Total |
Knowledge of HPV | 314(46.51%) | 361(53.49%) | 675 |
No knowledge of HPV | 386(23.50%) | 1265(76.50%) | 1642 |
Total | 700(30.09%) | 1626(69.91%) | 2326 |
To enhance the comparability between the two groups, we paired them according to age, resulting in 417 matched pairs with an equal number of participants in both groups after matching(Table 1). After matching, the two groups were of equal age. Compared with the irregular screening group, the regular screening group was more educated and had a higher annual household income (P < 0.05).There were 216(51.80%) positive HPV test results in irregular screening and 84(20.14%) in regular screening,(p < 0.001). After matching, 165(39.95%) and 191(46.59%) women in the regular screening group and irregular screening group were farmers by occupation respectively(p = 0.045). Overall the educational level of women in the matched regular screening group was higher than that of irregularly screened women. The number of regular gynecological check-ups was also higher in the regular plus cervical cancer screening group 362 (86.81%) than in the irregular screening group.(p < 0.001).
Table 4 shows the differences in HPV knowledge between the regular and irregular screening groups. Regarding the question “Do you know about HPV?” the number of individuals with HPV knowledge in the regular screening group (214 [51.32%]) was higher than that in the irregular screening group (107 [25.66%]) (P < .0001). Among the participants with HPV knowledge, no significant difference was found between the regular and irregular screening groups in terms of HPV-related diseases and transmission, prognosis, and prevention of HPV infection.
Table 4
Knowledge of HPV between the regular screening group and the irregular screening group.
Questions | Answer | Regular | Irregular | χ2 | P |
| | N(%) | N(%) | | |
Do you know about HPV? | YES | 214(51.32) | 107(25.66) | 57.9844 | < .0001 |
| NO | 203(48.68) | 310(74.34) |
HPV is an important etiological factor of cervical cancer* | Know | 195(90.28) | 99(92.52) | 0.4415 | 0.506 |
| Unknown | 21(9.72) | 8(7.48) |
HPV can cause genital warts in both males and females* | Know | 145(67.13) | 67(63.81) | 0.3473 | 0.555 |
| Unknown | 71(32.87) | 38(36.19) |
HPV can be transmitted through sexual contact* | Know | 172(79.26) | 84(78.50) | 0.0248 | 0.874 |
| Unknown | 45(20.74) | 23(21.50) |
Most HPV infections can naturally regress without treatment* | Know | 119(57.77) | 48(48.00) | 2.5905 | 0.107 |
| Unknown | 87(42.23) | 52(52.00) |
Men can also infection HPV* | Know | 133(61.57) | 60(56.60) | 0.7315 | 0.392 |
| Unknown | 83(38.43) | 46(43.40) |
Condoms can prevent HPV infection* | Know | 164(76.28) | 82(77.36) | 0.0462 | 0.829 |
| Unknown | 51(23.72) | 24(22.64) |
*The number of respondents who answered “YES” to "Do you know about HPV?" question.
Table 5 shows attitudes toward HPV vaccine among regular screening group and the irregular screening group.In the regular screening group, 237 (56.83%) individuals were aware that “HPV infection can be prevented by vaccination,” whereas in the irregular screening group, 194 (46.52%) individuals had this knowledge (P = 0.0029). Regarding “willingness to receive HPV vaccination,” most of the participants in both the regular (348 [83.45%]) and irregular (345 [82.73%]) screening groups demonstrated a positive attitude toward HPV. Regarding the willingness to have their daughters vaccinated against HPV, mothers in the irregular screening group (17 [6.97%]) exhibited a higher level of hesitancy compared with mothers in the regular screening group (4 [1.70%], P = 0.004).
Table 5
Attitudes toward HPV vaccine among regular screening group and the irregular screening group.
Questions | | Regular | Irregular | χ2 | P |
| | N (%) | N (%) | | |
HPV infection can be prevented by vaccination | | | | 8.8781 | 0.0029 |
| YES | 237(56.83) | 194(46.52) | | |
| NO | 180(43.17) | 223(53.48) | | |
Willingness to receive HPV vaccination | | | | 0.0768 | 0.781 |
| YES | 348(83.45) | 345(82.73) | | |
| NO | 69(16.55) | 72(17.27) | | |
Whether there are daughters | | | | 0.0171 | 0.896 |
| YES | 246(60.59) | 249(60.14) | | |
| NO | 160(39.41) | 165(39.86) | | |
Willingness to allow your daughter to receive HPV vaccination | | | | 7.9162 | 0.004 |
| YES | 231(98.30) | 227(93.03) | | |
| NO | 4(1.70) | 17(6.97) | | |
A total of 295 women provided reasons on not undergoing regular screening. Multiple reasons could be simultaneously selected. “Do not know how to check regularly” was the most frequently selected reason, followed by “Do not know the significance of screening.” The third reason was “No symptoms,” and a small percentage of reasons included feeling unnecessary and having no time. Figure 1 shows the reasons for not having regular screening.