Soil sample collections
Three collections were carried out at different points on the UFAM campus (Point 1 - 3°05'19.4" S 59°58'00.5" W, Point 2 - 3°05'20.8" S 59°57'57.5" W and Point 3 - 3° 5'19.06"S 59°57'56.26"W), in which there were individuals of I. edulis that were not the period of seedpod production. At each point, three rhizosphere samples were collected at distances of 40 cm from the collar of the plant and 20 cm below in piliferous regions of the roots. Sterilized materials were used in all sample collections: 50 mL FalconTM tubes, metal spatulas and plastic bags to transport the samples. The samples were collected and taken to the Laboratory of Bioassays and Microorganisms of the Amazon (LaBMicrA) - UFAM, where they were stored at -20 ºC.
Isolation and purification of actinobacterium strains
All the manipulations of the microorganisms in this study were performed in a biological safety cabin (Filterflux® Class II A1). Twenty-four hours after the collections, 1 g of soil from a sample of each of the points was dissolved in 5 mL of sterilized distilled water containing 0.02% Tween-20. One mL of each suspension was subjected to serial decimal dilution in test tubes containing 9 mL of 0.8% saline. From the 5th, 4th and 3rd dilutions, 50 µL were spread in triplicate in 90 x 15 mm Petri dishes containing the oat-based culture medium (for 1 L: 10 g of oats, 14 g of agar, 10 g of malt, 4 g of yeast extract, and 4 g of glucose) and ISP2 culture medium (for 1 L: 10 g of starch, 14 g of agar, 10 g of malt, 4 g of yeast extract, and 4 g of glucose), to which 100 µg/mL of the antifungals nystatin and tetracycline were added. This was followed by incubation in a BOD chamber at 28 ± 2 ºC for a period of 30 days, during which the strains of actinomycetes that grew were isolated and purified.
Microculture and microscope analysis
The isolated and purified actinobacteria were subjected to microcultures (adapted from Shirling and Gottlieb 1972) and were stained using the Gram method (LB Laborclin®). In summary, the spores of the purified strains were sown in 40 x 15 mm Petri dishes containing their respective isolation media; 18 x 18 mm coverslips were tilted at 45º over the streaks. After 96 hours of incubation at 28 ± 2 ºC in a BOD chamber, the coverslips were removed and attached with plastic tape to 26 x 76 mm slides; then they were subjected to the Gram staining method. All the stained slides were observed under an optical microscope with the 100x objective (Carl Zeiss optical microscope, coupled to Zen AxioCamER - Zen lite 2012 photo documenter).
Conservation, selection, and morphological description of the strains of actinobacteria
For the conservation, the strains of actinobacteria were cultured in a solid medium (as described in Section 2.2) for 10 days. Five fragments of each colony were preserved in triplicates in 1.5 mL microtubes containing 20% glycerol. All the microtubes were stored in a freezer at -80 ºC and are preserved in the LaBMicrA microorganism collection at the UFAM’s Analytical Center. As selection criteria and for the definition of the group of biotechnological studies, the macromorphological aspects of isolates grown in ISP2 were observed. The strains were registered in the National System for the Management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (SisGen) under the number AC1746C. After cultivation in ISP2 culture medium, the selected strains were described morphologically according to the manuals of Shirling and Gottlieb (1972). In the macromorphological aspects, we observed the patterns of the pigmentation of the pseudohyphae, dorsal-dishes and types of edges of the colonies – the colors of the pseudohyphae and dorsal dishes were determined using the ISCC/NBS color system (available at https://www.w3schools.com/colors/colors_nbs.asp).
Phytopathogens selected to evaluate the antifungal potential of the actinobacteria
To evaluate the antifungal potential of the actinobacteria, five phytopathogens were chosen, which were kindly provided by the Laboratory of Microbiology and Phytopathology of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences (FCA) at UFAM: Colletotrichum sp. (habanero-type pepper-ISO01) isolated from leaf tissue lesions of habanero-type pepper plants (Capsicum chinense); C. guaranicola (guarana plant-P01) and Pestalotiopsis sp. (guarana plant-3002R2) isolated from leaf tissue lesions of different guarana plants (Paullinia cupana); Corynespora cassicola (tomato plant-ISO079) isolated from leaf tissue lesions of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum); and Sclerotium coffeicola (Mango tree-M01) isolated from leaf tissue lesions of mango trees (Mangifera indica). These plants, especially guarana, are of economic importance to the Amazon region and to rest of the world.
DNA extraction, PCR, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
For DNA extraction, the selected strains of actinobacteria were cultured in 125 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 mL of potato, dextrose and yeast extract (PDY) medium (Souza et al. 2004), at 28 ± 2 °C and 120 rpm, for 72 h. The extractions followed the protocol of the Zymo Research Fungal/Bacterial DNA MicroPrep™kit. The DNAs were quantified in a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Thermo Scientific) and their integrities were recorded using electrophoresis with 0.8% agarose gel. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using 20 ng of DNA, the PCR kit Illustratm PuReTaq Ready-to-GoTM PCR beads (GE Healthcare) and the primers 27F AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG and 1492R CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT (Haygood & Davidson 1997), with a final volume of 25 µL, in a 96-well thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) (Ebrahimi-Zarandi et al. 2021). The amplified product was visualized in electrophoresis with 1% agarose gel, stained with GelRed™, using the Invitrogen® 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder base pair marker, and photo-documented using the L-Pix Touch Loccus® Photo-documentation system. Amplicons were purified with the enzyme ExoSAP-IT (GE Healthcare). The samples were sequenced using the Sanger method and the BigDye Terminator kit (Applied Biosystems).
The products of the partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene were compared with the sequences retrieved from the GenBank databases (NCBI) using the BLASTn alignment (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/Blast.cgi) and EzBioCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/). The alignment of the sequencing products was performed using CLUSTAL W (MEGA 11 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis). Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the evolutionary analysis by the maximum likelihood method using the neighbor-joining and BioNJ (Tamura-Nei, 1993) algorithms and the bootstrap test with a maximum of 1,000 replications ((MEGA 11, available at www.megasoftware.net) (Felsenstein 1985; Tamura et al. 2021). Accession numbers generated by NCBI are available in the Supplementary Material (MS 1).
Screening using the paired cultures method
After being reactivated in ISP2, the actinomycete strains were inoculated linearly, from one end to the other, passing through the center, in new Petri dishes containing ISP2, and incubated at 28 ± 2 ºC in a BOD chamber. Two days previously, the pathogen lines were inoculated in PDA (Souza et al. 2004). On the fifth day of growth of the pathogens and third of the actinomycetes, discs of agar of 5 mm in diameter containing the phytopathogens were removed from the culture in PDA and inoculated at one centimeter from the edges, perpendicularly in relation to the line containing the bacterial inocula, in the dishes with ISP2. At one centimeter from one of these inocula, a cavity was made by removing a 10 mm wide strip of the culture medium from one edge to the other, parallel to the bacterial line, in order to verify the possible production of antifungal volatile substances (Fig.5). Similar control dishes were also made with ISP2, which contained only each phytopathogen at two opposite poles and separated by a 10 mm cavity. All paired cultures were made in triplicate and incubated for 10 days, in order to observe the possible inhibition of pathogens by the actinomycetes. A stacked bar graph was constructed from the means of the inhibition zones of each triplicate using the GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1.
Production curves of the extracts
The strains Streptomyces spp. LaBMicrA B270 (OR724732) and B280 (OR724701), which were selected from the bioassay of paired cultures, were cultured for 96 h in Petri dishes with ISP2 and 1.5% microbiological agar, from which two fragments of 5 x 5 mm were inoculated in an Erlenmeyer flask of 250 mL containing 120 mL of ISP2, with a total of 36 flasks. The strains were grown at 120 rpm and 28 ± 2 ºC. During incubation, three Erlenmeyer flasks of each strain were collected at scheduled intervals, totaling 12 samples in triplicate at intervals of 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, 72 h, 120 h, 168 h, 216 h, 264 h, 312 h, 360 h, and 408 h. At each interval, glucose consumption and pH were measured, and intra- and extracellular extracts were obtained, the masses of which were used for the construction of the production curves of the extracts and biological assays.
To obtain the extracts at each interval, the biomass and cultured medium of each flask were separated via centrifugation (Eppendorf® centrifuge) at 4,000 rpm for 15 min, and then the biomass was washed three times with 10 mL of distilled water. The biomasses were then vortexed and macerated for 24 h with 5 mL of 1:1 MeOH/AcOEt. The cultured medium was partitioned with successive volumes of 40, 30, and 30 mL of AcOEt/2-propanol 9:1, which were then pooled. After evaporation of the solvents, the extracts were weighed, dried in a desiccator with activated silica, and weighed again, until they reached a constant weight, in order to establish the average values of the triplicate of each point. After this, the three extracts from each point were collected, concentrated, weighed, and stored at 4 ºC until the day of the bioassays.
Assays of the extracts from the points of the curve against phytopathogens
Only the extracts collected from the cultured medium of each of the twelve points of the growth curve of the Streptomyces spp. LaBMicrA B270 (OR724732) and B280 (OR724701) strains were tested against the target phytopathogens. To the flasks containing the dried and weighed extracts, 200 µL of DMSO were added and, after being dissolved, 800 µL of autoclaved distilled water were added. From these solutions, stock solutions were made by diluting aliquots corresponding to 20 mg of each dry extract in sterilized distilled water, reaching a final volume of 1 mL. As a positive control, 20 mg of nystatin was dissolved in 1 mL of water. Phytopathogens were reactivated in Petri dishes containing potato, dextrose, agar and yeast extract (PDAY) ulture medium (Souza et al. 2004) at 28 ± 2 ºC for 96 h, in a BOD chamber. The extract and control assays were performed in triplicate in cell culture plates with 12 wells, containing: test: 0.950 mL PDAY, 50 µL extract + phytopathogen; negative control: 1 mL PDAY + phytopathogen; positive control: 0.950 mL PDAY, 50 µL nystatin solution + phytopathogen. The solutions of the extract or control with the culture medium were homogenized at approximately 40 ºC. For the inoculation of the pathogens in the wells, discs (5 mm in diameter) of the culture in PDAY were used in each of them. The assays were observed for 10 days.
Production of the extracts and minimum inhibitory concentration assay
From the results of the growth curves and bioassays, new extracts of LaBMicrA B270 (OR724732) and B280 (OR724701) strains were prepared, which were cultivated for 10 days using cultivation and extract production methods similar to those described above (Section 2.8.). In the production of the extracts, the only difference was the lyophilization of the cultured medium after partition with AcOEt/2-propanol 9:1. The concentrated extracts and lyophilized material were stored at -18 ºC. To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the AcOEt/2-propanol 9:1 and MeOH/AcOEt 1:1 extracts and the aqueous lyophilized material were successively diluted to the concentrations of: 1,000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.63 and 7.81 µg/mL. The extracts were tested with the phytopathogens in a similar way to what is described in the previous item.