COORDINATION & COLLABORATION
Implementation of the BBS surveys has provided increased opportunities for multisectoral collaboration among host government entities (Ministry of Health, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Labor and Provincial Health Departments), bilateral organizations (CDC, PEPFAR, UNAIDS), international academic research partners (UCSF), NGOs (ITECH, ICRH and Pathfinder International Population Services International) and civil society organizations: Association for Sexual Minority Rights in Mozambique (LAMBDA), FSW network (Tiyane Vavassate), National Network Against Drugs (UNIDOS). This participatory approach to collaboration with civil society was unprecedented in Mozambique for other national surveillance surveys and was critical for the success of the implementation of the surveys because of their contextual experience and links with the target populations. As an example of gradually enhanced collaboration, the National HIV/STI Control Program and the National Mental Health Program initially provided technical and programmatic input and eventually became listed as principal investigators. The multi-sectoral involvement of various partners in the survey design and implementation, and dissemination of the findings has enhanced a sense of ownership of the data and set a precedence for meaningful collaboration between government agencies, technical assistance partners, and civil society organizations.
Institutional roles of the various collaborators were defined at the outset via a memorandum of understanding. The implementation of the surveys has been coordinated by a technical working group (TWG) with members from key stakeholders. The TWG is organized into sub-committees responsible for areas such as general coordination, administration and logistics, survey methods, laboratory procedures, data management, and data analysis. The TWG meets bi-weekly and regularly schedules work sessions to focus on key outputs such as protocol development, data analysis, and report writing.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING
One major impact of ongoing BBS survey implementation has been gradual workforce development at the National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Saúde - INS) and Ministry of Health (MOH) and institutional capacity building evidenced by increasingly complex systems that support data management and use.
Technical assistance for the implementation of the BBS was initially based on a twinning model whereby technical advisors were hired by foreign donors and provided direct mentorship to national INS and MOH staff. To date, twinning has focused on building capacity of principal investigators, survey coordinators, data managers, and data analysts. Twinning has helped these individuals gain the knowledge and skills necessary to take on increasingly sophisticated roles of leadership within the INS and MOH over the years. As an example, the national BBS coordinator transitioned from a role of coordinating single surveys to the role of coordinator of the entire INS unit responsible for large national surveys and initiatives.
As the roles and experiences of INS and MOH staff increased and became more complex, so too did the vision of the types of skills necessary to support the implementation of high-quality surveys. For example, informatics specialists were hired to become involved in more high-tech surveillance activities that focus on providing technical assistance in database development, mobile data collection tools, data visualization and survey implementation monitoring.
To promote the analysis and dissemination of BBS scientific documents such as abstracts, manuscripts, presentations, reports, policy briefs, and brochures, the Mozambique BBS Scientific Manuscript Advisory Panel was established in 2012. This advisory panel provides oversight to ensure appropriate use of data, reviews analysis proposals to ensure scientific integrity and to avoid duplication. It was initially composed of representatives from INS and foreign donors and universities. Panel membership is periodically reviewed to ensure representation of the institutions leading the design and development of BBS in Mozambique. The advisory panel convenes quarterly and organizes ad hoc meetings when necessary. A data sharing policy was approved between INS and CDC in 2015, further cementing its role and institutional function. This data sharing policy was created to ensure that the data collected for BBS are used and disseminated widely and appropriately and that BBS investigators can fairly participate in the process of publishing findings, while also ensure the integrity of the use of survey data. The policy also provides guidance on data access procedures for investigators and other entities not already granted direct access to the study datasets for purposes of preparing final survey reports as described in individual BBS protocols. This data sharing policy is the first of its kind for HIV surveillance studies in Mozambique and is being used to support the development of a more generalized inter-institutional data sharing policy that encompasses the use and dissemination of various survey and surveillance activities led by INS.
The creation of the advisory panel and the need to guarantee the proper management of BBS data coincided with a broader conversation about data management practices and structures at INS. As a result, the institution established a Data Management Unit (DMU), which manages a central data repository of all survey and surveillance data generated by INS. The DMU is staffed by data managers, statisticians, and informatics specialists, who are responsible for drafting data management and security policies, providing analysis support to various research and surveillance activities, producing reports, infographics, and supporting a website displaying summary information from key data sources. DMU staff are members of the BBS TWG and are involved in the planning, coordination, and daily implementation of the surveys.
Finally, INS’ implementation role has expanded over the years from governmental collaborator to primary implementor. Experience with the BBS surveys positioned INS as the key institution to lead the Mozambican arm of a multi-country study funded by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) focusing on miners and their communities. Subsequent studies that have benefited from the human resources, institutional structures and experience gained through the implementation of BBS include the TB Prevalence Survey, Violence Against Children Survey (VACS), Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), and the upcoming Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) survey.
DATA USE AND DISSEMINATION
Upon completing preliminary data analysis, the findings were shared with local stakeholders through community forums, and concise brochures developed in Portuguese and English for use during partner outreach activities. A final national report was then prepared, based upon additional data analyses and stakeholder input (8–12). Results were also shared with other government institutions, such as Mozambique’s National AIDS Council (Conselho Nacional de Combate ao HIV/SIDA) and the National HIV/STI Control Program. Findings have also been disseminated at local, national, and international scientific conferences through poster and oral presentations (20–30). Although communicating findings to the government, donors, and service delivery partners has been successful, and despite strong collaborations with central-level civil society organizations, sharing results with large numbers of key populations - especially subgroups within these key populations throughout the country (ex: high-income FSW, PWID and MSM or married MSM who may be stigmatized in their communities by their sexual behaviors) - has been a challenge due to the lack of formal networks and community organizations, especially outside of urban centers.
The data has also been used for global reporting and national target setting particularly for Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting (GARPR) and Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM), HIV prevalence and incidence estimates based on the UNAIDS-supported Spectrum package, Global Fund Proposals and PEPFAR annual plans, as well as global campaigns such as the “All In” initiative, focusing on HIV among adolescents and youth (31).
Finally, there has been a systematic approach to the use and dissemination of data for the development of abstracts for international conferences and manuscripts for international peer-reviewed journals of both INS staff and students interested in using the BBS data for their thesis and dissertation work. To date, sixteen manuscripts have been published or are under review in peer-reviewed journals (32–34, 16, 14, 35, 36, 15, 37–44), and five students have used BBS data for their dissertations (undergraduate, masters, and doctorate). These abstracts and manuscripts have benefited from systematic and ongoing support from INS leadership and partner organizations.
ADVOCACY AND POLICY IMPACT
These BBS surveys in Mozambique produced the first HIV prevalence estimates among key populations in the country and have been used to support strategic information needs, and to identify prevention and treatment program gaps. The results of these surveys also provided the evidence necessary for key stakeholders to effectively monitor and evaluate HIV interventions and strategies directed to these populations This is exemplified by the National HIV/STI Control program’s use of BBS results to establish treatment guidelines for KPs and promote KP-friendly health provider trainings to address issues related to stigma found in the healthcare setting (45). The National HIV program also led a recent triangulation exercise using BBS results to estimate the size of the three key population groups throughout the country, disaggregated by district. The results have been used to allocate resources, set programmatic targets and model the impact of targeted key population HIV interventions.
In addition to the use of data to identify programmatic gaps and to create the evidence base necessary for new policies, they have also been used as a powerful advocacy tool. For example, a policy brief including recommendations based on the findings from the PWID survey was produced and used by the National Mental Health Program as evidence to advocate for the introduction of harm-reduction interventions in the country. The National AIDS Council (Conselho Nacional de Combate ao HIV/SIDA, CNCS) is also using the data to advocate for the inclusion of key populations as part of the Prevention Roadmap.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
The majority of funding for the implementation of the first five BBS has been through PEPFAR via CDC and their partners. Financial support has also extended to technical and implementation support which has strengthened the quality of implementation. The second round of BBS among FSW is funded by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, with lab supplies purchased by CDC; UCSF continues to provide technical assistance. Unlike the collaboration with CDC during the first round of BBS, which was characterized by significant technical involvement by CDC staff and partners, the Global Fund has followed a classical donor role with limited technical involvement in the design and implementation of the surveys. This has required the BBS implementation team to learn about Global Fund policies as well as those unique to MOH in order to access funds for administrative and logistic processes. INS contributes through human resources and infrastructural support and provides general scientific oversight to ensure alignment with the objectives of the National Strategic Plan for HIV and AIDS Response. Behavioral surveillance staff also led the development of key sections of the Global Fund Proposals pertaining to research and surveillance. Despite these gains, however, the PEPFAR Sustainability Index, which monitors national investments and the sustainability landscape, highlighters that there are no domestic public or private sector funds supporting the BBS (46). As such, there is a recognized need to diversify funding sources, however, the economic crisis in Mozambique limits the government’s ability to fund these activities at present. Finally, all future studies will include a financial evaluation to assess whether budgeted costs were met or exceeded in order to track spending and ensure the cost-effective use of limited resources.
From a practical perspective, financial structures need to be reviewed in line with the unique needs of the surveys. For example, the procurement of certain items used as “unique objects” for population size estimation – e.g., key chain flashlights, make-up kits, and hygiene kits – are difficult to acquire given the MOH/INS procurement policies which necessitate a labor-intensive and time-consuming public bidding process that requires constant communication and collaboration between the supplier and study coordinators. Hiring policies have also posed a challenge. For example, there is a need to hire a different set of staff for the formative and RDS phases of the survey who have specialized training, background, and skill sets. However, MOH considers the BBS surveys to be one unique study and, therefore, requires that the staff be the same throughout, which has had an impact on the appropriateness of short-term staff being hired. Shifts in the global economic landscape and political commitment suggest that fewer resources will be available that can be dedicated to surveillance activities, further constraining future survey implementation.
COMMUNITY IMPACT
The BSS surveys helped to increase the visibility of KP groups and organizations in Mozambique. For example, LAMBDA, an association for the LGBT network in Mozambique, is not yet legally recognized as a formal association but has participated in planning of interventions and strategies directed towards KP and is a key collaborator on the MSM surveys. Data from the PWID study has strengthened the multisectoral collaboration to develop a Harm Reduction Strategy (MoH-Mental Health Program and HIV/STI National Program, National AIDS Council, USAID and civil society). Strengthening these collaborations have had a positive influence on KP engagement in HIV care and treatment.