Adipose-derived stem cells (rADSCs) isolation and characterization
The rat adipose-derived stem cells (rADSCs) isolation and characterization were performed and described in our previous report 19. Briefly, the rADSCs cells were isolated from epididymal adipose tissue then minced and digested for 3 h at 37°C with collagenase type 2 (Col-II) (0.2% in PBS). After the digestion process, the solution was centrifuged, and the pellet was collected for cell culture. Further, cultured in DMEM low-glucose medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin (Invitrogen), 10% FBS (Invitrogen), 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen) and 2mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen) at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Western Blot Analysis
The following method was carried out and reported in our previous report 20. Briefly, the concentrations of the protein were determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, USA). The proteins were separated by using 8–12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Belford, Massachusetts, USA). Membranes were kept in 5% blocking buffer and incubated with specific primary antibodies (listed in Supplementary Table S1) at 4°C overnight. Then, the protein signals were measured using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The immunoblots were performed by Alphamager2200 digital imaging system (Digital Imaging System, Commerce, CA, USA).
RNA extraction and qRT PCR analysis
Total RNA from cell cultures and left ventricular heart tissue were extracted and purified by using the RNA isolation- Zymo Research Quick-RNA™ MiniPrep kit (Irvine, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Further, the RNA purity was quantified by Nanodrop instrument (260/280 = 1.8). The microRNA expression profile underwent analysis using qRT-PCR on the CFX96™ Quantitative Real-Time system by Bio-Rad, following the protocol provided by the manufacturer of the Mir-X™ microRNA first-strand synthesis (cDNA) kit (TaKaRa, Ohtsu, Japan). MicroRNA forward primers was received from PROTECH, Taipei, Taiwan and complementary reverse primer strands were supplied within the Mir-X™ microRNA first-strand synthesis (cDNA) kit. The forward and reverse primers of interested genes (listed in Supplementary Table S2) and the qRT PCR experiment were performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions, employing a total reaction volume of 20 µL. The cycle number at which the reaction crossed the threshold cycle (Ct) was determined for each gene. The 2ΔCt equation was employed to measure the relative amount of each gene to U6 rRNA, where ΔCt = (Ct interested gene – Ct U6). The relative quantification was done by normalization to U6. All reactions were done in triplicate.
Plasmids and construction of reporter plasmids
The CHIP wild-type plasmid was gifted by Dr. Jeng-Fan Lo in Yang-Ming Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 21. The lentiviral shLV and shHIF1α plasmids were purchased from National RNAi Core (Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan). JetPRIME Nanotechnology-based Transfection Reagent (JetPRIME, Strasbourg, France) was used for transfection for 24 h. The reporter assays for the 3′ UTR of the STUB1 and IGF1R plasmids (both wild type and mutant) were constructed using the annealing method with an insert (listed in Supplementary Table S2) containing the restriction site for XhoI and SalI sites of pmiRGLO vector, confirmed by colony PCR and restriction digestion. Purification of plasmid DNA was done by using the Qiagen-midi plasmid purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and further verified by sequencing and restriction digestion process.
Luciferase reporter assay
The following assay was performed and mentioned in our previous report 22. Briefly, the plasmid was constructed with the 3′ UTR region (listed in Supplementary Table S2) of the two genes, STUB1 and IGF1R, both wild and mutant types using the pmirGLO vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Twelve well plates were used for the co-transfection of the pmiRGLO-3′ UTR followed by a scramble or miR-764-5p mimic. Luciferase activities were identified using a dual-luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). For promoter assay, the promoter-luciferase miR-764-5p construct, PGL4.1, was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The shRNA or shHIF1α were transfected into rADSCs cells by using JetPRIME® reagents (Polyplus-transfection, France) as per the manufacturer’s instructions after 24 h transfection. Relative luciferase activity was quantified after normalized with Renilla luciferase in rADSCs. The sample was analyzed and each experiment was done at least three times.
Flow cytometry analysis for apoptosis, cell cycle, and ROS detection
For the analysis of apoptosis, flow cytometry was performed by using the apoptosis detection kit (Annexin V-FITC; BD, Biosciences, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were collected and double-stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI staining (BD, Biosciences, USA). Flow cytometry was carried out using the FACS Canto™ system (BD, Biosciences, USA) at the FACS Core Facility, China Medical University, Taiwan. Finally, cells were obtained and gated. For cell cycle analysis, the cells were exposed to two different conditions, normoxia or short-term hypoxia (1% O2) for 6 h. After the treatments, the cells were collected by trypsinization and washed with 1X PBS. Next, the following cells were kept in ice-cold ethanol (70%) overnight at 4°C, followed by a wash with 1X PBS three times and then stained with PI (10 mg/mL) in PBS and RNase A (0.5 mg/mL) for 15 min at RT. Finally, the cells were again washed with PBS, and flow cytometry was performed by using FACS Canto™. The cells were gated with DNA content labeled cells. The cells for ROS analysis also underwent the same flow cytometry using DCFDA (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific-US) staining. Cells were incubated with 10µM fluorescein, carboxy-H2DCFDA (C400) for 30 min. Then analyzed by flow cytometry. All experimental cycles, n = 10,000.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays
The Co-IP experiment was performed by using rADSCs cell lysates obtained with the protein G magnetic beads (Millipore) as per the manufactures’ instruction. After cells were harvested and lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. A total of 400 µg cell lysate was taken for quantification and incubated with anti-CHIP (sc-66830) overnight at 4°C. Further, the immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted from the beads at 95°C for 8 min and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The following separated proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane and the result was observed after being probed with the specific antibodies.
Transwell migration assay
The migration assay was performed by using transwell cell culture chambers (8 µm pore size; SPLInsert™ hanging 24-well plate). For migration assay, 2 × 104 cells were seeded in the upper chamber with a serum-free medium then exposed to normoxia or STH (6 h) conditions. In the lower chamber, the medium contains 10% FBS for chemoattractant property. After 24 h, the non-migrating cells were removed from the upper face by cotton swabs, and the migrating cells were stained with crystal violet staining with air-dried in the lower face and further cells were counted after images were taken by using 20x magnification by using Olympus microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
Cell viability assay
The following assay was performed and mentioned in our previous report23. In brief, the colorimetric assay was done to analyze the viability of the cells on the mechanism based on the conversion of MTT reagent (3–4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium-bromide) into the final product formazan to produce the blue color formation. After seeding the cells (1 × 104 cells/well), the rADSCs were exposed to normoxia or STH (6 h) then incubated in DMEM with 10% FBS. Further, the MTT (0.5 mg/mL) reagent was added to the stem cells for 4 h and incubate at 37°C. Then cells were mixed well with DMSO and kept for 10 min. The cell viability was quantified at OD 550 nm wavelength by using an automated microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA).
Docking studies
The docking study between the transcription factor HIF1α and the miR-764-5p promoter region was performed using GOLD (Genetic Optimization of Ligand Docking) software, based on genetic GA 24 and the open-source transcription factor prediction tool (http://www.ifti.org/). The docking was performed using the best and most energetically favorable conformation of the HIF1α transcription factor protein database (PDB) structure (1H2K), which was chosen and downloaded from the PDB database (https://www.rcsb.org/). The docking study score was calculated by using this formula:
(GoldScore = S (hbext) + S (vdwext) + S (hb int) + S (vdw int).
Immunofluorescence staining
The following methods were described in our earlier report 25. Briefly, cell fixation was done by using 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at RT and permeabilization by using 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at RT before staining with a specific antibody. Next, the seeded equal number of cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were thoroughly washed with 1X PBS three times and incubated with the secondary antibody, Alexa Fluro 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies, or Alexa Fluro 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Then images were captured using fluorescent microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Animal experiments and design
The eight weeks of normotensive WKY (Wistar Kyoto rats) and SHR (Spontaneously Hypertensive rats) were purchased from BioLasco Taiwan Co., Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan. All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (108-IACUC-71), Taiwan. The animals were housed in an animal care unit at 24 ± 2°C and regularly provided with food and water. After 9 months, the aging rats (n = 7) were grouped into five categories: (A) WKY, (B) SHR, (C) SHR tail-vein administered with rADSCs that transfected with constructed plasmid of scramble (SHR-rADSCsscramble), (D) miR-764-5p mimic (SHR-rADSCsmir−764−5p−mimic), or (E) antagomir (SHR-rADSCsanti−mir−764−5p) for 24 h. The 4 weeks of consecutive treatment with the cells (1 x 107 cells/rat/week) through intravenous tail-vein injection, were followed by echocardiography and sacrifice by terminal anesthesia. The hearts were then collected and stored at -80°C.
Immunohistochemistry
The heart tissue sections were dried overnight at 58°C and deparaffinized by using xylene followed by a hydration method in a series of ethanol. The activity of endogenous peroxidase was stopped by using H2O2 (3%) for 10 min followed by a rinse with ddH2O for 15 min, then the tissue sections were kept with citrate buffer in the microwave for 15 min and further cooled to RT for 30 min. After that, the slides were incubated by using a blocking buffer (i.e. 2.5% horse serum) for 15 min. Next, a specific primary antibody anti-BNP (Bioss, bs-2207R) at a 1:100 dilution ratio was added for 2h. The slides were washed thoroughly with 1X PBS and further incubated with the secondary antibody for 30 min at RT. After this step, the tissue slides were again washed with 1X PBS and treated with streptavidin-HRP conjugate for 30 min. Subsequently, the processed slides were washed with 1X PBS three times and chromogenic substrate DAB (diaminobenzidine) was added and followed by a 1 to 3 min incubation at RT. Finally, the slides were washed three times in PBS, air-dried, and mounted with VectaMount (H-5000). The images were taken using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Heart tissue for TUNEL assay
The following method is described in the previous reports 20. Briefly, the TUNEL + cells were identified by using TUNEL reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemical, Mannheim, Germany) detected by brilliant green color by using wavelength range 515–565 nm, and cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI further identified by blue color at 454 nm. Finally, the images were captured by using an Olympus DP 74 fluorescent microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical Analysis
The evaluation of statistics was quantified by mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The P-value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical data was performed in repeated independent experiments. Data processed by using Graph Pad Prism5 statistical software (San Diego, CA, USA) with unpaired student’s t-test for two groups and one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons followed by post hoc Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference tests.