From the beginning of September 2018 to September 2022, we evaluated 129 patients with DKA recruited from a tertiary hospital center in Tehran, Iran. The total population contained 84 individuals with and 45 without leukocytosis. Out of the total of 84, 53 individuals had an infection, while 31 exhibited no signs or symptoms. (Fig. 1)
[Insert Fig. 1 here]
Characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
The characteristics of study participants
Characteristics | Mean | SD | Number | Percentage |
Age | 38.17 | 21.30 | | |
Male | | | 52 | 40.3 |
Female | | | 77 | 59.6 |
Diabetes type I | | | 92 | 71.3 |
Diabetes type II | | | 37 | 28.6 |
Diabetes duration | 10.24 | 8.20 | | |
Hospitalization duration | 10.25 | 8.20 | | |
PH | 7.170 | 0.12 | | |
ESRa | 26.25 | 36.14 | | |
CRPb | 29.46 | 28.86 | | |
Normal CXRc | | | 80 | 62.01 |
Abnormal CXR | | | 49 | 37.98 |
Normal B/Csd | | | 122 | 94.57 |
Abnormal B/Cs | | | 7 | 5.42 |
Normal U/Cse | | | 109 | 84.49 |
Abnormal U/Cs | | | 20 | 15.50 |
Infected | 14.96 | 8.16 | | |
Uninfected | 13.29 | 7.66 | | |
Death | | | 4 | 3.10 |
Discharge | | | 125 | 96.89 |
a Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, b C−reactive protein, c Chest X−Ray, d Blood culture, e Urine culture |
Table 2 displays the mean and standard deviation of the participant's age. Participants of a higher age group exhibited a higher leukocytosis count and infection rate than younger participants, which is statistically significant. (P value = 0.0001)
Table 2
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and age
Leukocytosis | Infection | Mean | SDa | P value |
Yes | No | 42.67 | 22.887 | 0.0001 |
Yes | 52.17 | 25.145 |
Total | 47.85 | 24.251 |
No | No | 30.28 | 16.749 |
Yes | 33.00 | 12.871 |
Total | 31.07 | 15.633 |
No | 34.23 | 19.558 |
Total | Yes | 44.13 | 22.737 |
Total | 38.17 | 21.3000 |
a Standard Deviation |
Table 3 shows no statistically meaningful correlation between sex and leukocytosis. (P value = 0.070)
Table 3
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and sex
Leukocytosis | Infection | | Sex | Total | P value |
Male | Female |
Yes | No | Number | 14 | 17 | 31 | 0.393 |
% | 40.0% | 34.7% | 36.9% |
Yes | Number | 21 | 32 | 53 |
% | 60.0% | 65.3% | 63.1% |
Total | Number | 35 | 49 | 84 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | No | Number | 16 | 16 | 32 | 0.008 |
% | 94.1% | 57.1% | 71.1% |
Yes | Number | 1 | 12 | 13 |
% | 5.9% | 42.9% | 28.9% |
Total | Number | 17 | 28 | 45 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Total | No | Number | 30 | 33 | 63 | 0.070 |
% | 57.7% | 42.9% | 48.8% |
Yes | Number | 22 | 44 | 66 |
% | 42.3% | 57.1% | 51.2% |
Total | Number | 52 | 77 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
The number of patients diagnosed with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes is shown in Table 4. There was no statistically significant correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and diabetes type. (P value > 0.05)
Table 4
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and diabetes type
Leukocytosis | Infection | | Diabetes | Total | P value |
I | II |
Yes | No | Number | 22 | 9 | 31 | 0.393 |
% | 40.74% | 30.0% | 36.9% |
Yes | Number | 32 | 21 | 53 |
% | 59.2% | 70.0% | 63.0% |
Total | Number | 54 | 30 | 84 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | No | Number | 26 | 6 | 32 | 0.008 |
% | 68.4% | 85.7% | 71.1%% |
Yes | Number | 12 | 1 | 13 |
% | 31.6% | 14.3% | 28.9% |
Total | Number | 38 | 7 | 45 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Total | No | Number | 48 | 15 | 63 | 0.070 |
% | 57.7% | 40.5% | 49.2% |
Yes | Number | 44 | 22 | 66 |
% | 47.3% | 59.5% | 51.2% |
Total | Number | 92 | 37 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Table 5 depicts the relationship between diabetes and hospitalization duration and leukocytosis due to an infectious process. As demonstrated, a statistically robust correlation existed between leukocytosis, infection presence, and diabetes duration. Patients with more extended periods of diabetes exhibited signs and symptoms of infection more than others. (P value = 0.006) In addition, Patients with more extended hospital stays were diagnosed with infection more than patients with shorter periods of hospitalization, which was statistically significant. (P value = 0.008) Table 4. Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and diabetes and hospitalization duration
Table 5
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection, hospitalization, and diabetes duration
Leukocytosis | Infection | Duration of diabetes | P value | Hospitalization duration | P value |
Mean | SDa | | Mean | SDa |
Yes | No | 11.6667 | 11.58612 | 0.006 | 8.1333 | 8.08762 | 0.008 |
Yes | 14.5000 | 5.84355 | 11.4444 | 6.82747 |
Total | 13.2121 | 8.88383 | 9.9394 | 7.49558 |
No | No | 7.3250 | 7.25832 | 9.5313 | 4.62800 |
Yes | 9.9231 | 6.17065 | 12.5385 | 14.80774 |
Total | 8.0756 | 6.99432 | 10.4000 | 8.76304 |
Total | No | 8.7106 | 8.97463 | 9.0851 | 5.89705 |
Yes | 12.5806 | 6.31281 | 11.9032 | 10.69690 |
Total | 10.2487 | 8.20226 | 10.2051 | 8.20256 |
a Standard Deviation |
Table 6 shows the correlation between leukocytosis caused by infection and PH levels. The mean acidosis in infected patients with leukocytosis was 7.17, and in non-infected patients with leukocytosis was 7.17. As per the statistical analysis, we found no significant correlation between these two variables. (P value > 0.05)
Table 6
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and PH
Leukocytosis | Infection | PH | P value |
Mean | SDa |
Yes | No | 7.177 | 0.133 | 0.805 |
Yes | 7.173 | 0.113 |
Total | 7.175 | 0.119 |
No | No | 7.188 | 0.119 |
Yes | 7.116 | 0.164 |
Total | 7.167 | 0.136 |
Total | No | 7.184 | 0.122 |
Yes | 7.149 | 0.136 |
Total | 7.170 | 0.128 |
a Standard Deviation |
Table 7 displays the ESR and CRP levels in infected and uninfected patients, with and without leukocytosis. The infection rate among patients with higher ESR levels was higher than that of patients with lower levels of ESR. There was a statistically valid correlation between the two variables. (P value = 0.013) The mean levels of CRP in infected patients were higher than those in uninfected patients, and our analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. (P value = 0.002)
Table 7
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and ESR and CRP levels
Leukocytosis | Infection | ESR | P value | CRP | P value |
Mean | SDa | Mean | SDa | |
Yes | No | 11.2000 | 15.11007 | 0.013 | 21.9333 | 22.19545 | 0.002 |
Yes | 56.2000 | 42.11752 | 45.4467 | 35.66501 |
Total | 33.7000 | 38.60423 | 33.6900 | 31.54166 |
No | No | 11.6897 | 19.36142 | 17.8276 | 13.23434 |
Yes | 42.8333 | 49.19319 | 47.0000 | 38.61465 |
Total | 20.8049 | 33.67062 | 26.3659 | 26.70651 |
Total | No | 11.5227 | 17.84623 | 19.2273 | 16.68290 |
Yes | 50.2593 | 44.99794 | 46.1370 | 36.28201 |
Total | 26.2535 | 36.14404 | 29.4606 | 28.86180 |
a Standard Deviation |
Table 8 exhibits the number of patients with abnormal chest X-rays (CXR). There were no abnormalities in 28 infected patients, and 25 showed abnormalities in CXRs. Among non-infected patients, 21 showed normal CXRs, and 10 had abnormalities, which was statistically significant. (P value = 0.002)
Table 8
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and CXR findings
Leukocytosis | Infection | | CXRa | Total | P value |
Normal | Abnormal |
Yes | No | Number | 21 | 10 | 31 | 0.223 |
% | 42.8% | 28.5% | 36.9% |
Yes | Number | 28 | 25 | 53 |
% | 57.1% | 71.4% | 63.0% |
Total | Number | 49 | 35 | 84 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | No | Number | 29 | 3 | 32 | 0.001 |
% | 93.5% | 21.4% | 71.1% |
Yes | Number | 2 | 11 | 13 |
% | 6.4% | 78.5% | 28.8% |
Total | Number | 31 | 14 | 45 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Total | No | Number | 50 | 13 | 63 | 0.002 |
% | 62.5% | 26.5% | 48.8% |
Yes | Number | 30 | 36 | 66 |
% | 37.5% | 73.4% | 51.1% |
Total | Number | 80 | 49 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
a Chest X−Ray |
The data presented in Table 9 reveals no statistically significant correlation between the type of infection as determined by blood culture and leukocytosis. Two infected and four non-infected patients with leukocytosis blood cultures showed infections with the methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus species. (P value = 1)
Table 9
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and blood cultures
Leukocytosis | Infection | | B/Ca | Total | P value |
Normal | MSSA | MRSA |
Yes | No | Number | 27 | 4 | 0 | 31 | 1.0 |
% | 34.6% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 36.9% |
Yes | Number | 51 | 0 | 2 | 53 |
% | 65.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 63.1% |
Total | Number | 78 | 4 | 2 | 84 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | No | Number | 31 | 1 | - | 32 | 1.0 |
% | 70.4% | 100.0% | - | 71.1% |
Yes | Number | 13 | 0 | - | 13 |
% | 29.5% | 0.0% | - | 28.8% |
Total | Number | 44 | 1 | - | 45 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | 100.0% |
Total | No | Number | 58 | 5 | 0 | 63 | 1.0 |
% | 47.5% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 48.8% |
Yes | Number | 64 | 0 | 2 | 66 |
% | 52.4% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 51.2% |
Total | Number | 122 | 5 | 2 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
a Blood culture |
The contents of Table 10 indicate the correlation between leukocytosis and positive urine cultures. Infected patients with leukocytosis had 43 negative urine cultures and 10 positive urine cultures. Uninfected patients with leukocytosis had 30 negative and one positive urine culture, which is statistically meaningful. (P value = 0.005)
Among uninfected patients without leukocytosis, 29 had negative, and 3 had positive urine cultures. (P value = 0021) Infected patients without leukocytosis had seven normal and six positive urine cultures. (P value = 0.021) The correlation between leukocytosis and positive urine cultures was statistically significant. (P value < 0.05)
Table 10
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection in patients with DKA and urine cultures
Leukocytosis | Infection | | U/Ca | Total | P value |
Normal | Klebsiella |
Yes | No | Number | 30 | 1 | 31 | 0.005 |
% | 41.0% | 9.0% | 36.9% |
Yes | Number | 43 | 10 | 53 |
% | 58.9% | 90.9% | 63.1% |
Total | Number | 73 | 11 | 84 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | No | Number | 29 | 3 | 32 | 0.021 |
% | 69.04% | 33.3% | 71.1% |
Yes | Number | 7 | 6 | 13 |
% | 30.95% | 66.6% | 28.88% |
Total | Number | 36 | 9 | 45 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Total | No | Number | 59 | 4 | 63 | 0.0001 |
% | 43.96% | 100.0% | 48.8% |
Yes | Number | 50 | 16 | 66 |
% | 56.03% | 0.0% | 51.2% |
Total | Number | 109 | 20 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
a Urine culture |
As shown in Table 11, out of a total of 84 patients with leukocytosis, 31 (36.9%) had no apparent infectious source; 17 (20/2%) were diagnosed with respiratory infections; 10 (11/9%) were diagnosed with urine infections; and 6 (7/1%) had soft tissue infections; 5 (6/0%) had pelvic inflammatory disease; 4 (4/8%) were diagnosed with peritonitis; and 4 (4/8%) had COVID-19; 2 (2/4%) had meningitis; 2 (2/4%) had gastroenteritis; 2 (2/4%) had surgical site infections; and 1 (1/2%) was diagnosed with endocarditis. We found a significant correlation between leukocytosis and infection in patients with DKA. (P value = 0.034) The frequency of infections in patients with DKA, with or without leukocytosis, is shown in Fig. 2.
Table 11
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection and infection type
Source | | Leukocytosis | Total | P value |
Yes | No |
No infection | Number | 31 | 32 | 63 | 0.034 |
% | 36.9% | 71.1% | 48.8% |
UTI | Number | 10 | 6 | 16 |
% | 11.9% | 13.3% | 12.4% |
Meningitis | Number | 2 | 0 | 2 |
% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Peritonitis | Number | 4 | 0 | 4 |
% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 3.1% |
PID | Number | 5 | 0 | 5 |
% | 6.0% | 0.0% | 3.9% |
Respiratory | Number | 17 | 5 | 22 |
% | 20.2% | 11.1% | 17.1% |
Soft tissue and abscess | Number | 6 | 2 | 8 |
% | 7.1% | 4.4% | 6.2% |
Endocarditis | Number | 1 | 0 | 1 |
% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Gastroenteritis | Number | 2 | 0 | 2 |
% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 1.6% |
SSIa | Number | 2 | 0 | 2 |
% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 1.6% |
COVID-19 | Number | 4 | 0 | 4 |
% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 3.1% |
Total | Number | 84 | 45 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
a Surgical Site Infection |
[Insert Fig. 2 here]
By examining Table 12, we can ascertain that the mean and standard deviation of the WBC count in infected and uninfected patients were 14/96 ± 8.16 and 11/53 ± 6/73, respectively.
Table 12
Leukocytosis levels in patients with and without infection
Infection | Mean | SD |
No | 11.5381 | 6.73811 |
Yes | 14.9670 | 8.16414 |
Total | 13.2924 | 7.66809 |
Among all 129 patients, four patients with leukocytosis died, Including two with infections and two without any evident infection. However, there was no significant correlation between leukocytosis and the prognosis of patients, as shown in Table 13. (P value = 0.181)
Table 13
Correlation between leukocytosis due to infection in patients with DKA and prognosis
Infection | Leukocytosis | | Outcome | Total | P value |
Death | Discharge |
Yes | Yes | Number | 2 | 29 | 31 | 0.246 |
% | 100.0% | 47.5% | 49.2% |
No | Number | 0 | 32 | 32 |
% | 0.0% | 52.4% | 50.7% |
Total | Number | 2 | 61 | 63 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
No | Yes | Number | 2 | 51 | 53 | 0.642 |
% | 100.0% | 79.7% | 80.3% |
No | Number | 0 | 13 | 13 |
% | 0.0% | 20.3% | 19.7% |
Total | Number | 2 | 64 | 66 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Total | Yes | Number | 4 | 80 | 84 | 0.181 |
% | 100.0% | 64.5% | 65.6% |
No | Number | 0 | 45 | 45 |
% | 0.0% | 36.5% | 34.8% |
Total | Number | 4 | 125 | 129 |
% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |