TIP is one of the most frequently used procedures for distal hypospadias repair, which its use is becoming more frequent also for mid-shaft and proximal cases [13, 14]. Various surgical modifications have been applied to repair hypospadias [15, 16]. De-epithelialized preputial skin flap coverage technique is an easy and valuable modified method for hypospadias repair [15, 16].
This study employed the CUSUM technique to analyze the experiential learning curve of a sole surgeon in repairing hypospadias using this modified surgical procedure, focusing on experiential analysis. The learning curve was divided into three phases. Accordingly, in the initial learning phase, not only there was a longer OT, but also a higher CR. After the competence phase, the proficiency phases of both the OT and CR decreased exponentially. As the surgeon’s experience increased, both OT and CR notably declined, and the decrease in CR was mainly attributed to fewer fistulas and better cosmesis.
Recently, a single-surgeon series of CUSUM learning curves by Zu’bi et al. showed that the competence phase commenced after surpassing the 127th case, while the proficiency phase of both OT and CR was significantly decreased after the 234th case [11]. In comparison, we performed the TIP repair for hypospadias with a modified overlay. Our study showed that the learning curve reached a competence phase after operating on 99 patients, and after a competence phase of 131 patients, the proficiency phase reached by the patient number 231. Both the competence and proficiency phases of our series were achieved earlier, but the competence phase was longer. Moreover, Zu’bi et al. reported a higher severity of hypospadias and younger patients being repaired using the TIP technique during the proficiency phase, resulting in a decreased incidence of complications. Our results also showed fewer complications in younger patients underwent repair using our modified surgical procedure. Further, Zu’bi et al. indicated that they used two types of coverage techniques (dartos layer and spongioplasty) to cover the urethra, which was notably increased in the proficiency phase, which may have influenced the statistical results to some extent. Our series used the single coverage technique for hypospadias repair, which reduces the bias.
Horowitz and Salzhauer [17] reported earlier learning curves for 231 single-stage hypospadias operations performed by one pediatric urologist (M.H.) over a 5 years period in practice. Further, in their study fistula rates were used as the only objective outcome measure for CR, and there was a significant decrease in fistula rates between the first and second two-years. The fistula rates showed a significant decline in each year of observation from 23–6%. The fistula rates in our series also showed a gradual decline from the learning phase (10.1%) to the proficiency phase (2.6%).
Numerous studies have confirmed the beneficial impact of surgeon experience on the success rate of hypospadias repair using the TIP technique[11, 18, 19]. Rompre et al. [18] reported 303 cases who underwent primary TIP performed by a single surgeon. The learning curve stabilized after 50–70 cases and subsequently continued to decline further in a predictable negative exponential curve. Parikh et al. [19] retrospectively reviewed 184 patients who underwent TIP by a single fellowship-trained surgeon using CUSUM methodology. Their CR remained within the acceptable range until approximately 150 operations were performed, before the CR fell below the lower limit. They demonstrated that the fistula rate in distal hypospadias repairs fell below the acceptable rate after the initial 110 operations. All these studies supported this statement thar as the surgeon's experience increases, the complication rate decreases. Our series showed that even after the initial learning phase in 99 cases, the surgical outcomes improved constantly with time and experience.
Although surgeon experience is an important factor in the success of hypospadias surgery, there are still many other factors that influence clinical outcomes, such as meatal location, glans size, and presence of curvature. The initial meatal position, which is the neourethral length that needs to be reconstructed, is the major factor influencing TIP outcomes. Rompre et al. [18] reported that the CR of non-distal hypospadias was higher than that of distal hypospadias. Kim et al. [20] and Lucas et al.[21] reported similar results. Previous studies have mainly explored the relationship between the types of hypospadias and complications, and few studies have reported a correlation between the length of specific defective urethra and complications. Our series results showed that the rates of total complications, urethrocutaneous fistula, and reoperations were lower in the group with neourethral length less than 13.5 mm, compared to that of the other group.
Urethrocutaneous fistula is the most frequent complication of hypospadias, occurring in 13% of patients according to a meta-analysis [22]. Further, another large meta-analysis including 49 studies (4675 patients) reported that only 5.7% of fistulas were observed after primary distal hypospadias repair [23]. In our study, although the incidence of fistula was high in the learning phase (10.1%), it reached 2.6% in the proficiency phase, with an overall fistula rate of 5.5% (21/381). Accordingly, our fistula rate is similar to the result of the meta-analysis reported by Pfistermuller et al. [23]; however, 38% (145/381) of our cases were mid-shaft hypospadias.
The influence of surgeon experience on the OT of TIP has been reported in many studies, which reported that OT continues to decrease as the surgeon’s experience increases [11, 24]. We demonstrated that the reduction in OT did not lead to an increase in CR but continued to decrease.
This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design was conducted at a single center, which might result in a study bias. Second, there must be different follow-up periods for patients who underwent surgery in different phases. Additionally, some patients had only one follow-up visit at 13 months, which might have resulted in missing some complications. Third, our learning curve was formed by a single surgeon, and the others may have different learning patterns. However, we believe that this study has implications for surgeons who use this surgical technique, making it easier for them to quickly learn whether they are proficient in the procedure.