Animals and tissue preparation
A total number of 20 Male C57BL/6 mice weighing 25 ± 5 g were purchased from Jinan pengyue laboratory animal breeding co.ltd. 20 mice were divided into control group and periodontitis group by the way of simple random sampling. All mice received normal chow diet and were maintained in a temperature-controlled room at 25°C under a 12 h light/dark diurnal cycle. Authors were aware of the group allocation during the conduction of the experiments. However, they were blind during the outcome assessment and the data analysis.
All animal experiments comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals.
The establishment of experimental periodontitis was performed according to the method of et al (25). Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 1 % Pentobarbital (50mg/1000g body weight). Then silk thread ligation was operated in the cervical area of left maxillary second molar with nylon thread (No. 5 − 0). Using microinjectors, 10 µl of 1.0 mg/ml LPS from P. gingivalis (Invivogen, Toulouse, France) was injected into the gingival tissues adjacent to the left upper second molars every other day for 2 weeks. Control mice were injected with the equivalent volume of PBS (pH 7.4) in the similar anatomical regions with no ligatures. After 2 weeks, animals are euthanized by using an overdose of anesthesia (intraperitoneal injection of 1% Pentobarbital, 100mg/1000g body weight). Tissue samples were not collected until the animals were completely unconscious.
For statistical analysis, 10 animals were sacrificed for both control and periodontitis groups. In each experiment, the highest and lowest sample values will be removed, and the rest samples will be reserved for statistical analysis. At 2 weeks after ligation, fresh heparinized peripheral blood samples were collected for flow cytometry and ELISA analysis. Gingival tissues from both experimental and control mice were prepared for RNA extraction. For treg cell sorting, spleens were also taken under sterile conditions from each group. Following that, maxillary bone was extracted and immersed in the 4% paraformaldehyde fixative for 24 h. To evaluate alveolar bone loss, specimens were analyzed using a Micro CT system. After that, all specimens were embedded in paraffin after a series of processes including demineralization with 10% EDTA-2Na solution and dehydration through an ascending ethanol series. 5 µm thickness serial sections were prepared throughout the specimen for following histological analysis.
Detection of cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 by ELISA
To determine serum cytokine levels, sera were collected from blood drawn of experimental and control mice. IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 levels were measured using cytokine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the protocols provided by the manufacturer.
Measurement of cytokines in gingiva by Real-time quantitative PCR
The buccal gingival tissues (ranging from the mesial margin of the first molar to the distal margin of the third molar) from each group were diced into 1-mm fragments and homogenized for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with an RNA extraction reagent (TRIZOL) (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) and then complementary DNA was synthesized in a reverse transcription (RT) reaction (Takara). According to the instructions of the manufacturer, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-18, IL-6), Treg cell-related cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, Foxp3) and Th17 cell-related factors (Rorc, IL-17A) were performed using Roche Light Cycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The relative target gene quantification was calculated using the comparative threshold (CT) method following normalization to GAPDH. All experiments were performed in triplicate independently.
Micro CT Analysis
In order to evaluate the severity of bone destruction in experimental periodontitis, all specimens were analyzed using a Micro CT system (Quantum FX, Caliper Life Sciences, USA). Scaning was performed from the mesial margin of the first molar to the distal margin of the third molar, along the long axis of maxillary bone (source voltage 80 kV, source current 100 µA, and image pixel size 9.8). Then, two dimension (2D) images were reconstructed into 3D images for analysis using software package (Quantum FX). Crestal bone loss (mm) was calculated to reflect the degree of alveolar bone resorption.
Histological examination and image analysis
To identify the histological changes of alveolar bone in periodontitis model, H&E staining was performed and then digital images were taken using a light microscope (Olympus BX-53, Tokyo, Japan). Thickness of alveolar bone on buccal side of maxillary second molar (um) were measured with the aid of Image Pro Plus 6.2 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). For statistical analysis, three tissue slices were collected from each of the three levels (apical area, root center, and cervical part) and the average level of parallel samples were used for each group. Control and periodontitis group were compared using the sections from equal level.
Immunohistochemistry examination and image analysis
For immunolocalization of ALP, RANKL, Foxp3, IL-17, TGF-β and IL-6, 5 µm-thick paraffin sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol series. To block endogenous peroxidases, sections were preincubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide. Then nonspecific binding was reduced by treating sections with 1% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (BSA-PBS) for 20 min at room temperature. After that, sections were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature with: 1) rabbit antiserum against rat tissue-nonspecific ALPase, generated by Oda et al (Oda et al. 1999) at a dilution of 1:75; 2) anti-RANKL antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:50; 3) anti-Foxp3 antibody (ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA) at a dilution of 1:50; and 4) anti-IL-17 antibody (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:50 ; 5) anti-TGF-β antibody (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:50; and 6) anti-IL-6 antibody (Proteintech) at a dilution of 1:50 in 1% BSA-PBS. After rinsing with PBS, sections were treated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:100 for 1 h at room temperature. Furthermore, the immunostaining was visualized using diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as the substrate. The primary antibody was replaced with 1×PBS as a negative control.
After finishing ALP visualizing using DAB, double staining with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) were performed by employing enzyme histohemistry as previously showed (26)(Li et al., 2013)(26). In brief, sections were submerged in a mixture of 3.0 mg of naphthol AS-BI phosphate (Sigma), 18 mg of red violet LB salt (Sigma), and 100 mM L(+) tartaric acid (0.36 g) diluted in 30 ml of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for 15 min at 37 ºC. Staining were then assessed by light microscopy (Olympus) after faintly counterstaining with methyl green.
Statisticaly, ten sections were selected for each sample and the mean parameters of parallel samples were calculated. Immunostaining intensity of ALP, RANKL, TGF-β and IL-6 was measured in three randomly selected non-overlapping microscopic by Image-Pro Plus 6.2 software. Also, TRAP-positive osteoclast numbers, Foxp3-positive cell numbers, IL-17-positive cell numbers were counted in similar view of serial sections at an original magnification of ×400.
Isolation of Splenic lymphocytes and Flow Cytometry
Fresh heparinized peripheral blood samples from each group were collected. Spleens were removed and disrupted on 75-mm stainless steel screens. After being isolated using mouse lymphocyte separation medium (Dakewe Biotechnology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China) centrifugation, single mononuclear cells were suspended in cell culture medium with 10% fetal calf serum. Cell counting was performed in a hemocytometer after assessing cell viability by trypan blue staining.
The cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 and allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-mouse CD25 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min on ice. After being permeabilized with a cytofix/cytoperm solution, the cells were incubated with an phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-Foxp3 antibody (BD Biosciences) for 1h at 4°C. Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used to detect the labeled cells, and Kaluza Flow Cytometry Analysis Software (Beckman) was used to analyze the data. Lymphocytes were gated according to their forward and side-scatter characteristics. FITC, APC and PE labeled isotype-matched control mAbs (BD Biosciences) were used to determine the positive and negative expression of each molecule. The results were expressed by the percentage of CD25 + Foxp3 + in gated CD4 + cell. All experiments were explored in triplicate independently.
Isolation of CD4 + CD25 + T cells
Splenic single-lymphocyte suspension was prepared and then CD4 + CD25 + T cells were isolated using the “Regulatory T cell isolation kit” (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. MACS buffer (Bie & Berntsen, Denmark) and the AutoMACS Running Buffer (Miltenyi Biotec) was used for incubation with beads and cell separations on the AutoMACS Cell Separator respectively. The purity of CD4 + CD25 + T cell were above 85%. CD4 + CD25 + T cells were homogenized in TRIZOL for RNA extraction. And, PCR analysis of TGF-β1, IL-10, Foxp3, Rorc, IL-17A were performed as described above.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software and all values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Differences among groups were assessed by the unpaired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and P < 0.001 represent highly significant.