According to AIM theory, a molecular structure is characterized with the set of critical points. Each critical point is defined with the pair of numbers (ω, λ), where ω is a rank of the matrix of second derivatives ρ(r) computed in a critical point (or number of nonzero λi, i = 1–3), and λ is the signature (algebraic sum of signs λi). Values λ1, λ2, λ3 represent eigenvalues of matrix of second derivatives ρ(r) computed in a critical point.
The presence of critical point (3, − 1) indicates the chemical bonding in the molecular structure. Negative eigenvalues λ1 and λ2 at this point correspond to the eigenvectors, which are perpendicular to the bonding path, and positive eigenvalue λ3 is directed along the path. Accordingly, values λ1 and λ2 characterize a contraction ratio of electron density along the bonding path. The number λ3 determines a degree of displacement of electron density to atomic nuclei. From this point of view, ellipticity indicates the contribution of the π-component to the bonding between atoms, i.e. it is actually an analogue of the bond order [56]. Chemical bonds with cylindrical symmetry are expected to have λ1 ≈ λ2. Ethane, benzene, and ethylene are considered as golden standards in computational chemistry. The ellipticities of their carbon–carbon bonds are 0.0000, 0.2836, and 0.1783, respectively (calculated with the PBE/3ζ method). Thus, chemical bonds with pronounced π-component demonstrate high ε values.
For the 6.6- and 5.6-bonds of the C60 molecule, we obtained the following a sets of eigenvalues λ6.6 = (–0.6242, − 0.5182, 0.3157) and λ5.6 = (–0.5474, − 0.4754, 0.3921). The calculation of the ε values via Eq. (1) gives = 0.20458 and ε5.6 = 0.15134. Ellipticity reflects the partial delocalization of the π-electron density: the ε6.6 value fits into the interval between typical double and aromatic (delocalized) double bonds whereas ε5.6 lies out this range that corresponds to a more pronounced single-bond character. Thus, 6.6 bonds explicit double-bond properties and this agrees with the experimental observations, in which major chemical reactions proceed via attaching addends to the 6.6 bonds of the C60 core. In contrast, the addition to the 5.6-bonds of C60 in most cases does not occur or requires special conditions [4, 5, 20]. Herewith, 5.6 mono- and bisadducts of C60 are unstable and prone to undergo the isomerization to their 6.6-counterparts [20]. This is in good agreement with the Mulliken bond orders: p6.6 = 1.44 and р5.6 = 1.23 (estimated with PBE/3ζ method [23]).
We consider stepwise cycloadditions to the C60 core according to Fig. 2. As follows from the scheme, the number of regioisomers increases in each step being 1, 8, and 45 for C60X, C60X2, and C60X3, respectively (cf. [24]).
In the C60CH2 and С60O molecules, there are 8 inequivalent 6.6 bonds; their ellipticities vary in the narrow ranges: 0.1944…0.2188 and 0.1938…0.2169, respective;y (Table 1). However, these small differences are decisive and the ε values well correlate with the relative energies of regioisomeric С60O2 and C60(CH2)2 (Fig. 3). The larger bond ellipticity in C60X, the more stable the formed bisadduct C60X2.
Table 1
Bader’s parameters of the reaction sites in the C60X molecules and relative energies of the formed C60X2 bisadducts
Monoadduct | Bond type | λ1 | λ2 | λ3 | ε | ∆E, kJ/mol |
C60CH2 | cis-1 | –0.6276 | –0.5149 | 0.3069 | 0.2188 | 0.00 |
| cis-2 | –0.6251 | –0.5234 | 0.3199 | 0.1944 | 22.70 |
cis-3 | –0.6182 | –0.5146 | 0.3205 | 0.2012 | 16.08 |
e | –0.6233 | –0.5181 | 0.3167 | 0.2031 | 7.60 |
trans-1 | –0.6248 | –0.5189 | 0.3154 | 0.2039 | 10.22 |
trans-2 | –0.6226 | –0.5172 | 0.3169 | 0.2039 | 8.43 |
trans-3 | –0.6232 | –0.5175 | 0.3165 | 0.2043 | 6.99 |
trans-4 | –0.6247 | –0.5189 | 0.3157 | 0.2038 | 11.05 |
C60O | cis-1 | –0.6329 | –0.5201 | 0.3066 | 0.2169 | 0.00 |
| cis-2 | –0.6242 | –0.5228 | 0.3188 | 0.1938 | 29.44 |
cis-3 | –0.6188 | –0.5155 | 0.3199 | 0.2004 | 24.64 |
e | –0.6259 | –0.5190 | 0.3154 | 0.2060 | 17.05 |
trans-1 | –0.6248 | –0.5188 | 0.3158 | 0.2043 | 19.78 |
trans-2 | –0.6230 | –0.5175 | 0.3164 | 0.2038 | 18.66 |
trans-3 | –0.6232 | –0.5175 | 0.3169 | 0.2043 | 18.02 |
trans-4 | –0.6248 | –0.5189 | 0.3153 | 0.2039 | 19.83 |
According to the calculations, the electronic structure of the C60 core is quite complex. Indeed, there is a pandemonium of the points in the ∆E vs. ε plot at the center of the correlation field corresponding to the bonds e, trans-4, trans-3, trans-2, and trans-1 (Fig. 3). All these bonds are located in the fullerene hemisphere opposite to that one having already functionalized bond. In contrast, the ellipticities of the bonds of the same fullerene hemisphere decisively differ though the bonds lie close to each other. Moreover, the closest bonds cis-1 and cis-2 demonstrate the highest and the lowest reactivity in the whole set: the formed cis-2-C60X2 adducts are > 20 kJ/mol less stable as compared with cis-1-C60X2. Thus, the perturbation of the electronic system induced by the addition of the first addend is more pronounced in the same hemisphere and vice versa.
Note that the higher reactivity of the cis-1 bond in C60X is the experimentally known fact confirmed for various non-bulky X (so that the addition of the X groups to the fullerene core meet no steric hindrances) (cf. [4, 12, 17, 18, 24, 25, 27]).
We tried to obtain a similar plot in the case of the next step of the X addend attachment to C60, i.e. for conversion C60X2 → C60X3. As found, eight bisadducts must be separately treated to obtain the correlations like in the case of the C60X → C60X2 conversion. The calculated Bader’s parameters of the bonds in the C60X2 molecules and relative stabilities of C60X3 are collected in Supplementary materials. The ∆E vs. ε plots are presented in Figs. 4–7. Note that the plots contain different number of points as the number of trisadducts C60X3, formed from the certain C60X2, depends on the its symmetry. The optimized geometries of C60X3 correspond to the following symmetry point groups: Cs symmetry is found for cis-1, cis-2, e and trans-4 isomers; C2 symmetry is inherent in cis-3, trans-2 and trans-3; trans-4 isomers are D2h-symmetric. For example, trans-1-C60X2 (X = O and CH2) molecules have the highest symmetry in the set. Therefore, their molecules have only 5 inequivalent reaction sites, a minimal number among all C60X2 regioisomers.
As in the case of the previous reaction step, the plots corresponding to each transformation C60X2 → C60X3 demonstrate that the relative stabilities of C60X3 and bond ellipticities in the C60X2 molecules are symbatic values. Though the dependences ΔE = f(ε) have the quality of correlations, they allow revealing most and least stable C60X3 isomers formed from the considered C60X2 bisadduct. We have collected the C60O3 “extremal” structures in Table 2. Note that the addition patterns in the case of the most and least stable C60(CH2)3 isomers are the same. As the similar addition patterns are obtained for different addends (polar O and nonpolar CH2), we assume that the found regularity could be used without quantum-chemical calculations in the case of the fullerenes derivatives with other addends.