Previous studies have brought to attention the high burden of immunization-preventable diseases in Spain in terms of epidemiology and costs (40–45). Here, we provide an updated estimation of disease burden employing the BCoDE methodology, considering a holistic DALY approach.
Our analysis showed that, despite immunization efforts, the burden of disease for certain immunization-preventable infections remains high in Spain. Respiratory infections exhibit the highest burden, with 110.01, 25.20 and 10.57 annual DALYs per 100,000 population estimated for influenza, invasive pneumococcal disease and RSV, respectively. In general, disease burden derives from YLLs for most infections, in line with previously published results at a European level (8).
Influenza ranked highest across all the infections studied herein and had the greatest annual burden of disease in Europe, with 81.8 annual DALYs per 100,000 population, being primarily associated to mortality as well (76.3 YLLs vs 5.42 YLDs) (8). These data are further supported by BCoDE studies from individual European countries, such as Germany (46) and the Netherlands (47, 48), that identify influenza as a high-burden disease. Influenza stands as the infection with the highest burden in older adults (60 years or over), with 12.4 DALYs per 100,000/year for this sub-group population. This might be a consequence of a limited vaccination coverage rate (VCR), since the Spanish vaccination campaign only reached around 53.5% of adults over 64 years in 2019–2020, a percentage that has barely changed since 2010 (49, 50). Although high compared to other European countries, the Spanish coverage rates for influenza vaccination fall far from the EU goal of 75% (51, 52), which highlights the need to maximize immunization especially in adults over 60 years. While an increase in influenza VCR was observed post COVID-19 pandemic (22), Spanish experts propose several measures for continued improvement and steps are already being taken. Based on evidence on the improved efficacy in reducing the influenza viral load and severe complications, such as pneumonia and cardiorespiratory events, and consequent hospitalizations in the elderly (53–56), the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology recommends universal vaccination to all adults ≥ 60 years of age with the high-dose (HD) influenza vaccine as first option, being the adjuvant alternative the second choice. It also advocates for progressively extending the benefits of vaccination to individuals over 50 years (57). And while the Spanish Ministry of Health recommends vaccination for individuals ≥ 65 years, some regions are already lowering the threshold to 60 years. DALY estimates for invasive pneumococcal disease and RSV follow that of influenza, uncovering these respiratory infections as a major healthcare problem in Spain. The burden of invasive pneumococcal disease increases with age, being significantly higher in older adults (60 years or over), in coherence with general observations in Europe (8). However, Spanish estimates for age groups between 60 and 85 years are inferior to those reported in the Netherlands (48), where invasive pneumococcal disease burden exceeds that of influenza for the overall population (47).
RSV is associated with a significant burden in children under 5 years, with 2.92 DALYs per 100,000 population/year, driven by high infectivity and incidence coupled to high mortality (58, 59), as indicated by a vast number of studies that highlight the burden of hospitalizations due to bronchiolitis and RSV in children in Spain (42, 44, 60–63). Moreover, findings from a recently published longitudinal study that followed 51,292 Spanish children < 5 years suggest that hospitalization data alone underestimate the RSV infections requiring medical care and describe a larger clinical and economic burden in both primary care and hospital setting (64, 65). Given the significant burden of RSV, especially in children under 1 year, the Spanish Association of Pediatrics recommends immunization of neonates and infants under 6 months at the beginning of their first RSV season (66). At the time of this study, the only efficient preventive strategy in Spain was the single-dose monoclonal antibody nirsevimab, approved to prevent RSV in neonates and infants during their first RSV season (26). The Spanish Ministry of Health has recently published the first national RSV immunization recommendations, with nirsevimab addressing high-risk children under 24 months as well as infants under 6 months (15). Immunization with this long-acting antibody reduces the risk of medically attended infections and hospitalizations in term and preterm neonates (67), highlighting the potential of this approach to reduce the burden of RSV in infants.
Our study revealed a great variability in the burden across the different infections evaluated, in agreement with a previous study in the EU/EEA countries (8), but also across distinct geographies. This may be linked to many factors, such as different moments of analysis or data availability, but also to the immunization strategies in place and their effectiveness, since Spain reports higher VCRs when compared to other countries in the EU. For instance, the burden of HBV infection is calculated at 1.06 DALYs per 100,000/year in Spain, compared to 10.57 as reported in a German study (46), or the European average of 7.86 (8). Also, measles incidence is estimated at 0.41 cases per 100,000, as opposed to the median of 7.46 calculated for Europe (8).
The major strength of this study is that it uses the BCoDE toolkit, which employs a thoroughly validated methodology already used in previous European studies (8, 46–48), allowing for consistent comparisons between infectious diseases and geographies. Another strength of this analysis is that it relies on the Spanish epidemiological surveillance system, considered of high quality since it integrates reports for respiratory infections from all regions in Spain, unlike other European countries (20, 68). In this work, annual case numbers were collected from reliable nationwide sentinel systems, bringing forward influenza, RSV, herpes zoster and varicella as the infectious diseases with the greatest incidence among the Spanish population. However, one of the limitations of surveillance data is that not all reported cases are tested for the virus in sentinel programs (8, 49). Furthermore, as unveiled by a study in the UK, routine surveillance systems fail to capture a large proportion of subclinical and clinical cases of influenza, since not all cases seek medical consultation (19). In this model we assumed that due to the severity of disease in the elderly and school attendance requirements, all children < 15 years and adults over 65 years would seek medical care. For the rest of age groups, we applied an underestimation factor that reflects the proportion of people with influenza-like symptoms (with and without fever) that attended a GP consultation in the Flu Watch cohort among the ones who tested positive in a PCR test (19). However, even when not considering underestimation, influenza would remain the most burdensome infectious disease in our model with a total of 31.45 annual DALYs/100,000 population.
In addition, our study covers most of the diseases encompassed in the Spanish vaccination calendar that are not labelled as eradicated, representing a reasonably accurate approach to infectious disease burden estimation in Spain (14). Compared to previously published BCoDE analysis, it also incorporates four infections (herpes zoster, rotavirus, RSV and varicella zoster) as de novo models.
Four de novo models were built for this study and the epidemiological profile defined for each new infection arises from the interpretation and integration of a series of data sources. While a thorough literature review and step by step validation process was performed for each of them, these publicly available data have their strengths and limitations. On the one hand, mortality rates were collected from the MBDS (22), which provided reliable and robust data in comparison to published literature. On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that these estimates correspond to in-hospital fatality across the reported cases for a particular infection, whether the infectious agent was the ultimate cause of death or not. Thus, mortality probabilities might be over or underestimated. This was minimized by including mean mortality rates associated to main and secondary diagnosis hospitalizations, an approach used in previously published studies assessing mortality estimates in Spain (42, 44, 62, 69). Besides, probabilities of developing complications and disability weights for the de novo models come from the limited information accessible in the literature, except for some cases where it was collected from healthcare databases (e.g., MBDS). Age-specific risk of developing certain sequelae is not usually available, so the impact of complications that worsen in older population could not be considered. As a conservative approach, long-term clinical conditions were simplified, and outcome trees were built considering only severe complications (asthma for RSV (27, 28) and postherpetic neuralgia for herpes zoster (31)), given that other sequelae account for a low burden in these infections.
In the absence of publicly available data to estimate the percentage of individuals that develop asthma as a consequence of RSV, we utilized the probability of recurrent wheeze employed in a previous pharmacoeconomic analysis, for which we conservatively used the disutility value associated to controlled asthma for 5 years (64, 65). Disability associated with partially controlled and uncontrolled asthma is higher, and if considered in the model, it would have increased the number of annual DALYs associated with RSV to 11.84/100,000 and 17.71/100,000, respectively.
Lastly, no national surveillance data was reported by RENAVE for RSV in a pre- or post-pandemic setting, at the time of our analysis. Therefore, primary care estimates were collected from the Catalonian surveillance system and further extrapolated to the entire country. To minimize incidence variations, a conservative strategy was followed, so that (1) uncomplicated cases were calculated assuming that all hospitalizations were previously reported in primary care, on the basis of the BARI study (64, 65); and (2) just those cases corresponding to RSV-specific ICD-10-CM codes were included, following a study by Heppe-Montero et al. (42).
Considering these data source limitations, together with the ones inherent to the modelling of disease process, the methodology, assumptions, data inputs and results of this analysis were validated by a group of experts in epidemiology and disease modelling, immunization, health economics and public health policy. Taken all into account, we consider that the estimated burden of infectious diseases presented herein is based on a robust and reproducible methodology and it is a fair reflection of the Spanish context, which can contribute to the evaluation of the impact of current vaccination strategies and future programs.
These estimates provide a basis to guide prevention strategies, prioritize interventions and make public health decision in the field of infectious diseases in Spain. It is noteworthy that in 2019, the Spanish public spending in vaccines for influenza prevention was lower than the one for invasive pneumococcal disease, HBV and meningococcal disease prevention vaccines (70), despite having the highest disease burden. Since then, the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the subsequent in-hospital burden generated, potentially influenced priority setting. By 2022, the public spending investment in prevention increased by 36.5% and preventing influenza became top priority together with invasive pneumococcal disease (70), highlighting the importance of prioritizing and increasing investment in public health measures aimed to reduce the burden of those diseases with a major impact on population health and healthcare resources.