3.1 Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of vegetation cover
Section a is located in southern Tibet, the vegetation is mainly alpine shrubs and alpine meadows, and the overall FVC value is low. The spatial differentiation of FVC along the railway is obvious (Fig. 3a), showing a distribution feature of "high in the east and low in the west". The low-value areas with FVC of 0-0.25 are mainly distributed in Lhasa section and west Shannan section as well as along the Yarlung Zangbo River basin. The area with FVC less than 0.5 accounts for 64.1%, and the area with FVC greater than 0.75 accounts for only 1.1%.
Section b is located in the eastern low altitude area, mostly cultivated land and artificial surface along the route. The remote sensing data in August was selected for the study, which is the season of vigorous crop growth. The overall vegetation coverage along the railway is higher than that in Section a (Fig. 3b), and the spatial distribution is generally "high in the west and low in the east". The area with FVC between 0.5–0.75 accounts for 71.1% of the total area.
In this study, the average FVC value along major railway projects in Sichuan-Tibet region from 2001 to 2020 was selected to describe the changing trend of FVC in the study area (Fig. 4), and the average FVC value in 2001 was used as the reference value to analyze the changes of it in each year from 2002 to 2020. On the whole, FVC along section a and b showed a fluctuating upward trend, and the vegetation coverage of section b was always higher than that of section a.
For section b, the altitude is low, the climate is humid, most of them are forest and cultivated land, except in 2003, the FVC growth value along the line is positive, and the growth curve fluctuates steadily; Section a is located in the high altitude area, and the change curve of FVC growth value along the line fluctuates greatly, with obvious negative areas appearing in 2010, 2015 and 2018. However, the annual cumulative growth value is 0.4, which is greater than 0, indicating that the vegetation growth trend in section a shows a better trend in the long-term series observation. Moreover, the growth rate of the two railway sections showed a peak in 2003. Combined with the local policies at that time, Tibet implemented the work of returning farmland to forest in 2003, which led to a significant growth trend in vegetation coverage from 2003 to 2004.
3.2 Change trend of vegetation cover
Taking 2014 as the time node, the change trend of vegetation coverage before and after railway construction was analyzed. According to the classification criteria in Table 1, the vegetation change types were classified into five groups: Obvious deterioration, Slight degradation, No change, Slight improvement and Significant improvement.
Comparing the spatial distribution of vegetation cover change types before and after the construction of the railway, as shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, most of the types in the two sections showed a “No change” type. After the construction of the railway, the vegetation growth along section a showed an improved trend, while the vegetation growth along section b showed a worsening trend. According to statistics, from 2001 to 2014, the vegetation cover change type of section a and section b was “No change”, which accounted for 46.46% and 48.39%, respectively, and the vegetation proportion of “Obvious deterioration” or “Slight degradation” was 35.39% and 21.07%, respectively. During the period of railway construction from 2015 to 2020, the area of “Obvious deterioration” or “Slight degradation” vegetation cover in section a decreased from 35.39–28.91%, while that in section b increased to 41.75%.
We calculated the transfer matrix of each vegetation cover change type into other types before and after the construction of the railway based on the vegetation cover change types from 2001–2014 and 2015–2020. The trend of vegetation change from deterioration to improvement is called upward transfer, and vice versa is called downward transfer.
From the transfer matrix of vegetation cover change types (Table 3), it can be seen that the vegetation cover change types of “No change” and “Significant improvement” in section a are the most stable, with the probability of maintaining their own stability reaching 47.07% and 39.16%. Section b has the highest probability of maintaining its own stability with the vegetation change type of "No change", reaching 52%. However, in general, the vegetation cover of the two sections is not stable, and its diagonal probability is lower than the sum of the non-diagonal probabilities, i.e., the probability of the vegetation cover type changing to other types after the construction of the railroad is higher than the probability of the type not changing. In addition, the probability of downward shift of vegetation change type in section a (28.69%) is lower than the probability of upward shift (39.77%), which means that the vegetation growth along this section is not disturbed too much by the construction of the railroad, but rather improves; In section b, the probability of downward shift (49.23%) is higher than the probability of upward shift (18.55%), which means that the vegetation growth along this section deteriorates significantly after construction of the railroad. The construction of the railway may have affected the growth of vegetation, but whether it is the main factor needs further research.
Table 3
Transfer probability matrix of vegetation coverage change types from 2001 to 2020.
| Before building | After building | Area share (%) |
Obvious deterioration | Slight degradation | No change | Slight improvement | Significant improvement |
Section a | Obvious deterioration | 7.17 | 15.59 | 45.21 | 11.85 | 20.18 | 14.52 |
Slight degradation | 7.26 | 18.19 | 56.21 | 7.85 | 10.50 | 20.87 |
No change | 10.11 | 24.11 | 47.07 | 7.43 | 11.28 | 46.46 |
Slight improvement | 11.56 | 16.65 | 35.47 | 11.73 | 24.58 | 8.28 |
Significant improvement | 9.66 | 11.24 | 27.84 | 12.11 | 39.16 | 9.87 |
Area share (%) | 9.16 | 19.75 | 45.85 | 8.98 | 16.26 | |
Section b | Obvious deterioration | 18.49 | 29.75 | 44.57 | 4.82 | 2.36 | 8.33 |
Slight degradation | 14.53 | 29.36 | 45.69 | 6.21 | 4.21 | 12.74 |
No change | 11.04 | 28.83 | 52.00 | 4.32 | 3.81 | 48.39 |
Slight improvement | 10.65 | 31.87 | 48.75 | 4.72 | 4.01 | 17.03 |
Significant improvement | 9.21 | 32.30 | 46.16 | 5.15 | 7.19 | 13.51 |
Area share (%) | 11.79 | 29.96 | 49.24 | 4.78 | 4.23 | |
3.3 Stability of vegetation cover
According to the spatial distribution map (Fig. 7), the areas with higher stability of vegetation cover in section a are mainly distributed in the Lhasa and Shannan sections, and along the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. According to the statistics, the area proportion of the stability grade of this section was High (32.95%) > Slightly high (27.8%) > Medium (16.56%) > Slightly low (13.85%) > Low (8.85%) from large to small.
Whereas the areas with higher stability of vegetation cover in section b are mainly distributed in the Ya'an and the southern part of Chengdu near the Meishan section. The area proportion of the stability grade of this section was Medium (32.41%) > Slightly high (30.63%) > High (16.95%) > Slightly low (16.11%) > Low (3.89%) from large to small. The proportion of areas with a vegetation coverage stability grade of medium or above in the two sections is 77.31% and 79.99%, respectively, and the stability of vegetation coverage was high.
Also, compared with Fig. 3, it can be seen that the vegetation coverage of the region with higher stability in section a is mostly lower than 0.5, while the vegetation coverage of the region with higher than 0.5 is relatively low. The vegetation coverage stability of section b does not show similar characteristics to that of segment a.
In order to further analyze the difficulty of improving the ecological environment of vegetation along major railway project in Sichuan-Tibet Region, the differences of vegetation growth change types under different vegetation coverage stability were analyzed.
As can be seen from Table 4, in section a, the areas with “Slightly high” vegetation stability accounted for 27.8%, and the sum of the corresponding vegetation change types of "Obvious deterioration" and "Slight degradation" accounted for 47.92%; The areas with “High” vegetation stability accounted for 32.95%, and the sum of the corresponding vegetation change types of "Obvious deterioration" and "Slight degradation" accounted for 73.55%; 90.12% of the regions with "Slightly low" and "Low" stability levels showed an improvement trend (“Slight improvement” and “Significant improvement”). Although the proportion of vegetation improvement in the low-stability area is very large, the area of the low-stability area only accounts for 8.85% of the total study area, while the area of the high-stability area accounts for 60.75%. It can be seen that there is a correlation between the stability of vegetation coverage in section a and the trend of vegetation change: the higher the stability, the worse the vegetation growth trend. This indicates that it is difficult to improve the ecological environment of vegetation along section a.
In section b, the “Low” stability area has 69.35% of the area where the type of vegetation change is well transitioned. But again, the “Low” stability area accounts for only 3.89% of the total area. Except for "low" stability, the area of "No change" vegetation change type accounted for the largest proportion of the other four stability types, followed by the area of "Slight improvement". Unlike section a, section b does not show a higher stability in the area of vegetation deterioration, which makes ecological restoration easier.
Table 4
Corresponding relationship between vegetation coverage change types and stability.
| Stability | Change types | Area share (%) |
Obvious deterioration | Slight degradation | No change | Slight improvement | Significant improvement |
Section a | Low | 1.67 | 0.72 | 7.29 | 47.57 | 42.75 | 8.85 |
Slightly low | 3.30 | 2.31 | 23.36 | 53.86 | 17.17 | 13.85 |
Medium | 16.01 | 8.27 | 36.57 | 34.17 | 4.99 | 16.56 |
Slightly high | 31.85 | 16.07 | 38.37 | 12.88 | 0.83 | 27.80 |
High | 54.13 | 19.42 | 20.15 | 6.00 | 0.29 | 32.95 |
Section b | Low | 9.25 | 2.58 | 18.82 | 35.59 | 33.76 | 3.89 |
Slightly low | 22.64 | 11.20 | 31.57 | 28.77 | 5.82 | 16.11 |
Medium | 13.46 | 13.10 | 48.03 | 24.06 | 1.34 | 32.41 |
Slightly high | 8.97 | 12.77 | 53.08 | 24.20 | 0.98 | 30.63 |
High | 4.05 | 2.99 | 58.19 | 33.24 | 1.53 | 16.95 |
3.4 Effect distance of railway on vegetation coverage
Five buffer zones of 0 ~ 250, 250 ~ 500, 500 ~ 1000, 1000 ~ 2000 and 2000 ~ 5000 meters were selected to calculate the vegetation coverage change type area proportion of each section of major railway projects in Sichuan-Tibet region with different buffer distances. This paper analyzes the influence of railway construction on vegetation ecological environment in different spatial scales.
As can be seen from Fig. 8a, vegetation change in section a shows a significant improvement trend when the distance is 2000m from the railway line, and the effect distance of the railway on the vegetation coverage in this section is 2000m. Within the effect distance, with the increase of the distance from the railway, the area of "Obvious deterioration" decreased from 11–10%, and the area of "Significant improvement" increased from 14–16%.
As can be seen from Fig. 8b, The change type of vegetation cover in section b was always relatively stable, and there was no obvious change trend along the two sections with the increase of buffering distance. The proportion of “Obvious deterioration” area in the two sections is relatively small, only 5%-16% in different spatial scales of the respective sections. It can be seen that the railway construction has caused damage to the vegetation along the line to a certain extent, but the effect on the vegetation growth in the whole study area is not obvious. Therefore, the vegetation growth situation in the study area may also be affected by other related factors such as terrain and climate.
3.5 Driving factors of vegetation cover
Precipitation (PRE), temperature (TEM), elevation (DEM), slope (SLOPE), slope direction (ASPECT) and night light intensity (NLI), which characterizes the intensity of engineering activities, were selected as driving factors to analyze the influence of these factors on the vegetation cover from 2001 to 2020. The geographic detector should discretize the influence factors before conducting the detection. The natural intermittent point have the advantage of classifying the influence factors according to the distribution law of the data itself to maximize the differences among various types. Therefore, the natural intermittent point method is chosen in this study, and then the geographic detector is used to detect the explanatory power of the classified factors.
Table 5
Detection results of single factor.
Influence factor | DEM | SLOPE | ASPECT | NTL | PRE | TEM |
Section a | 0.1461 | 0.2602 | 0.0660 | 0.0289 | 0.2169 | 0.2597 |
Section b | 0.2387 | 0.0699 | 0.0016 | 0.4839 | 0.2541 | 0.2892 |
Table 6
Detection results of interaction of influencing factors.
Section a | Section b |
Interaction factor | Interaction force | Interaction factor | Interaction force |
PRE∩TEM | 0.4549 | DEM∩NTL | 0.5711 |
SLOPE∩PRE | 0.3967 | NTL∩TEM | 0.5576 |
DEM∩TEM | 0.3863 | NTL∩PRE | 0.5530 |
DEM∩PRE | 0.3803 | SLOPE∩NTL | 0.5172 |
DEM∩SLOPE | 0.3707 | ASPECT∩NTL | 0.4858 |
As shown in Table 5, The correlation analysis of each factor with vegetation cover shows that the degree of its respective explanatory power in section a decreased by SLOPE > TEM > PRE > DEM >ASPECT >NLI, the explanatory power of SLOPE was just slightly higher than that of TEM). The influence of temperature and precipitation on vegetation cover in section a was also significant. Slope direction and engineering activities have little effect.
The explanatory power of the single factor in section b for FVC is as follows: NLI > TEM > PRE > DEM > SLOPE > ASPECT, the explanatory power of night light is significantly higher than other factors, and the correlation between FVC and night light intensity is the strongest, that is, the FVC of this section is mainly directly affected by the intensity of engineering activities. In addition, temperature and precipitation also have strong explanatory power for FVC. The explanatory power of slope direction in both routes is less than 0.1, indicating that slope direction has no significant effect on vegetation growth.
As shown in Table 6, Five groups of factors with high q value for two-factor interaction detection were selected for analysis. The explanatory power of the interaction between precipitation and temperature in section a is the strongest, reaching 0.4549. The interaction between slope and precipitation is second, with explanatory power of 0.3967. In section b, the interaction between altitude and night light had the strongest explanatory power for vegetation cover, with explanatory power of 0.5711. Night light had the strongest effect on the spatial pattern of vegetation cover (in fact, the interaction with any influence factor had a strong significance).