Renoprotective effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients with decompensated heart failure

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-362880/v1

Abstract

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) reduces the risk of the composite renal endpoint and weakens the progressive decline in renal function in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, a detailed mechanism of SGLT2i on renal function and outcome remains uninvestigated.

Methods

We prospectively included 40 type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients (median 68 years old, 29 male) who were hospitalized for decompensated HF and received SGLT2i during the index hospitalization. Of them, 24 patients had increases in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12-month follow-up and 16 had decreases in eGFR. We investigated the factors associating with the improvement in renal function of SGLT2i therapy in participants.

Results

Lower plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level and the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) were independently associated with increases in eGFR during the follow-up period (p < 0.05 for both). Patients with both low plasma BNP levels and uses of RASI had significant increases in eGFR irrespective of the HbA1c levels.

Conclusions

Lower plasma BNP level and the use of RASI at baseline were associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i among patients with decompensated HF and T2DM.

Background

Patients with heart failure (HF) have a high risk of mortality and morbidity, particularly when they have concomitant kidney impairment [1, 2]. Impaired renal function is common in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and up to 50% have chronic kidney disease (CKD) [3]. Patients with CKD also commonly develop HF, and their dominant cause of death is a cardiovascular event.

The currently approved medication to protect kidney function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) [4, 5]. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), which ameliorates hyperglycemia by suppressing renal glucose reabsorption, has been demonstrated to have favorable effects on the kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in large clinical trials involving patients with T2DM [6–8]. The EMPEROR-Reduced trial further demonstrated that SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of composite renal outcome and a slower progressive decline in renal function in patients with chronic HFrEF, irrespective of the existence of T2DM [9]. These studies suggest that the renal benefit of SGLT2i appears to be independent of their blood glucose-lowering effects. However, a detailed mechanism remains uninvestigated. Detailed assessments of the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i would be a key to more clarify the clinical implication and optimal patient selection for the SGLT2i therapy. In this study, we investigated the factors associating with the renoprotection of SGLT2i therapy in patients with HF and T2DM.

Methods

The present study was a single-center, non-randomized, open-labeled, prospective registry study designed to assess the factors associating with the renoprotection of SGLT2i therapy for HF patients with T2DM. The Institutional Ethics Board of Toyama University Hospital approved the study protocol (#Rin 29–94), which complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients beforehand.

Study population

This study involved consecutive T2DM patients who had received SGLT2i for the first time during their index hospitalization for decompensated HF, which was diagnosed according to the Framingham criteria, at our institute between February 2016 and September 2019. All patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV symptoms upon admission for HF. Among canagliflozin (100mg/day), dapagliflozin (5mg/day), and empagliflozin (10mg/day), one SGLT2i was non-randomly selected and administered. All patients had HbA1c level of 6.1% or higher and received guideline-directed medical therapy for HF.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: type 1 diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 mL/min/1.73m2), use of any mechanical circulatory supports, pregnancy or breastfeeding in the study period, history of hypersensitivity to the study drugs, severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, and suspension of SGLT2i during the observation period.

Study design and data collection

Baseline characteristics including demographics and laboratory data were obtained at index discharge. In this study, eGFR at baseline and 6 and 12 months after discharge was retrospectively retrieved. A primary endpoint was defined as any increases in eGFR at 12 months after discharge compared with eGFR at index discharge (achievement of renoprotection). The eGFR was calculated using the guidelines from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables were expressed as the median and interquartile unless any specific statements. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages. Wilcoxon test was applied to compare continuous parameters, and Pearson’s χ2 test was applied for comparison of categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable analyses with logistic regression models were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) to assess the influence of various parameters on the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i. Variables significant with p < 0.05 in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analyses. A cut-off of plasm B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration for any increases in eGFR after SGLT2i initiation was calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multivariate analysis of variance was applied to investigate the differences in changes in eGFR over time between the two groups stratified by predictor of efficacy for renal function. The statistical analysis was performed by using JMP® 15 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

A total of 111 patients were considered to be included in this study (Fig. 1). Of them, 65 patients continued SGLT2i without suspension for 12 months. 18 patients who were lost to follow-up or had no biochemical tests were excluded. Cardiovascular death occurred in 4 patients and non-cardiovascular death occurred in 3 patients. A total of 40 patients (median 68 years old, 29 male) were finally included in this study.

The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The participants were divided into two groups according to the achievement of primary endpoint: any increases in eGFR at 12-month follow-up: an increased group (N = 26) and a decreased group (N = 14). The median value of changing eGFR (eGFR at month 12 - eGFR at baseline) in the two groups was + 5.5 and − 7.5, respectively (Fig. 2).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

 

Total

(N = 40)

Increased

eGFR

(N = 26)

No-increased

eGFR

(N = 14)

P value

Age, years

68 (57–75)

68 (55–72)

71 (61–79)

0.177

Male, N

29 (73)

19 (73)

10 (71)

0.911

Body weight, kg

62 (51–73)

66 (54–76)

54 (47–71)

0.112

Body mass index, kg/m2

23.9 (19.6–27.2)

24.7 (21.9–27.9)

20.4 (19.0-24.9)

0.076

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

108 (95–119)

110 (100–119)

100 (90–120)

0.173

Heart rate, beats per minutes

70 (63–81)

69 (63–83)

74 (64–79)

0.570

HbA1c, %

6.8 (6.6–7.6)

6.7 (6.6–7.7)

7.0 (6.6–7.2)

0.776

Fasting blood sugar, mg/dL

110 (96–129)

102 (86–128)

122 (107–130)

0.076

Left ventricular ejection fraction, %

42 (27–56)

39 (28–58)

42 (26–55)

0.966

Ischemic etiology, N

19 (48)

12 (46)

7 (50)

0.816

Atrial fibrillation, N

8 (20)

5 (19)

3 (21)

0.868

Hemoglobin, g/dL

12.9 (11.515.6)

13.6 (16.0-11.7)

12.4 (11.1–14.2)

0.223

Hematocrit, %

38.5 (34.2–44.9)

40.6 (35.2–45.6)

37.6 (33.5–41.4)

0.192

Serum albumin, g/dL

3.7 (3.5–3.8)

3.7 (3.5–3.9)

3.6 (3.2–3.7)

0.107

Serum sodium, mEq/L

138 (136–140)

140 (138–140)

137 (135–140)

0.094

Serum potassium, mEq/L

4.4 (4.1–4.6)

4.4 (4.1–4.6)

4.4 (4.2–4.5)

0.943

eGFR, mL/minute/1.73m2

53.0 (36.1–74.5)

54.5 (40.0-73.5)

50.1 (31.6–80.4)

0.712

Plasma BNP, pg/mL

94 (54–251)

86 (50–175)

205 (75–374)

0.059

Plasma NT-proBNP, pg/mL

864 (260–1819)

740 (251–1424)

1479 (356–3057)

0.242

Heart failure therapies

       

Beta-blockers, N

37 (93)

23 (89)

14 (100)

0.186

ACEI/ARB, N

37 (93)

26 (100)

11 (79)

0.014

Loop diuretics, N

19 (48)

11 (42)

8 (57)

0.370

Furosemide, mg/day

0 (0–20)

0 (0–20)

20 (0–40)

0.158

MRA, N

27 (68)

17 (65)

10 (71)

0.697

Thiazides, N

2 (5)

2 (8)

0 (0)

0.287

Anti-diabetic agents

       

Sulfonylureas, N

3 (8)

2 (8)

1 (7)

0.950

DPP-4i, N

20 (50)

14 (54)

6 (43)

0.741

Biguanides, N

8 (20)

5 (19)

3 (21)

0.868

Insulin, N

5 (12)

5 (19)

0 (0)

0.079

HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BNP, b-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Continuous variables were expressed as median (25%-75% percentile) and categorical variables were expressed as number (%)

There were no significant differences in most of the demographic data between the two groups. The prescription rate of RASI was higher in the increased eGFR group. The proportions of participants taking oral hypoglycemic agents were statistically not different between the two groups. Baseline plasma BNP level tended to be lower in the increased eGFR group. Of note, the baseline eGFR value was not statistically different between the two groups.

Association between the SGLT2i therapy and renoprotection

In univariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index, plasma BNP level, usage of RASI, and insulin administration were significantly associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i (p < 0.05 for all; Table 2). Lower plasma BNP level (0.26 of odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.79) and the use of RASI were independently associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i (p < 0.05 for both). Of note, no patients achieved the primary endpoints without RASI.

Table 2

Logistic regression analyses for any increases in eGFR

 

All patients (N = 40)

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Variables

95% CI

Odds ratio

p value

95% CI

Odds ratio

p value

Age

-

-

0.154

     

Male

-

-

0.912

     

Body mass index

0.99–1.39

1.17

0.041

-

-

0.265

Systolic blood pressure

-

-

0.145

     

Heart rate

-

-

0.671

     

HbA1c

-

-

0.520

     

Fasting blood sugar

-

-

0.311

     

Left ventricular ejection fraction

-

-

0.797

     

Ischemic etiology

-

-

0.816

     

Atrial fibrillation

-

-

0.869

     

Hemoglobin

-

-

0.199

     

Hematocrit

-

-

0.176

     

Serum albumin

-

-

0.068

     

Serum sodium

-

-

0.062

     

Serum potassium

-

-

0.685

     

eGFR

-

-

0.897

     

BNP (per 163 pg/mL increase)

0.16–0.88

0.37

0.016

0.08–0.79

0.26

0.007

NT-proBNP

-

-

0.163

     

Beta-blockers

-

-

0.100

     

ACEI/ARB

NA

NA

0.009

NA

NA

0.002

Loop diuretics

-

-

0.370

     

Furosemide (per 10 mg/day increase)

-

-

0.077

     

MRA

-

-

0.696

     

Thiazides

-

-

0.182

     

Sulfonylureas

-

-

0.950

     

DPP-4i

-

-

0.507

     

Biguanides

-

-

0.869

     

Insulin

NA

NA

0.030

-

-

0.103

HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BNP, b-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.

Odds ratio were not calculated in several variables due to statistical divergence.

Stratification of the primary endpoint using BNP and RASI use

A cut-off of baseline plasma BNP level to predict the primary endpoint was 192 pg/mL (0.684 of area under the curve, 0.808 of sensitivity, and 0.643 of specificity; Fig. 3).

Twenty-three patients satisfied plasma BNP < 192 pg/mL and RASI use (double-positive group). eGFR increased significantly during the 12-month follow-up in the double-positive group, whereas eGFR remained unchanged in the no double positive group (p for interaction < 0.01; Fig. 4).

As sub-analyses, similar trends were observed irrespective of the eGFR levels stratified by 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (Fig. 5AB) and the HbA1c levels stratified by 7.0% (Fig. 5CD).

Discussion

We investigated the factors associating with the renoprotection of SGLT2i therapy in patients with HF and T2DM. The major finding of the present study was that lower plasma BNP level and the use of RASI at baseline were associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i. Those with lower plasma BNP levels and the use of RASI had greater eGFR during the 12-month follow-up period over those without both of them irrespective of the eGFR levels and the HbA1c levels at baseline.

SGLT2i and BNP

Both EMPEROR-Reduced trial and DAPA-HF trial demonstrated that SGLT2i prevented the occurrence of worsening HF in patients with chronic HFrEF [9, 10]. The EMPEROR-Reduced trial further demonstrated that empagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of renal outcome and a slower progressive decline in renal function. Several large placebo-controlled trials using SGLT2i suggested that they might exert a beneficial effect on the renal outcome as a class effect [11–13]. On the contrary, the DAPA-HF trial, which used dapagliflozin, did not demonstrate the improvement of renal outcome [14].

The pattern of inconsistent findings in renal outcomes might be explained by the differences in the distribution of NYHA functional class in each trial. More patients with NYHA class II were enrolled in the EMPEROR-Reduced trial compared to the DAPA-HF trial. SGLT2i might have renoprotective effect particularly for those with less sick HF, as we also found in this study. In a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials, HFrEF patients with NYHA class II also had a lower risk of composite cardiovascular outcome compared to those with NYHA class III–IV symptoms [15]. These findings appear to be due to direct cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects, which may be related to actions on sodium balance, energy homeostasis, and mitigation of cellular stress [16]. The detailed mechanism remains uncertain, but the existence of renal congestion, indicated by the elevated BNP level, might suppress the improvement in renal function.

SGLT2i and RASI

RASI were the only classes of medication that have been shown to slow a decline in kidney function [4, 5]. The use of RASI was also associated with the renoprotective effect in the present study. Although few studies have investigated the combined effects of RASI and SGLT2i, several previous studies of SGLT2i have identified a minimal increase in plasma renin activity [17, 18]. SGLT2i can cause diuresis, natriuresis, and associated body fluid loss, resulting in renin activation. Although a reduction in plasma volume by SGLT2i would be expected to activate renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, RASI may counterbalance this effect. Hence, RASI may have played an important role in renal protection in the present study.

Conversely, several studies in animal models or humans have confirmed unchanged activity in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system following the SGLT2i administration [19, 20]. An increase in GFR associating with long-term SGLT2i therapy is thought to be secondary to tubuloglomerular feedback, which is also a response of the macula densa to the increased salt delivery via inhibition of sodium transport proximally [21]. Furthermore, an increase in sodium chloride delivery to the macula densa may suppress the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. These different effects of SGLT2i may explain the inconsistent data regarding the responses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to SGLT2i.

Consequently, the association between SGLT2i and systemic renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation is not straightforward. However, since plasma renin activity is significantly higher in patients with HF compared to healthy people [22], it is plausible that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is activated in participants in the present study. This hypothesis may explain the finding that the use of RASI was associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i in the present study.

Limitations

The sample size was small and the observation period was only one year. Given the low event number, the number of potential confounders included in the multivariate analyses was restricted. The one-year observation period may be insufficient to reveal changes in eGFR after SGLT2i administration. A large-scale multicenter study with a longer follow-up period is required. Although there was a difference in renal outcome between EMPEROR-Reduced trial and DAPA-HF trial, the multiple types of SGLT2i were used in the present study. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the renal beneficial effect is consistent across any SGLT2is. Lastly, the EMPEROR-Reduced trial revealed that SGLT2i reduced the risk of the composite renal endpoint, independently of diabetes status [23]. We also indicated that increases in eGFR during the observation period were independent of the HbA1c levels, whereas we did not include patients without T2DM in this study. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanism of SGLT2i on renal function and outcome.

Conclusions

Lower plasma BNP level and the use of RASI at baseline were associated with the renoprotective effect of SGLT2i among patients with HF and T2DM.

Abbreviations

HF

heart failure

HFrEF

heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

CKD

chronic kidney disease

T2DM

type 2 diabetes mellitus

RASI

renin-angiotensin system inhibitor

SGLT2i

sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor

NYHA

New York Heart Association

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

OR

odds ration

BNP

B-type natriuretic peptide

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Ethics Board of Toyama University Hospital approved the study protocol (#Rin 29-94), which complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients beforehand.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

Not applicable

Authors' contributions

TI analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the renal function and SGLT2i therapy, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

References

  1. Smith DH, Thorp ML, Gurwitz JH, McManus DD, Goldberg RJ, Allen LA, at al. Chronic kidney disease and outcomes in heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: the Cardiovascular Research Network PRESERVE Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6:333-42.
  2. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2020;395:709-33.
  3. Damman K, Valente MA, Voors AA, O'Connor CM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Hillege HL. Renal impairment, worsening renal function, and outcome in patients with heart failure: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2014;35:455-69.
  4. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Gherardi G, Garini G, Zoccali C, Salvadori M, et al. Renoprotective properties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Lancet 1999;354:359-64.
  5. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001;345:861-9.
  6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117-28.
  7. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;377:644-57.
  8. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Eng J Med 2019;380:347-57.
  9. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1413-24.
  10. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Eng J Med 2019;381:1995-2008
  11. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117-28.
  12. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;377:644-57.
  13. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Eng J Med 2019;380:347-57.
  14. Jhund PS, Solomon SD, Docherty KF, Heerspink HJL, Anand IS, Böhm M, et al. Efficacy of Dapagliflozin on Renal Function and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of DAPA-HF. Circulation 2021;143:298-309.
  15. Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, at al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet 2020;396:819-29.
  16. Nespoux J, Vallon V. SGLT2 inhibition and kidney protection. Clin Sci (Lond) 2018;132:1329-39.
  17. Schork A, Saynisch J, Vosseler A, Jaghutriz BA, Heyne N, Peter A, et al. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on body composition, fluid status and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in type 2 diabetes: a prospective study using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019;18:46.
  18. Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D, Wie L, Leslie B, List J. Dapagliflozin a glucose-regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15:853-62.
  19. Shin SJ, Chung S, Kim SJ, Lee EM, Yoo YH, Kim JW, et al. Effect of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor, Dapagliflozin, on Renal Renin-Angiotensin System in an Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes. PLoS One 2016; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165703.
  20. Yoshimoto T, Furuki T, Kobori H, Miyakawa M, Imachi H, Murao K, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on urinary excretion of intact and total angiotensinogen in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Investig Med 2017;65:1057-61.
  21. Cherney DZ, Perkins BA, Soleymanlou N, Maione M, Lai V, Lee A, et al. Renal hemodynamic effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2014;129:587-97.
  22. Nijst P, Verbrugge FH, Martens P, Bertrand PB, Dupont M, Francis GS, at al. Plasma renin activity in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction on optimal medical therapy. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2017; doi: 10.1177/1470320317729919.
  23. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Khan MS, Marx N, Lam CSP, et al. Effect of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure by Baseline Diabetes Status: Results From the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial. Circulation 2021;143:337-49