Our results showed that there was not a causal inference of genetically defined periodontitis to four types of APOs, which is contradictory to the observational studies before.
The extant studies indicate periodontitis has a prospective effect on the progression of APOs. One study hypothesized that changes in progesterone and estrogen levels during pregnancy would affect the chemotaxis of gingival tissue cells, enzymes, cytokines, and antioxidants, which would contribute to the inflammatory response to gingival tissue and the subgingival microbiota. These changes indirectly lead to increased gingival inflammation[24]. It has also been shown that periodontal disease causes inflammatory mediators such as cytokines or pathogens to enter the amniotic fluid or embryonic tissues through the blood stream[25].However, these phenomena may be the first manifestations of more serious diseases, such as adult cardiovascular and metabolic diseases[26].
Although numerous observational studies have shown that periodontitis during pregnancy can promote the occurrence of low birth weight and premature birth in newborns[5, 6]. But at the same time, many researchers have also observed that periodontitis does not necessarily lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes[7]. Meanwhile, many systematic reviews have found that improving maternal periodontal health does not necessarily improve adverse pregnancy outcomes[27]. We believe that periodontitis may not be the most important cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the occurrence of periodontitis may indicate more serious physical problems. Therefore, GWAS research with larger scale and more accurate classification is more needed.
This study has irreplaceable advantages. First, Mendelian Randomization can simulate randomized control trials to discover the causality, reducing a large amount of time cost, and money. Second, compared with conventional designed observational studies, the genetic potency of the IVs can prevent the effect of reverse causal effect and confounding bias. Third, we perform the first MR analysis focused on the causality between APOs and periodontitis. Considering the high prevalence of periodontitis in the pregnant population worldwide, revealing the causality effect between two diseases is instructive. Fourth, we use four common types of APOs so we can gain more nuanced conclusions.
However, our study also has limitations due to the lack of data. We've only studied the relationship between European populations, so the consistency and scalability among other populations still need to be validated. The other types of the oral diseases should also be focused on. GWAS studies based on inter-age and inter-ethnicity should be continued in the future.
We used Mendelian randomization method for the first time to test the possible role of periodontitis in adverse pregnancy outcomes, and used different testing methods to ensure the accuracy of the results. It was ultimately found that existing research data cannot prove that periodontitis at the genetic level can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes.