Culture methods for test cladocerans
D. magna was obtained from the National Institute for Environmental Studies (Ibaraki, Japan) and maintained with food (algae) and C. vulgaris (Recenttec K. K, Tokyo, Japan; cell concentration: 5 × 105 cells/mL, fed more than five times per week). Elendt M4 medium was used for culture (Elendt and Bias 1990). One Daphnia was cultured in 100 mL of medium in a 100 mL glass beaker, and several other beakers were established in a similar manner. Neonates from the third or fourth brood were used for the subsequent stock cultures. The frequency of culture medium exchange was set to at least three times per week. The daphnia were kept under the water temperature: 20 ± 1°C, photoperiod: 16:8 h (light: dark duration), and light intensity: approximately 800 lux.
Constant exposure methods
Pirimicarb was purchased from the Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan). Referring to the 48 h EC50 values (13–14 µg/L) in D. magna previously studied (Ishimota et al. 2020a), we established the continuous exposure concentrations of test chemical as 0, 3.8, 7.5, and 15 µg/L. We prepared a 1.6 g/L stock solution using a pure water: methanol solution (50:50, v/v), and the stock solution was diluted with the M4 medium to prepare the test water. Then, several sets of 100 mL beaker containing one Daphnia and 100 mL of test water were prepared for each group. Each water sample contained methanol (19 µL/L) and food (C. vulgaris). We confirmed that the 48 h EC50 values of D. magna, cultured with the sub-lethal (7.5 and 15 µg/L) pirimicarb for 15 generations, was approximately two times higher than that in the control (unpublished work). Because we expected to obtain a higher pirimicarb-tolerant population, we maintained the continuous exposure methods until the 26 generations (from F0 to F25). It was expected that this population would become more tolerant to pirimicarb. We established third- or fourth-brood neonates for the next generation. All test conditions followed the Culture methods for test cladocerans.
Acute immobilization test
To confirm the sensitivity (48 h EC50 value) of neonates from each exposure group in the F25 generations, acute immobilization tests were conducted according to the OECD guideline No. 202 (OECD 2004). We performed the test on neonates (< 24 h old) from the third and fourth broods. Immobilization of neonates was defined as neonates that were unable to swim for 15 s after gentle agitation of the beaker (OECD 2004). After we adjusted a stock solution of 1.6 g/L pirimicarb using a methanol: pure water solution (50:50, v/v), test solutions (0, 3.8, 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 µg/L) were prepared by diluting the stock solution with the culture medium. We added five neonates (< 24 h old) into a 100 mL glass beaker (n = 4, total number of neonates for this test: 20). The same experiment was performed for each test group in duplicate.
Life cycle test
To ascertain the extinction probability in the chemical-tolerant cladocerans, we conducted the life cycle tests by culturing Daphnia from each test group (0, 3.8, 7.5, and 15 µg/L) of F25, without pirimicarb exposure, for 21 days. Extinction probability is often used to determine the effects of chemicals on population size (Gergs et al. 2013, Tanaka 2003, Weir and Salice 2021). We prepared four sets of 100 mL glass beakers containing 100 mL of medium for each test group and added one neonate (< 24 h old) to each beaker. The triplicated experiments were performed with two foods, C. vulgaris and S. leopoliensis. We obtained C. vulgaris from Recenttec K. K (Tokyo, Japan) and S. leopoliensis from the National Institute for Environmental Studies (Ibaraki, Japan). The numbers of neonates born to the parents and dead parents were counted daily. To evaluate the changes in pirimicarb concentration with algae in the life cycle tests, we confirmed the recovery rates of pirimicarb concentrations in the test water at the beginning and after 48 h (because water exchange was performed at 48 h exposure).
Respiration experiment
The respiration rate was expressed as oxygen consumption, according to previous studies (Glazier 1991, Heisey and Porter 1977). We measured the respiration rates using the test neonates from F25 at 0, 3.8, 7.5, and 15 µg/L without any pollutants. We prepared several 150 mL glass bottles containing Elendt M4 medium and measured the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in each bottle using a DO meter (HQ 30D, Hach, Germany). After 10 neonates (< 24 h old) were washed with medium to remove any bacteria or particulate matter, they were added into one glass bottle with a lid in quadruplicate for each test group. Additionally, we used a bottle containing the culture medium without Daphnia as a blank sample in quadruplicate. Before being placed on the lid, the glass bottles were soaked in a bucket containing the culture medium to prevent air entry into the bottle. The glass bottle was covered with aluminum foil to prevent biological growth and respiration. The vessels were put into an incubator maintained at 20 ± 1°C (measured values: 20.1 to 20.3°C) under dark cycle and kept for 24 h. DO concentrations were assessed at the beginning and end of the exposure. Following this, we expressed the mean respiration rate as an individual/day in each group.
Chemical depuration test from daphnia body
To confirm the time-course depuration of the pirimicarb from daphnia body, we performed the chemical depuration test using the neonates collected from the 0 (control group) and 7.5 µg/L test group (which acquired pirimicarb tolerance) in the F25 generations. Thirty neonates (< 24 h old) from each test group were collected and exposed to 7.5 µg/L pirimicarb test solution with solvent (methanol; 19 µL/L) in the 1 L beaker in triplicate. Five sets of triplicate beakers were prepared (total number of beakers: 15; total number of individuals: 450). The neonates were then cultured for seven days, during which we exchanged the test water with 7.5 µg/L pirimicarb solution thrice a week to keep the nominal concentration. After seven days of exposure, we transferred the Daphnids into fresh medium without pirimicarb or solvent to start the depuration phase. Daphnids from each beaker were collected at each sampling point (0, 3, 6, 24, and 48 h after depuration), and 80 mg (wet weight) of which was weighed in triplicate; each sample was extracted with 1.5 mL of acetonitrile. After homogenization and sonication, the samples were certified. We collected the supernatant and evaporated them at 40°C water bath. Then, we added the acetonitrile: pure water (60:40, v/v) into the residue and filtered the solution with 0.20 µm membrane filter (Millex-LG hydrophilic PTFE membrane, Merck Millipore Corporation). We measured the pirimicarb concentrations in the solution by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using the following methods:
Pirimicarb concentrations in the test water were measured at the initiation and end of the exposure and at the initiation of the depuration phase.
Chemical analysis
We followed our prior analytical procedure for determining the pirimicarb concentration in the test water (Ishimota et al. 2020b). First, we diluted the test solution with acetonitrile: pure water (6:4, v/v) and measured the chemical concentrations using LC-MS/MS. The limit of quantification was set to 0.5 µg/L. A flow rate was set as 0.3 mL/min using a column at 40°C (LC 1290 HPLC; MS/MS: 6460 Triple Quad LC-MS/MS, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA; column: Acquity UPLC HSS T3, 1.8 µm × 2.1 mm × 100 mm, Waters, MA, USA). The monitored precursor and product ions of pirimicarb were 239.1/72.1 m/z. The peak area of the calibration standard was plotted against the corresponding amount to construct a calibration curve for pirimicarb using the least-squares method.
Although we validated the pirimicarb analysis in the test water and confirmed pirimicarb stability (48 h) in our previous study (Ishimota et al. 2020b), the analytical validation for the Daphnia body was unclear. Therefore, we performed the following analytical validation of the Daphnia body: Pirimicarb solution was added to homogenized Daphnia samples to obtain 0.5 (limit of quantification) and 10 µg/kg samples. After determining these concentrations using the aforementioned methods, we determined the mean recovery rate and relative standard deviation (RSD (%), calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean concentration) in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
We used R version 3.6.1 and 4.1.0 (R Core Team 2020; 2021) for all statistical analyses. We estimated the 48 h EC50 values and confidence intervals using a two-parameter log-logistic model. The lower range was set to 0, and the upper range was set to 1, calculated using Eq. 1 as follows:
$$f\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{(1+exp(a\left({log}\left(x\right)-{log}\left(e\right)\right))}$$
1
,
where f(x) denotes the immobility probability, x is the nominal concentration of pirimicarb, e is the inflection point of the fitted line (equivalent to the concentration required to cause 50% immobility (48 h EC50)), and a is the relative slope around e. Because we considered duplicate experiments as random effects, we estimated EC50 values using the medrc package (Gerhard and Ritz 2017). We statistically compared EC50 values among the test groups using the EDcomp function (drc package) (Ishimota et al. 2022, Ritz et al. 2006). This function was tested to determine whether the ratios of the EC50 values were comparable to those of 1. Additionally, we adapted the significance level for each pair using Holm’s method (Holm 1979).
In the life cycle test, the extinction probability was estimated using the countCDFxt function in the R package “popbio” with 95% confidence intervals using bootstrapped estimation (Stubben and Milligan 2007, William and Daniel 2002). The calculation was performed using Eq. 2 below:
\(G\left(T\right|d, \mu ,\) σ 2 ) = Φ\(\left(\frac{-d-\mu T}{\sqrt{{\sigma }^{2}T}}\right)\) + \(\text{e}\text{x}\text{p}(-2\mu d/\)σ2) Φ\(\left(\frac{-d+\mu T}{\sqrt{{\sigma }^{2}T}}\right)\) (2)
where, \(G\left(T\right|d, \mu ,\)σ2) denotes the extinction probability, Φ is the area of the extinction probability under a normal distribution curve, T is a future time of interest. Additionally, the equation includes log mean (µ) and log variation (σ2) of population growth rate during the life-cycle experiments (21 d). The population growth rate was calculated from the daily age-specific survival, parents, and reproduction numbers. In the countCDFxt function, increasing σ2 increases extinction probability. When µ value is negative or zero, the ultimate extinction is certain. We ran the simulation for 21 d (exposure time) for 500 replicates using bootstrapping methods. The quasi-extinction threshold was defined as that of an individual.
For the data analysis of extinction probability and respiration rate, variances in data among test groups were checked using Levene’s test in the car package (Fox and Weisberg 2019). Since the homogeneity of variance was confirmed using Levene’s test, we performed Tukey's HSD method in the multcomp package for each data point (Hothorn et al. 2022).
In the depuration test, we estimated the half-life of pirimicarb in Daphnia using the following equation:
$${t}_{1∕2}=\frac{-ln\left(0.5\right)}{k}$$
3
where t1/2 is the half-life (50% depuration) of pirimicarb in the Daphnia body; ln is the natural logarithm; k is the depuration rate constant, which is the slope of the linear regression curve (natural logarithms of the pirimicarb concentration at multiple sampling points vs. depuration time) (Castro et al. 2019).
To estimate (1) whether chemical sensitivity (48 h EC50) affects the extinction probability under the two algal food conditions and (2) whether the sensitivity would be related to the respiration rate, a generalized liner model (GLM) analysis was performed. Each distribution was assumed to be gamma (log link) distribution. In these GLM analysis, we used Wald statistic test to calculate the statistical significance of each variable with the χ2 test (p < 0.05) (Hosmer and Lemeshow 2000).