This study included 63 patients with CML-CP treated with TKIs (39 men and 24 women). The median ages at the initial examination, follow-up, and treatment periods were 56 (range, 19–86) years, 72 (range, 6–288) months, and 72 (range, 6–288) months, respectively. IM, NIL, DAS, and BOS were used as first-line treatment in 33 (52%), 15 (24%), 12 (19%), and 3 (5%) patients, respectively. The proportion of second-generation TKIs was higher than first- and third-generation in second-line treatment. Specifically, IM, NIL, DAS, BOS, and PON were used in 4 (11%), 13 (36%), 11 (31%), 7 (19%), and 1 patient, respectively. Regarding TKIs used as a third-line treatment, IM, NIL, DAS, BOS, and PON were used in 6 (40%), 3 (20%), 2 (13%), 3 (20%), and 1 patient, respectively. NIL, DAS, and BOS were administered as a fourth-line treatment to 3 (42%), 2 (29%), and 2 patients (29%), respectively (Table 1-B).
The following data on 63 patients are shown in Tables 2 and 3-A-1: comorbidity; concomitant drugs (anticoagulant drugs, antiplatelet agents, lipid-lowering drugs, antihypertensive drugs, and hypoglycemic drugs); CVE risk evaluation based on SCORE2 Risk Chart, SCORE2-OP Risk Chart, or Suita Score; and the presence or absence of CVE onset. Of 30 patients with CVE risk factors, such as cardiovascular diseases (cerebral infarction, hypertension, aortic stenosis, bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, and myocardial infarction [MI]), type 2 diabetes, or dyslipidemia, 17 received interventions for lifestyle-related diseases. Specifically, anticoagulant drugs, antiplatelet agents, lipid-lowering drugs, antihypertensive drugs, and hypoglycemic drugs were administered to 1, 4, 5, 14, and 5 patients, respectively (Table 2). The following symbols were used to represent the patient status: ◆, patients who required TKI switching because of CVE onset; ▼, patients with reduced TKI dose because of CVEs; ●, patients who experienced CVE that required intervention but continued the same TKI at the same dosage; ○, patients who experienced a CVE that did not require intervention and continued the same TKI at the same dosage; and ■, patients in whom the TKI treatment was discontinued after CVE onset. Elevated BNP (≥ 100 pg/mL), elevated TRPG (≥ 30 mmHg), and increased CTR on chest X-ray (≥ 50%) were observed in 8 (13%), 10 (16%), and 19 (30%) patients, respectively; however, TKIs were continued at the same dose in all the patients. PE occurred in 10 (16%) patients. Owing to this adverse event, a TKI was switched in 6 patients, a TKI was not switched, but its dose was reduced in 2 patients unique patient number (UPN): 22 and 48), and no intervention was performed, and the same TKI and dose were continued in 2 patients (UPN: 7 and 14). Abnormal findings on UCG were observed in 15 patients, and one of them (UPN: 1) required TKI discontinuation because of depressed left/right ventricular systolic function, right heart strain, pericardial effusion, and PE. Abnormal ECG findings were observed in 30 patients, and one of them (UPN:1) required TKI discontinuation because of T-wave inversion attributed to myocardial damage. Hypertension classified as Grade 2 (i.e., systolic blood pressure, sBP ≥ 140 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure, dBP ≥ 90 mmHg) occurred in 32/63 patients (51%) after TKI initiation or switching. Of these, 11 patients (17%) required hypotensive therapy (Table 2). Nine patients (UPN: 1, 5, 23, 26, 30, 31, 39, 41, and 42) experienced ischemic heart disease (angina pectoris [AP] and MI) or cerebral infarction. Specifically, 2 patients (UPN: 1 and 41) had PE, 4 (UPN: 1, 26, 41 and 42) had elevated TRPG, 5 (UPN: 1, 23, 31, 39, and 41) showed abnormal findings on UCG, 5 (UPN: 1, 5, 23, 41, and 42) had an increased CTR, and 8 (UPN: 1, 5, 23, 26, 31, 39, 41, and 42) showed abnormal ECG findings. TKI switching (9 patients), reduction (3 patients), and discontinuation (1 patient) because of CVEs, as well as CVE treatment (14 patients), were required. The risk assessment of CVE onset based on the SCORE2 Risk Chart and SCORE2-OP Risk Chart showed that 21, 31, and 11 patients were classified into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (Tables 2 and 3-A-1). The risk assessment of CVE onset based on the Suita Score indicated that 30, 22, and 11 patients were classified into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Of the 9 patients who experienced serious CVEs (AP, cerebral infarction, and MI) that required intervention, 8 (89%) patients were categorized as a moderate- or high-risk group (unique patient number [UPN]: 5, 23, 26, 30, 31, 39, 41, and 42) and the other patient (UPN: 1) was categorized to the low-risk group based on the SCORE2 Risk Chart, SCORE2-OP Risk Chart, and Suita Score. Before the initial TKI treatment, 22 patients had abnormal findings on cardiovascular examination and mild CVEs. During the TKI treatment, abnormal findings on cardiovascular examination and mild CVEs were observed. Specifically, Grade 2 hypertension (sBP, ≥ 140 mmHg, dBP, ≥ 90 mmHg), elevated BNP, increased CTR on plain chest X-ray (≥ 50%), abnormal findings on ECG, elevated TRPG, and abnormal findings on UCG occurred in 32 (51%), 8 (13%), 19 (30%), 30 (48%), 10 (16%) and 15 (24%) patients, respectively. Prolongation of QT interval (≥ 500 ms), an adverse event associated with NIL, did not occur (Table 3-B). Non-cardiogenic PE developed in 10/63 patients (16%). The median age at the initial examination was compared among the following three groups: patients with abnormal findings on cardiovascular examination and mild CVEs (mild CVEs group), those with serious CVEs (serious CVEs group), and those without serious CVEs (non-CVEs group). The median age was 58 (range, 19–85), 66 (range, 27–78), and 38 (range, 28–70) years for men in mild CVEs group, serious CVEs group, and non-CVEs group, respectively, and 58 (range, 40–75), 63, and 64 (range, 32–72) years for women in mild CVEs group, serious CVEs group, and non-CVEs group, respectively. Male patients tended to experience more abnormal findings on cardiovascular examination and mild CVEs ith increasing age (Table 3-C), whereas female patiens did not show such a tendency. Abnormal findings on cardiovascular examination was freqyenth of seved in CML patients under TKI treatment; however, blood pressure control and periodical cardiovascular examination allowed prevention or early detection of CVEs, which enabled the safe continuation of TKIs.
Figure 1 shows the presence or absence of TKI treatment and CVE status over time. TKIs were discontinued in 1 patient (UPN: 1) because of serious CVE. After achieving a deep molecular response, other patients (UPN: 2–8). The TKIs were discontinued in 1 patient (UPN: 1) and 16 (UPN: 9–24) patients owing to serious CVEs and adverse events other than CVEs, respectively, and were interrupted in 7 patients after achieving DMR. Furthermore, TKIs were discontinued in 16 patients (UPN: 9–24) because of adverse events other than CVEs. Other patients were able to continue TKIs (UPN: 25–63). The clinical course of these patients was shown as follows also examined. In June 2014, 4 years after initiating DAS as a second-line treatment, UNP: 1 (Fig. 3-A) experienced pleural effusion; thus, DAS was switched to NIL. In July 2014, the NIL was discontinued because of abnormal findings on UCG and T-wave inversion on ECG owing to myocardial damage. The patient achieved MR 4.5 at the time of the discontinuation. DMR has been maintained for 75 months since the discontinuation; therefore, TKI re-administration is not required. Among the 7 patients (i.e., [UPN: 2–8] who maintained long-term DMR and in whom TKIs were discontinued to achieve TFR), 4 (UPN: 2–5) had an IM treatment history of ≥ 10 years, 2 (UNP: 6 and 7) had a DAS treatment history of ≥ 2 years, and 1 (UPN: 8) had a NIL treatment history of ≥ 2 years. Of the 8 (UPN: 1–8) patients, 3 (UPN: 2, 5, and 6) patients lost MR 3.0, and the same TKI (i.e., the same TKI was used in these patients before and after the discontinuation) was readministered. DMR was maintained in the other 5 patients, and no TKI was administered. TKIs were discontinued in a total of 16 patients because of adverse events other than CVEs. Specifically, hyperbilirubinemia, cytopenia, and other adverse events (e.g., rash [UPN: 10], colitis [UPN: 24], gastrointestinal symptoms [UPN: 12 and 14], fever [UPN: 13], and herpes zoster [UNP: 21]) occurred in 5 (UPN: 15, 18, 19, 20, and 23), 5 (UPN: 9, 11, 14, 16, and 17), and 6 patients, respectively.
Figure 2 shows the data on TRPG (reference value ≦ 30 mmHg), BNP (reference value < 100 mmHg) status, and sBP/dBP changes before and after TKI (switching/reduction/discontinuation) in 63 patients. TRPG data of 19 patients were also provided. Of these, elevated TRPG returned to normal in the following 3 (16%) patients: BOS was switched to IM as a second-line treatment in 1 patient (UPN: 41, TRPG decreased from 45 to 28 mmHg); NIL was changed to BOS as a fourth-line treatment (5%) (UPN: 40, TRPG decreased from 31 to 24 mmHg) and DAS as a first-line treatment was reduced from 100 to 20 mg (5%) (UPN: 12, TRPG decreased from 30 to 24 mmHg). TRPG was increased from the reference to high values in the following 4 patients (21%): DAS as a first-line treatment (UPN: 7, TRPG increased from 24 to 34 mmHg); NIL switched to PON as a fourth-line treatment (UPN: 26, TRPG increased from 12 to 33 mmHg); NIL reduced from 800 to 400 mg as the second-line treatment (UPN: 40, TRPG increased from 21 to 31 mmHg); and BOS as a second-line treatment after NIL (UPN: 18, TRPG increased from 22 to 30 mmHg) (Fig. 2-A). Data on BNP before and after TKI discontinuation were available for 19 patients with elevated BNP ( ≧ 100 pg/ml), which returned to normal in 5 (26%) patients; TKI was discontinued after completing the first-line treatment using NIL in 1 patient (UPN: 41, BNP decreased from 238 to 28 pg/ml); BOS was switched to IM as a third-line treatment in 1 patient (UPN: 41, BNP decreased from 209 to 49 pg/ml); NIL was switched to BOS as the third-line treatment in 1 patient (UPN: 48, BNP decreased from 155 pg/ml to 33 pg/ml); DAS as a first-line treatment was reduced from 70 to 20 mg in 1 patient (UPN: 7, BNP decreased from 123 to 57 pg/ml); DAS was changed to BOS as a second-line treatment in 1 patient (UPN: 12, BNP decreased from 105 to 56 pg/ml); and BNP increased from the reference value to ≥ 100 pg/ml in 3 patients (16%). Specifically, NIL was reduced from 400 mg to 150 mg in 2 patients (11%) (UPN: 41 and UPN: 48, BNP increased from 20 pg/ml to 238 pg/ml in the former and from 57 to 155 pg/ml in the latter). NIL was discontinued because of PE, and BOS was initiated as a second-line treatment in 1 patient (UNP: 41, BNP increased from 28 to 209 pg/ml) (Fig. 2-B). Elevated TRPG and BNP levels were observed after switching from the second-and third-generation TKIs to BOS or after IM and TKI discontinuation; however, such abnormal findings improved. Nevertheless, BNP increased after TKI reduction in 2 patients (UPN: 41 and 48) who had received NIL, a second-generation TKI, for > 2 years. Before and after TKI switching, data on blood pressure were available in 27 patients. Of these, Grade 2 hypertension (sBP, ≥ 140 mmHg; dBP, ≥ 90 mmHg) developed in the following 3 patients (11%): (UPN: 26) who received PON as a fourth-line treatment after receiving IM as a first-line treatment, (UPN: 8) who initiated NIL as a first-line treatment, and (UPN: 48) in whom NIL was reduced from 200 to 150 mg (Fig. 2-C). Grade 2 or higher hypertension became normal in the following 5 patients (18%): (UPN: 28) in whom NIL used as a fourth-line treatment was reduced from 600 to 400 mg (UPN: 12,13), in whom DAS was switched to BOS (UPN: 7), in whom DAS used as a first-line treatment was discontinued (UPN: 31), and in whom PON used as a second-line treatment was discontinued. These results showed that TKI reduction, switching from the second-and third-generation TKIs to BOS or IM, and TKI discontinuation were associated with normalized TRPG, BNP, and blood pressure. Such positive findings were observed in 12/14 patients (86%). Conversely, TKI reduction was not associated with TRPG and BNP improvement in the remaining 2 patients (14%) (UPN: 40 and 41) who received NIL for > 6 years.
PE and heart failure developed in UPN 7 during the treatment with second-generation TKIs; however, the patient’s condition improved after TKI discontinuation (Fig. 3-B). The severity of cardiotoxicity improved after switching from the second-generation TKI to BOS in UPN 12 (Fig. 3-C). UPN 7 was diagnosed with CML in April 2016. DAS 100 mg/day was administered, and the patient achieved MR 4.5 in January 2017. However, PE and elevated BNP were observed; thus, it was reduced to 20 mg/day (Fig. 3-B). However, DAS was discontinued in July 2019 because BNP increased from 123 to 163 pg/ml. Subsequently, BNP decreased to 74.2 pg/ml. The patient maintained an MR4.5 without cardiotoxicity (Fig. 3-B). UPN 12 was diagnosed with CML in January 2012. DAS 100 mg/day was initiated (Fig. 3-C). The patient maintained an MR of 4.5 for > 2 years, but BNP increased, and DAS decreased to 20 mg/day in April 2017. However, the patient failed to achieve an MR of 4.0 in January 2018. DAS was increased to 100 mg/day, achieving an MR of 4.5. However, BNP increased to 232 pg/ml, and DAS was switched to BOS 100 mg/day in April 2019. BOS was increased to 300 mg/day while monitoring the patient’s tolerability. The patient maintained an MR of 4.0 without worsening CVEs (Fig. 3-C).