Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants
A total of 297 participants were enrolled in the study, the majority, 173 (58.2%) were female. The mean age of participants was 26.7 years ± 16.3 standard deviation. Age group 20 to 44 years 148 (49.8%) had the most respondents. Participants with primary education (40.1%) constituted the majority as well as unemployed (39.7%) and single marital status (52.9%). (Table 1)
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants
Variables
|
Frequency
|
Percentage (%)
|
Sex
|
|
|
Male
|
124
|
41.8
|
Female
|
173
|
58.2
|
Age group (years)
|
|
|
1-12
|
48
|
16.2
|
13-19
|
58
|
19.5
|
20-44
|
148
|
49.8
|
≥45
|
43
|
14.5
|
Occupation
|
|
|
Business
|
29
|
9.8
|
Employed
|
50
|
16.8
|
Farming
|
100
|
33.7
|
None
|
118
|
39.7
|
Level of education
|
|
|
None
|
27
|
9.1
|
Primary Education
|
119
|
40.1
|
Secondary
|
91
|
30.6
|
Higher Education
|
60
|
20.2
|
Marital status
|
|
|
Divorced
|
2
|
0.7
|
Married
|
132
|
44.4
|
Single
|
157
|
52.9
|
Widowed/widower
|
6
|
2.0
|
Clinical presentation of study participants
Most participants presented with a history of abdominal pain (77.8%), followed by headache (59.6%) and fever (48.8%). Only 99 (33.7%) presented with Diarrhoea (Figure 2)
Figure 2: Clinical presentations of participants enrolled in the study. The percentages of participants with each complaint are indicated at the top of the bars.
Prevalence of Salmonella infection
Out of 297 stool cultures, 49 (16.5%, 95% CI: 12.7-21.1) were positive for Salmonella, of which 41 (83.7%, 95% CI: 70.9-91.5) were NTS, while eight (16.3%, 95% CI: 8.5-29.0) were Typhoid Salmonella species. Among the typhoid species, five were Salmonella typhi and three were Salmonella paratyphi. There was no significant difference in the proportion of Salmonella infection between females (19.1%, 95% CI: 13.9-25.6) and males (12.9%, 95% CI: 8.1-19.9). The lowest prevalence of Salmonella infection (8.3%) was observed in children between 1-12 years, while the prevalence was almost similar ranging from 16% to 19 % in age groups above 12 years. Employed participants had the highest proportion of Salmonella infection (30.0%, 95% CI: 19.1-43-7) compared to other occupations (13.7% 95% CI: 10.0-18.7) (Table 2a). There was no significant difference in proportion of Salmonella isolation rate among participants with formal education (16.3%, 95% CI 12.4-21.2) and informal education (18.5%, 95% CI 8.2-36.7) as well as among married participants (18.9%, 95% CI: 13.2-26.5) and unmarried (14.5%, 95% CI 10.0-20.7) (Table 2(a)).
Salmonella infection was more prevalent in patients presenting with abdominal pain (20.3%, 95% CI: 15.7-26.0 vs. 3.0%, 95% CI, 0.8-10.4, p < 0.05) and diarrhea (25.3%, 95% CI: 17.7-34.6 vs. 12.1%, 95% CI: 8.3-17.4). There was no significant difference in the proportion of Salmonella infection between participants with and without fever, joint pain and headache (Table 2(a)).
Patients using water from wells or rivers had a higher proportion of Salmonella infection (24.4%, 95% CI: 16.7-34.2) than those using tape water (13.0%, 95% CI: 9.1-18.3), p < 0.05. Salmonella infection was more prevalent in the sampled individuals with preference of drinking untreated water (22.2%, 95% CI: 16.4-29.2 vs. 10.1%, 95% CI: 6.1-16.2, p = 0.005) and eating at restaurants (27.9% 95% CI: 16.8-42.7 vs. 14.6%, 95% CI: 10.8-19.4, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in proportion of Salmonella infection with or without eating stewed beef, drinking raw milk, keep animals at home, hands washing in basin and preference of salad (Table 2(b))
Table 2(a): Proportion of Salmonella infection among participants with socio-demographic characteristics and clinical presentations
Variables
|
Total
|
Number of Positive
|
Proportion positive
(95% CI)
|
P -value
|
Overall
|
297
|
49
|
16.5 (12.7-21.1)
|
|
Sex
|
|
|
|
|
Male
|
124
|
16
|
12.9 (8.1-19.9)
|
0.158
|
Female
|
173
|
33
|
19.1 (13.9-25.6)
|
|
Age group (years)
|
|
|
|
|
1-12
|
48
|
4
|
8.3 (3.3-19.5)
|
0.615
|
13-19
|
58
|
10
|
17.2 (9.6-28.9)
|
|
20-44
|
148
|
28
|
18.9 (13.4-26.0)
|
|
≥45
|
43
|
7
|
16.3 (8.1-30.0)
|
|
Occupation
|
|
|
|
|
Employed
|
50
|
15
|
30.0 (19.1-43.7)
|
0.005
|
Others
|
247
|
34
|
13.8 (10.0-18.7)
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
|
Informal
|
27
|
5
|
18.5 (8.2-36,7)
|
0.767
|
Formal
|
270
|
44
|
16.3 (12.4-21.2)
|
|
Marital status
|
|
|
|
|
Married
|
132
|
25
|
18.9 (13.2-26.5)
|
0.311
|
Unmarried
|
165
|
24
|
14.5 (10.0-20.7)
|
|
Abdominal Pain
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
231
|
47
|
20.3 (15.7-26.0)
|
0.001
|
No
|
66
|
2
|
3.0 (0.8-10.4)
|
|
Fever
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
145
|
26
|
17.9 (12.5-25.0)
|
0.516
|
No
|
152
|
23
|
15.1 (10.3-21.7)
|
|
Headache
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
177
|
27
|
15.3 (10.7-21.3)
|
0.483
|
No
|
120
|
22
|
18.3 (12.4-26.2)
|
|
Diarrhea
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
99
|
25
|
25. 3 (17.7-34.6)
|
0.004
|
No
|
198
|
24
|
12.1 (8.3-17.4)
|
|
Joint pain
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
86
|
20
|
23.3 (15.6-33.2)
|
0.06
|
No
|
211
|
29
|
13.7 (9.7-19.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2(b): Proportion of Salmonella infection with participants' behavior and practices
Variable
|
Total
|
Number of Positive
|
Prevalence (%)
|
(95% CI)
|
P-value
|
Source of water
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells/River
|
90
|
22
|
24.4
|
16.7-34.2
|
0.015
|
Tape water
|
207
|
27
|
13.0
|
9.1-18.3
|
|
Drink untreated water
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
158
|
35
|
22.2
|
16.4-29.2
|
0.005
|
Yes
|
139
|
14
|
10.1
|
6.1-16.2
|
|
keep animal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
131
|
23
|
17.6
|
12.0-24.9
|
0.679
|
No
|
164
|
26
|
15.9
|
11.1-22.2
|
|
Eat at restaurants
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
43
|
12
|
27.9
|
16.8-42.7
|
0.029
|
No
|
254
|
37
|
14.6
|
10.8-19.4
|
|
Hand wash practice
|
|
|
|
|
On the Basin
|
115
|
23
|
20.0
|
13.7-28.2
|
0.196
|
Running water
|
182
|
26
|
14.3
|
9.9-20.1
|
|
Eat salad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
133
|
18
|
13.5
|
8.7-20.4
|
0.215
|
No
|
164
|
31
|
18.9
|
13.6-25.6
|
|
Eat stewed beef
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
67
|
13
|
19.4
|
11.7-30.4
|
0.467
|
No
|
230
|
36
|
15.7
|
11.5-20.9
|
|
Drink raw milk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
5
|
2
|
40.0
|
11.7-76,9
|
0.153
|
No
|
292
|
47
|
16.1
|
12.3-20.7
|
|
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern
Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on 36 out of 49 (73.5%) isolates. Amongst the isolate assessed for antimicrobial susceptibility, 8(100%,) and 28(68.3%) were typhoid Salmonella and NTS respectively. ST All isolates were sensitive to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin. Resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, co-trimoxazole and chloramphenicol were 100%, 75.0%, 27.8% and 16.7% respectively. Resistance were observed more in typhoid Salmonella species than NTS for tetracycline (88% vs 71%) and co-trimoxazole (100% vs 7%). Out of 36 isolates, 9 (25%) were multidrug resistance (MDR) being resistant to 3 or more groups of antibiotics (Table 3).
Table 3: Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Salmonella isolates from participants with gastrointestinal complaints (N = 36)
Name of Antimicrobial
|
Susceptible isolates
N (%)
|
Intermediate resistance isolates
N (%)
|
Resistant isolates
N (%)
|
Ceftriaxone
|
36 (100.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
Ciprofloxacin
|
36 (100.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
Chloramphenicol
|
28 (77.8)
|
2 (5.6)
|
6 (16.7)
|
Co-trimoxazole
|
25 (69.4)
|
1 (2.8)
|
10 (27.8)
|
Tetracycline
|
7 (19.4)
|
2 (5.6)
|
27 (75.0)
|
Ampicillin
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
36 (100.0)
|
MDR
|
|
|
9 (25.0)
|
Factors associated with Salmonella infection
The odds of having Salmonella infection was eight times among patients reported abdominal pain (AOR 8.5, 95% CI, 1.81- 39.78) as compared to patients without abdominal pain. Having diarrhea had two times odds of having Salmonella infection (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.13 - 4.24) compared to patients without diarrhea. The odd of having Salmonella infection were three times among employed participants (AOR 3.03, 95% CI 1.42 - 6.49) than other occupations. (Table 4)
The odd of having Salmonella infection was three times more among participants regularly eating at restaurants (AOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.28 - 8.93). Participants who reported using water from rivers or well had two times probability of Salmonella infection compared to those using tape water (AOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.05- 3.88), whereas drinking untreated water had three times higher chances of having Salmonella infection compared to those who drink treated water (AOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.21-5.48) (Table 4). There were no potential interactions between wells/river source of water and drink untreated water as well as employment and eating at restaurant on Salmonella infection HIV status was checked, the interaction term was not significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test result was p = 0.52 which indicated the fitness of the overall model.
Table 4: Association of Salmonella infection with socio-demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and behavioral factors among participants with gastrointestinal complaints
Variables
|
COR (95% CI)
|
p-value
|
AOR (95% CI)
|
p-value
|
Male (Ref: Female)
|
0.6 (0.33-1.20)
|
0.158
|
0.5 (0.23-1.09)
|
0.083
|
Employed (Ref: Unemployed)
|
2.7 (1.33-5.43)
|
0.005
|
3.03 (1.42-6.49)
|
0.004
|
Abdominal Pain
|
8.2 (1.93-34.62)
|
0.001
|
8.5 (1.81-39.78)
|
0.007
|
Diarrhea
|
2.5 (1.31-4.57)
|
0.004
|
2.19 (1.13-4.24)
|
0.020
|
Joint pain
|
1.9 (1.01-3.59)
|
0.045
|
1.8 (0.97-3.77)
|
0.060
|
Wells/River Source of water (Ref: Tape water)
|
2.2 (1.15-4.04)
|
0.015
|
2.02 (1.05-3.88)
|
0.035
|
Drink untreated water
|
2.5 (1.30-4.95)
|
0.005
|
2.6 (1.21-5.48)
|
0.014
|
Eat at restaurant
|
2.3 (1.07-4.82)
|
0.029
|
3.4 (1.28-8.93)
|
0.032
|
Wash hand in basin (Ref: Running water)
|
1.5 (0.81-2.78)
|
0.196
|
1.3 (0.60-2.61)
|
0.545
|
Key: AOR = Adjusted odds ratio, CI = Confidence interval, COR = Crude odds ratio, Ref = Reference