3.1 Pulse current Vs Output responses
3.1.1 Material Removal Rate (MRR)
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a direct relationship between pulse current and material removal rate. The analysis showed that as the pulse current increased, the material removal rate also increased simultaneously throughout the entire range of pulse currents.
As the pulse current increases, the energy delivered to the workpiece during each electrical discharge also increases. The higher discharge energy leads to more intense and efficient material removal, resulting in an increased material removal rate.
The higher pulse current leads to a greater number of electrons flowing through the spark gap. This increased electron flow generates a higher-temperature plasma channel between the electrode and the workpiece. The elevated temperature and pressure cause localized melting and vaporization of the workpiece material, leading to more effective erosion and material removal.
The higher pulse current promotes the formation of a more intense and stable plasma channel between the electrode and the workpiece. This intensified plasma facilitates a higher level of material erosion and evaporation, results in increasing the material removal rate.
3.1.2 Electrode Wear Rate, taper angle, and radial overcut (ROC)
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, the electrode wear rate, taper angle, and ROC at the bottom initially increase due to increased discharge energy, electrode shape changes, thermal effects, and material removal efficiency. However, beyond a critical threshold, approximately 7 amperes, these parameters start to decrease due to improved material removal efficiency and stable machining conditions. On the other hand, the ROC at the top surface initially decreases due to optimal material removal, but beyond 7 amperes, it starts to increase due to excessive material removal and changes in the surface profile.
The initial increase in electrode wear rate, taper angle, and ROC at the bottom can be attributed to the higher discharge energy resulting in more significant material removal.
With higher pulse currents, the electrode experiences more frequent and intense electrical discharges, leading to increased wear and deformation. The changes in electrode shape can result in altered discharge dynamics, affecting the taper angle and ROC at the bottom surface.
Beyond a certain threshold, around 7 amperes, the increased pulse current may lead to improved material removal efficiency due to enhanced discharge energy and better flushing conditions. This results in reduced electrode wear rate, taper angle, and ROC at the top and bottom surface.
3.1.3 Wear Ratio
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, the wear ratio initially decreases due to optimal material removal and erosion. However, beyond a certain threshold, approximately 7 amperes, the wear ratio starts to increase drastically due to excessive material removal, thermal stress, changes in dielectric properties, material adherence, and alterations in the electrode shape.
As the pulse current increases, the energy delivered to the electrode and workpiece during each electrical discharge becomes higher. This leads to more intense material removal and erosion, which can result in reduced tool wear initially. The optimal material removal contributes to the decrease in the wear ratio.
The higher pulse current can affect the dielectric properties of the EDM process. This includes changes in the dielectric breakdown strength, resistivity, and dielectric constant. Altered dielectric properties can influence discharge characteristics, spark formation, and material removal, ultimately impacting the wear ratio.
3.1.4 Circularity and Cylindricity
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, both circularity and cylindricity initially decrease slightly due to electrode wear and changes in machining dynamics. However, beyond a critical threshold, approximately 7 amperes, both circularity and cylindricity decrease drastically due to excessive material removal, increased thermal effects, changes in dielectric properties, melt pool dynamics, and interaction with material properties.
The initial slight decrease in circularity and cylindricity can be attributed to the early stages of electrode wear and consequent changes in the machining dynamics, leading to alterations in the shape of the machined features.
The higher pulse current can affect the dielectric properties of the EDM process, such as dielectric breakdown strength, resistivity, and dielectric constant. These changes can influence spark formation, discharge characteristics, and material removal, impacting circularity and cylindricity.
3.1.5 Perpendicularity and runout
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, both perpendicularity and run out increase simultaneously throughout the pulse current range. This behavior is mainly attributed to the increased discharge energy, electrode wear, thermal effects, material removal efficiency, changes in dielectric properties, and melt pool dynamics.
The higher discharge energy causes a more significant material removal process, which can result in increased tapering and run out on the machined surface.
The higher pulse current can affect the dielectric properties of the EDM process, such as dielectric breakdown strength, resistivity, and dielectric constant. These changes can influence spark formation, discharge characteristics, and material removal, impacting perpendicularity and run out.
3.1.6 Bottom and Top diameter of the drilled hole
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, both the bottom diameter and top diameter of the drilled hole initially decrease due to increased discharge energy, electrode wear, thermal effects, and material removal efficiency. However, beyond a critical threshold, approximately 7 amperes, both dimensions start to increase due to improved material removal efficiency and stable machining conditions.
The higher discharge energy causes a more significant material removal process, resulting in the initial decrease in both the bottom diameter and top diameter of the drilled hole.
With higher pulse currents, the electrode experiences more frequent and intense electrical discharges, leading to increased wear and deformation. The changes in the electrode shape can result in altered discharge dynamics, affecting the drilling accuracy and the final dimensions of the drilled hole.
3.1.7 Surface roughness
The experimental results suggest that as the pulse current increases, the surface roughness of the machined Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites increases simultaneously throughout the pulse current range. This behavior is mainly attributed to the increased discharge energy, material removal efficiency, melting and resolidification effects, changes in dielectric properties, and thermal damage to the workpiece surface. The results indicate that increasing the pulse current can lead to higher surface roughness due to the more aggressive material removal and thermal effects.
The intense heat generated by higher pulse currents can lead to localized melting of the workpiece material. Subsequently, the molten material may resolidify in a slightly deformed state, leading to irregularities on the machined surface and contributing to surface roughness. The rapid heating and cooling cycles during EDM can cause localized thermal damage to the workpiece surface, leading to the formation of micro-cracks, pits, and other defects, which can increase the surface roughness.
3.2 Dielectric Pressure Vs Output Responses
3.2.1 Material removal rate, electrode wear rate, ROC top and Top diameter of the drilled hole
The Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) of Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites, the dielectric pressure plays a crucial role in the material removal process and the resulting characteristics of the drilled hole. The observed changes in material removal rate, electrode wear rate, rate of change of top radius of curvature (ROC top), and top diameter of the drilled hole can be explained by the following mechanisms:
At lower dielectric pressure, the spark energy may not be sufficient to facilitate efficient material removal. This results in a relatively slower material removal rate and a lesser wear of the electrode. The low dielectric pressure leads to a less forceful flushing action, which might cause the electrode to remain in closer proximity to the workpiece surface, resulting in a smaller ROC top and a reduced top-hole diameter.
Increasing the dielectric pressure significantly improves the flushing action during EDM, leading to better spark distribution and improved material removal rate. However, the higher dielectric pressure can also lead to an increase in the number of sparks and their intensity, causing a more aggressive wear of the electrode and resulting in a higher electrode wear rate. The enhanced flushing action and higher spark intensity can also lead to increased energy concentration at the workpiece surface, resulting in a more significant melting and vaporization of the material. Consequently, this leads to an increase in the ROC top and a larger top hole diameter.
The experimental results revealed that when the dielectric pressure was maintained below 17 kg/cm^2, the material removal rate, electrode wear rate, ROC top, and top diameter of the drilled hole were observed to decrease slightly. This behavior can be attributed to the limited energy provided by the sparks at lower dielectric pressures, leading to less efficient material removal and reduced wear of the electrode. The smaller ROC top and hole diameter can be explained by the weaker flushing action at lower pressures, which keeps the electrode closer to the workpiece surface during the machining process. Conversely, when the dielectric pressure was increased to 17 kg/cm^2 and beyond, there was a drastic increase in the material removal rate, electrode wear rate, ROC top, and top diameter of the drilled hole. This phenomenon can be understood by the combined effect of improved flushing action and higher spark intensity. The enhanced flushing action helps in better spark distribution and material removal, leading to a higher material removal rate. However, the increased spark intensity causes more aggressive wear of the electrode, leading to a higher electrode wear rate.
3.2.2 Wear Ratio, Runout, Perpendicularity, and Top Diameter of the Drilled Hole
The experimental results demonstrate that with increasing dielectric pressure up to 17 kg/cm2, the wear ratio, runout, perpendicularity, and top diameter of the drilled hole increase drastically. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of improved flushing action and intensified sparking. The stronger flushing action promotes better spark distribution, but the higher spark intensity leads to more aggressive wear of the electrode, deviations in perpendicularity, and increased top diameter.
When the dielectric pressure is increased up to 17 kg/cm2, the enhanced flushing action promotes better spark distribution and material removal. However, it also results in more aggressive sparking, leading to a higher wear ratio. The increased dielectric pressure can intensify the sparks and concentrate the energy on the electrode, causing higher localized wear and erosion, thereby increasing the wear ratio. Beyond 17 kg/cm2, the dielectric pressure may reach a level where the excessive flushing action and spark intensity lead to rapid electrode wear and erosion.
The increased dielectric pressure causes stronger flushing action, which can lead to increased electrode movement or vibrations. This excessive movement or vibrations may lead to higher runout, indicating deviations from the desired axis of rotation or concentricity of the electrode during the machining process. At very high dielectric pressures, the strong flushing action can help stabilize the EDM process. This improved stability may result in reduced electrode movement and vibrations, leading to a decrease in runout.
As the dielectric pressure is raised, the flushing action becomes more forceful, causing increased material removal. However, due to the aggressive sparking at higher pressures, the EDM process may become less stable and less controlled, leading to deviations in the perpendicularity of the drilled hole with respect to the workpiece surface. As the dielectric pressure increases beyond 17 kg/cm2, the EDM process may become more stable and controlled.
The improved flushing action at higher dielectric pressures contributes to more efficient material removal, which results in an increase in the top hole diameter. Additionally, the higher sparking intensity can lead to broader melting and vaporization zones at the top surface of the hole, further contributing to the increased top diameter. At very high dielectric pressures, the increased spark intensity and energy concentration may lead to more precise and localized material removal.
3.2.3 Taper Angle and Circularity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the dielectric pressure is increased up to 17 kg/cm2, the taper angle and circularity of the drilled hole drastically decrease. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effect of improved flushing action, better spark distribution, and reduced spark intensity at lower dielectric pressures.
As the dielectric pressure increases up to 17 kg/cm2, the flushing action becomes more forceful and efficient. The improved flushing action helps in better spark distribution, leading to more uniform and distributed material removal along the electrode's axial direction. This results in a reduction of the taper angle, indicating less deviation from the desired perpendicularity of the drilled hole, and an improvement in circularity.
At lower dielectric pressures, the spark intensity may not be as high due to limited energy provided by the sparks. The lower spark intensity results in a softer and less aggressive material removal process, which can contribute to a smoother and more uniform hole profile, leading to decreased taper angle and improved circularity.
Beyond 17 kg/cm2, the dielectric pressure may reach a level where the spark intensity becomes too high and concentrated. The intensified sparks can cause more aggressive material removal and electrode erosion, leading to a rougher and less uniform hole profile. This can result in an increase in taper angle, indicating a larger deviation from perpendicularity, and a decrease in circularity, indicating a less concentric hole.
At very high dielectric pressures, the increased sparking intensity can lead to rapid electrode wear and erosion. As the electrode wears and changes shape, its effectiveness as a tool diminishes, causing variations in the EDM process and negatively impacting hole quality. The irregular shape of the electrode can lead to deviations in the machined hole, contributing to increased taper angle and reduced circularity.
3.2.4 ROC Bottom
The experimental results demonstrate that as the dielectric pressure increases up to 17 kg/cm^2, the rate of change of the bottom radius of curvature (ROC bottom) drastically decreases. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effect of enhanced material removal and aggressive sparking at higher dielectric pressures. The increased flushing action and spark intensity result in a faster removal of material from the workpiece surface, leading to a significant reduction in the bottom radius of curvature.
As the dielectric pressure increases up to 17 kg/cm^2, the flushing action becomes more forceful, leading to improved spark distribution and better material removal. The increased flushing action aids in efficiently removing material from the workpiece surface, leading to a faster decrease in the bottom radius of curvature (ROC bottom).
3.2.5 Surface Roughness
The experimental results demonstrate that as the dielectric pressure is increased, the surface roughness of Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites decreases gradually. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of enhanced flushing action, improved spark distribution, reduced electrode wear, and suppression of melting and vaporization.
As the dielectric pressure increases, the flushing action becomes more forceful and efficient. The improved flushing action helps in the efficient removal of debris, eroded material, and dielectric fluid from the machining zone. As a result, the recast layer (re-deposited material on the machined surface) is minimized, leading to a smoother surface finish and reduced surface roughness.
Higher dielectric pressure promotes better spark distribution, ensuring more uniform material removal. The improved spark distribution helps in reducing localized melting and vaporization, which can lead to uneven surface roughness.
3.2.6 Cylindricity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the dielectric pressure increases, the cylindricity of the drilled hole in Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites increases gradually. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of enhanced flushing action, improved spark distribution, reduced electrode wear and suppression of melting and vaporization.
As the dielectric pressure increases, the flushing action becomes more forceful and efficient. The improved flushing action helps in the better removal of debris and eroded material from the machining zone, leading to a cleaner and more uniform hole profile. The increased dielectric pressure also promotes better spark distribution, ensuring more uniform material removal along the entire circumference of the drilled hole.
3.3 Gap Voltage Vs Output Responses
3.3.1 Circularity, Cylindricity, Runout, Perpendicularity, ROC Bottom and Taper Angle
The experimental results demonstrate that as the gap voltage is increased in the EDM of Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites, the Circularity, Cylindricity, Runout, Perpendicularity, ROC Bottom, and Taper Angle increase gradually. These observations can be attributed to the combined effects of increased spark energy, intensified sparking, electrode wear, and overflushing effects.
Higher gap voltage promotes intensified sparking, with more sparks occurring per unit time. The intensified sparking causes more material to be melted, vaporized, and eroded, leading to increased recast layer and material redeposition. This can cause irregularities on the machined surface, contributing to variations in Circularity, Cylindricity, Runout, Perpendicularity, ROC Bottom, and Taper Angle.
3.3.2 Wear ratio, ROC Top, Top diameter of drilled hole and Bottom diameter of drilled hole
The experimental results demonstrate that as the gap voltage increases, the ROC Top and Top diameter of the drilled hole drastically increase, while the Wear ratio and Bottom diameter of the drilled hole increase. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of increased spark energy, intensified sparking, and electrode wear.
As the gap voltage increases, the potential difference between the electrode and workpiece also increases. This results in higher spark energy during the electrical discharges. The intensified sparking, caused by higher gap voltage, leads to more energetic sparks and greater material removal rates. The increased spark energy and intensified sparking cause more extensive melting, vaporization, and erosion at the workpiece surface, leading to larger ROC Top and an increased Top diameter of the drilled hole.
With higher spark energy and intensified sparking due to increased gap voltage, the electrode undergoes more significant wear and erosion. The higher wear rate of the electrode results in increased electrode material being deposited on the machined surface (recast layer) and an increase in the Bottom diameter of the drilled hole.
3.3.3 Material Removal rate and Surface roughness
The experimental results demonstrate that as the gap voltage increases, the Material Removal rate and Surface roughness in the EDM of Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites slightly decrease. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of increased spark energy, intensified sparking, and enhanced melting and vaporization at the workpiece surface.
As the gap voltage increases, the potential difference between the electrode and workpiece also increases. This results in higher spark energy during the electrical discharges. The intensified sparking, caused by higher gap voltage, leads to more energetic sparks and greater material removal rates. However, the increased spark energy can also lead to enhanced melting and vaporization at the workpiece surface, resulting in a smoother surface finish and slightly decreased surface roughness.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically 35V, the gap voltage may become excessively high, leading to overflushing effects. Overflushing can cause excessive removal of material, leading to a decrease in the material removal rate. Additionally, at very high gap voltages, the EDM process may become less stable, leading to a more erratic and less controlled material removal process, resulting in a drastic decrease in material removal rate and surface roughness.
3.3.4 Electrode wear rate
The experimental results demonstrate that as the gap voltage increases, the electrode wear rate in the EDM of Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites decreases. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of increased spark energy, intensified sparking, and reduced material deposition on the electrode.
The higher spark energy and intensified sparking due to increased gap voltage result in more efficient material removal from the workpiece, leading to less material being deposited on the electrode surface, thus reducing the electrode wear rate.
However, beyond a certain threshold, typically 35V, the gap voltage becomes excessively high, leading to aggressive erosion and wear of the electrode surface. The higher gap voltage causes intensified sparking and aggressive material removal, resulting in more significant melting, vaporization, and erosion of the electrode material, leading to a drastic increase in the rate of electrode wear.
3.4 Pulse on time Vs Output Responses
3.4.1 Material Removal Rate, Electrode wear rate, Surface Roughness, Taper Angle and ROC Bottom
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse on time increases from 7 microseconds to 8 microseconds, the Material Removal Rate, Electrode Wear Rate, Surface Roughness, Taper Angle, and ROC Bottom increase drastically. This behavior can be attributed to the increased energy input, enhanced melting and vaporization, thicker recast layer, and aggressive material removal at the workpiece surface.
As the pulse on time increases, the duration of each electrical discharge between the electrode and workpiece also increases. This leads to an increased energy input during each discharge event. The increased energy input results in more aggressive material removal from the workpiece, leading to a higher Material Removal Rate.
With longer pulse on time, there is more time for the spark energy to heat and melt the workpiece material. The extended pulse duration promotes deeper melting and vaporization at the workpiece surface, leading to a higher Electrode Wear Rate due to increased material loss from the electrode.
The increased energy input and extended pulse duration also contribute to more aggressive material removal, leading to a higher Taper Angle and larger ROC Bottom. The Taper Angle increases due to enhanced material removal at the upper portion of the drilled hole, while the larger ROC Bottom indicates a more pronounced curvature at the bottom of the hole.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 8 microseconds, the extended pulse on time may cause overburning of the workpiece surface. Overburning refers to excessive and uncontrolled material removal, which can lead to decreased Material Removal Rate and Taper Angle due to over-aggressive material removal. However, at very high pulse on times, the material removal may become more stable, and the electrode wear rate can decrease as the spark energy becomes more evenly distributed.
3.4.2 Wear Ratio, Bottom diameter of drilled hole, Runout and Perpendicularity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse on time increases from 7 microseconds to 8 microseconds, the Wear Ratio and Bottom diameter of the drilled hole decrease drastically. This behavior can be attributed to the improved material removal efficiency and smoother, more controlled spark discharge during the longer pulse on time.
As the pulse on time increases, the duration of each electrical discharge between the electrode and workpiece also increases. This results in a longer period of material removal during each discharge event. The increased pulse on time leads to a more efficient and consistent material removal process, resulting in a decrease in the Wear Ratio and a reduction in the Bottom diameter of the drilled hole.
Longer pulse on time allows for a smoother and more controlled spark discharge between the electrode and workpiece. This smoother discharge can contribute to a more uniform and precise material removal process, leading to a decrease in Runout and Perpendicularity.
At very long pulse on times, the EDM process may become less stable due to overburning and other factors. The reduced stability can lead to less uniform and less controlled material removal, resulting in an increase in the Wear Ratio and decreased dimensional accuracy, reflected in higher Runout and Perpendicularity.
3.4.3 Top diameter of drilled hole, ROC Top, Circularity and Cylindricity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse on time increases from 6 microseconds to 8 microseconds, the Top diameter of the drilled hole, ROC Top, Circularity, and Cylindricity gradually increase. This behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of extended material removal duration, enhanced melting and material redistribution, and improved hole shape conformity during the longer pulse on time.
As the pulse on time increases, the duration of each electrical discharge event between the electrode and workpiece also increases. This results in a longer period of material removal during each discharge. The increased pulse on time allows more material to be eroded from the workpiece, leading to a gradual increase in the Top diameter of the drilled hole.
3.5 Pulse off time Vs Output Responses
3.5.1 Material Removal Rate, Bottom Diameter of Drilled Hole, Top Diameter of Drilled Hole, Surface Roughness, Perpendicularity, Run out and ROC Top
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse-off time increases from 11 microseconds to 12 microseconds, the Material Removal Rate, Bottom Diameter of Drilled Hole, Top Diameter of Drilled Hole, Perpendicularity, Runout, and ROC Top drastically decrease, while the Surface Roughness slightly decreases. This behavior can be attributed to reduced material removal efficiency, increased cooling and solidification, reduced sparking and material redistribution, and the formation of a smoother surface during the longer pulse-off time.
As the pulse-off time increases, the duration between successive electrical discharge events (pulses) also increases. Longer pulse-off time leads to a longer interval between spark discharges, resulting in reduced material removal efficiency. The decreased material removal efficiency contributes to a drastic decrease in Material Removal Rate.
Longer pulse-off time allows for more cooling and solidification of the molten material around the drilled hole during the interval between pulses. The increased cooling and solidification restrict the material's flow and prevent it from being effectively removed, leading to a reduction in the Bottom Diameter of the Drilled Hole and Top Diameter of the Drilled Hole.
With longer pulse-off time, the energy input during the spark discharge is reduced due to a longer interval between pulses. The decreased energy input results in less melting and material redistribution during each spark discharge, leading to a decrease in Perpendicularity, Runout, and ROC Top.
The increased cooling and solidification during the longer pulse-off time contribute to the formation of a smoother surface. The smoother surface results in a slightly reduced Surface Roughness.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 12 microseconds, the increased pulse-off time may allow for better flushing of debris and eroded material from the machining zone. Improved flushing can result in more efficient material removal during each spark discharge, leading to a drastic increase in Material Removal Rate.
3.5.2 Wear Ratio, Cylindricity and Circularity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse-off time increases from 11 microseconds to 12 microseconds, the Wear Ratio, Cylindricity, and Circularity drastically decrease. This behavior can be attributed to the reduced material removal efficiency and the increased solidification and smoother surface formation during the longer pulse-off time.
As the pulse-off time increases, the duration between successive electrical discharge events (pulses) also increases. Longer pulse-off time leads to a longer interval between spark discharges, resulting in reduced material removal efficiency. The decreased material removal efficiency contributes to a drastic decrease in the Wear Ratio.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 12 microseconds, the increased pulse-off time allows for better flushing of debris and eroded material from the machining zone. This improved flushing action can lead to more efficient material removal during each spark discharge, resulting in a slight decrease in the Wear Ratio.
The increased material removal efficiency and improved flushing action at longer pulse-off times can contribute to better dimensional control of the machined hole. As a result, the Cylindricity and Circularity may slightly decrease due to better stability and control in the material removal process.
3.5.3 Electrode Wear Rate, ROC Bottom and Taper angle
The experimental results demonstrate that as the pulse-off time increases from 11 microseconds to 12 microseconds, the Electrode Wear Rate, ROC Bottom, and Taper Angle increase drastically. This behavior can be attributed to reduced cooling and erosion stabilization, the accumulation of molten material on the electrode surface, and increased material removal efficiency during the longer pulse-off time.
As the pulse-off time increases, the duration between successive electrical discharge events (pulses) also increases. Longer pulse-off time results in a longer interval between spark discharges, leading to reduced cooling of the electrode between pulses. The reduced cooling inhibits the stabilization of the electrode surface, leading to increased electrode wear due to more aggressive erosion.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 12 microseconds, the increased pulse-off time allows for better cooling and stabilization of the electrode surface. The improved cooling and stabilization contribute to a reduction in the electrode wear rate as the electrode surface is less susceptible to aggressive erosion.
At very long pulse-off times, the improved cooling and stabilization can also lead to reduced material removal efficiency during each spark discharge. The reduced material removal efficiency results in a decrease in the ROC Bottom and Taper Angle due to less material loss from the workpiece.
3.6 Spark gap Vs Output Responses
3.6.1 Cylindricity and Perpendicularity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the spark gap increases from 0.18mm to 0.44mm, the Circularity and Perpendicularity reduce gradually. This behavior can be attributed to the increased spark energy dissipation, diffusion, spark erosion, reduced spatial resolution, and increased electrode wear at larger spark gaps.
The increased spark gap leads to higher electrical resistance and weaker sparks, which affects the precision of material removal and reduces Circularity and Perpendicularity. As the spark gap increases, the distance between the electrode and workpiece also increases. A larger spark gap leads to higher electrical resistance, resulting in increased spark energy dissipation during the discharge process. The increased spark energy dissipation causes a weaker and less energetic spark, affecting the precision of material removal.
3.6.2 Run out, Electrode Wear Rate, ROC Bottom, ROC TOP and Taper Angle
The experimental results demonstrate that as the spark gap increases from 0.18mm to 0.25mm, the Runout, Electrode Wear Rate, ROC Bottom, ROC Top, and Taper Angle drastically reduce. This behavior can be attributed to the increased spark energy concentration, improved spark discharge control, and reduced electrode wear rate at larger spark gaps.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 0.25mm, the spark gap becomes less critical in affecting the EDM process parameters. As the spark gap further increases, the EDM system may tolerate slight variations without significant impacts on the machining precision.
3.6.3 Bottom diameter of the drilled hole and Circularity
The experimental results demonstrate that as the spark gap increases from 0.18mm to 0.25mm, the Bottom Diameter of the drilled hole and Circularity increase drastically. This behavior can be attributed to the increased spark energy concentration, improved material removal efficiency, and enhanced EDM stability at larger spark gaps.
As the spark gap increases, the distance between the electrode and workpiece also increases. With a larger spark gap, the electrical discharge events become more concentrated in a smaller area on the workpiece. The increased spark energy concentration results in more efficient and localized material removal during each spark discharge.
Larger spark gaps allow for higher energy discharges that result in more efficient and controlled material removal from the workpiece. The increased material removal efficiency contributes to a larger Bottom Diameter of the drilled hole and improved Circularity.
Larger spark gaps provide a more stable and controlled spark discharge environment, reducing the chances of erratic or uneven material removal. The increased stability enhances the dimensional accuracy and improves Circularity.
3.6.4 Material Removal Rate
The experimental results demonstrate that as the spark gap increases from 0.18mm to 0.44mm, the Material Removal Rate increases gradually. This behavior can be attributed to the increased spark energy concentration, enhanced material removal efficiency, increased heat generation, and improved debris flushing at larger spark gaps. The increased spark energy concentration results in higher energy input to the workpiece during each spark discharge, leading to more efficient material removal. Additionally, the enhanced material removal efficiency at larger spark gaps is facilitated by the increased heat generation, which softens the material and makes it more susceptible to removal during the spark discharge process. Moreover, the improved debris flushing at larger spark gaps prevents re-deposition of eroded material, allowing for continuous and efficient material removal, further contributing to the gradual increase in Material Removal Rate.
3.6.5 Wear Ratio
The experimental results demonstrate that as the spark gap increases from 0.18mm to 0.25mm, the Wear Ratio decreases drastically. This behavior can be attributed to the increased spark energy concentration, enhanced material removal efficiency, and reduced electrode wear rate at larger spark gaps.
As the spark gap increases, the distance between the electrode and workpiece also increases. With a larger spark gap, the electrical discharge events become more concentrated in a smaller area on the workpiece. The increased spark energy concentration results in higher energy input to the workpiece during each spark discharge.
Beyond a certain threshold, typically beyond 0.25mm spark gap, the spark energy starts to disperse over a wider area on the workpiece. The reduced spark energy concentration leads to less efficient and more diffused material removal during each spark discharge.
3.7 Servo Speed Vs Output Responses
3.7.1 Material Removal Rate
The material removal rate was found to increase with an increase in servo speed up to 6 m/s, after which it started to decrease.
At lower servo speeds (5 m/s), the EDM process exhibited a relatively low energy discharge, resulting a material removal rate of 0.02655 gm/min. As the servo speed was increased to 6 m/s, the discharge energy became more intense, leading to higher material removal rates. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increased frequency of electrical discharges, which resulted in a greater number of removal events on the workpiece surface.
The optimal material removal rate was achieved at a servo speed of 6 m/s. Beyond this speed, the material removal rate started to decrease. This decrease can be attributed to several factors. First, at higher servo speeds, the energy of the electrical discharges might have exceeded the threshold for efficient material removal, leading to the formation of larger craters and debris, which could reduce the overall material removal efficiency.
3.7.2 Electrode Wear Rate
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites demonstrated a remarkable reduction in electrode wear rate with increasing servo speed. The data obtained from the experiments revealed that as the servo speed increased, the electrode wear rate consistently decreased.
As the servo speed increases, the movement of the electrode becomes faster and more dynamic. This enhanced motion facilitates better flushing of dielectric fluid and electrode debris from the spark gap region. Effective flushing helps in removing the eroded particles and debris from the machining area, reducing the chances of re-deposition of material on the electrode surface. Consequently, the electrode experiences reduced contact with recast material, leading to a decrease in wear.
3.7.3 Wear Ratio
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a consistent increase in the wear ratio with increasing servo speed. The data obtained from the experiments clearly demonstrated that as the servo speed increased, the wear ratio also increased. The mechanism analysis provides insights into why this phenomenon occurs. The intensified thermal effects at higher servo speeds lead to more severe material erosion and wear on both the workpiece and the electrode. This, in turn, contributes to the higher wear ratio observed in the experiments.
As the servo speed increases, the frequency of electrical discharges also increases. Moreover, the higher material removal rate at elevated servo speeds is a double-edged sword. While it results in increased machining efficiency, it also leads to a larger volume of material removal from the electrode, causing accelerated wear. The reduced interaction time between the electrode and the workpiece at higher servo speeds allows for more material to adhere to the electrode surface, further contributing to increased wear. Additionally, the potential reduction in flushing efficiency at higher servo speeds can lead to the re-deposition of eroded material on the electrode, exacerbating the wear.
3.7.4 Perpendicularity
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a significant relationship between servo speed and perpendicularity of the machined features. As the servo speed increased, the perpendicularity reduced simultaneously throughout the servo speed. However, a notable change in the rate of perpendicularity reduction was observed between 5m/s and 6m/s, where the reduction rate was relatively low. After 6m/s, the perpendicularity suddenly reduced at a higher rate.
At higher servo speeds, the material removal rate also increases, as discussed earlier. The higher material removal rate can lead to a higher volume of material being removed from the workpiece, which can influence the perpendicularity of the machined features. The increased material removal can potentially introduce variations and inaccuracies in the machined surface, affecting the perpendicularity.
3.7.5 Cylindricity
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a significant relationship between servo speed and cylindricity of the machined features. The analysis showed that as the servo speed increased, the cylindricity of the machined material initially increased up to 6m/s. However, beyond 6m/s, the cylindricity of the machined material started to decrease.
3.7.6 Circularity and Cylindricity
The experimental results suggest that both the cylindricity and circularity of the machined material initially increase up to 6m/s, indicating an improvement in machining precision and accuracy at these speeds. This improvement can be attributed to improved tool path dynamics, optimal material removal rate, reduced thermal effects, and reduced electrode wear. However, beyond 6m/s, both the cylindricity and circularity start to decrease, which can be attributed to the influence of dynamic tool path behavior and potential instabilities in the machining process at these high servo speeds. The dynamic effects can introduce errors in the tool motion, leading to deviations from the desired geometrical tolerances.
3.7.7 Run out
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a significant relationship between servo speed and runout of the machined features. As the servo speed increased, the runout reduced simultaneously throughout the servo speed. However, a notable change in the rate of runout reduction was observed between 5m/s and 6m/s, where the reduction rate was relatively low. After 6m/s, the runout suddenly reduced at a higher rate.
At lower servo speeds, the discharge energy may not be as intense, leading to less efficient material removal and potential thermal effects on the workpiece. As the servo speed increases, the discharge energy also increases, leading to more efficient and localized material removal. The higher servo speeds reduce the duration of electrical discharges, which can minimize heat-affected zones and thermal distortion, resulting in reduced runout.
3.7.8 Surface Roughness
It was observed that as the servo speed increased, the surface roughness initially decreased up to 6 m/s, after which it started to increase.
At lower servo speeds (5 m/s), the machining process exhibited relatively poor material removal rates, resulting a surface roughness value of 0.41 μm. As the servo speed was increased to 6 m/s, the material removal rate improved, leading to a reduction in surface roughness. The peak-to-valley distance decreased, and the surface became smoother, indicating better material removal efficiency.
However, beyond the servo speed of 6 m/s, the surface roughness started to increase. This deterioration in surface finish can be attributed to various factors. First, at higher servo speeds, the discharge energy may have increased excessively, leading to the generation of larger craters and micro-cracks on the machined surface. Second, the excessive thermal energy might have induced localized melting and recasting of the material, resulting in a rougher surface texture.
3.7.9 Radial Overcut, Bottom Diameter, and Top Diameter of the drilled hole
The experimental results revealed an interesting trend with respect to the servo speed. Initially, as the servo speed increased up to 6 m/s, the Radial Overcut, Bottom Diameter, and Top Diameter of the drilled hole increased. However, beyond 6 m/s, these parameters started to decrease.
At lower servo speeds, the thermal energy delivered to the machining zone is relatively low. This results in less efficient material removal, leading to a smaller Radial Overcut and reduced material removal at the bottom and top of the drilled hole. As the servo speed increases, more thermal energy is delivered to the machining zone, enhancing the material removal rate and increasing the Radial Overcut and hole diameters.
Beyond a certain servo speed (6 m/s in this case), the machining process encounters a critical threshold. At higher speeds, excessive thermal energy may be generated, causing overheating of the tool-electrode and the workpiece. This overheating leads to accelerated tool wear, increased electrode erosion, and reduced machining accuracy. Consequently, the Radial Overcut, Bottom Diameter, and Top Diameter start to decrease due to a compromised and less stable EDM process.
3.7.10 Taper angle
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed an interesting relationship between servo speed and the taper angle of the machined circle. The analysis showed that as the servo speed increased, the taper angle of the machined circle reduced suddenly at a high rate from 5m/s to 6m/s. After 6m/s, the taper angle of the machined circle continued to reduce, but at a lower rate.
As the servo speed increases, the electrode wear rate reduces, as discussed earlier. The improved flushing, reduced overcut, higher energy density, shorter discharge durations, and improved surface quality contribute to decreased electrode wear. The reduced electrode wear at higher servo speeds can lead to a more stable and consistent tool shape, resulting in a reduction in taper angle.
3.7.11 Radial Overcut
The EDM experiments on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites revealed a significant relationship between servo speed and radial overcut of the machined features. The analysis showed that as the servo speed increased, the radial overcut reduced simultaneously throughout the entire range of servo speeds.
The increased servo speed leads to more frequent and intense electrical discharges, resulting in a higher energy density at the machining zone. This increased energy density promotes faster and more efficient material removal, reducing the radial overcut.
3.8 Effect of Input Parameters on Surface Quality
In the conducted EDM process on Si3N4-TiN ceramic composites, a systematic investigation of various input parameters was carried out to understand their influence on the resultant surface quality. The input parameters included Polarity, Current, Pulse on Time, Pulse Off Time, Dielectric Pressure, Gap Voltage, Spark Gap, and Servo Speed. The analysis of the machined surfaces using a scanning electron microscope revealed distinct surface characteristics based on these input parameters.
The investigation showed a clear trend in surface quality variation based on the order of the input parameters. The surfaces obtained were categorized into three groups: worst, optimal, and smooth. These groups aligned with the range of input parameter values applied during the EDM process.
Worst Surface
The worst surface quality was observed when higher-order input parameters were employed. From the Fig. 10(a) it seems that this phenomenon can be attributed to intensified material removal rates and larger discharge energies. The higher current, longer pulse on time, and shorter pulse off time collectively lead to enhanced thermal energy deposition and more aggressive material removal. Consequently, this results in a rougher surface with increased thermal damage and re-solidified molten material.
Optimal Surface
The medium-order input parameters yielded an optimal surface quality. From the Fig. 10(b) it seems that this can be attributed to a balanced combination of material removal and thermal effects. The chosen parameter values likely led to controlled and efficient removal of material while minimizing excessive thermal damage. The resulting surface exhibited a desirable compromise between material removal rate and surface integrity.
Smooth Surface
Employing lower-order input parameters resulted in the attainment of a smooth surface. Reduced discharge energy, lower current, longer pulse off time, and appropriate gap voltage collectively contributed to gentler material removal. The reduced thermal effects helped maintain surface integrity, leading to a smoother finish as shown in Fig. 10(c).