Common complications of grafts in hemodialysis patients include thrombosis, infection, steal syndrome, pseudoaneurysms with a risk of bleeding, venous hypertension, seromas, and heart failure[4]. Thrombosis and infection occur more frequently with grafts than with fistula. Graft to vein fistula (GVF) means the fistula connection between AVG and adjacent veins. It was first reported by Dousset et al. using a color Doppler flow image in two of twenty-two patients with hemodialysis grafts [6]. Kanterman et al. also identified abnormal fistulas between dialysis grafts and adjacent native veins in five patients. Remarkably, all of them had venous anastomotic stenosis or venous outflow occlusion. However, venous stenosis is the most critical factor that predisposes the graft to thrombosis since the small caliber of the fistula is not likely to reduce the flow to the more distal loop. In the follow-up, no further functioning problems occurred in these five grafts [7]. A few cases reported described [8–10], such as partially thrombosed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTEF) grafts maintained by fistulation to adjacent forearm veins. After reviewing these cases, they put forward four points about this abnormal fistula, i.e., the unusual presentation, incidence, etiology, and appropriate treatment. The suspicious clinical finding that points to GVF with partial thrombosis included a palpable thrill over the arterial limb only, dilated superficial forearm veins, thrombosed graft only found in the venous limb, and aspiration of pulsatile blood on the arterial side with dark blood or clot from the venous side. When abnormal routine graft surveillance tests, e.g., increasing venous resistance, increased recirculation, or alteration in the graft efficiency (KT/V), are noted, GVF should be considered. The duplex examination may demonstrate flow within only a partial limb of the graft and the presence of a fistula to adjacent veins. An angiogram can show the contrast dye going from the graft to the adjacent vein via the fistula, which is the gold standard of diagnosis. In our present case, a palpable thrill over the arterial limb only and thrombosed graft only found in the venous limb were noted, which strongly indicated GVF formation. The ultrasonogram examination confirmed the diagnosis.
The report by Standage also discussed the incidence of the fistulae as about 9%, 3.9%, and 0.027% according to the existing case reports. There are over seven hundred thousand dialysis patients in China, of which less than 3% use grafts as hemodialysis access[11]. We are the first to report this kind of GVF with partial thrombosis graft in China. Despite the consideration of underreported due to small caliber, the incidence of GVF with partial thrombosis is rare. They also suggest the outflow of venous stenosis is the main factor that needs to be corrected. The other two cases of GVF with thrombosis from South Korea, the report by Seung et al. [12], were treated through fistula ligation. They deem it the opposite that GVF is the reason for AVG thrombosis due to decreased blood flow in the graft. Is the outflow of venous stenosis or the reduced blood flow in the graft playing a vital role in causing AVG thrombosis? It still arouses great controversy in different reports. Interestingly, no evidence of outflow of venous stenosis was found in our case, but AVG's recurrent venous limb thrombosis was present. Therefore, we propose that AVG to GVF shunt is the main reason for AVG thrombosis in the present case. Haddad et al. [13] reported five cases of GVF formation, of which the GVF of case number 3 resolved after PTA and case number 4 was not found at the time of thrombectomy. It is possible that GVF can be a natural “cure.” Interestingly, in some instances, thrombosis has already happened, or graft infection occurred. GVF can be an alternative treatment approach to thrombectomy and total graft excision[14, 15].
The process of GVF development is still unknown, but we believe that traumatic cannulation is the primary reason for GVF development. The GVF may resolve spontaneously if there is no increased intra-graft pressure caused by pre-existing venous outflow stenosis. We can continue to monitor the blood flow of GVF and AVG. When venous outflow stenosis gradually increases intra-graft pressure, the caliber of GVF may increase, allowing the GVF to persist, especially when there is no other cause for the arm swelling, a pseudoaneurysm, or intra-graft limitation, venous outflow stenosis, and GVF should be treated with PTA or fistula ligation before thrombosis occurs. However, in our current case, partial thrombosis had already happened when he arrived at our center. PTA was performed once without ligation of the fistula, and his AVG showed partial thrombosis again within a month. GVF was functional for HD as an alternative outflow and had optimal blood flow during the Doppler examination. The length of the arterial limb of AVG and nearby vein is enough for cannulation. Meanwhile, Quan Zheng et al. demonstrated that the postintervention patency rates of the AVG group at 3, 6, and 12 months are 78.5% %, 57.4%, and 20.0%, much lower than the AVF group[16]. In our case, less than a month's patency time after the first time PTA makes us believe that it likely would not last longer if we performed the second PTA. The patient may have to consider CVC for alternative access, increasing the risk of infection and central vein thrombosis. Since adequate blood flow was detected and the patient reported no complaint during HD, we left it as an HD access without further intervention. As a result, the GVF has been kept patency for over a year without other complications like stenosis or thrombosis. Based on the available literature and our case, we propose that GVF can be both a risk factor for graft thrombosis and an alternative access point for continuous HD.
To prevent GVF development, proper cannulation techniques are essential. It is possible to avoid this complication by avoiding cannulation with an adjacent vein that could penetrate the graft, rotating the cannulation site to allow for adequate healing of the previous cannulation site, and adequately compressing the cannulation site at the end of HD to prevent a persistent connection between the graft and the vein.
To conclude, we present a partial thrombosis graft with graft to vein fistula, which we keep persist and routine follow-up without PTA and fistula ligation. We believe it provides further insight into managing this uncommon complication based on existing reports.