This preprint is under consideration at BMC Oral Health. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Duo Li
Fujian Medical University union hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The application of intermaxillary traction is often accompanied by the unexpected movement of dentition, especially anchorage teeth. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the influence of cross-sectional shape of ribbon arch wires with edgewise and round wires on intermaxillary traction in Class II malocclusion treatment using FEA simulation.
Methods: The dentofacial structure was simulated in finite element software. A retraction force of 1.5 N was applied to different cross-sectional orthodontic arch wires: a ribbon wire (0.025×0.017-inch and 0.025×0.019-inch), a rectangular wire (0.017×0.025-inch and 0.019×0.025-inch) and a round wire (Φ 0.018-inch and Φ 0.020-inch).
Results: Among the three groups, ribbon wire (0.025×0.017-inch and 0.025×0.019-inch) exhibited the lowest displacement in the X-axis (12.61 μm and 12.77 μm, respectively) and Z-axis (8.99 μm and 9.06 μm, respectively). However, the 0.025×0.017-inch ribbon wire showed the highest Y-axis displacement. In the round wire group, Φ 0.020-inch wire displayed less rotation than Φ 0.018-inch wire, where the sagittal, frontal and occlusal rotation of Φ 0.020-inch wire was almost half of that of Φ 0.018-inch wire. The movement of the first molar region was intermediate between the ribbon arch group and the round wire group. Notably, the values of the 0.025×0.017-inch arch wire displacement, which were much higher than those of any other group, peaked at 0.019 mm in the central incisor region with a spike-like shape. The deformation range of the Φ 0.018-inch wire group was the largest in this study.
Conclusions: The cross-section of the arch wire influenced force delivery in Class II intermaxillary traction. With the same shape, a larger cross-sectional area would lead to less mandibular dentition movement. For the rectangular arch wire and ribbon arch wire groups, since the height and width were inverted, the vertical displacement of anchorage teeth in the ribbon wire group was significantly reduced, but the possibility of buccal tipping in mandibular anterior teeth also increased.
Keywords
finite element analysis, orthodontic arch wire, anchorage loss, class II malocclusion, intermaxillary traction, ribbon wire
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
No competing interests reported.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 07 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 22 Apr, 2021
Reviews received
Received 16 Apr, 2021
Reviewers agreed
On 06 Apr, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Apr, 2021
Editor assigned
On 06 Apr, 2021
Editor invited
On 06 Apr, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 06 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 27 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Dentistry
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at BMC Oral Health. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Duo Li
Fujian Medical University union hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 07 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 22 Apr, 2021
Reviews received
Received 16 Apr, 2021
Reviewers agreed
On 06 Apr, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Apr, 2021
Editor assigned
On 06 Apr, 2021
Editor invited
On 06 Apr, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 06 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 27 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Dentistry
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The application of intermaxillary traction is often accompanied by the unexpected movement of dentition, especially anchorage teeth. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the influence of cross-sectional shape of ribbon arch wires with edgewise and round wires on intermaxillary traction in Class II malocclusion treatment using FEA simulation.
Methods: The dentofacial structure was simulated in finite element software. A retraction force of 1.5 N was applied to different cross-sectional orthodontic arch wires: a ribbon wire (0.025×0.017-inch and 0.025×0.019-inch), a rectangular wire (0.017×0.025-inch and 0.019×0.025-inch) and a round wire (Φ 0.018-inch and Φ 0.020-inch).
Results: Among the three groups, ribbon wire (0.025×0.017-inch and 0.025×0.019-inch) exhibited the lowest displacement in the X-axis (12.61 μm and 12.77 μm, respectively) and Z-axis (8.99 μm and 9.06 μm, respectively). However, the 0.025×0.017-inch ribbon wire showed the highest Y-axis displacement. In the round wire group, Φ 0.020-inch wire displayed less rotation than Φ 0.018-inch wire, where the sagittal, frontal and occlusal rotation of Φ 0.020-inch wire was almost half of that of Φ 0.018-inch wire. The movement of the first molar region was intermediate between the ribbon arch group and the round wire group. Notably, the values of the 0.025×0.017-inch arch wire displacement, which were much higher than those of any other group, peaked at 0.019 mm in the central incisor region with a spike-like shape. The deformation range of the Φ 0.018-inch wire group was the largest in this study.
Conclusions: The cross-section of the arch wire influenced force delivery in Class II intermaxillary traction. With the same shape, a larger cross-sectional area would lead to less mandibular dentition movement. For the rectangular arch wire and ribbon arch wire groups, since the height and width were inverted, the vertical displacement of anchorage teeth in the ribbon wire group was significantly reduced, but the possibility of buccal tipping in mandibular anterior teeth also increased.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Loading...