See the published version of this preprint at BMC Veterinary Research.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Anna Cywinska
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-9218
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Breed specific reference ranges for selected blood parameters are recommended for proper interpretation of blood tests, but there are only few reports dealing with ponies. The purpose of this study was to investigate if blood parameters differ among ponies’ classes and to check if general normal values for equine species are applicable to ponies.
Results: All, except total protein concentration, biochemical parameter significantly (p<0.05) differed among ponies’ classes. The most pronounced difference was noted in blood lactate concentrations, higher (p<0.001) in the smallest ponies (class A). In all groups of ponies muscle enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase) and urea were high when compared to normal values for equine species, but triglycerides and creatinine were low. Blood lactate concentration was high in comparison with normal values for horses only in class A ponies’.
Conclusions: In healthy ponies, blood lactate concentration significantly differs between height classes. Normal values for equine species should not be directly applied to interpret the lactate, triglycerides, aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase values in ponies.
Keywords
pony horse, lactate, triglycerides, haematology, blood biochemistry
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Veterinary Research.
Version 3
Posted 07 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 26 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 17 Dec, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 14 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 24 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 22 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 16 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 23 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 16 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #4 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 22 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 21 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 21 Jun, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Veterinary Research.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Anna Cywinska
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-9218
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Veterinary Research.
Version 3
Posted 07 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 26 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 17 Dec, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 14 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 24 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 22 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 16 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 23 Oct, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 16 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #4 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 22 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 21 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 21 Jun, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Veterinary Research.
Background: Breed specific reference ranges for selected blood parameters are recommended for proper interpretation of blood tests, but there are only few reports dealing with ponies. The purpose of this study was to investigate if blood parameters differ among ponies’ classes and to check if general normal values for equine species are applicable to ponies.
Results: All, except total protein concentration, biochemical parameter significantly (p<0.05) differed among ponies’ classes. The most pronounced difference was noted in blood lactate concentrations, higher (p<0.001) in the smallest ponies (class A). In all groups of ponies muscle enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase) and urea were high when compared to normal values for equine species, but triglycerides and creatinine were low. Blood lactate concentration was high in comparison with normal values for horses only in class A ponies’.
Conclusions: In healthy ponies, blood lactate concentration significantly differs between height classes. Normal values for equine species should not be directly applied to interpret the lactate, triglycerides, aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase values in ponies.
Loading...